南京航空航天大学 非定常空气动力学与流动控制工业和信息化部重点实验室,南京,210016
李通(1995-),男,陕西宝鸡人,博士生,研究方向:计算流体力学,舰面流场数值分析. E-mail:lee_tong@foxmail.com
赵宁*(1963-),山东人,教授,博导,研究方向:计算流体力学. E-mail:zhaoam@nuaa.edu.cn
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李通, 王逸斌, 赵宁. 舰船纵摇突变对舰面流场的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(3): 80−89.
LI Tong, WANG Yibin, ZHAO Ning. Influence of sudden change in pitching motion on ship flow field[J]. 2021, 39(3): 80-89.
李通, 王逸斌, 赵宁. 舰船纵摇突变对舰面流场的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(3): 80−89. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0136
LI Tong, WANG Yibin, ZHAO Ning. Influence of sudden change in pitching motion on ship flow field[J]. 2021, 39(3): 80-89. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0136.
舰船在海上航行时会受到海浪的影响而产生横摇、纵摇等不同方向上的运动,同时海浪的随机性也会造成舰船摇摆参数发生变化,扰乱舰面流场,增加舰载直升机在甲板上方作业的危险性。为了保障舰载直升机在舰船上的起降和其他甲板作业的安全性,现基于两栖攻击舰的简化模型,通过计算流体力学方法,在纵摇状态下对舰面流场进行数值模拟,将不规则的纵摇运动简化为具有周期性的简谐运动,采用动网格方法来实现舰船的摇摆。首先定性分析了甲板上方涡结构的发展以及舰船纵摇周期和振幅的突变对流场结构带来的影响,其次通过垂向速度的变化对动态舰面流场做了进一步的定量分析。结果表明:当舰船突然开始纵摇或纵摇周期减半后,上层建筑和舰尾附近的位置要滞后于舰首一段时间才能建立起周期性流动,同时纵摇的加速导致了流场的恶化。当纵摇振幅减半后,相当于舰船的“静息期”,流场变化平缓,垂向速度变化范围明显减小,有利于舰载直升机的降落。对于不同的纵摇状态,甲板上方各观测点垂向速度的波动都随高度的降低而增强,特别是舰首靠近甲板区域的波动最强。舰载机飞行员在进行甲板作业时应针对纵摇突变带来的影响,及时采取相应措施以保障作业安全。
Moving on the sea
the ship can be heavily affected by sea waves
which results in rolling
pitching and other different motions. Meanwhile
the randomness of sea waves can also cause the change of ship's motion parameters
such as the period and amplitude of pitching or rolling
which can disturb the ship flow field and increase the risk of the ship-borne helicopter's operation above the flight deck. In order to ensure the safety of the take-off/landing and other operations on the deck for ship-borne helicopters
the flow field over the flight deck of a simplified amphibious assault ship in the pitching motion was numerically simulated using computational fluid dynamics method. The irregular pitching motion was simplified as a periodic harmonic motion
and the dynamic mesh method was employed to simulate ship's rolling motion. The development of vortex structures over the deck and the influence of the change of the pitching period and amplitude on the ship airwake were analyzed qualitatively first. Then the dynamic ship airwake was further analyzed quantitatively by the change of vertical velocity. When the ship suddenly begins to pitch or its pitching period is halved
the establishment of the periodic flow field near the superstructure and stern will lag behind that near the bow. At the same time
the acceleration of pitching angular velocity leads to the deterioration of the flow field. When the pitching amplitude is halved
the ship is in the "rest period". The flow field changes gently and the variation of vertical velocity is significantly reduced at this state
which is conducive to the landing of the ship-borne helicopter. For different pitching states
the standard deviations of vertical velocity at the observation points have an increasing trend as the height decreases. It is worth noting that the fluctuation of vertical velocity at the bow near the deck is the strongest. The pilots of ship-borne helicopters should pay attention to the influence of the sudden change of pitching motion
and take corresponding measures to ensure the safety of deck operation.
GU Y S, MING X. Experimental investigation on flow field properties around aft-deck of destroyer[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2001, 22(6): 500-504. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2001.06.005
ZHAO W Y, WANG Z Y. Research on the effect of warship air-wake on helicopter landing on shipboard[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical Engineering Institute, 2007, 22(4): 435-438. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1522.2007.04.008
POLSKY S. A computational study of unsteady ship airwake[C ] //40th AIAA Aeros pace Sciences Meeting Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2002.doi: 10.2514/6.2002-1022 .
WOODSON S, GHEE T. A computational and experimental determination of the air flow around the landing deck of a US navy destroyer (DDG)[C ] //23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-4958 .
GAO Y, XIE H S. The numerical simulation of flow around the warship during ramp ski-jump take-off[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2008, 26(4): 513-518. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2008.04.018
GAO Y, LIU C M, HE Z. Research on CVN deck vortices structure characteristics caused by wind direction changes[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(3): 310-315. (in Chinese)
HONG W H, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Influence on air-wake with different layout of ship superstructure[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(2): 53-58, 68. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2009.02.012
LU C, JIANG Z F, WANG T. Influences of different airflow situations for ship airwake[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2009, 31 (9): 38-42. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2009.09.005
ZHAO Y Z. Numerical simulation of steady and unsteady air flow field around large ship[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2012. (in Chinese)
LIU C M, GAO Y. Research on the airwake characteristics of flight deck for different frigate ship models[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 46(3): 80-85. (in Chinese)
FORREST J S, OWEN I. An investigation of ship airwakes using Detached-Eddy Simulation[J]. Computers Fluids, 2010, 39(4): 656-673. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.11.002
CAO G, CHENG J, BI X B, et al. Investigation on the numerical simulation of ship airwake based on DES[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(3): 48-54. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2016.03.009
LI T, WANG Y B, ZHAO N, et al. An investigation of ship airwake over the frigate afterbody[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2020, 34(14n16): 2040069.
ZHAO P C, LI H X, ZONG K, et al. Study of influence factors on taking-off/landing safety of shipborad helicopter[J]. Ship Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 88-92. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.13788/j.cnki.cbgc.2017.09.088
SU D C, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Numerical simulatin of coupled flow field of helicopter/ship[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 520853-520853.. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.120853[万方]
ZONG K, ZONG W, LI H X, et al. Research of simulation methods on landing flow field for shipborne helicopters[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(2): 124-130, 139. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2018.02.024
WANG J L, JIANG G W, ZHU F, et al. Numerical research for effect of WOD on ship airwake[J]. Ship Engineering, 2018, 40(2): 46-52. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.13788/j.cnki.cbgc.2018.02.046
WANG J L, JIANG G W, YANG M S. Influence of ABL on SFS 2 ship airwake[J ] . Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(8): 37-40. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2018.08.007
GAO J, SHA E L, XIE Z, et al. Study on the air wake field of CVN-73 carrier using active control technology[J]. Science Technology Review, 2019, 37(13): 47-52. (in Chinese)
WATSON N A, KELLY M F, OWEN I, et al. Computational and experimental modelling study of the unsteady airflow over the aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 172: 562-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.024
WILKINSON C, ZAN S J, FUNK J D, et al. Modelling and simulation of ship air wakes for helicopter operations: A collaborative venture[C]// Symposium on Fluid Dynamics Problems of Vehicles Operating Near or in the Air-Sea Interface, 1998, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
REDDY K R, TOFFOLETTO R, JONES K R W. Numerical simulation of ship airwake[J]. Computers Fluids, 2000, 29(4): 451-465. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(99)00033-X
SYMS G F. Simulation of simplified-frigate airwakes using a lattice-Boltzmann method[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(6-7): 1197-1206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.040
MORA R B. Experimental investigation of the flow on a simple frigate shape (SFS)[J]. ScientificWorldJournal, 2014, 2014: 818132. DOI: 10.1155/2014/818132
ZHAO R, RONG J L, LI H X, et al. Entropy-based detached-eddy simulation of the airwake over a simple frigate shape[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 7(11): 168781401561693. DOI: 10.1177/1687814015616930
LI C M, JIANG W J, CHENG J, et al. Comparisons of DES and LES turbulent model for simulation of surface ship airwake[C ] //ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea. 2016.doi: 10.1115/OMAE2016-55037 .
ZHANG J, MINELLI G, RAO A N, et al. Comparison of PANS and LES of the flow past a generic ship[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 165: 221-236. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.023
YUAN W X, WALL A, LEE R. Combined numerical and experimental simulations of unsteady ship airwakes[J]. Computers Fluids, 2018, 172: 29-53. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.06.006
WANG C R, ZHU Y B. A study on the method of calculation for helicopter-ship take-off/landing flight envelope[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1996, 14(1): 36-40.. (in Chinese)
章晓冬, 侯志强, 胡国才, 等. 某型舰载直升机着舰风限图的计算[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2012, 33(10): 30-33. doi: 10.11809/j.issn.1006-0707.2012.10.012
JEONG J, HUSSAIN F. On the identification of a vortex[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 285: 69. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112095000462
UK Civil Aviation Authority. Offshore helicopter landing areas-Guidance on standards: CAP 437[S]. Documedia Solutions Ltd, 2016-12.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621