1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京,100083
2. 国家能源页岩气研发(实验)中心,北京,100083
3. 中国石油西南油气田公司开发事业部,四川,成都,610051
4. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室(成都理工大学),四川,成都,610051
网络首发:2026-10-14,
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
武瑾, 郑马嘉, 赵群, 王凯, 张晓伟, 何建华, 操旭, 杨峰, 徐浩. 天然裂缝与地层压力演化耦合作用对页岩气差异富集的影响——以四川盆地南部筇竹寺组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(9): 1818-1834.
Wu Jin, Zheng Majia, Zhao Qun, et al. The coupling effect of natural fractures and formation pressure evolution on differential enrichment of shale gas:a case study of Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(9): 1818-1834.
武瑾, 郑马嘉, 赵群, 王凯, 张晓伟, 何建华, 操旭, 杨峰, 徐浩. 天然裂缝与地层压力演化耦合作用对页岩气差异富集的影响——以四川盆地南部筇竹寺组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(9): 1818-1834. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202609006.
Wu Jin, Zheng Majia, Zhao Qun, et al. The coupling effect of natural fractures and formation pressure evolution on differential enrichment of shale gas:a case study of Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(9): 1818-1834. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202609006.
天然裂缝是制约四川盆地筇竹寺组页岩气富集与高产的关键因素。目前,筇竹寺组不同成因天然裂缝的发育特征、形成期次及其与地层压力的耦合演化机制尚不明确,页岩气差异化富集机理有待进一步研究。基于天然裂缝在岩心、岩石薄片和成像测井等多尺度上的表征,结合流体包裹体测试、激光拉曼光谱测试等实验手段,明确了四川盆地资阳—威远地区筇竹寺组页岩天然裂缝的发育规律,建立了天然裂缝的形成与演化序列,阐明了筇竹寺组地层超压的成因机制和古地层压力的演化过程,揭示了裂缝-地层压力时空耦合作用对页岩气差异富集的控制机制。研究结果表明:资阳—威远地区筇竹寺组页岩储层以构造成因裂缝为主,主要发育张性缝、剪切缝及张剪复合缝3类。平面上,资阳—威远地区天然裂缝的展布规律主要受构造作用控制;纵向上,裂缝的发育程度受岩石内脆性矿物含量的影响。资阳—威远地区的天然裂缝主要形成于加里东晚期、海西晚期—印支期和燕山晚期—喜马拉雅早期,各期裂缝的充填矿物与烃类包裹体存在明显差异。资阳—威远地区筇竹寺组的地层超压以生烃增压为主,地层压力演化历经4个阶段,最终形成了现今的地层压力系统。加里东中—晚期,资阳—威远地区整体发育中等超压;海西晚期—印支期,资阳地区的地层压力持续缓慢增加,而威远地区的地层压力则逐渐衰减;燕山早—中期,筇竹寺组页岩处于生烃高峰期,促使资阳地区形成强超压(地层压力系数为2.00~2.92),威远地区发育中等超压;燕山晚期—喜马拉雅早期,威远地区构造核部抬升,地层压力转为常压(地层压力系数为1.00~1.20),资阳地区则仍保持超压状态(地层压力系数为1.60~2.01)。多期构造运动形成的天然裂缝与页岩生烃增压过程协同,控制着资阳—威远地区页岩气的差异化富集。加里东早—中期,天然裂缝通过调控油气的侧向运移与逸散效率影响区域上地层压力的分异;海西期至燕山早—中期,裂缝体系兼具油气输导、补给与局部封存多重效应,资阳地区形成超高强度超压,威远地区则受生烃增压与构造挤压共同作用发育中等强度超压;燕山晚期—喜马拉雅早期,区域构造的差异性抬升与构造格局的调整进一步加剧了油气保存条件分异,威远背斜抬升幅度大,发育大量穿层剪切缝,页岩气大规模逸散,而资阳地区遭受的构造改造强度弱,地层超压体系得以保存,具备优越的页岩气富集条件。
Natural fractures are key factors controlling shale gas enrichment and high production in Qiongzhusi Formation of Sichuan Basin. However
the development characteristics and formation stages of natural fracture systems of different origins
as well as the coupled evolution mechanisms of the fracture systems and formation pressure in Qiongzhusi Formation
remain unclear. Consequently
further investigation is required to clarify differential shale gas enrichment mechanisms. Based on multi-scale characterization of natural fractures through cores
rock thin sections
and imaging logs
combined with fluid inclusion and laser Raman spectroscopy analyses
this study systematically investigates the development patterns of natural fractures in Qiongzhusi Formation shale in Ziyang-Weiyuan area of Sichuan Basin. The formation and evolution sequences of natural fractures are established
the genetic mechanism of formation overpressure and the evolution history of formation paleo-pressure in Qiongzhusi Formation are elucidated
and the spatiotemporal coupling between fractures and formation pressures controlling differential shale gas enrichment is revealed. The results indicate that the shale reservoirs of Qiongzhusi Formation in Ziyang-Weiyuan area are dominated by tectonic fractures
mainly including tensile fractures
shear fractures
and hybrid tensile-shear fractures. Horizontally
the distribution patterns of natural fractures are primarily controlled by tectonic forces. Vertically
fracture development is controlled by the content of brittle minerals in rocks
and fractures are most developed in the middle to lower parts of the fifth layer of submember 2 of Member 1 of Qiongzhusi Formation. The natural fractures in Ziyang-Weiyuan area mainly formed during the Late Caledonian
Late Hercynian-Indosinian and Late Yanshanian-Early Himalayan periods. The fracture-filling minerals and hydrocarbon inclusions exhibit significant differences among fractures formed during different stages. The overpressure in Qiongzhusi Formation is primarily attributed to hydrocarbon generation-induced pressurization. The evolution of formation pressure can be divided into four stages
ultimately resulting in the present-day formation pressure system. During the Middle-Late Caledonian period
moderate overpressure developed throughout Ziyang-Weiyuan area. During the Late Hercynian-Indosinian period
formation pressure in Ziyang area continued to increase slowly
whereas that in Weiyuan area gradually dissipated. During the Early-Middle Yanshanian period
Qiongzhusi Formation shale entered into the peak stage of hydrocarbon generation
promoting the development of strong overpressure in Ziyang area (formation pressure coefficient of 2.00-2.92) and moderate overpressure in Weiyuan area. From the Late Yanshanian to Early Himalayan period
structural uplift of the Weiyuan area resulted in the transformation of formation pressure into a normal pressure system (formation pressure coefficient of 1.00-1.20)
while the Ziyang area remained overpressured (formation pressure coefficient of 1.60-2.01). The synergistic interaction between natural fractures generated by multi-stage tectonic movements and the pressurization process associated with shale hydrocarbon generation governs the differential enrichment of shale gas in the study area. During the Early-Middle Caledonian period
natural fractures influenced the spatial variation of regional formation pressure by controlling the efficiency of lateral hydrocarbon migration and dissipation. During the Hercynian to Early-Middle Yanshanian period
the fracture system exhibited multiple functions
including hydrocarbon transport
replenishment
and localized sealing. The Ziyang area developed extremely high overpressure
whereas the Weiyuan area experienced medium-intensity overpressure under the combined effects of hydrocarbon generation-induced pressurization and tectonic compression. From the Late Yanshanian to Early Himalayan period
regional differential uplifting and reconfiguration of the tectonic framework further exacerbated the heterogeneity of hydrocarbon preservation conditions. The Weiyuan anticline underwent substantial uplift
which promoted the extensive development of through-going shear fractures and large-scale shale gas dissipation. In contrast
the Ziyang area experienced relatively weak tectonic modification
allowing the preservation of the overpressure system and providing favorable conditions for shale gas enrichment.
姜鹏飞,吴建发,朱逸青,等. 四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J].石油学报,2023,44(1):91-109.
武瑾,王红岩,施振生,等.海陆过渡相黑色页岩优势岩相类型及成因机制——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘二叠系山西组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(6):1137-1149.
张君峰,周志,宋腾,等.中美页岩气勘探开发历程、地质特征和开发利用条件对比及启示[J].石油学报,2022,43(12):1687-1701.
王濡岳,胡宗全,龙胜祥,等.四川盆地上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征与演化机制[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(2):353-364.
邹才能,赵群,王红岩,等.中国海相页岩气主要特征及勘探开发主体理论与技术[J].天然气工业,2022,42(8):1-13.
武瑾,郭为,郭伟,等.深层海相页岩气立体开发“甜点”岩相及其成因机制——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J].石油学报,2024,45(8):1219-1233.
赵文智,李建忠,杨涛,等.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):499-510.
雍锐,吴建发,吴伟,等.四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气勘探发现及其意义[J].石油学报,2024,45(9):1309-1323.
郭彤楼.中国页岩气发展的回顾与思考——从志留系到寒武系[J].油气藏评价与开发,2025,15(3):339-348.
王濡岳,胡宗全,周彤,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及其控储意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(6):1295-1306.
LI Bo,ZHAO Shengxian,LIU Yongyang,et al.Fracture features and fault influence on gas accumulation in the Longmaxi Formation in Changning block,southern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry B,2024,11(5):482-495.
唐建明,何建华,魏力民,等.川东南林滩场地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏压力演化及其地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(4):739-750.
ANDERSEN T,BURKE E A J.Methane inclusions in shocked quartz from the Gardnos impact breccia,South Norway[J].European Journal of Mineralogy,1996,8(5):927-936.
GEORGE S C,VOLK H,DUTKIEWICZ A,et al.Preservation of hydrocarbons and biomarkers in oil trapped inside fluid inclusions for >2 billion years[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2008,72(3):844-870.
刘冬冬,郭靖,潘占昆,等.页岩气藏超压演化过程:来自四川盆地南部五峰组—龙马溪组裂缝流体包裹体的证据[J].天然气工业,2021,41(9):12-22.
WANG Dandan,JIANG Zhenxue,DU Wei,et al.Fluid activity characteristics of shallow shale veins in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Shixi syncline in northern Guizhou and their significance for shale gas preservation[J].Natural Gas Industry B,2024,11(5):511-524.
GOLDSTEIN R H,REYNOLDS T J.Systematics of fluid inclusions in diagenetic minerals[M].Tulsa,Oklahoma:SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology),1994.
刘斌,沈昆.流体包裹体热力学[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
TANG Ling,WANG Pengfei,ZHAO Zhigang,et al.Overpressure origin and evolution during burial in the shale gas plays of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of southern Sichuan Basin[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,236:212729.
张凤奇,王震亮,钟红利,等.沉积盆地主要超压成因机制识别模式及贡献[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(6):1151-1158.
徐龙龙,胡强,刘建章,等.准噶尔盆地中央坳陷西部三叠系深层—超深层超压测井响应特征及成因[J].地质科技通报,2025,44(4):154-166.
高键,何生,易积正.焦石坝页岩气田中高密度甲烷包裹体的发现及其意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(3):472-480.
陈丽清,吴娟,何一凡,等.四川盆地绵阳—长宁拉张槽中段下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩裂缝脉体特征及古流体活动过程[J].地质科技通报,2023,42(3):142-152.
李彦佑,吴娟,周志鹏,等.四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷槽中段寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气差异富集过程——来自裂缝脉体与流体包裹体的证据[J].石油实验地质,2025,47(5):988-1002.
李海,赵文韬,刘文磊,等.四川盆地资中—威远地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气成藏演化过程[J].石油科学通报,2025,10(3):460-477.
刘树根,孙玮,罗志立,等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(5):511-520.
熊亮,邓虎成,吴冬,等.四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统筇竹寺组细粒沉积特征与影响因素[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(5):857-871.
雍锐,石学文,罗超,等.四川盆地寒武系筇竹寺组页岩气“槽-隆”富集规律及勘探前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2024,51(6):1211-1226.
CHEN Wenyi,WANG Bo,JIANG Zhenxue,et al.Characteristics of shale reservoir development under the influence of sedimentary differentiation:a case study of the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Deyang-Anyue rift trough of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry B,2025,12(3):251-263.
梅庆华,何登发,文竹,等.四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起地质结构及构造演化[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):11-25.
姜华,汪泽成,杜宏宇,等.乐山—龙女寺古隆起构造演化与新元古界震旦系天然气成藏[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):192-200.
国家能源局.岩石薄片鉴定:SY/T 5368—2016[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2016.
国家能源局.岩石矿物阴极发光鉴定方法:SY/T 5916—2013[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2013.
国家能源局.沉积盆地流体包裹体显微测温方法:SY/T 6010—2011[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2011.
中华人民共和国教育部.激光拉曼光谱分析方法通则:JY/T 0573—2020[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2020.
刘力,何生,翟刚毅,等.黄陵背斜南翼牛蹄塘组二段页岩岩心裂缝脉体成岩环境演化与页岩气保存[J].地球科学,2019,44(11):3583-3597.
ZHANG Jianli,QIAO Shaohua,LU Wanjun,et al.An equation for determining methane densities in fluid inclusions with Raman shifts[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2016,171:20-28.
BOWERS G L.Detecting high overpressure[J].The Leading Edge,2002,21(2):174-177.
HERMANRUD C,WENSAAS L,TEIGE G M G,et al.Shale porosities from well logs on Haltenbanken (offshore mid-Norway) show no influence of overpressuring[M]∥LAW B E,ULMISHEK G F,SLAVIN V I.Abnormal pressures in hydrocarbon environments.Tulsa,Oklahoma:AAPG,1998:65-85.
赵靖舟,李军,徐泽阳.沉积盆地超压成因研究进展[J].石油学报,2017,38(9):973-998.
OSBORNE M J,SWARBRICK R E.Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins:a reevaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(6):1023-1041.
王濡岳,聂海宽,胡宗全,等.压力演化对页岩气储层的控制作用——以四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2020,40(10):1-11.
0
浏览量
19
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621