致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱实验

马莅; 卢聪; 郭建春; 吴建发; 宋毅; 沈骋; 黎俊峰

doi:10.7623/syxb202606009

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱实验

油田开发 | 更新时间：2026-07-10

- 致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱实验
- Integrated “injection-soaking-production” fracturing-flooding experiment for tight reservoirs
- 石油学报 2026年47卷第6期页码：1244-1257
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 石油西南油气田公司页岩气研究院,四川,成都,中国,610051
  2. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室,四川,成都,610500
  3. 页岩气地质评价与高效开发四川省重点实验室,四川,成都,610051
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7623/syxb202606009
  中图分类号： TE357
- 网络首发：2026-07-02，
  
  纸质出版：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
马莅, 卢聪, 郭建春, 吴建发, 宋毅, 沈骋, 黎俊峰. 致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱实验[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(6): 1244-1257.

Ma Li, Lu Cong, Guo Jianchun, et al. Integrated “injection-soaking-production” fracturing-flooding experiment for tight reservoirs[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(6): 1244-1257.
马莅, 卢聪, 郭建春, 吴建发, 宋毅, 沈骋, 黎俊峰. 致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱实验[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(6): 1244-1257. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202606009.

Ma Li, Lu Cong, Guo Jianchun, et al. Integrated “injection-soaking-production” fracturing-flooding experiment for tight reservoirs[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(6): 1244-1257. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202606009.

摘要

基于核磁共振在线监测技术

设计了致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱实验

通过核磁共振伪彩图分析“注入—焖井—生产”过程中基质—裂缝内油水流动规律

根据核磁共振

谱从微观尺度定量表征不同孔径介质中油水渗吸置换—动态驱替规律

探究基质渗透率、裂缝长度、注水速度以及焖井时间对压驱采油效果的影响。实验结果表明

裂缝在前期注入过程中可降低注水压力;在焖井过程中

裂缝增加驱替剂与基质中原油的接触面积

提高油水渗吸置换效率;在生产过程中

在驱油剂协同作用下可提高驱油效率。当缝长比从0增至2/3时

前期注水阶段中大孔及裂缝的采出程度增加且占据前期注水阶段驱油量的主要部分

驱替效率从48.73 % 提升至65.99 %; 当缝长比增至1(贯穿缝)时

注入流体沿裂缝优势通道窜流

微小孔及中孔采出程度降低

驱油效率下降至56.12 % 。当压驱注水速度从0.2 mL/min增至1.0 mL/min时

注入水沿储层高渗层窜流

减小水驱作用的面积

驱油效率由53.21 % 降至48.24 % 。在焖井过程中

微小孔及中孔中油相在渗吸作用下进入大孔及裂缝

即压驱注水后进行适度焖井

可强化基质与裂缝之间的油水置换作用

提高后期驱油效果。研究结果揭示了致密储层“注入—焖井—生产”一体化压驱作用机理

可有效指导压驱现场实施。

Abstract

An integrated "injection-soaking-production" fracturing-flooding experiment for tight reservoirs was designed utilizing online nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) monitoring technology. Fluid flow patterns within the matrix and fractures during the "injection-soaking-production" cycle were analyzed via NMR pseudo-color imaging. Based on NMR

spectra

the mechanisms of oil-water imbibition-replacement and dynamic displ

acement in media with varying pore sizes were quantitatively characterized at the microscopic scale. Furthermore

the influences of matrix permeability

fracture length

injection rate

and soaking time on the pressure-driven oil recovery efficiency were investigated. Experimental results demonstrate that fractures effectively reduce injection pressure during the initial injection phase. During the soaking phase

fractures expand the contact area between the displacement agent and the crude oil within the matrix

thereby enhancing the oil-water imbibition and replacement efficiency. During the production phase

the synergistic effect of the displacement agent further improves oil recovery efficiency. When the fracture length ratio increases from 0 to 2/3

the recovery percentage of macropores and fractures during the initial waterflooding stage rises

accounting for the majority of oil recovery in this phase

and the displacement efficiency improves from 48.73 % to 65.99 % . However

when the fracture length ratio reaches 1 (penetrating fractures)

the injected fluid undergoes channeling through the dominant fracture pathways

leading to a decrease in the recovery percentage from micropores and mesopores

and a subsequent reduction in oil displacement efficiency to 56.12 % . As the water injection rate increases from 0.2 mL/min to 1.0 mL/min

the injected water channels through high-permeability zones

thereby reducing the sweep efficiency and causing the oil displacement efficiency to decrease from 53.21 % to 48.24 % . During the soaking phase

the oil phase within micropores and mesopores migrates into macropores and fractures via capillary imbibition; specifically

optimal soaking time following pressure-driven injection enhances the oil-water replacement between the matrix and fractures

improving subsequent displacement efficiency. These findings elucidate the integrated "injection-soaking-production" mechanism in tight reservoirs

providing effective guidance for the field implementation of pressure-driven

development.

关键词

Keywords

references

胡文瑞,魏漪,鲍敬伟. 中国低渗透油气藏开发理论与技术进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):646-656.

朱如凯,李国欣,崔景伟,等.中国致密油气形成地质条件与勘探前景[J].石油学报,2025,46(1):17-32.

刘顺,刘建斌,杜恒毅,等.致密储层渗透流动特征及渗吸—渗透耦合驱油机理[J].石油学报,2026,47(2):455-465.

胡连博,陈志明,廖新维,等.基于"压—焖—采"多数据协同分析的页岩油井裂缝参数反演与产能预测[J].石油学报,2025,46(8):1550-1567.

王飞,乔润伟,李建民,等.渗吸换油-排驱泄油协同作用下的页岩油动用体积计算[J].石油学报,2025,46(6):1157-1167.

贾承造.中国石油工业上游发展面临的挑战与未来科技攻关方向[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1445-1464.

郭建春,马莅,卢聪.中国致密油藏压裂驱油技术进展及发展方向[J].石油学报,2022,43(12):1788-1797.

崔传智,李怀亮,吴忠维,等.考虑压驱注水诱发裂缝影响的注水井压力分析[J].油气藏评价与开发,2023,13(5):686-694.

蔡新明,黄艳梅,金忠康.江苏油田复杂断块低渗透油藏压驱研究与实践[J].复杂油气藏,2023,16(3):343-346.

崔传智,王俊康,吴忠维,等.致密油藏压驱动态裂缝模型建立及应用[J].特种油气藏,2023,30(4):87-95.

杨勇,张世明,曹小朋,等.胜利油田低渗透油藏压驱开发技术实践与认识[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(6):61-71.

马珍福,邵现振,李刚,等.低渗油藏扩容压驱工艺技术在渤南油田的应用[J].非常规油气,2023,10(4):58-66.

COLLINS P M.Geomechanical effects on the SAGD process[R]. SPE 97905,2005.

COLLINS P M.Geomechanical effects on the SAGD process[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2007,10(4):367-375.

邸士莹.致密油藏注水裂缝扩展机理及有效开发方式研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2021.

林伯韬.疏松砂岩储层微压裂机理与应用技术研究[J].石油科学通报,2021,6(2):209-227.

庞惠文.油砂力学变形及渗流特征研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2020.

BARNES D J.Micro-fabric and strength studies of oil sands[D].Edmonton:University of Alberta,1980.

OLA S A.Geotechnical properties and behaviour of Nigerian tar sand[J].Engineering Geology,1991,30(3/4):325-336.

申婷婷.浅层超稠油水平井微压裂扩容技术及应用[J].特种油气藏,2022,29(6):111-118.

齐梅,郑小武,尹秀玲,等.地层破裂状态下实施大排量污水回注技术研究[J].石油学报,2008,29(3):455-458.

王强.微压裂井注水动态模拟研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2018.

刘映玥.BN海上油田微压裂增注关键理论研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2019.

杨凯,王新亮,陈旭,等.微压裂酸化复合解堵技术在渤海某油田的应用[J].海洋石油,2022,42(4):48-51.

PERKINS T K,GONZALEZ J A.The effect of thermoelastic stresses on injection well fracturing[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1985,25(1):78-88.

HUANG J,WONG R C K,YEUNG K C.Effect of reservoir permeability and deformability on well injectivity[C]//Proceedings of the Annual Technical Meeting.Calgary,Alberta:Petroleum Society of Canada,1998.

唐巨鹏,齐桐,代树红,等.水平地应力差对周期注水应力改造水力压裂影响的试验研究[J].应用力学学报,2020,37(3):990-998.

ZHANG Z,AZAD M S,TRIVEDI J J.IFT or wettability alteration:what is more important for oil recovery in oil-wet formation?[J].Fuel,2021,291:119986.

于馥玮,高振东,朱文浩,等.基于微流控模型的裂缝性储集层渗吸机理实验[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(5):1004-1013.

石立华,程时清,常毓文,等.致密油藏微观渗吸试验及数值模拟[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(1):111-119.

CARDONA A,SANTAMARINA J C.Immiscible imbibition in fractured media:a dual-porosity microfluidics study[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2023,170:105555.

王家禄,刘玉章,陈茂谦,等.低渗透油藏裂缝动态渗吸机理实验研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2009,36(1):86-90.

杨正明,刘学伟,李海波,等.致密储集层渗吸影响因素分析与渗吸作用效果评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(4):739-745.

黄兴,窦亮彬,左雄娣,等.致密油藏裂缝动态渗吸排驱规律[J].石油学报,2021,42(7):924-935.

徐润滋,杨胜来,王吉涛,等.高温高压下陆相致密油藏非稳态压裂液渗吸机理研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(3):94-103.

刘建中,刘翔鹗,孙聚晨,等.水平井水力压裂真三维物理模拟实验[J].石油勘探与开发,1993,20(6):69-76.

韩福来.利用大物理模型研究特高含水期水驱规律[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2012.

熊钰,徐宏光,王玲,等.反九点井网加密前后流场变化及驱油效率实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(3):70-78.

邹雨时,石善志,张士诚,等.薄互层型页岩油储集层水力裂缝形态与支撑剂分布特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(5):1025-1032.

吕金龙,卢祥国,王威,等.裂缝对致密储层渗流能力影响实验研究[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(2):141-146.

国家能源局.岩样核磁共振参数实验室测量规范:SY/T 6490—2023[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2023.

黄婷,苏良银,达引朋,等.超低渗透油藏水平井储能压裂机理研究与现场试验[J].石油钻探技术,2020,48(1):80-84.

翟成,孙勇,范宜仁,等.低场核磁共振技术在煤孔隙结构精准表征中的应用与展望[J].煤炭学报,2022,47(2):828-848.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高含水致密凝析气藏特殊相态变化

前陆层序致密储层的单因素成岩相分析

川西坳陷须家河组古圈闭类型及识别技术

致密储层应力敏感性及其对油田开发的影响

石油充注对储层成岩作用影响研究现状与展望