中国航天空气动力技术研究院,北京,100074
朱志斌(1987-), 男, 山西太原人, 工程师, 研究方向:可压缩湍流, 转捩数值模拟.E-mail:zhuzhb@sina.cn
白鹏(1973-), 男, 研究员, 主要研究方向:空气动力学及新概念飞行器气动总体技术.E-mail:baipengaero@163.com
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
朱志斌, 刘强, 白鹏. 低雷诺数翼型层流分离现象大涡模拟方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(6): 915-923.
ZHU Zhibin, LIU Qiang, BAI Peng. Large eddy simulation method for the laminar separation phenomenon on low Reynolds number airfoils[J]. 2019, 37(6): 915-923.
朱志斌, 刘强, 白鹏. 低雷诺数翼型层流分离现象大涡模拟方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(6): 915-923. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0025.
ZHU Zhibin, LIU Qiang, BAI Peng. Large eddy simulation method for the laminar separation phenomenon on low Reynolds number airfoils[J]. 2019, 37(6): 915-923. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0025.
为准确预测翼型低雷诺数条件下出现的层流分离流动现象,发展了基于结构化拼接网格的大涡模拟方法。控制方程为Favre滤波Naver-Stokes方程,并选用多种亚格子模型。空间离散采用AUSM格式以及高阶WENO格式,时间推进采用显式方法和隐式方法。以SD7003翼型在雷诺数60000及4°迎角下的层流分离流动为研究对象,对比分析了数值格式、亚格子模型、网格尺度对流场预测结果的影响。数值结果表明:划分的计算网格能够有效解析小尺度流动结构,基于隐式亚格子模型、采用AUSM格式和双时间步推进的大涡模拟方法能够准确预测流动分离、转捩、再附等复杂流动现象,计算得到的平均压强系数与雷诺应力分布与文献数据吻合较好。与转捩模式计算结果对比进一步表明:发展的大涡模拟方法能够准确预测翼型低雷诺数层流分离流动非定常演化过程,为下一步的研究工作建立了有效的数值模拟手段。
The large eddy simulation method based on structured patched mesh was developed to accurately predict the laminar separation phenomena under low Reynolds number conditions. The Favre averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved
and various sub-grid scale models are utilized. The AUSM and high order WENO scheme are adopted for spatial discretization
and explicit and implicit methods are used for time integration. Through the simulation of the laminar separation flow around the SD7003 airfoil at Reynolds number 60 000 and angle of attack 4°
the influence of numerical schemes
sub-grid models
and mesh resolution on the computed results were compared and analyzed. The computational results show that
the computational meshes are effective for resolving the small scale flow structures
and the implicit large eddy methodology which utilizes the AUSM scheme and the dual time method can predict the complex flow phenomena of separation
transition
and reattachment accurately. The computed averaged pressure coefficients and Reynolds stress agree well with the computational and experimental data in literatures. The comparison with the results of transition model further reveals that
the developed large eddy simulation method can accurately predict the unsteady evolution of laminar separated flow on low Reynolds number airfoils. The present study establishes an effective numerical simulation method for the future research.
LI F, BAI P, SHI W, et al. Micro air vehicle aerodynamics at low Reynolds number[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(2): 257-268. (in Chinese).
GASTER M. The structure and behavior of laminar separation bubbles[R]. AGARD CP-4, 1966: 813-854.
HORTON H P. Laminar separation bubbles in two-and three-dimensional incompressible flow[D]. University of London, 1968.
SELIG M S, GUGLIELMO J J, et al. Experiments on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers[R]. AIAA 96-0062.
BREHM C, MACK S, GROSS A, et al. Investigations of an airfoil at low Reynolds number conditions[C]//4th AIAA Flow Control Conference. Seattle, Washington, 2008.
GROSS A, FASEL H F. Numerical investigation of separation for airfoils at low Reynolds numbers[C]//40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Chicago, Illinois, 2010.
BAI P, CUI E J, ZHOU W J, et al. Numerical simulation of laminar separation bubble over 2D airfoil at low Reynolds number[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2006, 24(4): 416-424. (in Chinese)
YUAN W X, KHALID M, WINDTE J, et al. An investigation of low-Reynolds-number flows past airfoils[C]//23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Toronto, AIAA 2005-4607.
RADESPIEL R, WINDTE J, SCHOLZ U. Numerical and experimental flow analysis of moving airfoils with laminar separation bubbles[J]. 2007, AIAA Journal, 45(6): 1346-1356.
LIAN Y S, WEI S. Laminar-turbulent transition of a low Reynolds number rigid or flexible airfoil[C]//36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. San Francisco, California, 2006.
CHOUDHRY A, ARJOMANDI M, KELSO R. A study of long separation bubble on thick airfoils and its consequent effects[J]. International Journal of Heat Fluid Flow, 2015, 52: 84-96.
ARNAL D, CASALIS G, JUILLEN J C. A survey of the transition prediction methods: From analytical criteria to PSE and DNS[C]//UTAM Symposia. Sendai, Japan, 1994.
YANG Z, HAAN F L, HUI H, et al. An experimental investigation on the flow separation on a low-reynolds-number airfoil[J]. AIAA Paper, AIAA-2007-0275.
ANANDA G K, SUKUMAR P P, SELIG M S. Measured aerodynamic characteristics of wings at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Aerospace Science Technology, 2015, 42: 392-406.
OL V, MCAULIFFE B R, HANFF E S, et al. Comparison of laminar separation bubble measurements on a low Reynolds number airfoil in three facilities[C]//35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Toronto, Ontario Canada, 2005. AIAA 2005-5149.
SHAN H, JIANG L, LIU C R. Direct numerical simulation of flow separation around a NACA 0012 airfoil[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2005, 34(9): 1096-1114.
GALBRAITH M C, VISBAL M R. Implicit large eddy simulation of low Reynolds number flow past the SD7003 airfoil[C]//46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, 2007.
VILEM S, MIYAJI K. Transitional flow over a SD7003 wing using flux reconstruction scheme[C]//52nd AIAA Sci Tech. National Harbor. MD, United States, 2014. AIAA 2014-0250.
AI G Y, YE J. Large-eddy simulation of low Reynolds number airfoil with different separating flow[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(2): 299-304. (in Chinese)
GARNIER E, ADAMS N, SAGAUT P. Large eddy simulation for compressible flows[M]. Scientific Computation, Springer Netherlands, 2009: 22-30.
LU X Y, WANG S W, SUNG H Y, et al. Large eddy simulations of turbulent swirling flows injected into a dump chamber[J]. J Fluid Mech, 2005, 527: 171-195.
BORIS J P, GRINSTEIN F F, ORAN E S, et al. New insights into large eddy simulation[J]. Fluid Dynamics Research, 1992, 10(4): 199-228.
SMAGORINSKY J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equation Ⅰ: The basic experiment[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1963, 91(3): 99-164.
GERMANO M, PIOMELLI U, MOIN P, et al. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model[J]. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamic, 1991, 3(7): 1760-1765.
NICOUD F, FUCROS F. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor[J]. Flow Turbulence and Combusition, 1999, 62(3): 183-200.
LIU M S. Progress towards an improved CFD method: AUSM+[R]. AIAA 95-1701, 1995.
ZHU Z B, YANG W V, YU M. A WENO scheme with geometric conservation law and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2017, 34(6): 779-784. (in Chinese)
LIU X D, OSHER S, CHAN T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 115: 200-212.
JIANG G S, SHU C W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 126: 202-228.
DENG S T, JIANG L, LIU C Q. DNS for flow separation control around airfoil by steady and pulsed jets[J]. Computer Fluid, 2007, 36(6): 1040-1060.
ANTONY J. Time dependent calculations using multigrid with application to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings[C]//AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Honolulu, HI, 1991.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621