跨声速嗡鸣诱发机理及其失稳参数研究

高传强; 张伟伟

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0204

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

跨声速嗡鸣诱发机理及其失稳参数研究

专栏——首届中国空气动力学大会青年优秀论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 跨声速嗡鸣诱发机理及其失稳参数研究
- Study on the mechansim and instability parameters of transonic buzz
- 空气动力学学报 2019年37卷第1期页码：99-106
- 作者机构：
  
  西北工业大学航空学院,陕西,西安,710072
- 作者简介：
  
  高传强(1988-), 男, 博士后, 主要从事气动弹性力学研究.E-mail:gaocq@nwpu.edu.cn
  张伟伟(1979-), 男, 教授、博导, 主要从事流体力学/气动弹性力学研究.E-mail:aeroelastic@nwpu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金优秀科学青年基金（11622220）;博士后创新人才支持计划（BX20180258）;高等学校创新引智计划资助（B17037）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0204
  中图分类号： O354;V211.5
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高传强, 张伟伟. 跨声速嗡鸣诱发机理及其失稳参数研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(1): 99-106.

GAO Chuanqiang, ZHANG Weiwei. Study on the mechansim and instability parameters of transonic buzz[J]. 2019, 37(1): 99-106.
高传强, 张伟伟. 跨声速嗡鸣诱发机理及其失稳参数研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(1): 99-106. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0204.

GAO Chuanqiang, ZHANG Weiwei. Study on the mechansim and instability parameters of transonic buzz[J]. 2019, 37(1): 99-106. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0204.

摘要

跨声速嗡鸣问题是现代飞行器设计和使用过程中的拦路虎，会造成操纵面的损坏或严重变形。目前嗡鸣研究的局限在于缺乏预测嗡鸣触发参数范围的有效方法，难以指导工程实践。本文通过基于ROM的气动弹性分析模型和CFD/CSD时域仿真方法，研究了三种类型嗡鸣的触发条件及其参数的物理意义。相关结果表明，三种嗡鸣本质都是亚稳定的流动模态和结构模态耦合诱发结构失稳。降阶模型进一步揭示嗡鸣的触发要求流动的稳定裕量足够低（往往在抖振边界附近），同时结构频率在开环伯德图的零极点频率之间。该研究有助于对嗡鸣物理更深入的理解以及提出新的嗡鸣抑制方法。

Abstract

Transonic control surface buzz is an obstacle in the designing and using processes of modern aircraft

which can cause damages or serious deformation of the control surface. The limitation of previous investigations on transonic buzz is that they failed to predict the instability boundaries

which are key parameters to aircraft designers. In this paper

towards the typical buzz cases (A/B/C types)

the inducing flow and structure conditions as well as the physical meaning of these parameters are studied by using the ROM-based aeroelastic analysis model and CFD/CSD time domain simulation method. Relevant results show that these buzzes are all the result of the instability on the structural branch owing to the coupling effect between the least-stable fluid mode and the structural mode. The eigenvalue analysis further reveals that the occurrence of transonic buzz requires the followings:(i) the stability margin of the flow is low enough (often near transonic buffet onset and offset conditions); (ii) the structural frequency is between those of zero-pole points of the open-loop Bode graph. This study helps to understand the physics and to propose new suppression methods for transonic buzz.

关键词

Keywords

references

ERICKSON A L, STEPHENSON J D. A suggested method of analyzing for transonic flutter of control surfaces based on available experimental evidence[R]. Technical Report Archive Image Library, NACA RM A7F30, 1947.

DOWELL E H. Some recent advances in nonlinear aeroelasticity: fluid-structure interaction in 21st century[R]. AIAA-2010-3137.

LAMBOURNE N C. Control-surface buzz[R]. In: HM Stationery Office, Reports and Memoranda No. 3364, 1964.

TIJDEMAN H. Investigations of the transonic flow around oscillating airfoils[D]. Technische Hogeschool Delft, 1977.

LANG J. A model for the dynamics of a separation bubble used to analyze control-surface buzz and dynamic stall[C]//8th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference. 1975.

NIXON D. An analytic model for control surface buzz[R]. AIAA-98-0417, 1998.

OBAYASHI S, GURUSWAMY G P. Navier-Stokes computations for oscillating control surfaces[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(3):631-636.

STEGER J L, BAILEY H E. Calculation of transonic aileron buzz[J]. AIAA Journal, 1980, 18(3):249-255.

RAMPURAWALA A, BADCOCK K J. Evaluation of a simplified grid treatment for oscillating trailing-edge control surfaces[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44:1177-1188.

YANG G, OBAYASHI S, NAKAMICHI J. Aileron buzz simulation using an implicit multiblock aeroelastic solver[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(40):580-589.

DAI J, LIU Q G. Calculation of transonic control surface buzz[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1997, 15(3):366-371. (in Chinese)

SHI A M, YANG Y N, YE Z Y. Investigation of two aeroelasticity problems in transonic flow[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2005, 23(4):414-418. (in Chinese)

ZHANG W W, YE Z Y, SHI A M, et al. Numerical analysis for B-type buzz and C-type buzz based on Euler codes[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2005, 18(4):458-464. (in Chinese)

GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, LIU Y L, et al. Numerical study on the correlation of transonic single-degree-of-freedom flutter and buffet[J]. Science China Physics Mechanics Astronomy, 2015, 58(8):1-12.

GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. A new viewpoint on the mechanism of transonic single-degree-of-freedom flutter[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 52, 144-156.

ZHANG W W, JANG Y W, YE Z Y. Two better loosely coupled simulation algorithms of CFD based aeroelastic simulation[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 1(4):253-262.

GAO C, ZHANG W, LI X, et al. Mechanism of frequency lock-in in transonic buffeting flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 818:528-561.

KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. Dynamic mode decomposition and its applications in fluid dynamics[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2):163-179. (in Chinese)

GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Reduction of transonic buffet onset for a wing with activated elasticity[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77:670-676.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

飞行器操纵面嗡鸣风洞试验技术综述

翼型激波抖振的无模型自适应控制

特殊大气环境下格尼襟翼的气动特性

类HyTRV升力体阻尼/交叉动导数特性分析

风扇叶片颗粒侵蚀特性的多因素分析与模拟