考虑不同四塔形式特大型冷却塔群风荷载极值分布特征与取值探讨

柯世堂; 王浩

doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0058

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

考虑不同四塔形式特大型冷却塔群风荷载极值分布特征与取值探讨

研究论文 | 更新时间：2026-05-28

- 考虑不同四塔形式特大型冷却塔群风荷载极值分布特征与取值探讨
- Distribution characteristics and value of extreme wind loads of four super-large cooling towers considering different layouts
- 空气动力学学报 2020年38卷第1期页码：48-57
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京航空航天大学航空学院,江苏,南京,210016
  2. 南京航空航天大学土木与机场工程系,江苏,南京,210016
- 作者简介：
  
  柯世堂(1982-), 男, 安徽人, 教授, 博士, 副院长, 主要从事结构工程与风洞试验研究.E-mail:keshitang@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金（51761165022，U1733129）;江苏省优秀青年基金项目（BK20160083）;江苏省六大人才高峰高层次人才计划（JZ-026）;江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划（KYCX18_0244）;江苏省青蓝工程优秀青年骨干教师培养计划
- DOI：10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0058
  中图分类号： TU271.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
柯世堂, 王浩. 考虑不同四塔形式特大型冷却塔群风荷载极值分布特征与取值探讨[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(1): 48-57.

KE Shitang, WANG Hao. Distribution characteristics and value of extreme wind loads of four super-large cooling towers considering different layouts[J]. 2020, 38(1): 48-57.
柯世堂, 王浩. 考虑不同四塔形式特大型冷却塔群风荷载极值分布特征与取值探讨[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2020, 38(1): 48-57. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0058.

KE Shitang, WANG Hao. Distribution characteristics and value of extreme wind loads of four super-large cooling towers considering different layouts[J]. 2020, 38(1): 48-57. DOI： 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0058.

摘要

塔群干扰作用下特大型冷却塔表面风荷载分布非常复杂，尤其是极值模型更加难以预测。首先，以工程中最常见的串列、矩形、菱形、L形和斜L形五种四塔组合形式为例，进行了320种工况的世界最高220 m特大型冷却塔群刚体测压风洞试验。然后，分析了特大型冷却塔局部风压和整体力系数的非高斯和非平稳特征，并基于Hermite法和峰值因子法对比探讨了特大型冷却塔的局部风压极值和整体力系数极值的分布规律，着重讨论了特征角度与局部、整体气动力极值之间的映射关系。最后，提出了冷却塔四塔塔群最大负压极值和整体力系数极值的数学计算模型，建议了考虑不同四塔干扰效应的四塔组合特大型冷却塔群一维极值风压系数估算公式，并验证了上述公式的精确度和有效性。主要研究结论表明：矩形、菱形和L形布置下特大型冷却塔最大负压极值均小于-3.40，矩形布置形式下的负压极值最大，菱形布置下出现强吸力现象的可能性较高；可基于特征角度与塔群脉动风荷载之间的线性关系对特大型冷却塔局部风压极值和整体力气动力极值进行有效预测。

Abstract

The distribution of wind loads of super-large cooling tower is very complicated considering interference effect of towers group

especially the extreme value is highly unpredictable. First

according to the world's highest cooling tower (220 m) which is being built with engineering background

wind tunnel tests with 320 test conditions for rigid body were performed under five typical four-tower arrangements in engineering practice

namely

single row

rectangular

rhombic

L-shaped

and oblique L-shaped. Then

the non-Gaussian and non-stationary features of local wind pressure and integral force coefficient of super-large cooling tower were analyzed. Based on the Hermite method and the peak factor method

the distribution rules of the extreme wind pressure and extreme integral force coefficient were discussed. The mapping relationship between the characteristic angle and the local and global aerodynamic extremum was emphatically discussed. On this basis

the mathematic calculation model of the maximum negative pressure extremum and the integral force coefficient extremum of the four-tower group was proposed. Finally

we proposed a uniform equation for fitting the extreme wind loads under the four-tower arrangements

and the accuracy and reliability of the equation were verified. The results show that the maximum negative pressure extremum is less than -3.40 under rectangular

diamond

and L-shaped arrangement. The maximum negative pressure under the rectangular arrangement is the highest

and the strong suction is more likely achieved under the diamond arrangement. The local wind pressure extremum and the integral aerodynamic extremum of the super-large cooling tower can be effectively predicted based on the linear relationship between the characteristic angle and the pulsating wind load of the tower group.

关键词

Keywords

references

SWARTZ S E, CHIEN C C, HU K K, et al. Tests on microconcrete model of hyperbolic cooling tower[J] Experimental Mechanics, 1985, 25(1), 12-23.

POPE R A. Structural deficiencies of natural draught cooling towers at uk power stations. Part 1: failures at ferrybridge and fiddlers ferry[J]. Structures Buildings, 1994, 104(1), 1-10.

GB/T 50102-2014. Code for design of cooling for industrial recirculating water[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2014. (in Chinese)

DL/T5339-2006. The thermal power plant hydraulic design specification[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

VGB-R 610Ue, Structural design of cooling tower- technical guideline for the structural design, computation and execution of cooling towers[S]. BTRBautechnik bei Kühltürmen, Standard Essen, 2005. (in German)

NIEMANN H J, KOPPER H D. Influence of adjacent buildings on wind effects on cooling towers[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20(10): 874-880.

ZHANG J F, GE Y J, ZHAO L. Interference effects on global wind loads and wind induced responses for group hyperboloidal cooling towers[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(8): 15-23. (in Chinese)

CHEN X X, ZHAO L, GE Y J. Wind tunnel investigation on interference effect of eight grouped super large cooling towers with rectangular arrangement[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(1): 372-380. (in Chinese)

KE S T, GE Y J, ZHAO L, et al. Stability and reinforcement analysis of super-large exhaust cooling towers based on a wind tunnel test[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2015, 141(12): 04015066.

VILADKAR M N, KARISIDDAPP A, BHARGAVA P, et al. Static soil-structure interaction response of hyperbolic cooling towers to symmetrical wind loads[J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(9): 1236-1251.

KE S T, GE Y J, ZHAO L. Research on festures of fluctuating wind pressure on large hyperbolic cooling tower: features of non-Gaussian[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 24(3): 12-18. (in Chinese)

KE S T, WANG H, GE Y J. Non-Gaussian characteristics and extreme distribution of fluctuating wind pressures on large cylindrical-conical steel cooling towers[J]. Structural Design of Tall Special Buildings, 2017, 9: 1-16.

KE S T, WANG H, GE Y J. Interference effect and the working mechanism of wind loads in super-large cooling towers under typical four-tower arrangements[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 170(1): 197-213.

GB50009-2012. Load code for the design of building structures[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2012. (in Chinese)

CHENG X X, ZHAO L, GE Y J, et al. Wind pressures on a large cooling tower[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2015, 18(2): 201-220.

RUSCHEWEYH H. Wind loadings on hyperbolic natural draught cooling towers[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 1975, 1(5): 335-340.

SUNA T F, ZHOUB L M. Wind pressure distribution around a ribless hyperbolic cooling tower[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 1983, 14(1): 181-192.

JSJ/T 338-2014. Standard for wind tunnel test of buildings and structures[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2014. (in Chinese)

DAUBECHIES I. Ten lectures on wavelets[J]. Computers in Physics, 1992, 6(3): 1671-1671.

ZAREIFARD H, KHALEDI M J. Non-Gaussian modeling of spatial data using scale mixing of a unified skew Gaussian process[J]. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2013, 114(114): 16-28.

BENDAT J S, PIERSOL A G. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. (Izmerenie i analiz slucainyh processov.) Vbersetzung aus dem Englischen von G. V. Matusevskii und V. E. Prival'skii. Mit einem Vorwort von G. Ja. Mirskii[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(7), 3938-3945.

KAREEM A, ZHAO J. Analysis of non-Gaussian surge response of tension leg platforms under wind loads[J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics Arctic Engineering, 1994, 116(3): 137-144.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

阻力舵机翼颤振特性仿真与风洞试验

典型高速飞行器滚转失稳特性研究

典型山体地形下低矮房屋风荷载受周边建筑群干扰效应研究

民用飞机大展弦比大柔性机翼高速静气动弹性载荷风洞试验

基于双气动弹性模型风洞试验的邻近超高层建筑风致干扰效应