武汉理工大学 道路桥梁与结构工程湖北省重点实验室,武汉,430070
吉柏锋(1982-), 男, 河南洛阳人, 博士, 副研究员, 主要从事结构风工程研究.E-mail:jbfeng@whut.edu.cn
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
吉柏锋, 柳广义, 尹旭, 瞿伟廉. 地面粗糙度对下击暴流风剖面特征影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(3): 393-399.
JI Baifeng, LIU Guangyi, YIN Xu, et al. Effects of terrain roughness on downburst wind profile characteristics[J]. 2019, 37(3): 393-399.
吉柏锋, 柳广义, 尹旭, 瞿伟廉. 地面粗糙度对下击暴流风剖面特征影响[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(3): 393-399. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0117.
JI Baifeng, LIU Guangyi, YIN Xu, et al. Effects of terrain roughness on downburst wind profile characteristics[J]. 2019, 37(3): 393-399. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0117.
地面粗糙度是大气边界层中反映下垫面形态的重要指标,也是影响近地风场特征的重要因素。为研究地面粗糙度对下击暴流风剖面特性的影响,基于计算流体力学方法建立了下击暴流三维足尺模型,通过实验对数值模型进行了验证。通过调整粗糙元高度及分布密度来模拟自然界地面不同的粗糙类别,数值模拟了具有不同地面粗糙长度的下击暴流近地风场。结果表明:在距离风暴中心较近的位置(
r
≤ 1.0
D
jet
),地面粗糙度对下击暴流风场的影响并不明显,各径向位置的最大风速值和最大风速所在高度都基本不受地面粗糙度影响;在下击暴流冲击地面后沿径向发展的过程中,经过粗糙的地面,产生能量耗散效应,地面粗糙度对于下击暴流风剖面特征的影响逐渐显著,不同地貌下的竖直风剖面产生较大差异;在近地面高度,地面粗糙度对下击暴流径向风剖面影响显著且影响范围大,沿径向发展的方向下击暴流的风速随着地面粗糙长度的增加而下降更迅速;随着距离地面高度增加,地面粗糙度对径向风剖面的影响主要体现在远离风暴中心的区域。尽管下击暴流形成后沿径向扩散过程存在强度自然衰减过程,但在距离风暴中心较远的径向位置,当遭遇强下击暴流时,下击暴流引起的近地面强风仍然具有很大的威胁和破坏性,因此地面粗糙度对下击暴流风剖面特性的影响不能忽略,需要在风剖面模型中考虑地面粗糙度的修正。
Terrain roughness is an important index of reflecting ground undulation and shape in the atmosphere boundary layer
and is also the key factor affecting the near-ground wind field characteristics. In order to study the effects of terrain roughness on downburst wind profiles characteristics
a three-dimensional full-scale downburst model was established and validated by physical experiments. The variable terrain roughness was achieved by compiling program
to adjust the uniform roughness element height and distribution density. The downburst wind fields with variable terrain roughness were numerical simulated. The results indicate that
at a close position from the center of the storm (
r
≤ 1.0
D
jet
)
the effects of surface roughness for downburst wind field are not significant. The value and position of the maximal wind velocity are hardly affected by the terrain roughness. With the downburst impacting the ground and diffusing along the radial direction
the energy dissipation is significantly affected by the surface roughness
resulting in different vertical wind profile characteristics at different terrain roughness. The radial wind profiles are affected evidently by the terrain roughness near the ground
and it has a large range of affected area. The wind velocity of the downburst in the radial direction decreases rapidly as the rough length of the ground increases. With the height from ground increasing
the affected area of terrain roughness in the radial wind profile are mainly reflected far from the center of the storm. Although there is a natural intensity attenuation process in the radial diffusion
the near ground strong wind induced by the downburst is still threatening and destructive. The effect of ground roughness on the downburst wind profile cannot be ignored. It is necessary to consider the correction of terrain roughness in the downburst wind profile model.
FUJITA T T. Manual of downburst identification for project NIMROD[R]. SMRP-RP-156. NASA-CR-156953, 1978.
PROCTOR F H. Numerical simulations of an isolated microburst. Part Ⅱ:Sensitivity experiments[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1989, 46(14):2143-2165.
DEMPSEY D, WHITE H. Winds wreak havoc on lines[J]. Transmission and Distribution World, 1996, 48(6):32-37.
SHEN J, PARKS E K, BACH R E. Comprehensive analysis of two downburst-related aircraft accidents[J]. Journal of aircraft, 1996, 33(5):924-930.
LETCHFORD C W, MANS C, CHAY M T. Thunderstorms-their importance in wind engineering, a case for the next generation wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12-15):1415-1433.
QU W L, JI B F. Formation and diffusion of downburst and its disaster effects on transmission tower[M]. Science Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
FUJITA T T. Tornadoes and downbursts in the context generalized planetary scales[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 1981, 38(8):1511-1534.
KIM J D, HANGAN H. Numerical simulations of impinging jets with application to downbursts[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007, 95(4):279-298.
SENGUPTA A, SARKAR P P. Experimental measurement and numerical simulation of an impinging jet with application to thunderstorm microburst winds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(3):345-365.
MASON M S, WOOD G S, FLETCHER D F. Impinging jet simulation of stationary down burst flow over topography[J]. Wind and Structures, an International Journal, 2007, 10(5):437-462.
MASON M S, WOOD G S, FLETCHER D F. Numerical simulation of downburst winds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(11-12):523-539.
JI B F, QU W L. Mean wind pressure distribution characteristics on tall building under downburst[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(9):89-94. (in Chinese)
JI B F, QU W L, WANG Y F, et al. Study on time varying characteristics of downburst vertical wind profile[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2013, 35(10):92-97. (in Chinese)
TANG Z, LV L Y. Large eddy simulation of downburst wind load[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(1):47-51. (in Chinese)
LI C, LI Q S, XIAO Y Q, et al. A revised empirical model and CFD simulations for 3D axisymmetric steady-state flows of downbursts and impinging jets[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 102:48-68.
WANG C, WANG Z S, LI Z L. Comparison and parametric analysis of wind profile characteristics of impinging jet and wall jet[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(11):86-93. (in Chinese)
CHEN Y, PENG Z W, LOU W J, et al. CFD simulations of steady downbursts and 3D wind velocity empirical models[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2010, 27(3):428-434. (in Chinese)
CHEN Y, LIU G G, XU T, et al. Time histories of horizontal wind velocity of moving thunderstorms and phenomenological model[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2012, 40(1):22-26. (in Chinese)
ZOU X, WANG Z Z, LI Z L. Wind velocity profile model of steady thunderstorm downburst[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(15):74-79. (in Chinese)
DENG Y C, LIU S, YU Z, et al. Effect of roughness on CFD wind field simulation over natural terrain[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2010, 31(12):1645-1648. (in Chinese)
GB 50009-2012. Building Structure Load Specification[S]. 2012-10-01. (in Chinese)
ANSI/ASCE7-10. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S]. 2010-01-01.
AS/NZS 1170.2: 2002. Structural design actions, Part 2: Wind actions[S]. 2002-01-01.
Fluent 14. 0 User's guide[M]. ANSYS FLUENT Inc, 2011.
BLOCKEN B, STATHOPOULOS T, CARMELIET J. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer:Wall function problems[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(2):238-252.
BLOCKEN B, PERSOON J. Pedestrian wind comfort around a large football stadium in an urban environment:CFD simulation, validation and application of the new Dutch wind nuisance standard[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(5):255-270.
OSEGUERA R M, BOWLES R L. A simple analytic 3-dimensional downburst model based on boundary layer stagnation flow[R]. NASA TM-100632, 1988.
VICROY D D. A simple, analytical, asymmetric microburst model for downdraft estimation[R]. NASA TM-104053, 1991.
WOOD G S, KWOK K C S. An empirically derived estimate for the mean velocity profile of a thunderstorm downburst[C]//Proceedings of 7th Australian Wind Engineering Society Workshop, Melbourne: Australian Wind Engineering Society, 1998.
LETCHFORD C, ILLIDGE G C. Turbulence and topographic effects in simulated thunderstorm downdrafts by wind tunnel jet[C]//Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Copenhagen: The International Association for Wind Engineering, 1999.
HJELMFELT M R. Structure and life cycle of microburst outflows observed in Colorado[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1988, 27(8):900-927.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621