浙江大学 建筑工程学院,杭州,31005
刘奕(1992-),男,山东泰安人,博士研究生,研究方向:结构风工程. E-mail:lyi@zju.edu.cn
陈水福*(1967-),男,浙江衢州人,教授,博导,研究方向:结构风工程. E-mail:csf@zju.edu.cn
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
刘奕, 陈水福. 湍流特性对矩形高层建筑风荷载影响的研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(2): 142−150.
LIU Yi, CHEN Shuifu. Effects of turbulence characteristics on wind loads on rectangular high-rise buildings[J]. 2021, 39(2): 142-150.
刘奕, 陈水福. 湍流特性对矩形高层建筑风荷载影响的研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(2): 142−150. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0091
LIU Yi, CHEN Shuifu. Effects of turbulence characteristics on wind loads on rectangular high-rise buildings[J]. 2021, 39(2): 142-150. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0091.
为研究湍流特性对矩形高层建筑风荷载及周围绕流特性的影响,对4种不同地貌条件下9种深宽比的矩形高层建筑进行了风洞测压试验,考察了湍流度与湍流积分尺度对不同深宽比建筑平均、脉动与极值风压,以及横风向气动力谱和流动分离再附特性的影响规律。结果表明,随湍流度增大,分离流更早再附于侧风面上,郊区地貌下再附点出现位置较开阔地貌提前约30%,且分离流下平均风压减小、极值风压增大(均指绝对值),最不利脉动风压与极值出现位置更靠近前缘;随湍流积分尺度减小,迎风面、背风面与侧风面的平均和极值风压均减小,但湍流积分尺度对分离再附流形态及分离流下的风压分布形状影响不大。相对于深宽比更大的情况,湍流特性对深宽比介于1到2的建筑影响更大。
In order to study the effects of turbulence characteristics on the wind loads and the flow characteristics for rectangular high-rise buildings
wind tunnel pressure tests were carried out for rectangular buildings with 9 depth-to-width ratios under 4 different terrains. Effects of the turbulence intensity and the integral length scale on the mean
fluctuating and peak pressures
the cross-wind aerodynamic force spectra
and the separation/reattachment flow characteristics for buildings with different depth-to-width ratios were examined. Results show that as the turbulence intensity increases
earlier flow reattachment occurs
and the reattachment point under suburban terrain appears about 30% earlier than that in the open terrain case. Under the separation flow
magnitudes of both the mean and the peak wind pressures decrease
and the most unfavorable fluctuating and peak pressures occur close to the leading edge. As the integral length scale decreases
the mean and the peak pressures on the windward
leeward and side surfaces decrease
but the integral scale has limited effects on the flow patterns for the separation/reattachment flow as well as on the pressure distributions under the separation flow. Among all the depth-to-width ratios studied
turbulence characteristics have greater effects for buildings with depth-to-width ratios between 1 and 2.
LEE B E. The effect of turbulence on the surface pressure field of a square prism[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 69(2): 263-282.DOI: 10.1017/s0022112075001437.
LANEVILLE A. An explanation of some effects of turbulence on bluff bodies[C]//Proc. Fourth International Conference on Wind Effects on Building and Structures, Heathrow, 1975.1975.
NAKAMURA Y, OHYA Y. The effects of turbulence on the mean flow past two-dimensional rectangular cylinders[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1984, 149: 255.DOI: 10.1017/s0022112084002640.
HILLIER R, CHERRY N J. The effects of stream turbulence on separation bubbles[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1981, 8(1-2): 49-58.DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(81)90007-6.
NAKAMURA Y, OZONO S. The effects of turbulence on a separated and reattaching flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 178: 477-490.DOI: 10.1017/s0022112087001320.
SAATHOFF P J, MELBOURNE W H. The generation of peak pressures in separated/reattaching flows[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1989, 32(1-2): 121-134.DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(89)90023-8.
SAATHOFF P J, MELBOURNE W H. Effects of free-stream turbulence on surface pressure fluctuations in a separation bubble[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 337: 1-24.DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096004594.
LI Q S, MELBOURNE W H. An experimental investigation of the effects of free-stream turbulence on streamwise surface pressures in separated and reattaching flows[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 54-55: 313-323.DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(94)00050-N.
LI Q S, MELBOURNE W H. The effect of large-scale turbulence on pressure fluctuations in separated and reattaching flows[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83(1-3): 159-169.DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00069-0.
GU M, YE F. Characteristics of wind pressure amplitude on super-tall buildings[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2006, 34(2): 143-149. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 0253-374X.2006.02.001.
GU M, YE F. Frequence domain characteristics of wind loads on typical super-tall buildings[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2006, 27(1): 30-36. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2006.01.005.
SU W L. Wind tunnel tests research on turbulence effects of wind acting on tall buildings[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2017.
AKON A F, KOPP G A. Mean pressure distributions and reattachment lengths for roof-separation bubbles on low-rise buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 155: 115-125.DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.05.008.
HOLMES J D, OSONPHASOP C. Flow behind two-dimensional barriers on a roughened ground plane, and applications for atmospheric boundary-layer modelling[C]// Proc. 8th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conf., Newcastle, NSW. 1983, 28.
ESDU-82026. Strong winds in the atmosphere boundary layer, Part 1: Mean-hourly wind speeds[S]. London, U. K. : Engineering Sciences Data Unit, 1982.
ESDU-85020. Characteristics of atmosphere turbulence near the ground, Part 2: Single Point Data for Strong Winds (Neutral Atmosphere)[S]. London, U. K.: Engineering Sciences Data Unit, 1985.
ESDU-74031. Characteristics of atmosphere turbulence near the ground, Part 2: Single point data for strong winds (neutral atmosphere)[S]. London, U. K.: Engineering Sciences Data Unit, 1974.
HO T C E, SURRY D, MORRISH D, et al. The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 1. Archiving format and basic aerodynamic data[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2005, 93(1): 1-30.
GAVANSKI E, GURLEY K R, KOPP G A. Uncertainties in the estimation of local peak pressures on low-rise buildings by using the gumbel distribution fitting approach[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(11): 04016106.DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001556.
PIERRE L M S, KOPP G A, SURRY D, et al. The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 2. Comparison of data with wind load provisions[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2005, 93(1): 31-59.DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.007.
HONG E S. Wall pressure coefficients for low-to high-rise buildings[D]. Western University, 2017.
LIEBLEIN J. Efficient methods of extreme-value methodology[R ] . National Bureau of Standards, 1974. doi: 10.6028/nbs.ir.74-602 .
RUDERICH R, FERNHOLZ H H. An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1986, 163: 283-322.DOI: 10.1017/s0022112086002306.
MORRISON M J, KOPP G A. Effects of turbulence intensity and scale on surface pressure fluctuations on the roof of a low-rise building in the atmospheric boundary layer[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 183: 140-151.DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.10.017.
LIANG S G, LIU S C, LI Q S, et al. Mathematical model of acrosswind dynamic loads on rectangular tall buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12-15): 1757-1770.DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00285-4.
LANDER D C, LETCHFORD C W, AMITAY M, et al. Influence of the bluff body shear layers on the wake of a square prism in a turbulent flow[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2016, 1(4): 044406.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621