凸拐角附近激波与湍流边界层干扰的数值模拟研究

王德鑫; 褚佑彪; 刘难生; 李祝飞; 杨基明

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0111

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

凸拐角附近激波与湍流边界层干扰的数值模拟研究

专栏——湍流结构研究 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 凸拐角附近激波与湍流边界层干扰的数值模拟研究
- Numerical investigation of shock wave/boundary layer interactions near a convex corner
- 空气动力学学报 2020年38卷第1期页码：148-159
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国航天科技集团有限公司四院四十一所,陕西,西安,710025
  2. 中国科学技术大学近代力学系,安徽,合肥,230027
- 作者简介：
  
  王德鑫(1989-), 男, 四川绵阳人, 工程师, 博士, 研究方向:流体力学.E-mail:dxwang@mail.ustc.edu.cn
  刘难生(1975-), 教授, 研究方向:流体力学.E-mail:lns@ustc.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（Nos.11772325，11572312，11621202）;挑战计划（TZ2016001）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0111
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王德鑫, 褚佑彪, 刘难生, 李祝飞, 杨基明. 凸拐角附近激波与湍流边界层干扰的数值模拟研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(1): 148-159.

WANG Dexin, CHU Youbiao, LIU Nansheng, et al. Numerical investigation of shock wave/boundary layer interactions near a convex corner[J]. 2020, 38(1): 148-159.
王德鑫, 褚佑彪, 刘难生, 李祝飞, 杨基明. 凸拐角附近激波与湍流边界层干扰的数值模拟研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(1): 148-159. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0111.

WANG Dexin, CHU Youbiao, LIU Nansheng, et al. Numerical investigation of shock wave/boundary layer interactions near a convex corner[J]. 2020, 38(1): 148-159. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0111.

摘要

采用大涡模拟方法数值研究了来流马赫数

∞

=3、雷诺数

=2070的凸拐角附近激波与湍流边界层干扰问题。对于尖拐角和钝拐角两种情况，计算考察了激波入射到拐角下游时的流场结构、非定常分离流以及湍流统计特性。研究发现：尖拐角能够使流动产生局部集中的顺压梯度，导致壁面摩擦系数在拐角处出现峰值，因此分离点难以越过拐角向上游运动，而再附点发生前后运动。与尖拐角情况不同的是，钝拐角产生的局部顺压梯度不足以阻止分离点越过拐角，因此分离点和再附点都会发生运动。此外，尽管凸拐角产生的顺压梯度能抑制分离点附近的近壁小尺度涡结构，但在经过入射激波作用之后，近壁小尺度涡结构在再附点附近显著增强。

Abstract

Large-eddy simulations have been conducted on the interaction of shock/turbulent boundary layer near a convex corner of inflow with

∞

=3 and

=2070. Two typical convex corners

i.e.

the sharp and blunt corners

are considered. The geometrical effects of convex corner on the flow structures

unsteady separating flow

and turbulent statistical characteristics are analyzed systematically. For the sharp corner case

locally concentrated favorable pressure gradients are formed near the corner

where the wall friction coefficient obtains a high level. As a result

the separation point is fixed and thus unable to move cross th

e sharp corner

while the attachment point takes a front/back motion. However

for the blunt corner case

the separation point is not fixed at the corner because of the dispersed distribution of the favorable pressure gradient. As a consequence

both the separation and attachment points become to move front and back. Furthermore

the small scale vortical structures near the separation point are suppressed due to the presence of favorable pressure gradients near the convex corner

while enhanced greatly near the attachment point by the incident shock interaction.

关键词

Keywords

references

MATHESON M A, GROSVENOR A D, ZHELTOVODOV A A. Shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions[C]//Companion on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage Analysis Companion. ACM, Seattle Washington, USA. 2011.

SUN M B, HU Z W, SANDHAM N D. Recovery of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer after an expansion corner[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29(7):76-103.

GILLIS J C, JOHNSTON J P. Turbulent boundary-layer flow and structure on a convex wall and its redevelopment on a flat wall[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983, 135:123-153.

DUSSAUGE J P, GAVIGLIO J. The rapid expansion of a supersonic turbulent flow:role of bulk dilatation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 174:81-112.

SMITH D R, SMITS A J. The rapid expansion of a turbulent boundary layer in a supersonic flow[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1991, 2(5-6):319-328.

ANDREOPOULOS Y, AGUI J H, BRIASSULIS G. Shock wave turbulence interactions[J]. Annual Review Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 32:309-345.

ZHELTOVODOV A. Some advances in research of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, AIAA paper, 2006-496.

CHEW Y T. Shockwave and boundary layer interaction in the presence of an expansion corner[J]. Aeronautical Quarterly, 1979, 30(3):506-527.

HAWBOLDT R J, SULLIVAN P A, GOTTLIEB J. Interactions between shock wave and hypersonic laminar boundary layer near convex corner[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1995, 32(5):783-790.

CHUNG K M, LU F K. Hypersonic turbulent expansion-corner flow with shock impingement[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1995, 11(3):441-447.

WHITE M E, AULT D A. Expansion corner effects on hypersonic shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12(6):1169-1173.

ZHANG Y, TAN H J, ZHUANG Y, et al. Influence of expansion waves on cowl shock/boundary layer interaction in hypersonic inlets[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2014, 30(5):1183-1191.

LI Z F, YANG J M. Leading edge bluntness effects on shock wave/boundary layer interactions near a convex corner[C]//20th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, AIAA paper, 2015-3601.

CHEN L W, XU C Y, LU X Y. Numerical investigation of a compressible flow past anaerofoil[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 643:97-126.

CHEN L W, WANG G L, LU X Y. Numerical investigation of a jet from a blunt body opposing a supersonic flow[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 684:85-110.

XU C Y, CHEN L W, LU X Y. Large eddy simulation of a compressible flow past a wavy cylinder[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 665:238-273.

PIROZZOLI S, GRASSO F. Direct numerical simulation of impi nging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M =2.25[J ] . Physics of Fluids, 2006, 18:065-113.

LI Q, COLEMAN G N. DNS of an oblique shock wave impinging upon a turbulent boundary layer[M]. Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation V. Springer Netherlands, 2004.

SANDHAM N, YAO Y F, LAWAL A. Large-eddy simulation of transonic turbulent flow over a bump[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2003, 24:584-595.

WANG L, LU X Y. Effect of Mach number on turbulence behaviors in compressible boundary layer[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2011, 28:064702.

PIROZZOLI S, BERNARDINI M, GRASSO F. Characterization of coherent vortical structures in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 613:205-231.

SMITS A J, DUSSAUGE J P. Turbulent shear layers in supersonic flow[M]. Springer Science Business Media, 2006.

BABINSKY H, HARVEY, J K. Shock waves-boundary layer interactions[M]. Cambridge University, 2015.

YOUNG A D, Boundary layers[M]. BSP. Professional Books, Oxford, 1989.

KIM K C, ADRIAN R J. Very large-scale motion in the outer layer[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1999, 11(2):417-422.

SAMTANEY R, PULLIN D I, KOSOVI C B. Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2001, 13:1415-1430.

CLEMENS N T, NARAYANASWAMY V. Low-frequency unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions[J]. Annual Revivew Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 46:469-492.

DECK S, PASCAL T. Unsteadiness of an axisymmetric separating-reattaching flow:Numerical investigation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2007, 19:65-103.

GEROLYMOS G A, VALLET I. Pressure, density, temperature and entropy fluctuations in compressible turbulent plane channel flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 757:701-746.

LARSSON J, LELE S K. Direct numerical simulation of canonical shock/turbulence interaction[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2009, 21:101-126.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

上游山脉对风力机尾流和功率影响的模拟研究

基于LBM方法的LAGOON起落架噪声预测与降噪方法研究

交错型CPR方法的保正实现策略及其对比研究

基于神经网络与遗传算法的热气防冰结构优化

个体间距对多扑翼气动噪声的影响特性