基于非结构网格求解器的CHN-T1标模气动特性计算研究

许晨舟; 乔建领; 聂晗; 汪远; 宋敏华; 张阳; 韩忠华; 宋文萍

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0198

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于非结构网格求解器的CHN-T1标模气动特性计算研究

专栏——CFD验证与确认 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 基于非结构网格求解器的CHN-T1标模气动特性计算研究
- Numerical investigation on aerodynamic performance of a standard model CHN-T1 using an unstructured flow solver
- 空气动力学学报 2019年37卷第2期页码：291-300
- 作者机构：
  
  西北工业大学航空学院气动与多学科优化设计研究所翼型、叶栅空气动力学重点实验室,西安,710072
- 作者简介：
  
  许晨舟(1994-), 男, 江苏无锡人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:计算流体力学, 代理优化算法, 基于代理模型的多目标优化方法.E-mail:xucz@mail.nwpu.edu.cn
  韩忠华, 男, 教授/博导, E-mail:hanzh@nwpu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（11772261）;航空科学基金项目（2016ZA53011）;CFD前沿技术项目（2015-F-016）
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0198
  中图分类号： V211.3
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
许晨舟, 乔建领, 聂晗, 汪远, 宋敏华, 张阳, 韩忠华, 宋文萍. 基于非结构网格求解器的CHN-T1标模气动特性计算研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(2): 291-300.

XU Chenzhou, QIAO Jianling, NIE Han, et al. Numerical investigation on aerodynamic performance of a standard model CHN-T1 using an unstructured flow solver[J]. 2019, 37(2): 291-300.
许晨舟, 乔建领, 聂晗, 汪远, 宋敏华, 张阳, 韩忠华, 宋文萍. 基于非结构网格求解器的CHN-T1标模气动特性计算研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(2): 291-300. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0198.

XU Chenzhou, QIAO Jianling, NIE Han, et al. Numerical investigation on aerodynamic performance of a standard model CHN-T1 using an unstructured flow solver[J]. 2019, 37(2): 291-300. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0198.

摘要

高可信度计算流体力学（CFD）技术在大型运输机精细化气动设计中发挥着越来越重要的作用。虽然目前基于RANS方程的数值模拟技术已经应用于大型运输机复杂外形的气动性能计算与分析中，但其可信度仍需进一步确认。针对AeCW-1组委会发布的CHN-T1运输机标模，采用基于RANS方程的非结构网格求解器TNS进行了气动性能计算，并与组委会提供的风洞试验结果进行了对比。此外，还研究了网格量和湍流模型等因素对巡航气动特性计算结果的影响，以及支撑干扰和静气弹变形对跨声速抖振特性的影响。结果表明，TNS预测的巡航升阻比及跨声速抖振特性等气动性能与试验值吻合良好，计算结果完全位于试验值误差带内，验证了所采用的非结构网格求解器在大型运输机复杂外形气动力预测中的可靠性。

Abstract

Nowadays

high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology plays an increasingly important role in aerodynamic shape design and large transport aircraft optimization. Despite the wide application of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) flow solvers to aerodynamic performance analysis for complex aircraft configurations in transonic flows

there is still a strong need to verify these solvers. An unstructured RANS solver TNS is used to predict both the cruise performance and buffeting-characteristics of a standard transport model CHN-T1

which is released by the 1st aeronautics CFD credibility workshop (AeCW-1) organizing committee. The computed results are compared with the wind-tunnel experimental data. The influence of mesh size and turbulence model on the cruising performance prediction is studied and the effects of support interference

and static aeroelastic deformation on the buffeting characteristics computation are analyzed. The results show that the predicted aerodynamic performance including lift-to-drag ratio at the cruising condition is in very good agreement with experimental data

with all the values located within the error bar of experimental data. This good agreement indicates the reliability and accuracy of the TNS solver for the design and aerodynamic performance analysis of large transport aircrafts.

关键词

Keywords

references

GAO Z H, WANG C. Aerodynamic shape design methods for aircraft:status and trends[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4):516-528. (in Chinese)

XIONG J T, QIAO Z D, HAN Z H. Aerodynamic optimization design of transonic airfoil and wing based on Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25(1):29-33. (in Chinese)

WANG Y T. An overview of DPW Ⅳ~DPW Ⅳ numerical simulation technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(4):021836. (in Chinese)

WANG Y T. An overview of HiLiftPW-1 to HiLiftPW-3 numerical simulation technologies[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(7):021997. (in Chinese)

WANG Y T, SUN Y, WANG G X, et al. High-order accuracy numerical simulation of DLR-F6 wing-body configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9):2923-2929. (in Chinese)

WANG Y T, MENG D H, SUN Y, et al. High-order accuracy numerical simulation of DLR-F6/FX2B wing-body configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(2):484-490. (in Chinese)

SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD Vision 2030 Study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences: NASA/CR-2014-218178[R]. Washington, D C: NASA, 2014.

WANG G, YE Z Y. Generation of three dimensional mixed and unstructured grids and its application in solving Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2003, 24(5):385-390. (in Chinese)

ROY C J. Summary of data from the Sixth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop: Case 1 code verification[C]. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, AIAA 2017-1206.

ABDOL-HAMID K S, CARLSON J, RUMSEY C L, et al. DPW-6results using FUN3D with focus on k-kL-MEAH2015 turbulence model[C]. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, AIAA 2017-0962.

MICHAL T R, BABCOCK D, KAMENETSKIY D S, et al. Comparison of fixed and adaptive unstructured grid results for drag prediction workshop 6[C]. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, AIAA 2017-0961.

TINOCO E N, BRODERSEN O, KEYE S, et al. Summary of data from the sixth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop: CRM Cases 2 to 5[C]. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, AIAA 2017-1208.

DERLAGA J M, MORRISON J H. Statistical analysis of CFD solutions from the sixth AIAA drag prediction workshop[C]. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, AIAA 2017-1209.

SLOTNICK J, HANNON J, CHAFFIN M. Overview of the 1st AIAA CFD high lift prediction workshop[C]. AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2013.

BALIN R, JANSENK E. A comparison of RANS, URANS, and DDES for high lift systems from HiLiftPW-3[C]. 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2018-1254.

ELIASSON P, CATALANO P, PAPE M C L, et al. Improved CFD predictions for high lift flows in the European project EUROLIFT Ⅱ[C]. 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, DLR, AIAA 2007-4303.

YU Y G, ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, et al. Aerodynamic design of a standard model CHN-T1 for single-aisle passenger aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3):505-513. (in Chinese)

LI Q, LIU D, XU X, et al. Experimental study of aerodynamic characteristic of CHN-T1 standard model in 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):337-344. (in Chinese)

WANG N H, CHANG X H, ZHAO Z, et al. Aerodynamic performance prediction and credibility study of the transport model CHN-T1 based on HyperFLOW solver[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):301-309. (in Chinese)

ZHANG Y B, TANG J, CHEN J T, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics prediction of CHN-T1 standard model with unstructured grid[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):262-271. (in Chinese)

LI W, WANG Y T, Hong J W, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics simulation of CHN-T1 model with TRIP3.0[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):272-279. (in Chinese)

ECIBINIB T D, PALACIOS F, COPELAND S R, et al. SU2:An open-source suife for multiphysics simulation and design[J]. AIAA J, 2015, 54(3):1-19.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于NURBS曲线的任意圆心角度叶型前尾缘构造

挡风墙距离影响高速列车气动性能LES研究

大型运输类飞机设计中雷诺数效应问题研究进展

一种仿生蜻蜓式垂直起降喷管的流动特性分析及优化设计

桨叶数目对对转螺旋桨气动和噪声特性的影响