1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 空气动力学国家重点实验室,绵阳,621000
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 计算空气动力研究所,绵阳,621000
王年华(1992-), 男, 硕士, 研究实习员, 主要研究方向:非结构有限体积离散方法, 验证与确认.E-mail:nianhuawong@126.com
张来平(1968-), 男, 研究员, 博士生导师, 主要研究方向:计算流体力学, 网格生成技术, 数值虚拟飞行.E-mail:zhanglp_cardc@126.com
纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
王年华, 张来平, 李明. 基于网格缩小的非结构网格梯度重构及制造解精度测试与验证[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(5): 722-730.
WANG Nianhua, ZHANG Laiping, LI Ming. Investigation on accuracy of gradient reconstruction and flow simulation on general unstructured grids based on downscaling method[J]. 2019, 37(5): 722-730.
王年华, 张来平, 李明. 基于网格缩小的非结构网格梯度重构及制造解精度测试与验证[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(5): 722-730. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0106.
WANG Nianhua, ZHANG Laiping, LI Ming. Investigation on accuracy of gradient reconstruction and flow simulation on general unstructured grids based on downscaling method[J]. 2019, 37(5): 722-730. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0106.
网格收敛性研究是验证与确认中的重要手段,本文针对一般非结构网格难以自相似加密的问题,实现了基于网格缩小的精度测试方法。在典型的各向同性和各向异性拉伸网格上,利用网格缩小精度测试方法分别考察了梯度重构精度以及制造解流动模拟精度,将网格缩小精度测试结果与传统的网格加密精度测试结果以及理论分析结果进行对比,验证了网格缩小精度测试方法与网格加密精度测试方法及理论分析的一致性。最后将网格缩小精度测试方法应用到各向异性拉伸网格粘性制造解精度测试中,得到了预期中的结果,并初步考察了梯度重构方法、网格类型对数值模拟精度的影响,显示出网格缩小精度测试方法在一般非结构网格精度测试上的优势,具有一定应用前景。
With the great improvement in computer technology and numerical methods
computational fluid dynamics has progressed significantly. Even though it is easy and fast to obtain discretized results via numerical simulations
the validity and accuracy of the results need to be carefully verified and validated. Grid convergence study is one of the important approaches in verification process; however
traditional methods cannot realize consistent refinement on general unstructured grids
causing difficulties in grid convergence study on general unstructured grids. In order to solve this problem
the downscaling accuracy testing method (DS method) was adopted in this paper. The DS method was successfully verified by comparing with traditional mesh refinement method and analytical stencil analysis for three cases:a) gradient reconstruction accuracy on isotropic grids; b) gradient reconstructure accuracy on anisotropic grids; c) flow simulation accuracy of a manufactured solution on isotropic grids. The DS method was implemented for accuracy tests on anisotropic stretched grids commonly used in the simulation of viscous flows
and the results were consistent with predictions
which demonstrate the advantage of the DS method on accuracy verification with general unstructured grids.
YAN C, YU J, XU J L, et al. On the achievements and prospects for the methods of computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(5):562-589. (in Chinese)
OBERKAMPF W L, ROY C J. Verification and validation in scientific computing[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
OBERKAMPF W L, SINDIR M N, CONLISK A T. Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations[M]. Sponsor American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998.
DENG X G, ZONG W G, ZHANG L P, et al. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(2):279-288. (in Chinese)
GHIA U, BAYYUK S, ROY C, et al. The AIAA code verification project-test cases for CFD code verification[R]. AIAA 2010-125, 2010.
IANNELLI J. An exact non-linear Navier-Stokes compressible-flow solution for CFD code verification[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013, 72:157-176.
ROACHE P J, STEINBURG S. Symbolic manipulation and computational fluid dynamics[J]. AIAA Journal, 1984, 22(10):1390-1394.
ROACHE P J. Code verification by method of manufactured solutions[J]. Transactions of ASME, 2002, 124:4-10.
CHEN J Q, ZHANG Y R. Verification and validation in CFD based on the Richardson extrapolation method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2012, 30(2):176-183. (in Chinese)
LI Z, CHEN H X, ZHANG Y F. Accuracy analysis of drag prediction based on generalized Richardson extrapolation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(7):2105-2114. (in Chinese)
ROY C J. Review of code and solution verification procedures for computational simulation[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 205:131-156.
HEBERT S, LUKE E A. Honey, I shrunk the grids! A new approach to CFD verification studies[R]. AIAA 2005-685, 2005.
DISKIN B, THOMAS J L. Accuracy analysis for mixed-element finite volume discretization schemes[R]. National Institute of Aerospace, NIA Report No.2007-08.
KATZ A, SANKARAN V. Mesh quality effects on the accuracy of CFD solutions on unstructured meshes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230:7670-7686.
WANG N H, ZHANG L P, ZHAO Z, et al. Accuracy verification of unstructured second-order finite volume discretization schemes based on the method of manufactured solutions[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(3):627-637. (in Chinese)
SOZER E, BREHM C, KIRISC C. Gradient calculation methods on arbitrary polyhedral unstructured meshes for cell-centered CFD solvers[R]. AIAA 2014-1440, 2014.
WANG N H, ZHANG L P, MA R, et al. Mesh quality effects on the accuracy of gradient reconstruction and inviscid flow simulation on isotropic unstructured grids[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2017, 34(5):555-563. (in Chinese)
MAVRIPLIS D J. Revisiting the least-squares procedure for gradient reconstruction on unstructured meshes[R]. AIAA 2003-3986, 2003.
HE X, ZHAO Z, MA R, et al. Validation of HyperFLOW in subsonic and transonic flow[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34(2):267-275. (in Chinese)
BAKER T J. Mesh generation:art or science[J]. Progress in Aerospace Science, 2005, 41:29-63.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621