1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心,绵阳,621000
2. 西南科技大学 计算机科学与技术学院,绵阳,621010
毛枚良(1965-),男,湖南人,研究员,研究方向:高超声速空气空气动力学. E-mail:mml219@163.com
王新光*(1985-),助理研究员,研究方向:高超声速空气动力学. E-mail:wangxinguang@cardc.cn
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
毛枚良, 闵耀兵, 王新光, 等. 可压缩湍流边界层壁面函数方法综述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(2): 1−11.
MAO Meiliang, MIN Yaobing, WANG Xinguang, et al. Overview of wall functions for compressible turbulent boundary layers[J]. 2021, 39(2): 1-11.
毛枚良, 闵耀兵, 王新光, 等. 可压缩湍流边界层壁面函数方法综述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(2): 1−11. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0028
MAO Meiliang, MIN Yaobing, WANG Xinguang, et al. Overview of wall functions for compressible turbulent boundary layers[J]. 2021, 39(2): 1-11. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2020.0028.
以建立工程实用的高超声速湍流边界层模拟方法为目标,从湍流壁面函数是湍流边界层方程近似解的角度,梳理了相关文献的研究工作,得到如下认识:1)壁面函数与所求定解问题数值解的相容程度决定了壁面第一层网格允许放粗的程度,在流动分离点和再附点附近区域,目前壁面函数尚需进一步完善,而“子网格”壁面函数从理论上解决了相容性问题,尽管要耗费更多计算资源,但在目前计算资源相对充裕的条件下,仍不失为一个解决问题的途径;2)对于具有强压缩性和显著气动加热的高超声速湍流边界层流动而言,常用的解析形式并未充分考虑可压缩性和传热的影响,并在文中进行了重点探讨。最后,建议基于数据驱动技术和依托“子网格”壁面函数方法来发展更加普适的壁面函数。
Related studies about wall functions
which are approximate solutions to turbulent boundary layers
are surveyed to shed light on the development of a pragmatic simulation method for hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. This overview reveals the following understandings: 1) The consistency between wall functions and numerical solutions determines the mesh size of the wall-next cells. However
the consistency problem is not well solved by analytical wall functions
especially in separation and reattachment regions where the pressure gradient is strong. The sub-grid wall function
in contrast
theoretically solves this problem
which makes it to be a promising method when computational resources are abundant. 2) The effects of strong compressibility and significant heat transfer in hypersonic turbulent flows need to be adequately integrated into analytical wall functions. Finally
the development of a more universal wall function based on the data-driven methods and sub-grid wall functions is recommended.
WANG M, MOIN P. Dynamic wall modeling for large-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(7): 2043. DOI: 10.1063/1.1476668
MILLIKAN C B A. A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes[C]// 5th International Congress of Applied Mechanics, 1938: 386-392.
TENNEKES H, LUMLEY J L. A first course in turbulence[M ] . The MIT Press, 1972. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/3014.001.0001
NICHOLS R. Development and validation of a two-equation turbulence model with wall functions for compressible flow[C ] // 14th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1996. doi: 10.2514/6.1996-2385
VIEGAS J, RUBESIN M, HORSTMAN C. O n the use of wall functions as boundary conditions for two-dimensional separated compressible flows[C ] // 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1985. doi: 10.2514/6.1985-180
SMITH B. The k-kl turbulence model and wall layer model for compressible flows[C ] // 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Seattle, WA. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1990. doi: 10.2514/6.1990-1483
WILCOX D. Wall matching, a rational alternative to wall functions[C ] // 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1989. doi: 10.2514/6.1989-611
SPALDING D B. A single formula for the “law of the wall”[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1961, 28(3): 455-458. DOI: 10.1115/1.3641728
FRINK N T. Tetrahedral unstructured Navier-Stokes method for turbulent flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(11): 1975-1982. DOI: 10.2514/2.324
SHIH T-H et al. Turbulent surface flow and wall function[C]// 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1999, AIAA- 99-2392.
NICHOLS R H, NELSON C C. Wall function boundary conditions including heat transfer and compressibility[J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(6): 1107-1114. DOI: 10.2514/1.3539.
WHITE F M, CHRISTOPH G H. A simple new analysis of compressible turbulent two-dimensional skin friction under arbitrary conditions: AFFDL-TR-70-133[R]. U. S. Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab, Wright-Patterson AFB: 1971.
GRANVILLE P S. A modified van driest formula for the mixing length of turbulent boundary layers in pressure gradients[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1989, 111(1): 94-97. DOI: 10.1115/1.3243606
DURBIN P A, BELCHER S E. Scaling of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1992, 238: 699-722. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112092001873.
KNOPP T, ALRUTZ T, SCHWAMBORN D. A grid and flow adaptive wall-function method for RANS turbulence modelling[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 220(1): 19-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.05.003.
GONCALVES E, HOUDEVILLE R. Reassessment of the wall functions approach for RANS computations[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2001, 5(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01083-X.
KALITZIN G, MEDIC G, IACCARINO G, et al. Near-wall behavior of RANS turbulence models and implications for wall functions[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 204(1): 265-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.018.
HE X Z, ZHAO H Y, LE J L. Application of wall function boundary condition considering heat transfer and compressibility[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24(4): 450-453. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2006.04.010.
HE X Z, ZHAO H Y, LE J L. Aerodynamic force and heat of hypersonic laminar and turbulent flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 25(5): 555-560. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-246X.2008.05.006.
WU X J, MA M S, DENG Y Q, et al. Two turbulence models for the computation of transonic flow[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2008, 26(1): 85-90. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2008.01.016.
XIAO H L, LUO J S. Improvement of sub-grid model in large eddy simulation and applications in turbulent channel flow[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(4): 583-587. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2007.04.010.
GAO Z X, JIANG C W, LEE C. Improvement and application of wall function boundary condition for high-speed compressible flows[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56(10): 2501-2515. DOI: 10.1007/s11431-013-5349-4.
TAO Z, WU H J, YOU R Q, et al. Turbulent characteristics and rotation correction of wall function in rotating channel with high local rotation parameter[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(10): 1985-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.08.006.
LIU J, WU S P. Generalized wall function and its application to compressible turbulent boundary layer over a flat plate[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 822: 012017. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/822/1/012017.
VAN DRIEST E R. Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1951, 18(3): 145-160. DOI: 10.2514/8.1895.
SCHÜLEIN E. Optical skin friction measurements in short-duration facilities (invited)[C ] // 24th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Portland, Oregon. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2004. doi: 10.2514/6.2004-2115
KUSSOY M I, HORSTMAN K C. Documentation of two- and three-dimensional shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction flows at Mach 8.2[R]. NASA Technical Memorandum 103838, 1991.
MARVIN J G, BROWN J L, GNOFFO J G. Experimental database with baseline CFD solutions: 2-D and axisymmetric hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions: NASA TM-2013-216604[R]. NASA Langley Research Center, 2013.
HUANG P G, BRADSHAW P, COAKLEY T J. Skin friction and velocity profile family for compressible turbulent boundary layers[J]. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31(9): 1600-1604. DOI: 10.2514/3.11820.
KADER B A. Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1981, 24(9): 1541-1544. DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(81)90220-9.
STRATFORD B S. An experimental flow with zero skin friction throughout its region of pressure rise[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1959, 5(1): 17-35. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112059000027.
WHITE F M. Viscous fluid flow[M]. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1974.
TIDRIRI M D. Domain decomposition for compressible Navier-Stokes equations with different discretizations and formulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995, 119(2): 271-282. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1135.
SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C ] // 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1992. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-439.
LAUNDER B E, SPALDING D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2): 269-289. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2.
MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605. DOI: 10.2514/3.12149.
CRAFT T J, GERASIMOV A V, IACOVIDES H, et al. Progress in the generalization of wall-function treatments[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2002, 23(2): 148-160. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-727X(01)00143-6.
IACOVIDES H, LAUNDER B E. PSL—an economical approach to the numerical analysis of near-wall, elliptic flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1984, 106(2): 241-242. DOI: 10.1115/1.3243109.
CRAFT T J, GANT S E, IACOVIDES H, et al. A new wall function strategy for complex turbulent flows[J]. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 2004, 45(4): 301-318. DOI: 10.1080/10407790490277931.
CHOI H, MOIN P. Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman's estimates revisited[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24(1): 011702. DOI: 10.1063/1.3676783.
LARSSON J, KAWAI S, BODART J, et al. Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: recent progress and future directions[J]. Mechanical Engineering Reviews, 2016, 3(1): 15-00418. DOI: 10.1299/mer.15-00418.
WU T, SHI B J, WANG S Z, et al. Wall-model for large-eddy simulation and its applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2018, 50(3): 453-466. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-071.
BOSE S T, PARK G I. Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for complex turbulent flows[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 50: 535-561.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621