低温风洞自抗扰控制研究

刘为杰; 何帆; 杨国超

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0160

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

低温风洞自抗扰控制研究

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 低温风洞自抗扰控制研究
- Active disturbance rejection control for cryogenic wind tunnels
- 空气动力学学报 2020年38卷第5期页码：866-873
- 作者机构：
  
  中国空气动力研究与发展中心高速空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
- 作者简介：
  
  刘为杰(1989-), 男, 安徽六安人, 硕士研究生, 工程师, 研究方向:风洞控制系统设计.E-mail:15000160275@163.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0160
  中图分类号： V211.74
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘为杰, 何帆, 杨国超. 低温风洞自抗扰控制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 866-873.

LIU Weijie, HE Fan, YANG Guochao. Active disturbance rejection control for cryogenic wind tunnels[J]. 2020, 38(5): 866-873.
刘为杰, 何帆, 杨国超. 低温风洞自抗扰控制研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(5): 866-873. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0160.

LIU Weijie, HE Fan, YANG Guochao. Active disturbance rejection control for cryogenic wind tunnels[J]. 2020, 38(5): 866-873. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0160.

摘要

低温风洞总温、总压和马赫数三者之间具有强耦合，流场容易受到干扰，并且流场的精确数学模型难以获得，这些给高性能的流场控制器的设计带来了困难。自抗扰控制具有不依赖被控对象精确模型、抗干扰能力强、算法简单便于工程应用等优点。为此，本文基于自抗扰控制原理设计了低温风洞流场控制策略。采用自抗扰控制，将总温、总压和马赫数三个通道之间的耦合、流场建模误差、系统的参数摄动和外界干扰等视为总干扰，通过扩张状态观测器将总干扰估算出来并进行前馈补偿，一方面实现总温、总压和马赫数的解耦控制，另一方面提高流场的抗干扰能力。研究以NASA 0.3 m TCT风洞为对象，在Matlab/Simulink平台上搭建该风洞流场自抗扰控制模型，并进行了仿真分析。结果表明：自抗扰控制能够很好地实现总温、总压和马赫数的解耦控制，在系统参数具有较大摄动的情况下仍然能够保持良好的控制性能，表现出了良好的抗干扰能力。

Abstract

It is strong coupling between the total temperature

Mach number and stagnation pressure in cryogenic wind tunnel. Moreover

the flow filed is susceptible to external interference and its accurate mathematical model is difficult to be obtained. Thus it is difficult to design a high performance flow filed controller for the cryogenic wind tunnel. The active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) has some advantages

such as not relying on the accurate mathematical model

strong anti-interference ability

simple algorithm for engineering applications and so on. So a flow control strategy for the cryogenic wind tunnel is designed based on the ADRC theory. According to the principle of the ADRC

all the coupling between the total temperature

total pressure and Mach number

the modelling errors

the parameter perturbation of the flow field

and the external disturbance etc

can be regarded as total disturbance. The total disturbance is estimated by a extended state observer (ESO) and compensated by a feed-forward control. On the one hand

the decoupling control of the total temperature

total pressure and Mach number is realized; on the other hand

the anti-interference ability of the flow field is improved. Taking NASA 0.3m TCT wind tunnel as the research object

the flow field ADRC control model was built on Matlab/Simulink platform for simulation analysis. The results show that the ADRC can achieve good decoupling control of the total temperature

total pressure and Mach number

maintain good control performance under the condition of large perturbation of system parameters

and show good anti-interference ability.

关键词

Keywords

references

LIAO D X, HUANG Z L, CHEN Z H, et al. Review on large-scale cryogenic wind tunnel and key technologies[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 28(2):1-6, 20. (in Chinese)

THIBODEAUX J J, BALAKRISHNA S. Automatic control of a 0. 3 m cryogenic test facility[J ] . Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1981, 4(4): 428-432. doi: 10.2514/3.56095

BALAKRISHNA S, GOGLIA G L. Automatic control of a liquid nitrogen cooled, closed-circuit, cryogenic pressure tunnel: NASA-CR-162636[R]. United States: NASA, 1980.

BALAKRISHNA S, GOGLIA G L. Synthesis of a control model for a liquid nitrogen cooled, closed circuit, cryogenic nitrogen wind tunnel and its validation: NASA-CR-162508[R]. United States: NASA, 1979.

BALAKRISHNA S, KILGORE W, THIBODEAUX J. Control of large cryogenic tunnels[C ] //28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Nashville, TN. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1992. doi: 10.2514/6.1992-3930

GOBERT J. ETW control system: Design and first results[C ] //25th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Colorado Springs, CO. Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1994. doi: 10.2514/6.1994-2514

ZHU R S, YIN G F, TANG G S, et al. Temperature trajectory control of cryogenic wind tunnel with robust L1 adaptive control[J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2018, 40(13):3675-3689. doi:10. 1177/0142331217728569

HAN J Q. From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3):900-906. doi:10. 1109/TIE. 2008. 2011621

GAO Z Q. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning[C ] //Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003, Denver, CO, USA. IEEE, 2003: 4989-4996. doi: 10.1109/ACC.2003.1242516

CHENG Y, CHEN Z Q, SUN M W, et al. Multivariable inverted decoupling active disturbance rejection control and its application to a distillation column process[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(6):1080-1088. (in Chinese)

XUE H W, WU A G, DONG N. Active disturbance rejection decoupling control for refrigeration systems[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(9):85-90. (in Chinese)

ZHAO C Z. Capability of ADRC for minimum-phase plants with unknown orders and uncertain relative degrees[C]//Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, Beijing, China. IEEE, 2010: 6121-6126.

ZHAO C Z, LI D H. Control design for the SISO system with the unknown order and the unknown relative degree[J]. ISA Transactions, 2014, 53(4):858-872. doi:10. 1016/j.isatra. 2013. 10. 001

ZHAO S, GAO Z Q. Active disturbance rejection control for non-minimum phase systems[C]//Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, Beijing, China. IEEE, 2010: 6066-6070.

TAN W, FU C F. Analysis of active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay[C ] //2015 American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, IL, USA. IEEE, 2015: 3962-3967. doi: 10.1109/ACC.2015.7171948

DONG L, EDWARDS J. Active disturbance rejection control for an electrostatically actuated MEMS device[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, 2011, 16(3):160-169.

YUAN D, MA X J, ZENG Q H, et al. Research on frequency-band characteristics and parameters configuration of linear active disturbance rejection control for second-order systems[J]. Control Theory Applications, 2013, 30(12):1630-1640. (in Chinese)

ZHANG J H, ZHANG W A. Linear active disturbance rejection control to magnetic levitation ball system and parameters tuning[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2017, 37(8):1741-1756. (in Chinese)

ZHENG Q L, GAO Z Q. Predictive active disturbance rejection control for processes with delay[C]//32nd Chinese Control Conference, 2013: 4108-4113.

ZHAO S, GAO Z Q. Modified active disturbance rejection control for time-delay systems[J]. ISA Transactions, 2014, 53(4):882-888. doi:10. 1016/j.isatra. 2013. 09. 013

LIANG Q, WANG C B, PAN J W, et al. Parameter identification of b 0 and parameter tuning law in linear active disturbance rejection control[J ] . Control and Decision, 2015, 30(9):1691-1695. (in Chinese)

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

离心通风机降噪研究进展

热防护材料动态烧蚀形貌结构光视觉测量技术

交错型CPR方法的保正实现策略及其对比研究

大展弦比飞行器突风响应数值计算

基于LBM方法的LAGOON起落架噪声预测与降噪方法研究