1. 西南石油大学,四川,成都,610500
2. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室,四川,成都,610500
3. 昆仑数智科技有限责任公司,四川,成都,610000
网络首发:2026-07-02,
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
郭肖, 王作豪, 王鹏鲲, 陈祖伟, 王皓东. 考虑孔-渗演化机制的储气库注CO
Guo Xiao, Wang Zuohao, Wang Pengkun, et al. Multi-field coupling mechanism of CO2injection in underground gas storage under porosity-permeability evolution[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(6): 1217-1233. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202606007.
郭肖, 王作豪, 王鹏鲲, 陈祖伟, 王皓东. 考虑孔-渗演化机制的储气库注CO DOI: 10.7623/syxb202606007.
Guo Xiao, Wang Zuohao, Wang Pengkun, et al. Multi-field coupling mechanism of CO2injection in underground gas storage under porosity-permeability evolution[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(6): 1217-1233. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202606007. DOI:
储气库工程作为中国能源调控与资源战略布局的重要组成部分
若能以CO
2
作为垫底气
则可兼顾经济效益
助力实现双碳目标
具有广阔的应用前景。然而
在CO
2
注入过程中伴随着渗流、传热与岩石骨架应变等多重效应
其机理复杂。目前
国内外多数研究偏重于渗流场分析
较少考虑分子扩散、热传导和骨架形变对储层孔-渗结构和流体流动行为的综合影响。为深入揭示渗流场、热力学场与应力场的耦合机理及孔-渗演化特征
结合分子模拟结果
建立了考虑扩散的热-流-固耦合数学模型
开展了有限元数值模拟。研究结果表明:①在超临界CO
2
注入过程中
对流、重力分异与分子扩散协同控制着CO
2
的整体驱替。宏观运移由压力梯度驱动的对流主导
分子扩散显著拓宽了驱替前缘并形成有限混溶过渡带
重力分异则使得CO
2
优先沿储层底部运移;②当低温CO
2
注入后
CO
2
通过热传导和对流换热机制与孔隙内的天然气及围岩发生热交换
致使井周温降最大可达9 K
提高注入温度可优化储层的温度分布;③孔隙压力与热应力协同作用导致岩石的有效应力降低
孔隙度和渗透率的最大增幅分别为1.6 % 、4.8 %; 4储层的初始孔隙度对其孔-渗演化的影响最显著
渗透率次之
注入温度影响最小;⑤合理的注采配置有助于CO
2
注入并优化储气库的垫气效率
当采用注气量为40×10
4
m
3
/d、产气量为17.7×10
4
m
3
/d的多轮次周期注采策略时
储层中CO
2
的垫气效率可达55.48 % 。研究成果为储气库的合理建设与安全高效运行提供了理论支持与技术参考。
As an integral component of China’s energy regulation and strategic resource allocation
underground gas storage (UGS) engineering offers significant potential for application. Utilizing
CO
2
as a cushion gas can simultaneously enhance economic viability and contribute to the realization of "dual carbon" goals. However
the CO
2
injection process involves intricate mechanisms characterized by the synergistic effects of seepage
heat transfer
and rock matrix strain. Currently
the majority of domestic and international research prioritizes seepage field analysis
with insufficient attention paid to the coupled impacts of molecular diffusion
thermal conduction
and matrix deformation on reservoir porosity-permeability structures and fluid flow behavior. To further elucidate the coupling mechanisms between the seepage
thermodynamic
and stress fields
as well as the porosity-permeability evolution characteristics
this study establishes a diffusion-inclusive thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) coupled mathematical model integrated with molecular simulation results and performs finite element numerical simulations. The research results indicate as follows. (1) During the injection of supercritical CO
2
the overall displacement process is synergistically governed by convection
gravitational segregation
and molecular diffusion. Macroscopic transport is dominated by pressure gradient-driven convection
whereas molecular diffusion significantly broadens the displacement front and facilitates the formation of a finite miscible transition zone; concurrently
gravitational segregation causes CO
2
to migrate preferentially along the bottom of reservoir. (2) Upon the injection of low-temperature CO
2
heat exchange occurs with the interstitial natural gas and the surrounding host rock via thermal conduction and convective heat transfer mechanisms
resulting in a maximum temperature decrease of 9 K in the near-wellbore region. Increasing the injection temperature can effectively optimize the thermal distribution in reservoirs. (3) The synergistic effects of pore pressure and thermal stress lead to a reduction in the effective stress of the rock
resulting in m
aximum increments of 1.6 % and 4.8 % in porosity and permeability
respectively. (4) The initial reservoir porosity exerts the most significant influence on porosity-permeability evolution
followed by initial permeability
while injection temperature has the least impact. (5) Rational injection-production configurations facilitate CO
2
sequestration and optimize the cushion gas efficiency of the storage facility; specifically
under a multi-cycle periodic strategy with an injection rate of 40×10
4
m
3
/d and a production rate of 17.7×10
4
m
3
/d
the CO
2
cushion gas efficiency reaches 55.48 % . These findings provide theoretical support and technical references for the rational construction and safe
efficient operation of un derground gas storage facilities.
魏国齐,郑雅丽,邱小松,等. 中国地下储气库地质理论与应用[J].石油学报,2019,40(12):1519-1530.
GUO Wenpeng,ZHANG Bo,LIANG Yongtu,et al.Improved method and practice for site selection of underground gas storage under complex geological conditions[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2022,108:104813.
完颜祺琪,李国欣,朱华银,等.中国天然气地下储气库重大理论、关键技术进展与展望[J].天然气工业,2025,45(1):153-163.
杜思宇,柏明星,张志超,等.二氧化碳作天然气地下储气库垫层气的可行性[J].科学技术与工程,2024,24(27):11663-11670.
王建夫,王斌,王玮,等.基于U型盐穴储气库的新型CCUS方法[J].盐科学与化工,2024,53(4):14-18.
LI Yongsheng,XIA Caichu.Time-dependent tests on intact rocks in uniaxial compression[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2000,37(3):467-475.
FATT I,DAVIS D H.Reduction in permeability with overburden pressure[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1952,4(12):16.
GOBRAN B D,BRIGHAM W E,RAMEY H J.Absolute permeability as a function of confining pressure,pore pressure,and temperature[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1987,2(1):77-84.
WANG Rui,YUE Xiang’an,ZHANG Wei,et al.Effects of time lag and stress loading rate on permeability in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Mining Science and Technology (China),2009,19(4):526-530.
SELVADURAI A P S,GOWACKI A.Stress-induced permeability alterations in an argillaceous limestone[J].Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering,2017,50(5):1079-1096.
王秀影,吴通,蔡军,等.饶阳凹陷页岩油储层应力敏感规律[J].钻井液与完井液,2020,37(2):185-191.
游利军,邵佳新,高新平,等.储气库注采过程中有效应力变化模拟试验[J].石油钻探技术,2020,48(6):104-108.
SONG Juan,ZHANG Dongxiao.Comprehensive review of caprock-sealing mechanisms for geologic carbon sequestration[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47(1):9-22.
蔡少斌,杨永飞,刘杰.考虑热流固耦合作用的多孔介质孔隙尺度两相流动模拟[J].力学学报,2021,53(8):2225-2234.
张志雄,谢健,戚继红,等.地质封存二氧化碳沿断层泄漏数值模拟研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(2):109-116.
石钰,杨晓娜,李树刚,等.含水量对干酪根中多组分气体吸附和扩散的影响:分子模拟研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,36(4):50-57.
任俊豪,任晓海,宋海强,等.基于分子模拟的纳米孔内甲烷吸附与扩散特征[J].石油学报,2020,41(11):1366-1375.
GUO Xiao,CHEN Zuwei,WANG Pengkun,et al.Study on the occurrence mechanism of natural gas in sour gas reservoirs based on molecular simulation[J].Fuel,2025,394:135107.
ZHU Aimei,ZHANG Xinbo,LIU Qinglin,et al.A fully flexible potential model for carbon dioxide[J].Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2009,17(2):268-272.
DUPRÉ F,PIAGGESI D,RICCI F P.Self-diffusion coefficient in H2S along the coexistence curve[J].Physics Letters A,1980,80(2/3):178-180.
GROß T,BUCHHAUSER J,LüDEMANN H D.Self-diffusion in fluid carbon dioxide at high pressures[J].The Journal of Chemical Physics,1998,109(11):4518-4522.
GREINER-SCHMID A,WAPPMANN S,HAS M,et al.Self-diffusion in the compressed fluid lower alkanes:methane,ethane,and propane[J].The Journal of Chemical Physics,1991,94(8):5643-5649.
FULLER E N,SCHETTLER P D,GIDDINGS J C.New method for prediction of binary gas-phase diffusion coefficients[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry,1966,58(5):18-27.
WESSELINGH J A,BOLLEN A M.Multicomponent diffusivities from the free volume theory[J].Chemical Engineering Research and Design,1997,75(6):590-602.
于忠.超临界酸性天然气密度粘度变化规律实验研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2011.
WILKE C R.A viscosity equation for gas mixtures[J].The Journal of Chemical Physics,1950,18(4):517-519.
STANISAWSKA-GLUBIAK E,KORZENIOWSKA J,HOFFMANN J,et al.Effect of sulphur added to phosphate rock on solubility and phytoavailability of phosphorus[J].Polish Journal of Chemical Technology,2014,16(1):81-85.
VESOVIC V,WAKEHAM W A,OLCHOWY G A,et al.The transport properties of carbon dioxide[J].Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data,1990,19(3):763-808.
FENGHOUR A,WAKEHAM W A,VESOVIC V.The viscosity of carbon dioxide[J].Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data,1998,27(1):31-44.
SPAN R,WAGNER W.A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa[J].Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data,1996,25(6):1509-1596.
OUYANG L B.New correlations for predicting the density and viscosity of supercritical carbon dioxide under conditions expected in carbon capture and sequestration operations[J].The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal,2011,4(1):13-21.
冉启全,李士伦.流固耦合油藏数值模拟中物性参数动态模型研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1997,24(3):61-65.
KONG Xiangguo,WANG Enyuan,LIU Quanlin,et al.Dynamic permeability and porosity evolution of coal seam rich in CBM based on the flow-solid coupling theory[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2017,40:61-71.
陶云奇,许江,程明俊,等.含瓦斯煤渗透率理论分析与试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增刊2):3363-3370.
BEAR J,BACHMAT Y.Introduction to modeling of transport phenomena in porous media[M].Dordrecht:Springer Science & Business Media,2012.
YU Sang,SONG Yi,WANG Shouyi,et al.Novel phase field model of hydraulic fracture propagation in poroelastic media and numerical invest igation of interaction between hydraulic fracture and natural fracture[J].Petroleum,2024,10(4):672-695.
王作豪.U状油气藏型M储气库建库参数优化研究[D].重庆:重庆科技学院,2023.
0
浏览量
29
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621