基于广义Richardson外插方法的颤振模拟耦合时间精度研究

王昊; 王运涛; 孟德虹; 王毅

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0051

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于广义Richardson外插方法的颤振模拟耦合时间精度研究

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 基于广义Richardson外插方法的颤振模拟耦合时间精度研究
- On time domain accuracy of flutter simulations based on generalized Richardson extrapolation method
- 空气动力学学报 2021年39卷第2期页码：81-90
- 作者机构：
  
  中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
  
  王昊（1994-），男，山东单县人，硕士，研究方向：计算气动弹性力学. E-mail：wanghao848@qq.com
  孟德虹*，男，副研究员，研究方向：计算空气动力学. E-mail：mdh157@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研究发展计划（2016YFB0200700）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0051
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王昊, 王运涛, 孟德虹, 等. 基于广义Richardson外插方法的颤振模拟耦合时间精度研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(2): 81−90.

WANG Hao, WANG Yuntao, MENG Dehong, et al. On time domain accuracy of flutter simulations based on generalized Richardson extrapolation method[J]. 2021, 39(2): 81-90.
王昊, 王运涛, 孟德虹, 等. 基于广义Richardson外插方法的颤振模拟耦合时间精度研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(2): 81−90. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0051

WANG Hao, WANG Yuntao, MENG Dehong, et al. On time domain accuracy of flutter simulations based on generalized Richardson extrapolation method[J]. 2021, 39(2): 81-90. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0051.

摘要

为更准确地评估颤振问题时域模拟在实际计算中表现出的时间精度，采用不同精度的耦合方法对Isogai Wing和AGARD 445.6 Wing的颤振问题进行时域模拟。参照网格收敛性分析方法，提出了基于广义Richardson外插方法的颤振问题时域模拟耦合时间精度分析方法，分析时域计算结果的时间步长收敛性，计算数值模拟结果时间精度并获得时间步长无关解。分析表明，对于Isogai Wing和AGARD 445.6 Wing颤振问题，计算结果具有良好的时间收敛性，采用广义Richardson外插方法对各耦合方法分析所得精度与理论分析结果基本一致。在合适的时间步长区间内，可忽略具体时间步长选取对广义Richardson外插方法分析结果的影响，验证了提出的气动弹性模拟耦合时间精度分析方法。

Abstract

To evaluate the time domain accuracy of flutter simulations

three coupling methods

i.e.

loose coupling method

improved loose coupling method and tight coupling method

are used to simulate Isogai Wing and AGARD 445.6 Wing models fluttering in the time domain. In analogy to the grid convergence analysis

a time accuracy analysis approach based on the generalized Richardson extrapolation method for time domain flutter simulations is proposed

with which the time convergence and accuracy analysis of flutter boundary simulations in the time domain is performed

and the time discretization independent result is obtained. The analysis shows that time domain simulation results of both Isogai Wing and AGARD 445.6 Wing flutter have good time convergence. The time accuracy obtained by generalized Richardson extrapolation method is basically consistent with that of the theoretical analysis. Within an appropriate time step range

the influence of time step selection for the analysis can be neglected. The present study suggests that it is feasible to establish a time accuracy analysis method based on the generalized Richardson extrapolation method for flutter simulations in the time domain.

关键词

Keywords

references

DENG X G, ZONG W G, ZHANG L P, et al. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(2): 279-288. (in Chinese).

AIAA. Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations: AIAA G-077-1998[S]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Strandards Department, 1998: 1-29.

RICHARDSON L F. IX. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 1911, 210(459-470): 307-357.DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1911.0009.

RICHARDSON L F, ARTHUR GAUNT J. VIII. The deferred approach to the limit[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 1927, 226(636-646): 299-361.DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1927.0008.

ROACHE P J, KNUPP P M. Completed Richardson extrapolation[J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1993, 9(5): 365-374.DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1640090502.

Celik I, Ghia U, Roache P J, et al. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(7): 078001.

ROACHE P J. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1994, 116(3): 405-413.DOI: 10.1115/1.2910291.

SUN Y, HUANG Y, WANG Y T, et al. Development and precision validation of static aeroelastic computational module on flow solver TRIP[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(5): 620-624. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0154.

WANG Y T, MENG D H, SUN Y, et al. Software development of ultra-scale numerical simulaiton for aero-elastic problem(2017)[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6): 1019-1026. (in Chinese).

WANG Y T, WANG G X, ZHANG Y L. Numerical simulation of DPW Ⅲ wing and wing-body configurations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(3): 264-269. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2011.03.002.

WANG Y T, ZHANG S J, MENG D H. Numerical simulation and study for DPW4 wing/body/tail[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(6): 739-744. (in Chinese).

LU Z L, GUO T Q, GUAN D. A study of calculation method for transonic flutter[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2004, 25(3): 214-217. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2004.03.002.

GUO T Q. Transonic unsteady aerodynamics and flutter computations for complex assemblies[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006 (in Chinese).

ZHANG W W, LÜ L L, YE Z Y. Improved time-marching technique for solving aeroelastic equations[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2005, 24(5): 118-120. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2005.05.036.

JIANG Y W, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Study of time-marching method for fluid/structure coupling solution based on CFD technique[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2007, 20(4): 396-400. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.16385/j.cnki.issn.1004-4523.2007.04.012.

AN X M, XU M, CHEN S L. Analysis for second order time accurate CFD/CSD coupled algorithms[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 547-552. (in Chinese)DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-1825.2009.05.008.

YANG G W, QIAN W. Numerical analyses of transonic flutter on an aircraft[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2005, 37(6): 769-776. (in Chinese).

YANG G W. Recent progress on computational aeroelasticity[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2009, 39(4): 406-420. (in Chinese).

ISOGAI K. On the transonic-dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(7): 793-795.DOI: 10.2514/3.61226.

ISOGAI K. Transonic dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing. II[J]. AIAA Journal, 1981, 19(9): 1240-1242.DOI: 10.2514/3.7853.

ALONSO J, JAMESON A. Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions[C ] //32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 1994: 1-12.doi: 10.2514/6.1994-56 .

YATES Jr E C. AGARD standard aeroelastic configuration for dynamic response, candidate configuration I.– Wing 445.6: NASA-TM-100492 [R]. NASA, 1987: 1-73.

SILVA W A, CHWALOWSKI P, PERRY B. Evaluation of linear, inviscid, viscous, and reduced-order modelling aeroelastic solutions of the AGARD 445.6 wing using root locus analysis[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2014, 28(3-4): 122-139.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

阻力舵机翼颤振特性仿真与风洞试验

牛角岩平拉索桥风致振动现场调研与分析

飞行器操纵面嗡鸣风洞试验技术综述

机身刚度对双体飞机颤振的影响规律分析

桥梁若干流致振动与卡门涡街