中国石油化工股份有限公司西南油气分公司,四川,成都,610041
网络首发:2026-04-09,
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
熊亮, 魏力民, 冯少柯, 熊章凯, 李南颖. 四川盆地永川页岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(3): 692-705.
Xiong Liang, Wei Limin, Feng Shaoke, et al. Accumulation conditions as well as key exploration and development technologies of Yongchuan shale gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(3): 692-705.
熊亮, 魏力民, 冯少柯, 熊章凯, 李南颖. 四川盆地永川页岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2026, 47(3): 692-705. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202603013.
Xiong Liang, Wei Limin, Feng Shaoke, et al. Accumulation conditions as well as key exploration and development technologies of Yongchuan shale gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2026, 47(3): 692-705. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202603013.
位于四川盆地中南部低陡构造带的永川页岩气田
是中国复杂构造区内又一个成功探明储量超千亿立方米的大型整装深层页岩气田。该气田的主力产层为奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组一段海相富有机质页岩
其资源规模大
但受复杂构造背景控制
呈现地表与地下"双复杂"特征
表现为保存条件复杂、地应力场非均质性强、压裂改造难度大
页岩气的高效勘探与效益开发面临严峻挑战。通过系统总结该气田十余年的勘探开发实践
明确了成藏条件、演化阶段与成藏模式
研发并集成了适用于深层页岩气的勘探开发关键技术体系。研究结果表明:①气田的成藏过程可划分为海西期以前的有机质未成熟阶段、海西期—印支期的主生油阶段、燕山晚期的主生气阶段和燕山晚期—喜马拉雅期的页岩气藏差异抬升阶段;②气田整体具有埋深大、总有机碳含量高、孔隙度与含气量高
以及构造、断裂系统和地应力场复杂的特点
深水陆棚相富有机质页岩的稳定发育与有效保存是页岩气富集成藏的主控因素;③建立了地质评价与"甜点"预测关键技术
实现了"甜点"关键参数的精确预测
并完成断裂/裂缝、地应力和"甜点"的定量化精细评价
为页岩气的产量突破提供了可靠依据;④形成了以地质建模-数值模拟为核心的开发技术策略优化方法
创新提出了复杂构造区差异化压裂改造技术体系
为页岩气井的高产与稳产提供了有效支撑。该研究成果以期为中国同类复杂构造区深层页岩油气的勘探开发提供技术参考和借鉴。
The Yongchuan shale gas field
located in the low-steep structural belt in the central-southern Sichuan Basin
is another large-scale integrated deep shale gas field with proven reserves exceeding 100 billion cubic meters in complex tectonic area of China. The main production formation of the gas field is the marine organic-rich shale strata from the Ordovician Wufeng Formation to the Member 1 of Silurian Longmaxi Formation. Despite its substantial resource endowment
the gas field is strongly controlled by the complex tectonic setting and exhibits "dual complexity" in both surface and subsurface conditions
which is manifested as complicated preservation conditions
strong heterogeneity in the in-situ stress field
and great difficulty in fracturing stimulation. The efficient exploration and beneficial development of shale gas in the field face considerable challenges. By systematically reviewing the exploration and development practices of the gas field over more than ten years
the accumulation conditions
evolution stages
and accumulation models have been clarified
and a suite of key technologies applicable to deep shale gas exploration and development has been developed and integrated. The research results show as follows. (1) The accumulation process of the gas field can be subdivided into four stages
namely the immature stage of organic matter before Hercynian period
the main oil-generation stage during the Hercynian-Indosinian periods
the main gas-generation stage during the Late Yanshanian period
and the differential uplift stage of shale gas reservoirs during the Late Yanshanian to Himalayan periods. (2) The gas field is characterized by great burial depth
high TOC contents
high porosities and gas contents
as well as complex tectonic structures
fault systems
and geostress fields. The stable development and effective preservation of organic-rich shale in deep-water shelf facies constitute the primary controlling factors for shale gas enrichment and accumulation. (3) Key technologies for geological assessment and "sweet spot" prediction have been established
achieving the accurate prediction of critical "sweet spot" parameters
completing quantitative and fine-scale evaluation of fractures
in-situ stress
and "sweet spot" distribution
and providing a reliable basis for breakthrough in shale gas production. (4) A development strategy optimization approach centered on geological modeling and numerical simulation has been formulated
and a differentiated fracturing technology system tailored for complex structural zones has been innovatively proposed
providing effective support for achieving high and stable production in shale gas wells. These research achievements are expected to offer technical references and inspirations for the exploration and development of deep shale oil and gas in similar complex structural areas of China.
郭旭升,胡东风,黄仁春,等. 四川盆地深层—超深层天然气勘探进展与展望[J].天然气工业,2020,40(5):1-14.
张金川,陶佳,李振,等.中国深层页岩气资源前景和勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2021,41(1):15-28.
张旭亮,刘珠江,陈超,等.高陡复杂构造带深层页岩气保存条件差异性分析——以川东南綦江高陡复杂构造带为例[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(6):1121-1131.
葛勋,郭彤楼,黎茂稳,等.深层页岩储层"工程甜点"评价与优选——以川南永川、丁山地区为例[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(2): 211-221.
郭彤楼,熊亮,雷炜,等.四川盆地南部威荣、永川地区深层页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战与思考[J].天然气工业,2022,42(8):45-59.
葛勋,郭彤楼,黎茂稳,等.永川地区深层页岩气储层不同尺度裂缝精细建模[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(6):1-8.
冯少柯,熊亮,董晓霞,等.深层页岩气储层杨氏模量、泊松比定量评价[J].天然气勘探与开发,2025,48(3):64-75.
冯少柯,熊亮.基于多元力学实验的深层页岩气储层岩石力学特征研究[J].油气藏评价与开发,2025,15(3):406-416.
詹国卫,杨建,赵勇,等.川南深层页岩气开发实践与面临的挑战[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(6):1067-1077.
何建华,李勇,邓虎成,等.川东南永川地区龙马溪组页岩储层构造裂缝特征及期次演化研究[J].地学前缘,2024,31(3):298-311.
冯少柯,熊亮,尹帅,等.川东南林滩场五峰—龙马溪组深层页岩气储层脆性定量评价[J].石油实验地质,2025,47(4):742-753.
熊亮,赵勇,魏力民,等.威荣海相页岩气田页岩气富集机理及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2023,44(8):1365-1381.
郭旭升,王濡岳,申宝剑,等.中国页岩气地质特征、资源潜力与发展方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2025,52(1):15-28.
李勇,何建华,邓虎成,等.深层页岩储层现今地应力场特征及其对页岩储层改造的影响——以川南永川页岩气区块五峰—龙马溪组为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2024,53(3):546-563.
郭旭升,赵永强,申宝剑,等.中国南方海相页岩气勘探理论:回顾与展望[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):172-182.
马通.永川地区龙马溪组页岩可压性综合评价研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2023.
何建华,李勇,邓虎成,等.基于多元力学实验的深层页岩气储层脆性影响因素分析与定量评价[J].天然气地球科学,2022,33(7): 1102-1116.
WANG Enze,GUO Tonglou,LI Maowen,et al.Exploration potential of different lithofacies of deep marine shale gas systems:insight into organic matter accumulation and pore formation mechanisms[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2022,102:104563.
尹帅,张子阳,王濡岳,等.中国深层/超深层油气勘探储层地质力学研究进展、挑战及展望[J].天然气工业,2025,45(4):33-47.
SWENSON H,STADIE N P.Langmuir’s theory of adsorption:a centennial review[J].Langmuir,2019,35(16):5409-5426.
DONG Z,HOLDITCH S A A,MCVAY D A.Resource evaluation for shale gas reservoir[J].SPE Economics & Management,2013,5(1):5-16.
FANCHI J R,COOKSEY M J,LEHMAN K M,et al.Probabilistic decline curve analysis of Barnett,Fayetteville,Haynesville,and Woodford gas shales[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2013,109:308-311.
曹海涛,詹国卫,余小群,等.深层页岩气井产能的主要影响因素——以四川盆地南部永川区块为例[J].天然气工业,2019,39(增刊1):118-122.
王静波,敬朋贵,陈祖庆,等.面向深层页岩气"甜点"预测的地震勘探技术进展——以DX探区全方位三维地震为例[J].石油物探,2023,62(6):1154-1167.
刘振峰,刘忠群,郭元岭,等."断缝体"概念、地质模式及其在裂缝预测中的应用——以四川盆地川西坳陷新场地区须家河组二段致密砂岩气藏为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(4):973-980.
石学文,王畅,张洞君,等.四川盆地泸州北区五峰组—龙马溪组深层页岩气储层地应力地震预测技术[J].天然气地球科学,2024,35(11):2040-2052.
郑爱维,梁榜,舒志国,等.基于大数据PLS法的页岩气产能影响因素分析——以四川盆地涪陵气田焦石坝区块为例[J].天然气地球科学,2020,31(4):542-551.
邓乃尔,徐浩,邓虎成,等.断裂系统对现今地应力扰动特征研究——以四川盆地泸州北区深层页岩气为例[J].中国地质,2025,52(1):95-110.
徐华卿.海陆过渡相页岩气藏开发技术政策优化研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2023.
聂海宽,党伟,张珂,等.中国页岩气研究与发展20年:回顾与展望[J].天然气工业,2024,44(3):20-52.
李南颖.复杂构造区页岩气井产能影响因素及井位优化——以四川盆地永川气田南区为例[J].天然气技术与经济,2024,18(2): 26-31.
翁定为,雷群,管保山,等.中美页岩油气储层改造技术进展及发展方向[J].石油学报,2023,44(12):2297-2307.
赵金洲,雍锐,胡东风,等.中国深层—超深层页岩气压裂:问题、挑战与发展方向[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):295-311.
ABE A,KIM T W,HORNE R N.Laboratory hydraulic stimulation experiments to investigate the interaction between newly formed and preexisting fractures[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2021,141:104665.
0
浏览量
9
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621