声爆近场压力测量风洞试验技术研究进展

刘中臣; 钱战森; 冷岩

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0282

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

声爆近场压力测量风洞试验技术研究进展

专栏——声爆研究 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 声爆近场压力测量风洞试验技术研究进展
- Review of recent progress of wind tunnel measurement techniques for off-body sonic boom pressure
- 空气动力学学报 2019年37卷第4期页码：636-645
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国航空工业空气动力研究院,沈阳,110034
  2. 高速高雷诺数气动力航空科技重点实验室,沈阳,110034
- 作者简介：
  
  刘中臣(1987-), 男, 沈阳人, 工程师, 研究方向:声爆试验技术.E-mail:zhongchen_liu@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（11672280）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0282
  中图分类号： V211.7
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘中臣, 钱战森, 冷岩. 声爆近场压力测量风洞试验技术研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 636-645.

LIU Zhongchen, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. Review of recent progress of wind tunnel measurement techniques for off-body sonic boom pressure[J]. 2019, 37(4): 636-645.
刘中臣, 钱战森, 冷岩. 声爆近场压力测量风洞试验技术研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 636-645. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0282.

LIU Zhongchen, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. Review of recent progress of wind tunnel measurement techniques for off-body sonic boom pressure[J]. 2019, 37(4): 636-645. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0282.

摘要

声爆是超声速民用飞机研制的关键问题之一，风洞试验作为开展声爆研究必不可少的技术手段具有重要研究意义。简要介绍了声爆风洞试验的特点与难点，分析了声爆风洞试验技术的发展趋势。按照空间压力测量装置的不同，将试验技术归纳为测压板、静压探针、测压轨、无反射测压轨等四类空间压力测量技术。重点针对基于无反射测压轨的空间压力精确测量技术和数据修正技术进行了总结与分析。无反射测压轨具有试验效率高、测量精度高、可有效降低流场非均匀扰动误差等优点，是声爆近场压力测量技术的重要发展方向。

Abstract

Sonic boom is one of the key issues for supersonic civil aircraft. Wind tunnel

as a necessary research facility

is of great significance for sonic boom research. The characteristics and difficulties of wind tunnel test of off-body sonic boom pressure are analyzed

and the recent progress is reviewed. The spatial pressure measurement devices can be categorized as four classes

including pressure measurement plate

pressure measurement probe

pressure measurement rail

and non-reflection pressure measurement rail. The non-reflection pressure measurement rail is summarized and analyzed. It has become the most important one for wind tunnel test of off-body sonic boom pressure

due to its high test efficiency

high measurement accuracy

and effective reduction of non-uniform disturbance distortion of wind tunnel flow field.

关键词

Keywords

references

LEATHERWOOD J D, SULLIVAN B M, SHEPHERD K P, et al. Summary of recent NASA studies of human response to sonic booms[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 586 (2002).

ZHU Z Q, WU Z C, CHEN Y C, et al. Advanced technology of aerodynamic design for commercial aircraft[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2013.

ZHU Z Q, LAN S L. Study of supersonic commercial transport and reduction of sonic boom[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(8):2507-2528.

MAGLIERI D J, BOBBITT P J, Plotkin K J, et al. Sonic boom six decades of research[R]. NASA/SP-2014-622, 2014.

CARLSON H W. An investigation of some aspects of the sonic boom by means of wind-tunnel measurements of pressures about several bodies of revolution at a Mach number of 2.01[R]. NASA TND-161, 1959.

SBROUT B L, MACK R J, DOLLYBIGB S M. A wind-tunnel investigation of sonic-boom pressure distributions of bodies of revolution at Mach 2.96, 3.83, and 4.63[R]. NASA TND-6195, 1971.

MACK R J, DARDEN C M. Wind-tunnel investigation of the validity of a sonic boom minimization concept[R]. NASA TP-1421, 1979.

MAKINO Y, NOGUCHI M. Sonic-boom research activities on unmanned scaled supersonic experimental airplane[R]. AIAA Paper 2003-3574, 2003.

MACK R J. An analysis of measured sonic-boom pressure signatures from aLangley wind-tunnel model of a supersonic-cruise business jet concept[R]. NASA TM-2003-212447, 2003.

GRAHAM D H, DAHLIN J A, PAGE J A, et al. Wind-tunnel validation of shaped sonic boom demonstration aircraft design[J]. AIAA Paper 2005-0007, 2005.

BOBBITT P J, DARDEN C M. A wedge-shaped supersonic flow field probe[R]. NASA CP-10133, Ⅱ: 379-398, 1993.

DURSTON D A, CLIFF S E, WAYMAN T R, et al. Near field sonic boom test on two low-boom configurations using multiple measurement techniques at NASA Ames[R]. AIAA Paper 2011-3333, 2011.

CLIFF S, ELMILIGGUI A, AFTOSMIS M, et al. Design and evaluation of a pressure rail for sonic boom measurement in wind tunnels[C]. Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), BigIsland, Hawaii, July 9-13, 2012.

MORGENSTERN J M. How to accurately measure low sonic boom or model surface pressures in supersonic wind tunnels[R]. AIAA 2012-3215, 2012.

FURUKAWA T, MAKINO Y, NOGUCHI M, et al. Supporting system study of wind-tunnel models for validation of aft-sonic-boom shaping design[R]. AIAA 2008-6596, 2008.

KISELEVA T, KOSINOV A, ERMOLAEV Y, et al. Modeling of sonic boom phenomena[C]. Proceeding of the International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science and Technology (HiSST), Moscow, Nov. 25th-29th, 2018.

PRITULO T, CHENEYSHEV S, IVANOV A, et al. Development of the technique of sonic boom experimental researches[C]. Proceeding of the International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science and Technology (HiSST), Moscow, Nov. 25th-29th, 2018.

QIAN Z S, YANG X M. Key aerodynamic technologies of high Mach number civil transport[C]. Proceeding of Young Research Conference of the 5th International Forum of Aviation Research, Zhuhai, China, November 8th-11th, 2014.

LIU Z C, QIAN Z S, LENG Y. Research on accurate measurement techniques of pressure distribution in wind tunnel near field sonic boom test[C]. The First Chinese Conference of Aerodynamics. 15-19 August 2018, Mianyang, Sichuan.

LENG Yan, QIANZhansen, LIU Zhongchen. Numerical simulation assistant design of the near-field sonic boom signature measurement system for AVIC ARI's FL-60 wind tunnel[C]. Proceeding of the International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science and Technology (HiSST), Moscow, Nov. 25th-29th, 2018.

WHITHAM G B. The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile[J]. Communications on Pure Applied Mathematics, 1953, 1:301-348.

WHITHAM G B. On the propagation of weak shock waves[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1965, 1:290-318.

EDGE P M, HUBBARD HH. Review of sonic-boom simulation devices and techniques[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972, 51:722-728.

CARLSON H W, MORRIS O A. Wind-tunnel sonic-boom testing techniques[J]. Journal of Aircraft. 1967, 4(3):245-249.

MACK R J, KUHN N S. Determination of an extrapolation distance with pressure signatures measured at two to twenty span lengths from two low-boom models[R]. NASA TM-2006-214524, 2006.

CLIFF S E, DURSTON D A, ELMILIGUI AA, et al. Computational and experimental assessment of models for the first AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[R]. AIAA 2014-0560, 2014.

Park M A, Morgensterny J M. Summary and statistical analysis of the first AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[J]. AIAA Paper 2014-2006, 2014.

MORGENSTERN J M. Measurements supporting the 2014 first sonic boom workshop prediction cases[R]. AIAA 2014-2007, 2014.

PARK M A, NEMEC M. Near field summary and statistical analysis of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[R]. AIAA 2017-3256, 2017.

RALLABHANDI S K, LOUBEAU A. Summary of propagation cases of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[R]. AIAA 2017-3257, 2017.

FERRI A, WANGHuaichu. Observations of problems related to experimental determination of sonic boom[R]. NASA SP-255, 1970..

HICKS R M, MENDOZA J P, THOMAS C L. Pressure signatures for the Apollo command module and the Saturn V launch vehicle with a discussion of the strong shock extrapolation procedures[R]. NASA TMX-62117, 1972.

HICKS R M, MENDOZA J P. A brief study of the space shuttle sonic boom during ascent[R]. NASA TMX-62050]. 1971.

WAYMAN T R, WAITHE K A, HOWE D C, et al. Near field acoustic test on a low boom configuration inLangley's 4×4 Wind Tunnel[R]. AIAA Paper 2011-3331, 2011.

JACKSON C M, Jr, Corlett W A, et al. Description and calibration of the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel[R]. NASA TP 1905, 1981.

CARLSON H W. An investigation of the influence of lift on sonic boom intensity by means of wind-tunnel measurements of the pressure fields of several wing-body combinations at a Mach number of 2.01[R]. NASA TND-881, 1961.

CARLSON H W. Measurements of the flow properties in the vicinity of three wing-fuselage combinations at Mach numbers of 1.61 and 2.01[R]. NASA TMX-64, 1967.

PUTNAM L E, CAPONE F J. Experimental determination of equivalent solid bodies to represent jets exhausting into a Mach 2.24 external stream[R]. NASA TND-5553, 1969.

BOBBITT P J, MAGLIERI D J, BANKS D W, et al. Wind-tunnel and flight-test results for the measurements of flow variables at supersonic speeds using improved wedge and conical probes[R]. NASA TM-2012-216004, 2012.

MORGENSTERN J M. Distortion correction for low sonic boom measurement in wind tunnels[R]. AIAA 2012-3216, 2012.

FURUKAWA T, MAKINO Y, NOGUCHI M, et al. Supporting system study of wind-tunnel models for validation of aft-sonic-boom shaping design[R]. AIAA Paper 2008-6596, 2008.

DURSTON D A, ELMILIGUI A A, CLIFF S E, et al. Experimental and computational sonic boom assessment of Boeing N+2 low boom models[R]. AIAA 2014-2140, 2014.

CLIFF S E, Denison M, Moini-Yekta S, et al. Wind tunnel model design for sonic boom studies of nozzle jet flow with shock interactions[R]. AIAA 2016-2035, 2016.

DURSTON D A, CLIFF S E, DENISON M, et al. Nozzle plume/shock interaction sonic boom test results from the NASA Ames 9-by 7-foot supersonic wind tunnel[R]. AIAA 2017-0041, 2017.

SMITH N T, DURSTON D A, HEINECK J T. Retroreflective background-oriented schlieren imaging results from the nasa ames plume-shock interaction test[R]. AIAA 2017-0043, 2017.

SCHAIRER E T, KUSHNER L K, DRAIN B A, et al. Stereo photogrammetry measurements of the position and attitude of a nozzle-plume/shock-wave interaction model in the NASA Ames 9-by 7-Ft supersonic wind tunnel[R]. AIAA 2017-1053, 2017.

WINSKI C S, CARTER M B, ELMILIGUI AA. Computational and experimental study of plume and shock interaction effects on sonic boom in the NASA Ames 9x7 supersonic wind tunnel[R]. AIAA 2018-0331, 2018.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

声爆研究的现状与挑战

阻力舵机翼颤振特性仿真与风洞试验

典型高速飞行器滚转失稳特性研究

典型山体地形下低矮房屋风荷载受周边建筑群干扰效应研究

民用飞机大展弦比大柔性机翼高速静气动弹性载荷风洞试验