CHN-T1标模的数值计算及气动特性研究

李浩然; 李亚坤; 张宇飞; 陈海昕

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0255

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

CHN-T1标模的数值计算及气动特性研究

专栏——CFD验证与确认 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- CHN-T1标模的数值计算及气动特性研究
- Numerical simulation and aerodynamic performance analysis of the standard model CHN-T1
- 空气动力学学报 2019年37卷第2期页码：329-336
- 作者机构：
  
  清华大学航天航空学院,北京,100084
- 作者简介：
  
  李浩然(1995-), 男, 山东东营人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:空气动力学优化设计.E-mail:lihr17@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
  陈海昕(1974-), 男, 湖南隆回人, 教授, 博士生导师, 研究方向:计算流体力学, 空气动力学优化设计, 新概念飞行器布局, 无人机系统研发等.E-mail:chenhaixin@tsinghua.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（11872230，91852108）;清华大学自主科研项目（2015Z22003）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0255
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李浩然, 李亚坤, 张宇飞, 陈海昕. CHN-T1标模的数值计算及气动特性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(2): 329-336.

LI Haoran, LI Yakun, ZHANG Yufei, et al. Numerical simulation and aerodynamic performance analysis of the standard model CHN-T1[J]. 2019, 37(2): 329-336.
李浩然, 李亚坤, 张宇飞, 陈海昕. CHN-T1标模的数值计算及气动特性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(2): 329-336. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0255.

LI Haoran, LI Yakun, ZHANG Yufei, et al. Numerical simulation and aerodynamic performance analysis of the standard model CHN-T1[J]. 2019, 37(2): 329-336. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0255.

摘要

基于"第一届CHN-T1标模CFD可信度研讨会"的相关计算安排，采用CFL3D求解器结合组委会提供的结构网格进行CHN-T1标模的气动特性计算。对比发现CFL3D求解器的SST湍流模式相对SA模式具有更好的网格收敛性。对标模的抖振特性进行了分析，发现抖振起源于机翼中段的激波/边界层干扰，进入抖振状态后当迎角继续增大，激波将持续增强，同时外翼段的后加载减小，使得低头力矩下降，操纵特性变差。对静气弹效应进行了分析，发现该效应主要影响了变形较大位置的升力系数以及激波强度。大雷诺数下机翼截面压力分布后加载包围的面积增大，机翼上表面超声速区的吸力平台有所下降。

Abstract

Based on the computational tasks of the "1

Aeronautics CFD Credibility Workshop (AeCW-1)"

the aerodynamic performance analysis of the standard model CHN-T1 is evaluated using the provided structured grid and CFL3D flow solver. The grid convergence results show that the SST turbulence model has better performance than the SA model. The buffet study shows that the interference of shock wave/boundary layer appears from the middle of the wing span

and the shock wave continues to increase its strength with increasing angle of attack. The aft loading decreases rapidly in buffet state

which causes the deterioration of control performance. The elastic deformation mainly effects the strength of shock wave and lift

distribution in span direction. Under the condition of large Reynolds number

the aft loading area of the pressure coefficient increases

and the suction platform of pressure coefficient decreases

leading to a low drag coefficient.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG Y T, WANG G X, ZHANF Y L. Drag prediction of DLR-F6 configuration with TRIP2.0 software[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(01):108-113. (in Chinese)

WANG Z, JIANG C, GAO Z, et al. Prediction for the separation length of two-dimensional sonic injection with high-speed crossflow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(3):1-16.

ZHANG Y, CHEN H, WANG M, et al. Aeroacoustic prediction of a multi-element airfoil using wall-modeled large-eddy simulation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(1):1-15.

DENG X G, ZONG W G, ZHANG L P, et al. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007(02):279-288. (in Chinese)

STAF A A. AIAA guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations[M]. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998.

HAASE W, CHAPUT E, LESCHZINER M A. ECARP-European computational aerodynamics research project: validation of CFD codes and assessment of turbulence models[R]. Vieweg Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Germany, 1997.

TINOCO E N, BRODERSEN O P, KEYE S, et al. Summary data from the sixth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop:CRM Cases[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2017(4):1-28.

ZHAO T. Aerodynamic optimization design of supercritical wing based on structure weight/deformation performance[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016: 88-90. (in Chinese)

YU Y G, ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, et al. Aerodynamic design of a standard model CHN-T1 for single-aisle passenger aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3):505-513. (in Chinese)

LI W, WANG Y T, HONG J W, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics simulation of CHN-T1 model with TRIP3.0[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):272-279. (in Chinese)

Roe P. Approximate Riemannsolvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational physics, 1981, 43(02):357-372. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5

MENTER F, RUMSEY C. Assessment of two-equation turbulence models for transonic flows[R ] . AIAA-94-2343, 1994. doi: 10.2514/6.1994-2343

SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flo ws[R ] . AIAA-92-0439, 1992. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-439

ZHANG Y B, DENG Y Q, WU X J, et al. Drag prediction of DLR-F6 using MFlow unstructured mesh solver[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(2):163-169. (in Chinese)

MU R K, YANG Y N. Advances of studies for the buffet problem of aircraft[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2001, 18(z1):142-150. (in Chinese)

KENWAY G K W, MARTINS J R R A. Buffet-onset constraint Formulation for aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(6):1-18.

LI Q, LIU D, XU X, et al. Experimental study of aerodynamic characteristic of CHN-T1 standard model in 2.4m transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):337-344. (in Chinese)

顾诵芬, 吴兴世, 杨新军.运输类飞机的空气动力学设计[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2010:332.

DENG Y M. Research on integrating method of propulsion/airframe integration[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2017: 20-22. (in Chinese)

ZHANG P H, ZHOU N C, DENG Y Q, et al. The effects of Reynolds number on airplane aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(6):693-698. (in Chinese)

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

雷诺数对机翼尾缘噪声的影响

安装效应对螺旋桨纯音噪声的影响

类HyTRV升力体阻尼/交叉动导数特性分析

基于LBM方法的LAGOON起落架噪声预测与降噪方法研究

风扇叶片颗粒侵蚀特性的多因素分析与模拟