WANG Z G, LIANG J H, DING M, et al. A review on hypersonic airbreathing propulsion system[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2009, 39(6):716-739. (in Chinese)

YUG, FAN X J. Supersonic combustion and hypersonic propulsion[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2013, 43(5):449-471. (in Chinese)

MAURICE L, EDWARDS T, GRIFFITHS J. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels for hypersonic propulsion[M ] //CURRAN E T, MURTHY S N B. Scramjet Propulsion, 2000: 757-822. https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600866609.0757.0822

WU K, ZHANG P, YAO W, et al. Numerical investigation on flame stabilization in DLR hydrogen supersonic combustor with strut injection[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2017, 189(12):2154-2179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2017.1365847

LU T F, LAW C K. Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2009, 35(2):192-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.10.002

CHEN Z. Studies on the initiation, propagation and extinction of premixed flames[D]. Princeton: Princeton University, 2009.

SUN M B, FAN Z Q, LIANG J H, et al. Evaluation of partially premixed flamelet approach in supersonic combustion[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2010, 40(6):634-641. (in Chinese)

YANG Y, YOU J P, SUN M B. Modeling of turbulence-chemistry interactions in numerical simulations of supersonic combustion[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):261-273. (in Chinese)

FUREBY C. Large eddy simulation modelling of combustion for propulsion applications[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2009, 367(1899):2957-2969. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0271

JU Y. Recent progress and challenges in fundamental combustion research[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2014, 44(1):26-97. https://doi.org/10.6052/1000-0992-14-011

MAGNUSSEN B F, HJERTAGER B H. On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1977, 16(1):719-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(77)80366-4

KASSEM H I, SAQR K M, ALY H S, et al. Implementation of the eddy dissipation model of turbulent non-premixed combustion in OpenFOAM[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2011, 38(3):363-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.12.012

SPALDING D B. Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1971, 13(1):649-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(71)80067-X

PETERS N. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1984, 10(3):319-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(84)90114-x

GOLOVITCHEV V I, NORDIN N, JARNICKI R, et al. 3-D diesel spray simulations using a new detailed chemistry turbulent combustion model[R]. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1891, 2000. https: //doi.org//10.4271/2000-01-1891

POPE S B. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1985, 11(2):119-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4

GHODKE C, CHOI J, SRINIVASAN S, et al. Large eddy simulation of supersonic combustion in a cavity-strut flameholder[C]//49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, AIAA 2011-323. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-323

SUN M B, WANG Z G, LIANG J H, et al. Flame characteristics in supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholder[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(4):688-696. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34970

ZHANG M, HU Z, HE G, et al. Large-eddy simulation of kerosene spray combustion in a model scramjet chamber[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224(9):949-960. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100jaero738

WILLIAMS F. Progress in knowledge of flamelet structure and extinction[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, 26(4/5/6):657-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1285(00)00012-5

GAO Z X, LEE C. A flamelet model for turbulent diffusion combustion in supersonic flow[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(12):3379-3388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4169-z

SAGHAFIAN A, TERRAPON V E, PITSCH H. An efficient flamelet-based combustion model for compressible flows[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(3):652-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.08.007

LADEINDE F, LOU Z P. Improved flamelet modeling of supersonic combustion[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3):750-761. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36779

ZHAO G Y, SUN M B, WANG H B, et al. Investigation of combustion characteristics in a scramjet combustor using a modified flamelet model[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 148:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.04.005

SHAN F L, HOU L Y, CHEN Z, et al. Linearized correction to a flamelet-based model for hydrogen-fueled supersonic combustion[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(16):11937-11944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.100

LI X P, ZHANG T C, QI L, et al. Characteristic scales and influential factors in supersonic combustion[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(7):1458-1466. (in Chinese)

QIN F, HUANG Z W, HE G Q, et al. Flame stabilization mechanism study in a hydrogen-fueled model supersonic combustor under different air inflow conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(33):21360-21370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.237

BERGLUND M, FUREBY C. LES of supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine model[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2):2497-2504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.074

HUANG Z W, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Large eddy simulation of flame structure and combustion mode in a hydrogen fueled supersonic combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(31):9815-9824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.011

HUANG Z W, HE G Q, WANG S, et al. Simulations of combustion oscillation and flame dynamics in a strut-based supersonic combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(12):8278-8287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.142

MENON S, GENIN F, CHERNYAVSKY B. Large eddy simulation of scramjet combustion using a subgrid mixing/combustion model[C]//12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies, Norfolk, Virginia. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2003-7035. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-7035

FUREBY C. LES for supersonic combustion[C]//18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2012-5979. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-5979

FEDINA E, FUREBY C. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for an axisymmetric dump combustor[J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2011, 12:N24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2011.582586

FUREBY C. A comparative study of flamelet and finite rate chemistry LES for a swirl stabilized flame[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2012, 134(4):041503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004718

SABELNIKOV V, FUREBY C. LES combustion modeling for high Re flames using a multi-phase analogy[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(1):83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.09.008

GONZALEZ-JUEZ E D, KERSTEIN A R, RANJAN R, et al. Advances and challenges in modeling high-speed turbulent combustion in propulsion systems[J]. Progress in Energy andCombustion Science, 2017, 60:26-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.12.003

LAW C K, SUNG C J, WANG H, et al. Development of comprehensive detailed and reduced reaction mechanisms for combustion modeling[J]. AIAAJournal, 2003, 41(9):1629-1646. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7289

TURÁNYI T, TOMLIN A S. Reduction of reaction mechanisms[M]//Analysis of Kinetic Reaction Mechanisms. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014:183-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44562-4_7

OLUWOLE O O, SHI Y, WONG H W, et al. An Exact-Steady-state Adaptive Chemistry method for combustion simulations:Combining the efficiency of reduced models and the accuracy of the full model[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(7):2352-2362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.011

LU T F, JU Y G, LAW C K. Complex CSP for chemistry reduction and analysis[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2001, 126(1/2):1445-1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-2180(01)00252-8

MAAS U, POPE S B. Simplifying chemical kinetics:Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1992, 88(3/4):239-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-m

REIN M. The partial-equilibrium approximation in reacting flows[J]. Physics of Fluids A:Fluid Dynamics, 1992, 4(5):873-886. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858267

TOMLIN A S, TURNYI T, PILLING M J. Low-Temperature Combustion and Autoignition, Chapter 4: Mathematical tools for the construction, investigation and reduction[M ] //Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics. Elsevier, 1997, 35: 293-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0069-8040(97)80019-2

TURÁNYI T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications[J]. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 1990, 5(3):203-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01166355

NIEMEYER K E. Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels[D]. Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University, 2010.

LU T F, LAW C K. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1):1333-1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.145

PEPIOTDESJARDINS P, PITSCH H. An efficient error-propagation-based reduction method for large chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 154(1/2):67-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.10.020

NIEMEYER K E, SUNG C J, RAJU M P. Skeletal mechanism generation for surrogate fuels using directed relation graph with error propagation and sensitivity analysis[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(9):1760-1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.12.022

SUN W T, CHEN Z, GOU X L, et al. A path flux analysis method for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7):1298-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.03.006

GAO X, YANG S, SUN W T. A global pathway selection algorithm for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 167:238-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.007

LIANG L, STEVENS J G, FARRELL J T. A dynamic adaptive chemistry scheme for reactive flow computations[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1):527-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.073

CHEN J Y, KOLLMANN W, DIBBLE R W. Pdf modeling of turbulent nonpremixed methane jet flames[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1989, 64(4/5/6):315-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208908924038

TURÁNYI T. Parameterization of reaction mechanisms using orthonormal polynomials[J]. Computers Chemistry, 1994, 18(1):45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-8485(94)80022-7

CHRISTO F C, MASRI A R, NEBOT E M, et al. An integrated PDF/neural network approach for simulating turbulent reacting systems[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1996, 26(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(96)80198-6

TONSE S R, MORIARTY N W, BROWN N J, et al. PRISM:piecewise reusable implementation of solution mapping. An economical strategy for chemical kinetics[J]. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 1999, 39(1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.199900010

Maurice L, Edwards T, Griffiths J. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels for hypersonic propulsion[M]//Scramjet Propulsion, Chapter 12. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600866609.0757.0822

PANDEY K M, AZAD B K, SAHU S P, et al. Computational analysis of mixing in strut based combustion at air inlet Mach number 2[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2011, 2(1):73-80. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2011.V2.100

XIAO B G, YANG S H, XING J W, et al. An application of parallel in situ adaptive tabulation method in calculation of supersonic combustion[J ] . Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(4):412-417. (in Chinese)

MONTGOMERY C, ZHAO W, ADAMS B, et al. CFD simulations of supersonic combustion using reduced mechanisms and ISAT[C]//16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2003-3547. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-3547

WU K, CONTINO F, YAO W, et al. On the application of tabulated dynamic adaptive chemistry in ethylene-fueled supersonic combustion[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 197:265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.08.012

FAN X J, YU G. Analysis of thermophysical propertiesof Daqing RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2006, 27(2):187-192. (in Chinese)

MICKA D, DRISCOLL J. Reaction zone imaging in a dual-mode scramjet combustor using CH-PLIF[C]//44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Hartford, CT. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2008-5071. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-5071

SCHULTZ I A, GOLDENSTEIN C S, SPEARRIN R M, et al. Multispecies midinfrared absorption measurements in a hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014, 30(6):1595-1604. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b35261

YUAN Y M, ZHANG T C, YAO W, et al. Characterization of flame stabilization modes in an ethylene-fueled supersonic combustor using time-resolved CH * chemiluminescence[J ] . Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2):2919-2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.040

NARAYANASWAMY K, PITSCH H, PEPIOT P. A component library framework for deriving kinetic mechanisms for multi-component fuel surrogates:Application for jet fuel surrogates[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 165:288-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.12.013

MARINOV N M, WESTBROOK C K, PITZ W J. Detailed and global chemical kinetics model for hydrogen[R]. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-JC——120677, CONF-9510158——1, 1995. https: //digital.library.unt.edu/ark: /67531/metadc794810/

ROGERS R C, CHINITZ W. Using a global hydrogen-air combustion model in turbulent reacting flow calculations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(4):586-592. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8117

EKLUND D, STOUFFER S. A numerical and experimental study of a supersonic combustor employing sweep ramp fuel injectors[C]//30th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1994-2819. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-2819

ZHUKOV V P. Verification, validation, and testing of kinetic mechanisms of hydrogen combustion in fluid-dynamic computations[J]. ISRN Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 2012:1-11. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/475607

JACHIMOWSKI C J. An analytical study of the hydrogen-air reaction mechanism with application to scramjet combustion[R].NASA Langley Research Center, NASA-TP-2791, 1988.

CONAIRE M Ó, CURRAN H J, SIMMIE J M, et al. A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation[J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2004, 36(11):603-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20036

BURKE M P, CHAOS M, JU Y G, et al. Comprehensive H 2 /O 2 kinetic model for high-pressure combustion[J ] . International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2012, 44(7):444-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20603

POTTURI A, EDWARDS J. LES/RANS simulation of a supersonic combustion experiment[C]//50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2012-611. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-611

NING H B, LI Z R, LI X Y. Progress in combustion kinetics[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2016, 32(1):131-153. (in Chinese)

WU K. Investigation on the flame stabilization modes and chemical mechanism reduction in supersonic combustion[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018.

SLACK M W. Rate coefficient for H +O 2 + M=HO 2 + M evaluated from shock tube measurements of induction times[J ] . Combustion and Flame, 1977, 28:241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(77)90031-1

BHASKARAN K A, GUPTA M C, JUST T. Shock tube study of the effect of unsymmetric dimethyl hydrazine on the ignition characteristics of hydrogen-air mixtures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1973, 21(1):45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(73)90005-9

HU E J, HUANG Z H, HE J J, et al. Experimental and numerical study on laminar burning velocities and flame instabilities of hydrogen-air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(20):8741-8755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.044

ZHOU X J, JIANG X, MIRA MARTINEZ D. The effects of chemical kinetic mechanisms on large eddy simulation (LES) of a nonpremixed hydrogen jet flame[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(26):11427-11440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.079

DAVIS S G, JOSHI A V, WANG H, et al. An optimized kinetic model of H 2 /CO combustion[J ] . Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1):1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.252

HONG Z K, DAVIDSON D F, HANSON R K. An improved H 2 /O 2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements[J ] . Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(4):633-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.002

BOIVIN P, JIMÉNEZ C, SÁNCHEZ A L, et al. An explicit reduced mechanism for H2-air combustion[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(1):517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.002

KEISTLER P, XIAO X D, HASSAN, et al. Simulation of the SCHOLAR supersonic combustion experiments[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2007-835. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-835

GERLINGER P, NOLD K, AIGNER M. Influence of reaction mechanisms, grid spacing, and inflow conditions on the numerical simulation of lifted supersonic flames[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 62(12):1357-1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2076

KUMARAN K, BABU V. Investigation of the effect of chemistry models on the numerical predictions of the supersonic combustion of hydrogen[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(4):826-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.01.008

HSU K, JEMCOV A. Numerical investigations of detonation in premixed hydrogen-air mixture - Assessment of simplified chemical mechanisms[C]//Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2000-2478. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-2478

EDWARDS J R, BOLES J A, BAURLE R A. Large-eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulation of a supersonic reacting wall jet[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(3):1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.10.009

DAVIDENKO D, GÖKALP I, DUFOUR E, et al. Numerical simulation of hydrogen supersonic combustion and validation of computational approach[C]//12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies, Norfolk, Virginia. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2003-7033. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-7033

FUREBY C, FEDINA E, TEGNÉR J. A computational study of supersonic combustion behind a wedge-shaped flameholder[J]. Shock Waves, 2014, 24(1):41-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0459-2

LIU B, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Investigation of influence of detailed chemical kinetics mechanisms for hydrogen on supersonic combustion using large eddy simulation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(10):5007-5019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.005

MARINOV N M, PITZ W J, WESTBROOK C K, et al. Aromatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in a laminar premixed n-butane flame[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 114(1/2):192-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00275-7

WANG H, LASKIN A. A comprehensive kinetic model of ethylene and acetylene oxidation at high temperatures[R ] . Delaware: University of Delaware, 1998. http://ignis.usc.edu/Mechanisms/C2-C4/c2.pdf

KONNOV A. Development and validation of a detailed reaction mechanism for the combustion modeling[J]. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 2000, 2(3-4):257-264.

QIN Z W, LISSIANSKI V V, YANG H X, et al. Combustion chemistry of propane:a case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(2):1663-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80565-2

XU C Q, KONNOV A A. Validation and analysis of detailed kinetic models for ethylene combustion[J]. Energy, 2012, 43(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.006

SEGAL C. The scramjet engine[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511627019

WU K, YAO W, FAN X J. Development and fidelity evaluation of a skeletal ethylene mechanism under scramjet-relevant conditions[J]. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31(12):14296-14305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03033

KALITAN D M, HALL J M, PETERSEN E L. Ignition and oxidation of ethylene-oxygen-diluent mixtures with and without silane[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(6):1045-1056. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8026

EGOLFOPOULOS F N, ZHU D L, LAW C K. Experimental and numerical determination of laminar flame speeds:Mixtures of C2-hydrocarbons with oxygen and nitrogen[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1991, 23(1):471-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80293-6

KUMAR K, MITTAL G, SUNG C J, et al. An experimental investigation of ethylene/O2/diluent mixtures:Laminar flame speeds with preheat and ignition delays at high pressures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 153(3):343-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.11.012

WESTBROOK C K, DRYER F L. Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1981, 27(1/2):31-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208108946970

SINGH D J, JACHIMOWSKI C J. Quasiglobal reaction model for ethylene combustion[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(1):213-216. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11972

LØVÅS T, MALIK N, MAUSS F. Global reaction mechanism for ethylene flames with preferential diffusion[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2010, 182(11/12):1945-1960 https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2010.497419

MONTGOMERY C. Optimized reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for ethylene and JP-8 combustion[C]//45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2007-771. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-771

YIN Y, YU G. Numerical study of supersonic combustion of ethylene[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 20(2):55-57, 77.

ZHONG F Q, CHEN L H, LI F, et al. Numerical simulation of ignition and combustion of ethylene in a supersonic model combustor with a reduced kinetic mechanism[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 185(4):548-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2012.730080

XIAO B G, ZHAO H Y, YANG S H, et al. Application of reduced chemical kinetic model for ethylene combustion in combustor calculation of HIFiRE[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(6):1287-1294. (in Chinese)

LUO Z Y, LU T F, LIU J W. A reduced mechanism for ethylene/methane mixtures with excessive NO enrichment[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(7):1245-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.12.009

ZHONG F Q, MA S G, ZHANG X Y, et al. Development of efficient and accurate skeletal mechanisms for hydrocarbon fuels and kerosene surrogate[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2015, 31(5):732-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0434-5

LI R, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Skeletal chemical kinetic model generation and analysis for combustion of ethylene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(9):2074-2083. (in Chinese)

XU X, CAI G B. Numerical simulation on combustion of hydrogen/hydrocarbon in supersonic airstream[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2002, 23(5):398-401. (in Chinese)

ZHANG L W, CHOI J Y, YANG V. Supersonic combustion and flame stabilization of coflow ethylene and air with splitter plate[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(5):1242-1255. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b35740

TIAN Y, LE J L, YANG S H, et al. Study on flow oscillation and its control methods in an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(7):961-967. (in Chinese)

LI J, ZHANG L W, CHOI J Y, et al. Ignition transients in a scramjet engine with air throttling part Ⅱ:reacting flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(1):79-88. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b35269

BAURLE R, MATHUR T, GRUBER M, et al. A numerical and experimental investigation of a scramjet combustor for hypersonic missile applications[C]//34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cleveland, OH, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1998-3121. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-3121

EKLUND D, BAURLE R, GRUBER M. Numerical study of a scramjet combustor fueled by an aerodynamic ramp injector in dual-mode combustion[C]//39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2001-379. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-379

LIU J W, TAM C, LU T F, et al. Simulations of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flows using reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms[C]//42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Sacramento, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2006-4862. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-4862

COCKS P, DONOHUE J, BRUNO C, et al. IDDES of a dual-mode ethylene fueled cavity flameholder with an isolator shock train[C]//51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2013-116. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-116

EDWARDS T, MAURICE L Q. Surrogate mixtures to represent complex aviation and rocket fuels[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17(2):461-466. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5765

DAGAUT P, CATHONNET M. The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene:a review of experimental and kinetic modeling[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(1):48-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.003

DAGAUT P, REUILLON M, BOETTNER J C, et al. Kerosene combustion at pressures up to 40 atm:Experimental study and detailed chemical kinetic modeling[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1):919-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80727-7

DOUTÉ C, DELFAU J L, AKRICH R, et al. Chemical structure of atmospheric pressurepremixed n -decane and kerosene flames[J ] . Combustion Science and Technology, 1995, 106(4/5/6):327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209508 907785

VOVELLE C, DELFAU J L, REUILLON M. Formation of aromatic hydrocarbons in decane and kerosene flames at reduced pressure[M]//Springer Series in Chemical Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994:50-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85167-4_4

MAURICE L, BLUST J, LEUNG K, et al. Emissions from combustion of hydrocarbons in a well-stirred reactor[C]//37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1999-1038. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-1038

LINDSTEDT R P, MAURICE L Q. Detailed chemical-kinetic model for aviation fuels[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16(2):187-195. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5582

GUÉRET C, CATHONNET M, BOETTNER J C, et al. Experimental study and modeling of kerosene oxidation in a jet-stirred flow reactor[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1991, 23(1):211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80261-4

DAGAUT P. On the kinetics of hydrocarbons oxidation from natural gas to kerosene and diesel fuel[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2002, 4(11):2079-2094. https://doi.org/10.1039/b110787a

HONNET S, SESHADRI K, NIEMANN U, et al. A surrogate fuel for kerosene[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1):485-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.218

DAGAUT P, EL BAKALI A, RISTORI A. The combustion of kerosene:Experimental results and kinetic modelling using 1- to 3-component surrogate model fuels[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(7/8):944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.10.008

DOOLEY S, WON S H, CHAOS M, et al. A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(12):2333-2339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.001

DOOLEY S, WON S H, HEYNE J, et al. The experimental evaluation of a methodology for surrogate fuel formulation to emulate gas phase combustion kinetic phenomena[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(4):1444-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.11.002

DAGAUT P, KARSENTY F, DAYMA G, et al. Experimental and detailed kinetic model for the oxidation of a Gas to Liquid (GtL) jet fuel[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(3):835-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.015

XIAO B G, YANG S H, ZHAO H Y, et al. Detailed and reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for RP-3 aviation kerosene combustion[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(9):1948-1955. (in Chinese)

ZENG W, LI H X, MA H A, et al. Reduced chemical reaction mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(8):1139-1145. (in Chinese)

MAO Y, YU L, WU Z, et al. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of ignition characteristics of RP-3 kerosene over low-to-high temperature ranges in a heated rapid compression machine and a heated shock tube[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 203:157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.015

LIU W, LIANG X, LIN B Y, et al. A comparative study on soot particle size distributions in premixed flames of RP-3 jet fuel and its surrogates[J ] . Fuel, 2020, 259: 116222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116222 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236119315765

XU J Q, GUO J J, LIU A K, et al. Construction of autoignition mechanisms for the combustion of RP-3 surrogate fuel and kinetics simulation[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4):643-652. (in Chinese)

YU J, GOU X L. Comprehensive surrogate for emulating physical and kinetic properties of jet fuels[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3):679-689. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36766

ZHENG D, YU W M, ZHONG B J. RP-3aviation kerosene surrogate fuel and the chemical reaction kinetic model[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4):636-642. (in Chinese)

NAJJAR Y S H, GOODGER E M. Soot formation in gas turbines using heavy fuels. 1[J]. Fuel, 1981, 60(10):980-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(81)90096-x

ALY S L, SALEM H. Prediction of premixed laminar flame characteristics of commercial kerosene fuel[J]. Fuel, 1989, 68(9):1203-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(89)90196-8

KUNDU K P, DEUR J M. A simplified reaction mechanism for calculation of emissions in hydrocarbon (Jet-A) combustion[C]//29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 1993-2341. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-2341

WANG T S. Thermophysics characterization of kerosene combustion[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2001, 15(2):140-147. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6602

CHOI J. A quasi global mechanism of kerosene combustion for propulsion applications[C]//47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, San Diego, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2011-5853. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-5853

FRANZELLI B, RIBER E, SANJOSÉ M, et al. A two-step chemical scheme for kerosene-air premixed flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7):1364-1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.03.014

RAJASEKARAN A, BABU V. Numerical simulation of kerosene combustion in a dual mode supersonic combustor[C]//42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference Exhibit, Sacramento, California. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2006-5041. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-5041

HUANG S H, XU S L, LIU X Y. Combustionflow of kerosene-fueled scramjet with 3D cavity (Ⅲ) Multi-step chemistry characteristics of kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2005, 26(2):101-105. (in Chinese)

KUMARAN K, BABU V. Mixing and combustion characteristics of kerosene in a model supersonic combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009, 25(3):583-592. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40140

KUMARAN K, BEHERA P R, BABU V. Numerical investigation of the supersonic combustion of kerosene in a strut-based combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2010, 26(5):1084-1091. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46965

DHARAVATH M, MANNA P, SINHA P K, et al. Numerical analysis of a kerosene-fueled scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, 2016, 8(1):011003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030699

HOU L Y, NIU D S, PAN P F, et al. Effects ofkerosene global reaction mechanisms on supersonic combustion[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(7):938-943. (in Chinese)

KYNE A G, PATTERSON P, POURKASHANIAN M, et al. Prediction of premixed laminar flame structure and burning velocity of aviation fuel-air mixtures[C ] //ASME Turbo Expo 2001: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 2: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/2001-GT-0055ISBN:978-0-7918-7851-4

MONTGOMERY C, CANNON S, MAWID M, et al. Reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for JP-8 combustion[C ] //40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA. AIAA 2002-336. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-336

LUCHE J, REUILLON M, BOETTNER J C, et al. Reduction of large detailed kinetic mechanisms:application to kerosene/air combustion[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2004, 176(11):1935-1963. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200490504571

STRELKOVA M I, KIRILLOV I A, POTAPKIN B V, et al. Detailed and reduced mechanisms of jet a combustion at high temperatures[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 180(10/11):1788-1802. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200802258379

WANG Q D, FANG Y M, WANG F, et al. Skeletal mechanism generation for high-temperature oxidation of kerosene surrogates[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(1):91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.05.019

WANG Q D, FANG Y M, WANG F, et al. Systematic analysis and reduction of combustion mechanisms for ignition of multi-component kerosene surrogate[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1):187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.011

ZHONG B J, PENG H S. Development of a skeletal mechanism for aviation kerosene surrogate fuel[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(3):645-651. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b37421

YAO W, WU K, LEE Y, et al. Influence of chemical mechanisms on supersonic combustion characteristics fueled by kerosene[C]//2018 Joint Propulsion Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio. Reston, Virginia: AIAA. AIAA 2018-4740. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4740

FAN X F, WANG J F, ZHAO F M, et al. Applications of reduced reaction mechanism for numerical calculations in supersonic combustion of kerosene fuel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6):974-982. (in Chinese)

YAO W, WU K, FAN X J. Development of skeletal kerosene mechanisms and application to supersonic combustion[J]. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32(12):12992-13003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03350

YAO W, LU Y, WU K, et al. Modeling analysis of an actively cooled scramjet combustor under different kerosene/air ratios[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(4):975-991. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36866

YAO W, YUAN Y M, LI X P, et al. Comparative study of elliptic and round scramjet combustors fueled by RP-3[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2018, 34(3):772-786. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36721

YAO W, WU K, FAN X J. Influences of domain symmetry on supersonic combustion modeling[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(2):451-465. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b37227

SCHWER D A, LU P S, GREEN Jr W H. An adaptive chemistry approach to modeling complex kinetics in reacting flows[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 133(4):451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-2180(03)00045-2

LIANG L, STEVENS J G, FARRELL J T. A dynamic multi-zone partitioning scheme for solving detailed chemical kinetics in reactive flow computations[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2009, 181(11):1345-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200903190836

GOLDSBOROUGH S S, BANYON C, MITTAL G. A computationally efficient, physics-based model for simulating heat loss during compression and the delay period in RCM experiments[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(12):3476-3492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.07.010

CONTINO F, FOUCHER F, DAGAUT P, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of nitric oxide effect on the ignition of iso-octane in a single cylinder HCCI engine[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(8):1476-1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.02.028

REN Z Y, LIU Y F, LU T F, et al. The use of dynamic adaptive chemistry and tabulation in reactive flow simulations[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(1):127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.018

WEI H Q, ZHOU L, ZHOU H, et al. Toward efficient chemistry calculations in engine simulations through static adaptive acceleration[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2017, 189(4):623-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2016.1229312

YANG S, RANJAN R, YANG V, et al. Parallel on-the-fly adaptive kinetics in direct numerical simulation of turbulent premixed flame[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2):2025-2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.021

CONTINO F, JEANMART H, LUCCHINI T, et al. Coupling of in situ adaptive tabulation and dynamic adaptive chemistry:an effective method for solving combustion in engine simulations[J ] . Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2):3057-3064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.08.002

AN J, HE G Q, QIN F, et al. Dynamic adaptive chemistry with mechanisms tabulation and in situ adaptive tabulation (ISAT) for computationally efficient modeling of turbulent combustion[J ] . Combustion and Flame, 2019, 206:467-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.05.016