旋翼翼型气动设计与评估软件HRADesign

孙俊峰; 卢风顺; 黄勇; 江雄; 牟斌; 许勇

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0106

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

旋翼翼型气动设计与评估软件HRADesign

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 旋翼翼型气动设计与评估软件HRADesign
- Rotor airfoil aerodynamic design and evaluation software HRADesign
- 空气动力学学报 2021年39卷第4期页码：59-68
- 作者机构：
  
  中国空气动力研究与发展中心,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
  
  孙俊峰（1974-），男，博士, 高级工程师. 主要从事直升机旋翼气动设计与飞行器多学科优化设计等方面的研究. E-mail：jfsun3@163.com
  许勇*（1971-），男，博士，副研究员. 主要从事多学科优化设计与计算电磁学等方面的研究. E-main：stephen000@sina.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0106
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孙俊峰, 卢风顺, 黄勇, 等. 旋翼翼型气动设计与评估软件HRADesign[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(4): 59−68.

SUN Junfeng, LU Fengshun, HUANG Yong, et al. Rotor airfoil aerodynamic design and evaluation software HRADesign[J]. 2021, 39(4): 59-68.
孙俊峰, 卢风顺, 黄勇, 等. 旋翼翼型气动设计与评估软件HRADesign[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(4): 59−68. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0106

SUN Junfeng, LU Fengshun, HUANG Yong, et al. Rotor airfoil aerodynamic design and evaluation software HRADesign[J]. 2021, 39(4): 59-68. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0106.

摘要

HRADesign系统作为通用旋翼翼型气动设计和评估系统，研制目的主要是为工业设计环境提供通用、高效、鲁棒的优化设计架构，应用于各类旋翼翼型族的设计，提高旋翼翼型设计的效率和精度，以满足先进直升机对高性能旋翼翼型的迫切需求。旋翼翼型设计技术是直升机旋翼设计的核心技术，旋翼翼型的优化设计具有多点、多目标、强约束的特点。HRADesign系统针对旋翼翼型设计的特点，发展了多目标进化算法、PCA多目标降维技术、Kriging代理模型、基于CST方法的翼型参数化技术以及高精度CFD等优化设计技术，构建了基于进化算法的多目标优化流程。通过详细介绍平台的系统架构、主要的功能模块以及多目标优化流程，展现了系统架构设计的灵活性和功能模块的完备性。通过ADODG基准测试算例、某厚度旋翼翼型常规多目标优化算例和考虑多目标降维的优化算例进行了系统功能验证，优化结果表明，在满足约束的条件下，优化后的旋翼翼型和基准翼型相比，综合性能都有明显改善，验证了优化设计系统的有效性、可靠性。

Abstract

The HRADesign is a general-purpose rotor airfoil aerodynamic design and evaluation software platform. The main purpose of developing this platform is to provide an universal

efficient

high-fidelity

and robust design optimization framework for designing high-performance rotor airfoils of advanced helicopters. Rotor airfoil design

which is a multi-point

multi-objective

and strong-constrained process

is one of the core techniques of helicopter rotor aerodynamic design. According to the characteristics of rotor airfoil design

the HRADesign has developed multi-objective evolutionary algorithms

a PCA multi-objective dimensionality reduction technique

an airfoil parameterization based CST method

Kriging surrogate models

high-fidelity CFD analysis tools and so on

and has also constructed a multi-objectives optimization process based on evolutionary algorithms. By introducing the platform architecture

the main functional modules

and the multi-objective optimization process in detail

the flexibility of the system architecture design and the completeness of the functional modules are demonstrated. At last

system functions had been verified through three examples including a ADODG benchmark case

a conventional multi-objective rotor-airfoil optimization

and an optimization test considering multi-objective dimensionality reduction. The results show that the overall performance of the optimized rotor airfoil is significantly improved under the constraints

which verifies the effectiveness and reliability of the optimization system.

关键词

Keywords

references

LEISHMAN J G. Principle of helicopter aerodynamic[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

JAMESON A, PIERCE N, MARTINELLI L, et al. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations[C ] //35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1997. doi: 10.2514/6.1997-101

NIELSEN E J, ANDERSON W K. Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(6): 1155-1163. DOI: 10.2514/2.1765.

COELLO COELLO C A, LAMONT G B, Van VELDUIZEN D A. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, May 2002.

ZHENG C Y, HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, et al. Multidisciplinary optimization design of high dimensional target space for flying wing airfoil[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4): 587-597. (in Chinese)

DADONE L U. Design and analytical study of a rotor airfoil[R]. NASA CR-2988, 1978.

THIBERT J J. The elaboration of a new family of helicopter blade profiles[R]. NASA TM-75907, 1981.

QIAN R Z, QIAO Z D, CHEN Y C, et al. Rotor airfoil optimization design using navier-stokes equations[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2004, 22(1): 26-29. (in Chinese)

SUN J F, LIU G, JIANG X, et al. Research of rotor airfoil design optimization based on the Kriging model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(4): 437-441. (in Chinese)

DING C W, YANG X D. Multi-point aerodynamic optimization design strategy of rotor airfoil with multi-constrain conditions[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2013, 43(1): 52-57. (in Chinese)

YANG H, SONG W P, HAN Z H, et al. Multi-objective and multi-constrained optimization design for a helicopter rotor airfoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(7): 1218-1226. (in Chinese)

ZHAO Q J, WANG Q, ZHAO G Q. New optimization design method for rotor airfoil considering steady-unsteady characteristics[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics Astronautics, 2014, 46(3): 355-363. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.16356/j.1005-2615.2014.03.006.

LÓPEZ JAIMES A, COELLO COELLO C A, CHAKRABORTY D. Objective reduction using a feature selection technique[C ] //Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO '08, Atlanta, GA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 2008: 673-680. doi: 10.1145/1389095.1389228

ZHOU C C. The study on many-objective optimization algorithms based on PCA[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2014. (in Chinese)

HUBAND S, HINGSTON P, BARONE L, et al. A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(5): 477-506. DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2005.861417.

SHANG R H, ZHANG K, JIAO L C, et al. A novel algorithm for many-objective dimension reductions: Pareto-PCA-NSGA-II[C ] //Proc of the 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Beijing, China. IEEE, 2014: 1974-1981. doi: 10.1109/CEC.2014.6900346

LES PIEGL, WAYNE TILLER. The NURBS book[M], Springer, 1997.

KULFAN B. Recent extensions and applications of the “CST” universal parametric geometry representation method[C ] //Proc of the 7th AIAA ATIO Conf, 2nd CEIAT Int'l Conf on Innov and Integr in Aero Sciences, 17th LTA Systems Tech Conf; followed by 2nd TEOS Forum, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2007. doi: 10.2514/6.2007-7709

SEDERBERG T W, PARRY S R. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models[J]. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 1986, 20(4): 151-160. DOI: 10.1145/15886.15903.

THOMPSON J F, SONI B K, WEATHERILL N P. Handbook of grid generation[M ] . CRC Press, 1998. doi: 10.1201/9781420050349

MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 1979, 21(2): 239-245. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755.

FANG K T, MA C X. Orthogonal and uniform experimental design[M]. Beiing: Science Press, 1980 (in Chinese).

JEONG S, MURAYAMA M, YAMAMOTO K. Efficient optimization design method using kriging model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(2): 413-420. DOI: 10.2514/1.6386.

HAN Z H. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: a review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225. (in Chinese)

MOU B, JIANG X, XIAO Z Y, et al. Implementation and caliberation of γ-Re θ transition model[J ] . Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(1): 103-109. (in Chinese)

SUN J F, ZHOU Z, HUANG Y, et al. Digital inegrated platform for universal aircraft aerodynamic design optimization: DIPasda[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 623348. (in Chinese)doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23348.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于熵产理论设计方法的多目标翼型优化

基于神经网络与遗传算法的热气防冰结构优化

基于条件扩散模型的火箭气动外形快速设计方法

低空电动垂直起降飞行器螺旋桨气动设计研究进展

某中型皮卡发动机冷却风扇布局优化