1. 中联煤层气国家工程研究中心有限责任公司,北京,100095
2. 中石油煤层气有限责任公司,北京,100028
3. 深层油气全国重点实验室(中国石油大学(华东)),山东,青岛,266580
4. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东,青岛,266580
网络出版:2026-01-09,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
闫霞, 熊先钺, 王峰, 马瑞帅, 袁朴, 季亮, 孙俊义, 张纪远, 杨宏涛, 李春虎, 张铜, 尹泽松. 深部煤层支撑裂缝速敏效应影响机制及实践意义[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2374-2388.
闫霞, 熊先钺, 王峰, et al. Mechanism and practical significance of velocity sensitivity effects in propped fractures of deep coal seams[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(12): 2374-2388.
闫霞, 熊先钺, 王峰, 马瑞帅, 袁朴, 季亮, 孙俊义, 张纪远, 杨宏涛, 李春虎, 张铜, 尹泽松. 深部煤层支撑裂缝速敏效应影响机制及实践意义[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(12): 2374-2388. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202512012.
闫霞, 熊先钺, 王峰, et al. Mechanism and practical significance of velocity sensitivity effects in propped fractures of deep coal seams[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(12): 2374-2388. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202512012.
深部煤层气已成为中国天然气增储上产的重要增长极。现场实践发现
深部煤层气井在通井或修井时普遍存在压裂砂返吐现象
造成管柱冲蚀磨损、积砂堵塞、产量下降等
直接影响单井预计最终可采储量
而支撑裂缝导流能力变化是影响深部煤层气产气效果和制定合理排液制度的关键。但现有商业模拟器未考虑速敏效应影响
无法刻画排采过程中支撑剂运移导致的导流能力动态变化特征
导致深部煤层气井产量预测精度差
难以科学制定定量化返排制度。为此
首先通过岩心实验和颗粒作用分析
探究了铺砂浓度、支撑剂粒径、有效应力等因素对深部煤层支撑裂缝导流能力速敏特征的影响机制
然后基于实验规律建立了考虑流速影响的动态导流能力表征模型
耦合该模型
嵌入离散裂缝模型与煤层双孔单渗模型
构建了考虑压裂缝导流能力变化影响的数值模拟方法
进而确定合理返排制度。研究结果表明:①随着流速增加
深部煤层支撑裂缝导流能力呈现先上升、后下降的变化趋势
导流能力峰值对应流速为2.5~7.5 mL/min
且导流能力变化幅度与铺砂浓度、粒径和流体黏度正相关
与有效应力负相关。②煤岩支撑裂缝导流能力动态变化的内控机制在于
低流速下液流对小粒径支撑剂的冲刷携砂作用具有疏通流动通道的正向效应
而高流速下液流将起支撑作用的部分大粒径支撑剂冲刷出
具有闭合裂缝的负向效应。③考虑支撑裂缝导流能力速敏效应差异的数值模拟结果表明
速敏效应会显著影响产气效果
需通过控制返排液量以降低速敏效应的不利影响。④大吉区块生产实践证实了深部煤层气井支撑剂返吐量和产气效果受产液量影响显著
基于物理实验、数值模拟及现场监测数据统计分析
多种方法综合确定直井单层返排液量为20~23 m
3
/d
最大产液量不超过23 m
3
/d
水平井单段压裂参数和改造效果与直井相似时
建议水平井最大产液量不超过(段数×23)m
3
/d。研 究成果应用于大吉区块深部煤层气水平井返排液量控制
最高产液量由634 m
3
/d普遍控制至230 m
3
/d以下
压裂砂返吐现象明显减少
产气效果显著提升
为深部煤层气井合理返排制度提供了理论依据和技术支撑。
Deep coalbed methane (CBM)reservoirs have become an important growth driv
er for China’s natural gas production. Field practices have revealed that fracturing sand backflow frequently occurs during the wiper trip or workover operations in deep CBM wells. This phenomenon leads to issues such as tubing erosion
sand accumulation and blockage
and production decline
which directly affect the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR)of a single well. The variation in the conductivity of supporting fractures is therefore a critical factor influencing gas production performance in deep CBM reservoirs and plays a key role in establishing appropriate fluid drainage strategies. However
existing commercial simulators fail to incorporate the influence of velocity-sensitivity effects and thus cannot characterize proppant transport and fracture conductivity evolution during the drainage and production process. As a result
the production forecast accuracy for CBM wells remains low
making it difficult to establish a scientifically based and quantitatively optimized flowback strategy. To address these challenges
core flooding experiments and particle mechanics analyses were first conducted to investigate the influence mechanisms of factors such as sand concentration
proppant particle size
and effective stress on the velocity sensitivity characteristics of fracture conductivity in deep coal seams. Based on the experimental findings
a dynamic conductivity characterization model considering the effect of flow velocity was then developed. By coupling this model with a discrete fracture model and a dual-porosity single-permeability coal seam model
the study establishes a numerical simulation method considering the effects of fracture conductivity changes. This method ultimately enables the determination of a reasonable flowback strategy. The results indicate that:(1)With the increasing of flow velocity
the fracture conductivity in deep coal seams first rises and then declines
exhibiting a peak at the flow velocities between 2.5 and 7.5 mL/min. The variation amplitude of conductivity is positively correl
ated with proppant placement concentration
particle size
and fluid viscosity
while being negatively correlated with effective stress. (2)The intrinsic mechanism governing the dynamic variation of fracture conductivity in coal rock systems lies in the dual effect of fluid flow on proppant behavior. At low flow velocities
the flushing and sand-carrying action of the fluid on small-sized proppant particles exerts a positive effect by clearing and widening the flow channels. In contrast
at high flow velocities
the fluid tends to displace large-sized proppant particles that provide structural support
producing a negative effect by promoting fracture closure. (3)Numerical simulation results that incorporate the velocity sensitivity characteristics of fracture conductivity indicate that the velocity sensitivity effect significantly reduces gas production performance. Therefore
it is necessary to control the flowback rate to mitigate the adverse impact of velocity sensitivity effects. (4)The production practices in Daji block have verified that the fracturing sand backflow volume and gas production performance of CBM wells are both governed by the liquid production rate. Based on comprehensive analyses combining physical experiments
numerical simulations
and field monitoring data
it is recommended that the flowback rate for a single layer of vertical well should be maintained at 20-23 m
3
/d
with a maximum daily liquid production not exceeding 23 m
3
/d. For horizontal wells with the single-stage fracturing parameters and stimulation effects similar to those of vertical wells
the maximum daily liquid production should not exceed (number of stages × 23)m
3
/d. The field application in Daji Block demonstrates that the maximum daily liquid production of CBM horizontal wells has been effectively reduced from 634 m
3
/d to below 230 m
3
/d. As a result
the occurrence of fracturing sand backflow is significantly mitigated
and gas production performance is markedly imp
roved. These findings provide both theoretical support and technical guidance for formulating a reasonable flowback strategy for deep CBM wells.
秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J].石油学报,2023,44(11): 1791-1811.
罗平亚,朱苏阳.中国建立千亿立方米级煤层气大产业的理论与技术基础[J].石油学报,2023,44(11):1755-1763.
徐凤银,闫霞,林振盘,等.我国煤层气高效开发关键技术研究进展与发展方向[J].煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(3):1-14.
席胜利,闫伟,刘新社,等.鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):33-51.
闫霞,徐凤银,聂志宏,等.深部微构造特征及其对煤层气高产"甜点区"的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大吉地区为例[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(8):2426-2439.
侯 雨庭,喻健,张春雨,等.鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组深部煤层气富集地质特征及勘探前景[J].石油学报,2025,46(5):857-874.
徐凤银,闫霞,李曙光,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部(层)煤层气勘探开发理论技术难点与对策[J].煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(1):115-130.
周立宏,李曙光,王渊,等.深层煤岩气效益开发关键技术与实践——以鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块为例[J].石油学报,2025,46(8):1536-1549.
杨兆彪,卢本举,周国晓,等.深部煤层气地质特殊性与释放产出规律[J].石油学报,2025,46(8):1464-1476.
汪海阁,夏焱,丁吉平,等.中石油深层煤岩气钻完井工程技术现状及展望[J].石油学报,2025,46(8):1576-1588.
刘建忠,朱光辉,刘彦成,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策——以临兴一神府区块为例[J].石油学报,2023,44(11):1827-1839.
赵喆,徐旺林,赵振宇,等.鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组煤岩气地质特征与勘探突破[J].石油勘探与开发,2024,51(2):234-247.
熊先钺,闫霞,徐凤银,等.深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J].石油学报,2023,44(11):1812-1826.
闫霞,徐凤银,熊先钺,等.深部煤层气勘探开发关键实验技术及发展方向[J].煤田地质与勘探,2025,53(1):128-141.
闫霞,熊先钺,李曙光,等.深层煤岩气水平井各段产出贡献及其主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁—吉县区块为例[J].天然气工业,2024,44(10):80-92.
周立宏,闫霞,刘洪涛,等.深部煤层(岩)气渗吸置换开发机理及其实践意义[J].煤炭学报,2025,50(7):3534-3551.
徐加祥,丁云宏,杨立峰,等.压裂支撑剂在迂曲微裂缝中输送与分布规律[J].石油学报,2019,40(8):965-974.
胡胜勇,郝勇鑫,陈云波,等.煤粉运移与沉积对支撑裂缝渗透率动态影响规律[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(4):1288-1296.
皇凡生,桑树勋,刘世奇,等.压裂液矿化度对支撑裂缝及裂隙内煤粉运移的影响[J].煤炭学报,2023,48(4):1622-1633.
李骏,刘平礼,李年银.仿生学蒲公英支撑剂在类似煤层气裂缝网络中输运规律的物理模拟研究[J].煤炭学报,2025,50(2):1148-1161.
XIAO Hui,LI Zhenming,HE Siyuan,et al.Experimental study on proppant diversion transportation and multi-size proppant distribution in complex fracture networks[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,196:107800.
PARKER M,WEAVER J,VAN BATENBURG D.Understanding proppant flowback[R].SPE 56726,1999.
GOEL N,SHAH S N.Experimental investigation of proppant flowback phenomena using a large scale fracturing simulator[R].SPE 56880,1999.
VEGA F G,CARLEVARO C M,SÁNCHEZ M,et al.Stability and conductivity of proppant packs during flowback in unconventional reservoirs:a CFD-DEM simulation study[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,201:108381.
朱海燕,沈佳栋,周汉国.支撑裂缝导流能力的数值模拟[J].石油学报,2018,39(12):1410-1420.
WANG Duo,LI Sanbai,WANG Rui,et al.Evaluating the stability and volumetric flowback rate of proppant packs in hydraulic fractures using the lattice Boltzmann-discrete element coupling method[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2024,16(6):2052-2063.
王飞,周彤,许佳鑫,等.考虑支撑剂运移的压裂停泵压降模型[J].石油学报,2023,44(4):647-656.
李士斌,陈波涛,张海军,等.清水压裂自支撑裂缝面闭合残留宽度数值模拟[J].石油学报,2010,31(4):680-683.
倪小明,王延斌,接铭训,等.煤层气井排采初期合理排采强度的确定方法[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(6):101-104.
司庆红,朱炎铭,曹新款.煤层气井排采初期井底压降的计算方法[J].中国煤层气,2011,8(1):37-39.
胡秋嘉,毛崇昊,石斌,等.沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气井"变速排采-低恒套压"管控方法[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(6):1795-1803.
朱建英,高正龙,高丽军,等.煤层气井排采制度定量优化方法——以潘庄煤层气井为例[J].中国煤层气,2024,21(4):23-25.
李金平,潘军,李勇,等.基于流动物质平衡理论的煤层气井定量化排采新方法[J].天然气工业,2023,43(6):87-95.
刘展,张群霞,耿宇欣,等.煤层气L型水平井防窜气排采控制方法研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2024,52(5):77-87.
许耀波.煤层气井合层开发层间干扰分析与合采方法探讨——以平顶山首山一矿为例[J].煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(3):112-117.
黄华州,桑树勋,苗耀,等.煤层气井合层排采控制方法[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(S2):422-431.
HUANG Fansheng,DONG Changyin,SHANG Xiaosen,et al.Effects of proppant wettability and size on transport and retention of coal fines in saturated proppant packs:experimental and theoretical studies[J].Energy & Fuels,2021,35(15):11976-11991.
GUO Shenghao,WANG Bin,LI Ya,et al.Impacts of proppant flowback on fracture conductivity in different fracturing fluids and flowback conditions[J].ACS Omega,2022,7(8):6682-6690.
CAO Han,LI Zongce,GAO Qiang,et al.The characterization of incline-induced flow conductivity in shale’s proppant-packed crack:lab -scale study[J].Fuel,2024,357:129675.
KATENDE A,ALLEN C,RUTQVIST J,et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of proppant embedment and conductivity reduction within a fracture in the Caney shale,southern Oklahoma,USA[J].Fuel,2023,341:127571.
AHAMED M A A,PERERA M S A,ELSWORTH D,et al.Effective application of proppants during the hydraulic fracturing of coal seam gas reservoirs:implications from laboratory testings of propped and unpropped coal fractures[J].Fuel,2021,304:121394.
张纪远.煤层气藏流体运移规律及数值模拟研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2017.
KHAN C,KUZNETSOV D,RUFFORD T,et al.Optimisation of dewatering rates to maximise coal seam gas production[R].SPE 198210,2019.
0
浏览量
111
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621