1. 中国航天空气动力技术研究院,北京,100074
2. 中山大学 航空航天学院,广州,510275
3. 中国科学技术大学 工程科学学院,合肥,230026
白鹏(1973-), 男, 研究员, 主要研究方向为空气动力学及新概念飞行器气动总体技术.E-mail:baipengaero@163.com
刘荣健(1985-), 博士生, 工程师, 主要研究方向为飞行器空气动力学.E-mail:hyperfly@126.com
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
白鹏, 陈钱, 徐国武, 刘荣健, 董二宝. 智能可变形飞行器关键技术发展现状及展望[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(3): 426-443.
BAI Peng, CHEN Qian, XU Guowu, et al. Development status of key technologies and expectation about smart morphing aircraft[J]. 2019, 37(3): 426-443.
白鹏, 陈钱, 徐国武, 刘荣健, 董二宝. 智能可变形飞行器关键技术发展现状及展望[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(3): 426-443. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0030.
BAI Peng, CHEN Qian, XU Guowu, et al. Development status of key technologies and expectation about smart morphing aircraft[J]. 2019, 37(3): 426-443. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0030.
智能可变形飞行器是当前航空航天飞行器研究领域的一个热点,是最有可能带来航空航天技术变革,产生颠覆性影响的领域之一,因此受到国内外的广泛关注。本文首先指出飞行器可变形的需求主要来源于如下几个方面,即:1)未来飞行器的飞行空域、速域不断扩大,固定外形可能无法满足不同飞行工况对飞行器气动和飞行性能的需求;2)单架飞行器实现多个飞行使命和任务,可能需要飞行器在执行不同飞行任务时具有不同的气动外形;3)提升现有飞行器的气动总体性能,要求其在各个飞行阶段,通过调整气动外形,使其始终保持优良的气动和飞行性能。介绍了现代意义上的智能可变形飞行器所包含的"变形"和"智能"两方面的含义,其中"变形"是指不同空间尺度(局部、分布、整体)和时间尺度的连续变形,涵盖的范围很宽。按照变形尺度和实现的功能将其划分为三类,即:局部变形(小变形)、分布式变形(中等尺度变形)、整体式变形(大尺度变形)。按照实现方式将其划分为两类:机械式变形和基于智能材料结构的变形。并指出当前这个领域的所谓"智能"基本都限制在智能材料或结构、智能控制等较为单一的领域,距离理想的智能变形有很大差距。本论文的论述重点放在可变形技术所涉及的基础科学问题和关键技术。第二,从1903年人类第一架依靠柔性变形机翼实现控制的莱特兄弟的带动力飞行器起,到20世纪六七十年代以F14为代表的变后掠翼技术,至近些年来在湾流Ⅲ飞机上成功实现飞行演示验证的连续变后缘弯度技术,系统地介绍了可变形飞行器的发展历程。第三,分别从可变形飞行器设计所面临的关键技术和可变形飞行器两大基础科学问题及技术瓶颈问题的角度,系统地介绍了可变形飞行器所面临的关键问题和国内外研究进展。从设计的角度看,主要问题在于:智能可变形飞行器需求分析和概念研究,智能可变形飞行器总体和分系统设计技术。从基础科学问题和瓶颈技术的角度看,主要问题在于两个方面,即:可变形飞行器气动、飞行力学和飞行控制,变形结构、驱动与变形控制。第四,针对智能可变形飞行器的内涵、可变形的技术指标、变形材料与结构以及效费分析等几个方面进行了有益的探讨。最后对智能可变形飞行器技术的未来发展进行了展望,指出智能可变形飞行器技术是螺旋式发展的,一方面需要开展广泛系统的基础理论和关键技术探索研究,从基础做起;另一方面需要从工程化的角度梳理可变形飞行器一类或几类较为明确的背景需求,以牵引该领域的有序快速发展。
Smart morphing aircraft has already been a hot point of the aeronautics and aerospace research
which is one of the most possible domains that should bring the revolutionary influences to the development of the aeronautics and aerospace technologies. At first the necessaries about the smart morphing aircraft are pointed in this paper:1) As the scopes of the altitude and the velocity of future aircrafts increase widely
the conventional rigid configuration may not satisfy the requirements of the aerodynamic and flight characteristics under different flight conditions; 2) For the multiple flight missions and tasks achieved by a single plane
it may be necessary for aircraft to alter the aerodynamic configuration in performing different missions; 3) In order to improve the overall aerodynamic performance of the existing aircraft
it is required to maintain excellent aerodynamic and flight performance through adjusting aerodynamic shape in all flight stages. This paper introduces the meanings of "morphing" and "smart" in the modern sense of smart morphing aircraft
in which "morphing" refers to the continuous deformation of different spatial scales (local
distributed
global) and time scales
covering a wide range. According to the deformation scale and function
it can be divided into three categories:local deformation (small deformation)
distributed deformation (medium-scale deformation)
and integral deformation (large-scale deformation). It can be divided into two types according to the way of realization:mechanical deformation and deformation based on smart material structure. It is also pointed out that the so-called "smart" in this field is basically confined to a single field such as smart materials or structures and intelligent control
which is far from ideal smart morphing. So this paper focuses on the basic scientific issues and key technologies involved in morphing technology. Secondly
from the first Wright Brothers powered aircraft controlled by flexible deformable wings in 1903 to the variable swept wing technology represented by F14 in the 1960s and 1970s
to the successful demonstration of continuous variable rear-edge curvature flight on Gulf Stream Ⅲ aircraft in recent years
the development process of the morphing aircraft is systematically introduced in this paper. Thirdly
the key problems and research progress of morphing aircraft are systematically introduced from the point of view of the key technology and the bottleneck of deformable aircraft design. From the design point of view
the main problems include requirement analysis and conceptual research of the smart morphing aircraft
design technology of overall and subsystem of smart morphing aircraft. From the perspective of basic science and bottleneck technology
the main problems lie in following aspects:aerodynamics
flight dynamics and flight control of morphing aircraft
morphing structure
drive and morphing control. Fourthly
the connotation of smart morphing aircraft
morphing technical indicators
morphing materials and structures
and cost-effectiveness analysis is discussed. Finally
the future development of smart morphing vehicle technologies is prospected
and it is pointed out that smart morphing aircraft technology is spiral development. On the one hand
we need to carry out extensive and systematic research on basic theory and key technology
starting from the foundation; on the other hand
we need to sort out the background requirements of one or several types of morphing aircraft from the engineering point of view
in order to tract the orderly and rapid development of this field.
崔尔杰.近空间飞行器研究发展现状及关键技术问题[J].力学进展, 2009, 39(6):658-667.
崔尔杰, 白鹏, 杨基明.智能变形飞行器的发展之路[J].航空制造技术, 2007, (8):38-41.
BARBARINO S, BILGEN O, AJAJ R M, et al. A review of morphing aircraft[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2011, 22(9):823-877.
RAMRKAHYANI D S, LESIEUTRE G A, FRECKER M I, et al. Aircraft structural morphing using tendon actuated compliant cellular trusses[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(6):1614-1620.
PENDLETON E, GRI N K, KEHOE M, et al. The active aeroelastic wing flight research program[C]//Proceedings of the 37th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. AIAA 98-1972. Long Beach, CA, 1998.
KUDVA J N. Overview of the DARPA smart wing project[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2004, 15(4):261-268.
Bowman J, Sanders B, Cannon B, et al. Development of next generation morphing aircraft structures[C]//48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2007.
LAFLEUR J M, OLDS J R, BRAUN R D. Daedalon: A revolutionary morphing spacecraft design for planetary exploration[R]. AIAA 2005-2771, 2005
CAMBONE S A. Unmanned aircraft systems roadmap 2005-2030[M]. United State, Dept of Defense Office of the Secretary of Denfense, 2005.
KUZMINA S, AMIRYANTS G, SCHWEIGER J, et al. Review and outlook on active and passive aeroelastic design concept for future aircraft[C]//ICAS 2002 CONGRESS.
COOPER J. Smart aircraft morphing technologies[C]//Eurocores S3T Kick-off Meeting. Strasbourg, 2006.
STEPHEN C, BRADFORD A N, TIMOTHY R M. Flight testing the linear aerospike SR-71 experiment(LASRE)[R]. NASA TM 1998-206567, 1998.
COLVILLE J R, LEWIS M J. An aerodynamic redesign of the SR-71 inlet with applications to turbine based combined cycle engines[R]. AIAA 2004-3481, 2004.
张华军, 郭荣伟, 李博. TBCC进气道研究现状及其关键技术[J].空气动力学学报, 2010, 28(5):613-620.
LOIS J WEIR, BOBBY W SANDERS. A new design concept for supersonic axisymmetric inlets[R]. AIAA 2002-3775, 2002.
ALBERTSON C W, SAIED E, TREXLER C A. Mach 4 test results of a dual-flowpath, turbine based combined cycle inlet[R]. AIAA 2006-8138, 2006.
SECANELL M, SULEMAN A, GAMBOA P. Design of a morphing airfoil using aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(7):1550-1562.
BRIAN R, CHRIS P, CROSSLEY W A. Aircraft sizing with morphing as an independent variable: motivation, strategies and investigations[R]. AIAA 2002-5840.
JOSHUA B F, CROSSLEY W A. Enabling continuous optimization for sizing morphing aircraft concepts[R]. AIAA 2005-816.
MAUTE K, REICH G W. An aeroelastic topology optimization approach for adaptive wing design[C]//Collection of Technical Papers-AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2004: 3182-3191.
MAUTE K, REICH G W. Integrated multidisciplinary topology optimization approach to adaptive wing design[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(1):253-263.
BAI P, CHEN Q, LIU X Y, et al. Study on dynamic hysteresis and linear modeling of the sliding-skin variable-sweep morphing wing aerodynamics[C]//ICTAM2012, 2012.
白鹏, 陈钱, 刘欣煜, 等.滑动蒙皮变后掠气动力非定常滞回效应与线性建模[J].力学学报, 2011, 43(6):1020-1029.
NEAL Ⅲ D A, GOOD M, JOHNSTON C, et al. Design and wind-tunnel analysis of a fully adaptive aircraft configuration[R]. AIAA 2004-1727.
NEAL Ⅲ D A, FARMER J, INMAN D. Development of a morphing aircraft model for wind tunnel experimentation[R]. AIAA 2006-2141.
JANISA J H, JULIE E B, DARRYLL J P. Stability analysis for UAVs with a variable aspect ratio wing[R]. AIAA 2005-2044.
HALL J, MOHSENI K, LAWRENCE D. Investigation of variable wing-sweep for applications in micro air vehicles[R]. AIAA 2005-7171.
NEAL D A, GOOD M G, JOHNSTON C O, et al. Design and wind-tunnel analysis of fully adaptive aircraft configuration[R]. AIAA 2004-1727.
蒋增龑, 刘铁中, 何宏伟.提高变体飞机风洞测力试验精度的方法研究[J].实验流体力学, 2016, 30(1):102-106.
WICKENHEISER A M, GARCIA E. Aerodynamic modeling of morphing wings using an extended lifting-line analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(1):10-16.
BOWMAN J, SANDERS M B, WEISSHAAR T. Evaluating the impact of morphing technologies on aircraft performance[R]. AIAA 2002-1631.
SAMAREH J A, CHWALOWSKI P, HORTA L G, et al. Integrated aerodynamic structural dynamic analyses of aircraft with large shape changes[R]. AIAA 2007-2346.
NANGIA R K, PALMER M E. Morphing UCAV wings incorporating in-plane and folded-tips-aerodynamic design studies[R]. AIAA 2006-2835.
CHO J, LEE H, HAN C. Unsteady aerodynamics of dual biofoils[R]. AIAA 2006-2841.
高彦峰.可变形翼型的非定常气动特性研究[D].中国科学技术大学, 2012.
徐国武, 白鹏.翼型连续变形过程中非定常气动特性研究[J].力学季刊, 2012, 2:165-173.
AKHILESH K JHA, JAYANTH N KUDVA. Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications, and challenges[C]//Proceeding of SPIE, 2004: 213-224.
董二宝.智能变形飞行器结构实现机制与若干关键技术研究[D].中国科学技术大学, 2010.
KUDVA J N, SANDERS B, PINKERTON-FLORANCE J, et al. Overview of the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing Phase 2 Program[C]//Proceedings of SPIE, 2001: 383-389.
胡自立.含损伤智能结构的性能表征与细观分析[D].南京航空航天大学, 2003.
尹维龙, 石庆华.变体飞行器蒙皮材料与结构研究综述[J].航空制造技术, 2017, (17):24-29.
VALE J, LAU F, SULEMAN A. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a morphing wing for an experimental UAV[R]. AIAA 2006-7131.
KEIHL M M, BORTOLIN R S, SANDERS B, et al. Mechanical properties of shape memory polymers for morphing aircraft applications[C]//Proceedings of SPIE, 2005: 143-151.
KIKUTA M T. Mechanical properties of candidate materials for morphing wings[D]. Blacksburg, Virginia, 2003.
尹维龙, 孙启建, 张波, 等.形状记忆聚合物在可变形飞行器上的应用[C]//第十五届全国复合材料学术会议论文集, 2008.
邱涛, 何刚.自适应机翼——后缘变弯度机翼结构设计原理初探[C]//航空飞行器发展与空气动力学研讨会会议文集.杭州, 2006.
中国科协学会学术部.智能可变形飞行器发展前景及我们的选择[M]//新观点新学说学术沙龙文集-32[C].北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2010.
李敏, 陈伟民, 贾丽杰.压电驱动器的气动弹性应用[J].航空学报, 2009, 30(12):2301-2310.
陈伟民, 管德, 诸德超, 等.采用分布式压电驱动器升力面的颤振主动抑制[J].力学学报, 2002, 34(5):756-763.
VALASEK J. Morphing aerospace vehicles and structures print[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2013, 36(5):1562-1563.
孙健.基于SMPC蒙皮和主动蜂窝结构的可变形机翼结构研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
赵金涛, 王帮峰, 牟常伟, 等.波纹式结构柔性蒙皮拉伸变形与应变研究[J].中国机械工程, 2010, 21(8):1959-1963.
陈钱, 白鹏, 尹维龙, 等.可连续光滑偏转后缘的变弯度翼型气动特性分析[J].空气动力学学报, 2010, 28(1):46-53.
陈钱, 尹维龙, 白鹏, 等.变后掠变展长翼身组合体系统设计与特性分析[J].航空学报, 2010, 31(3):606-613.
刘欣煜, 白鹏, 王贵东.飞行器变后掠过程中的非定常气动力建模与分析[J].飞行力学, 2014, 32(6):481-484.
LUGER G F.人工智能[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2006.
李开复, 王咏刚.人工智能[M].北京:文化发展出版社, 2017.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621