油气钻采工程中的人工智能方法研究进展

孙宝江; 周梓强; 孙骞

doi:10.7623/syxb202511011

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 读者登录期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

油气钻采工程中的人工智能方法研究进展

石油工程 | 更新时间：2025-12-10

- 油气钻采工程中的人工智能方法研究进展
- Progress on artificial intelligence methods in oil and gas drilling and production
- 石油学报 2025年46卷第11期页码：2141-2173
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东,青岛,266580
  2. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFE0119600);国家自然科学基金基础科学中心项目(No.52288101);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52374050)和中国石油科技创新基金项目(2021DQ02-1101)资助。
- DOI：10.7623/syxb202511011
  中图分类号： E319
- 网络出版：2025-12-04，
  
  纸质出版：2025-12-04
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孙宝江, 周梓强, 孙骞. 油气钻采工程中的人工智能方法研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2141-2173.

Sun Baojiang, Zhou Ziqiang, Sun Qian. Progress on artificial intelligence methods in oil and gas drilling and production[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(11): 2141-2173.
孙宝江, 周梓强, 孙骞. 油气钻采工程中的人工智能方法研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(11): 2141-2173. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202511011.

Sun Baojiang, Zhou Ziqiang, Sun Qian. Progress on artificial intelligence methods in oil and gas drilling and production[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(11): 2141-2173. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202511011.

摘要

引入智能方法解决钻采过程中参数优化、状态识别等技术中的效率和可靠性等问题是目前的研究热点

并展现了广阔的发展前景。但在油气钻采智能化工程技术的研发过程中

智能优化算法和预测模型尚存在时效性和鲁棒性差、可靠性不足等问题

导致人工智能方法在油气钻采工程中的应用尚不理想。对国内外油气钻采领域内钻完井工程设计与施工参数优化、水力压裂改造效果评价与工艺参数优化、人工举升井故障诊断、油气藏物性和产能预测等方面的人工智能方法及智能化技术的发展现状进行了概述

并对人工智能模型的训练过程对标签数据依赖严重、可解释性不足以及小样本学习能力欠佳、工程适用性与可靠性验证不足

以及智能方法解决优化问题时效性差、多目标优化决策方法灵活性不足等主要问题进行了归纳分析。结合中国石油工业钻采技术研究现状及上述问题提出了油气钻采工程中人工智能方法发展建议:①建立标准化行业共享数据库体系

解决智能模型对比与验证难题;②加强学习范式研究

缓解标签数据依赖问题;③加强智能优化方法研究

提高决策精准性与时效性;④强化物理约束的数据驱动模型研究

增强物理—数据双驱动模型的可靠性;⑤推进样本均衡与增强技术研究

提升少数类识别准确性与模型稳定性;⑥加强多模态数据融合与处理方法研究

提升智能模型预测精度与工程鲁棒性;⑦发挥通用及行业大模型优势

提高油气钻采多场景智能优化决策可解释性与准确性。

Abstract

The current study mainly focus on the application of intelligent methods to improve the efficiency and reliability of technologies for optimizing parameters and identifying operational states in drilling and production processes

which exhibit great potential for future development. However

in the development of intelligent engineering technologies for oil and gas drilling and production

the smart optimization algorithms and predictive models still face the challenges including poor timeliness

weak robustness

and limited reliability. This hinder the practical application of artificial intelligence (AI)methods in oil and gas engineering. The paper provides an overview of the development status of AI methods and intelligent technologies for oil and gas drilling and production in China and abroad

involving engineering design and parameter optimization for well drilling and completion

evaluation of hydraulic fracturing performance and optimization of process parameters

diagnosis of artificial lift system failures

and prediction of reservoir properties and productivity. It further summarizes and analyzes the major challenges including a heavy reliance on labeled data for model training

poor model interpretability and weak performance in small-sample learning

inadquate validation of engineering applicability and reliability

poor timeliness of AI methods in performing optimization tasks

and limited flexibility in multi-objective optimization decision-making methods. Based on aforementioned challenges and the current research state of drilling and production technologies in China’s petroleum industry

this paper proposes several suggestions for the development of AI methods in oil and gas drilling and production as below:(1)establishing standardized

shared industry databases to support intelligent model comparison and validation; (2)enhancing research on learning paradigms to reduce the dependency on labelled data; (3)strengthening research on intelligent optimization methods to improve decision-making efficiency and timeliness; (4)focusing on studying physics-contrained data-driven models to improve the reliability of hybrid physics-data driven models; (5)advancing research on sample balancing and augmentation techniques to improve minority class recognition and model stability; (6)making efferts to develop multimodal data fusion and processing methods to boost the prediction accuracy and engineering robustness of intelligent models; (7)leveraging the advantages of general and industry-specific large models to enhance interpretability and accuracy of intelligent optimization decision-making for drill and production operations under multiple scenarios.

关键词

Keywords

references

李阳,廉培庆,薛兆杰,等. 大数据及人工智能在油气田开发中的应用现状及展望[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(4):1-11.

苏义脑,路保平,刘岩生,等.中国陆上深井超深井钻完井技术现状及攻关建议[J].石油钻采工艺,2020,42(5):527-542.

匡立春,刘合,任义丽,等.人工智能在石油勘探开发领域的应用现状与发展趋势[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(1):1-11.

汪海阁,乔磊,杨雄,等.中石油页岩油气工程技术现状及发展建议[J].石油学报,2024,45(10):1552-1564.

徐凤银,熊先钺,侯伟,等.深部煤层气产业升级与"八个一体化"体系的建立[J].石油学报,2025,46(2):289-305.

ERTEKIN T,SUN Qian.Artificial intelligence applications in reservoir engineering:a status check[J].Energies,2019,12(15):2897.

GAO Jiajia ,YANG Weidong ,CHEN Fuzhi,et al.Pore pressure prediction using machine learning methods and logging data considering Gaussian mixture clustering model[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2026,257:214188-214188.

冯义,朱亮,杨立军,等.基于LSTM神经网络深度序列机械钻速实时预测[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,39(1): 122-128.

ZHANG Chengkai,SONG Xianzhi,LIU Zihao,et al.Real-time and multi-objective optimization of rate-of-penetration using machine learning methods[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2023,223:211568.

李臻,宋先知,李根生,等.基于双输入序列到序列模型的井眼轨迹实时智能预测方法[J].石油钻采工艺,2023,45(4):393-403.

李辉,满曰南,李红星,等.基于相对熵改进模糊C均值聚类的溢流预警研究[J].钻采工艺,2023,46(3):165-170.

蔡晖,石洪福,王昭,等.基于机器学习的疏松砂岩油藏定向井初期产能预测与影响因素分析[J].中国海上油气,2025,37(3):123-131.

XU Xijie,RUI Xiaoping,FAN Yonglei,et al.A multivariate long short-term memory neural network for coalbed methane production forecasting[J].Symmetry,2020,12(12):2045.

SUN Qian,ERTEKIN T.Screening and optimization of polymer flooding projects using artificial-neural-network (ANN)based proxies[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2020,185:106617.

刘合,李艳春,贾德利,等.人工智能在注水开发方案精细化调整中的应用现状及展望[J].石油学报,2023,44(9):1574-1586.

ZHANG Kai,YU Haiqun,MA Xiaopeng,et al.Multi-source information fused generative adversarial network model and data assimilation based history matching for reservoir with complex geologies[J].Petroleum Science,2022,19(2):707-719.

谭茂金,武宏亮,王思宇,等.中国海相页岩气测井评价技术进展与发展方向[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):241-260.

REN Quan,ZHANG Hongbing,ZHANG Dailu,et al.A novel hybrid method of lithology identification based on k-means++ algorithm and fuzzy decision tree[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2022,208:109681.

LIN Jing,LI Hui,LIU Naihao,et al.Automatic lithology identification by applying LSTM to logging data:a case study in X tight rock reservoirs[J].IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters,2021,18(8):1361-1365.

DUAN Yajun,XIE Jun,SU Yanchun,et al.Application of the decision tree method to lithology identification of volcanic rocks-taking the Mesozoic in the Laizhouwan sag as an example[J].Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):19209.

SUN Jian,LI Qi,CHEN Mingqiang,et al.Optimization of models for a rapid identification of lithology while drilling:a win-win strategy based on machine learning[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,176:321-341.

REN Quan,ZHANG Hongbing,ZHANG Dailu,et al.Lithology identification using principal component analysis and particle swarm optimization fuzzy decision tree[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2023,220:111233.

QAEDI K,BARKER S M,SIMANJUNTAK A,et al.Automated machine learning for lithology prediction derived from seismic data[R].OTC 34778,2024.

MAHMOUD A A,ELKATATNY S,AL-ABDULJABBAR A.Application of machine learning models for real-time prediction of the formation lithology and tops from the drilling parameters[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,203:108574.

ZIADAT W,GAMAL H,ELKATATNY S.Real-time machine learning application for Formation tops and lithology prediction[R].OTC 32447,2023.

ZHANG Jiafeng,LIU Ye,MA Yuheng,et al.Real-time lithology identification from drilling data with self & cross attention model and wavelet transform[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,244:213427.

MENSAH A O.Real-time lithology prediction while drilling using machine learning algorithms:a web application based solution[R]. SPE 217479,2023.

YAN Tie,XU Rui,SUN Shihui,et al.A real-time intelligent lithology identification method based on a dynamic felling strategy weighted random forest algorithm[J].Petroleum Science,2024,21(2):1135-1148.

DENG Song,PAN Haoyu,LI Chaowei,et al.A real-time lithological identification method based on SMOTE-Tomek and ICSA optimization[J].Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition),2024,98(2):518-530.

QIAN Haiyu,GENG Yanfeng,WANG Hongyu.Lithology identification based on ramified structure model using generative adversarial network for imbalanced data[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,240:213036.

DING Yan,CUI Yi,XIN Qingqing,et al.Automated identification of lithology from drilling cuttings based on deep residual network[R].SPE 214565,2023.

TOLSTAYA E,SHAKIROV A,MEZGHANI M.Lithology prediction from drill cutting images using convolutional neural networks and automated dataset cleaning[R].SPE 216418,2023.

李根生,宋先知,祝兆鹏,等.智能钻完井技术研究进展与前景展望[J].石油钻探技术,2023,51(4):35-47.

LI Zhen,SONG Xianzhi,WANG Zheng,et al.Real-time prediction of wellbore trajectory with a dual-input GRU (Di-GRU)model[R].OTC 34894,2024.

GAO Yi,WANG Na,MA Yihao.L2-SSA-LSTM prediction model of steering drilling wellbore trajectory[J].IEEE Access,2024,12: 450-461.

GAO Yi,WANG Na,LI Fei.Steering drilling wellbore trajectory prediction based on the NOA-LSTM-FCNN method[J].Scientific Reports,2025,15(1):5215.

WANG Hongyu,GENG Yanfeng,WANG Weiliang,et al.Build-up rate prediction using data augmentation with VAE-based feature extraction[J].Energy,2025,330:136716.

LI Zhen,SONG Xianzhi,YU Qitao,et al.Integrating mechanics and machine learning for build-up rate prediction[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,246:213594.

CHEN Dong,MAO Kaifeng,YE Zhihui,et al.An artificial intelligent well trajectory design method combining both geological and engineering objectives[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,236:212736.

WANG Zhaojun,SHEN Shuilong,CHEN Dong,et al.Multi-objective optimization of the wellbore trajectory considering both geological and engineering factors[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,246:213647.

CHEN Bihai,WEN Guojun,HE Xin,et al.Application of adaptive grid-based multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for directional drilling trajectory design[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2023,222:211431.

XU Jiafeng,CHEN Xin,CAO Weihua,et al.Multi-objective trajectory planning in the multiple strata drilling process:a bi-directional constrained co-evolutionary optimizer with Pareto front learning[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2024,238:122119.

XU Jiafeng,CHEN Xin,ZHOU Yang,et al.Expensive deviation-correction drilling trajectory planning:a constrained multi-objective Bayesian optimization with feasibility-oriented bi-objective acquisition function[J].Control Engineering Practice,2025,156:106240.

SUN Shihui,GAO Yanwen,SUN Xiaofeng,et al.Intelligent optimization of horizontal wellbore trajectory based on reinforcement learning[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,244:213479.

VISHNUMOLAKALA N,KESIREDDY V,DEY S,et al.Optimizing well trajectory navigation and advanced Geo-Steering using deep-reinforcement learning[R].SPE 215011,2023.

MUHAMMAD R B,CHERAGHI Y,ALYAEV S,et al.Geosteering robot powered by multiple probabilistic interpretation and artificial intelligence:benchmarking against human experts[J].SPE Journal,2025,30(3):995-1009.

AL-MUDHAF M N,AL-HERZ A,HAFIZ H A,et al.Revolutionizing drilling efficiency with Neuro Autonomous Solutions:DrillOps automate,DD advisor,and AutoCurve coupled with SLB well construction rig & blue BHA[R].SPE 216690,2023.

UMEONAKU L,ALUU B,OKAFOR K,et al.A sustainable pathway to achieving operational efficiency while reducing carbon emissions using remote operations and drilling automation[R].SPE 217134,2023.

FARHI N,ABDEL SAMIE M A,ELDEMERDASH M M,et al.A smarter way to drill:first autonomous directional drilling run in Kuwait Delivers 8.5" landing section in record time-case study from North Kuwait[R].SPE 211742,2022.

FARHI N,MARCK J C,SANYAL A,et al.Remote drilling solution delivers consistency with the use of an automated drilling director:case studies from Kuwait[R].SPE 207866,2021.

VAN OORT E,TAYLOR E,THONHAUSER G,et al.Real-time rig-activity detection helps identify and minimize invisible lost time[J].World Oil,2008,229(4):39-47.

张菲菲,崔亚辉,于琛,等.基于机器学习的钻井工况识别技术现状及发展[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2023,20(4):53-65.

胡志强,杨进,王磊,等.钻井工况智能识别与时效分析技术[J].石油钻采工艺,2022,44(2):241-246.

毛光黔,宋先知,丁燕,等.基于梯度提升决策树算法的钻井工况识别方法[J].石油钻采工艺,2023,45(5):532-539.

QIAO Ying,LUO Yihan,SHANG Xu,et al.An efficient drilling conditions classification method utilizing encoder and improved Graph Attention Networks[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,233:212578.

LIU Zihao,SONG Xianzhi,YE Shanlin,et al.Intelligent identification workflow of drilling conditions combining deep learning and drilling knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arctic Engineering.Singapore:ASME,2024.

王正,宋先知,李洪松,等.基于1dCNN-BiGRU和注意力机制的钻井工况智能识别方法[J].石油科学通报,2025,10(5):926-940.

CHATAR C,SURESHA S,SHAO L,et al.Determining rig state from computer vision analytics[R].SPE 204086,2021.

殷启帅,杨进,曹博涵,等.基于长短期记忆神经网络的深水钻井工况实时智能判别模型[J].石油钻采工艺,2022,44(1):97-104.

中海石油(中国)有限公司,中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司.一种基于钻井多工况的钻井异常状态智能识别方法:202410805982.5[P].2024-09-06.

QIAO Ying,XU Hongmin,ZHOU Wenjun,et al.A BiGRU joint optimized attention network for recognition of drilling conditions[J].Petroleum Science,2023,20(6):3624-3637.

杨传书,王敏生,李昌盛,等.中国石化钻井工程决策支持系统进展及展望[J].钻采工艺,2025,48(1):55-62.

高健,汪海阁,宋世贵,等.中国石油工程作业智能支持中心模式改革与初探[J].钻采工艺,2025,48(1):37-45.

CURINA F,ABDO E,ROUHI A,et al.Rig state identification and equipment optimization using machine learning models[R].OMC 2021-063,2021.

KRIKOR A,KHAMBETE S P,BIMASTIANTO P A,et al.Machine learning delivers automated feedback on real time key performance indicators during drilling operations[R].SPE 211753,2022.

沐华艳,孙金声,丁燕,等.基于机械比能的钻速预测模型优选[J].钻采工艺,2023,46(3):16-21.

刘伟吉,张家辉,祝效华.多目标优化算法在机械比能与机械钻速耦合优化中的应用[J].石油钻采工艺,2025,47(03):265-276.

ALSAIHATI A,ISMAIL M,ELKATATNY S.Optimization of drilling parameters while drilling surface holes using machine learning and differential evolution[J].SPE Journal,2025,30(2):591-604.

CHEN Xuyue,DU Xu,WENG Chengkai,et al.A real-time drilling parameters optimization method for offshore large-scale cluster extended reach drilling based on intelligent optimization algorithm and machine learning[J].Ocean Engineering,2024,291:116375.

WU Xiao,LAI Xuzhi,HU Jie,et al.Improvement of rate of penetration in drilling process based on TCN-Vibration recognition[J].IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2024,73:2524912.

HAI weiguo,HE Yingming,LI Yafeng,et al.Multi-element drilling parameter optimization based on drillstring dynamics and ROP model[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,244:213460.

HAO Jiasheng,XU Haomin,PENG Zhinan,et al.An online adaptive ROP prediction model using GBDT and Bayesian optimization algorithm in drilling[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,246:213596.

HEGDE C,DAIGLE H,MILLWATER H,et al.Analysis of rate of penetration (ROP)prediction in drilling using physics-based and data-driven models[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,159:295-306.

祝兆鹏,朱林,宋先知,等.机理约束下钻井机械钻速智能预测泛化方法[J].天然气工业,2024,44(9):179-189.

郑双进,江厚顺,熊梦园,等.基于数据驱动和机理模型的机械钻速预测[J].钻采工艺,2025,48(1):78-87.

李博志,杨明合,许楷,等.基于注意力机制的卷积神经网络机械钻速预测方法[J].科学技术与工程,2024,24(21):8910-8916.

MENG Han,LIN Botao,JIN Yan.Stop using black-box models:application of explainable artificial intelligence for rate of penetration prediction[J].SPE Journal,2024,29(12):6640-6654.

彭炽,任书江,杨赟.基于子网络架构的页岩气水平井机械钻速预测[J].钻采工艺,2025,48(1):113-120.

YUAN Qingrui,HE Miao,CHEN Zhichao,et al.A real-time prediction method for rate of penetration sequence in offshore deep wells drilling based on attention mechanism-enhanced BiLSTM model[J].Ocean Engineering,2025,325:120820.

郭家,刘烨,韩雪银,等.机器学习预测机械钻速及在工程上的应用[J].海洋石油,2024,44(1):92-95.

YIN Hu,ZHAO Xiuwen,LI Qian.Research on adaptive prediction model of rate of penetration under dynamic formation conditions[J].Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2024,133:108281.

JUNIOR J R B,LAVI B.Enhancing rate of penetration prediction in drilling operations:a data stream framework approach[J].Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2025,143:110034.

MA Zhengchao,WENG Jintao,ZHANG Junkai,et al.Intelligent prediction of rate of penetration through meta-learning and data augmentation synergy under limited sample[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2025,250:213818.

PAYETTE G S,SPIVEY B J,WANG L,et al.A real-time well-site based surveillance and optimization platform for drilling:technology,basic workflows and field results[R].SPE 184615,2017.

DELAVAR M R,RAMEZANZADEH A,GHOLAMI R,et al.Optimization of drilling parameters using combined multi-objective method and presenting a practical factor[J].Computers & Geosciences,2023,175:105359.

YAVARI H,FAZAELIZADEH M,AADNOY B S,et al.An approach for optimization of controllable drilling parameters for motorized bottom hole assembly in a specific Formation[J].Results in Engineering,2023,20:101548.

WU Xiao,LAI Xuzhi,HU Jie,et al.Efficiency-safety coordination optimization in drilling process under complex Formations[J].Neurocomputing,2025,630:129732.

SAADELDIN R,GAMAL H,ELKATATNY S.Machine learning solution for predicting vibrations while drilling the curve section[J].ACS Omega,2023,8(39):35822-35836.

刘慕臣,宋先知,李大钰,等.钻柱摩阻扭矩智能预测模型与解释[J].煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(9):89-99.

汪海阁,高博,郑有成,等.机器学习在钻柱振动识别与预测中的研究进展[J].天然气工业,2024,44(1):149-158.

CAO Jie,NABAVI J,OEDEGAARD S I.Drilling advisory automation with digital twin and AI technologies[R].SPE 217960,2024.

MGIMBA M M,JIANG Shu,NYAKILLA E E,et al.Application of GMDH to predict pore pressure from well logs data:a case study from southeast Sichuan Basin,China[J].Natural Resources Research,2023,32(4):1711-1731.

JAFARIZADEH F,RAJABI M,TABASI S,et al.Data driven models to predict pore pressure using drilling and petrophysical data[J].Energy Reports,2022,8:6551-6562.

RADWAN A E,WOOD D A,RADWAN A A.Machine learning and data-driven prediction of pore pressure from geophysical logs:a case study for the Mangahewa gas field,New Zealand[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2022,14(6):1799-1809.

YALAMANCHI P,DATTA GUPTA S,UPADHYAY R.Evaluating the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning approaches for pore pressure prediction using petrophysical log data in carbonate reservoir[J].Acta Geophysica,2025,73(3):2591-2619.

DAS G,MAITI S.Ensemble learning-based interpretable method for pore pressure prediction using multivariate well logging data of IODP site U1517[J].Earth Science Informatics,2025,18(2):206.

KRISHNA S,IRFAN S A,KESHAVARZ S,et al.Smart predictions of petrophysical Formation pore pressure via robust data-driven intelligent models[J].Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling,Experiments and Design,2024,7(6):5611-5630.

DENG Song,PAN Haoyu,WANG Haige,et al.A hybrid machine learning optimization algorithm for multivariable pore pressure prediction[J]. Petroleum Science,2024,21(1):535-550.

XU Yuqiang,YANG Lei,XU Jiaxing,et al.Prediction method for Formation pore pressure based on transfer learning[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,236:212747.

CAO Shaohua,WANG Chengqi,NIU Qiang,et al.Enhancing pore pressure prediction accuracy:a knowledge-driven approach with temporal fusion transformer[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,238:212839.

SHI Fang,LIAO Hualin,QU Fengtao,et al.Collaborative-driven reservoir Formation pressure prediction using GAN-ML models and well logging data[J].Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,242:213271.

DELAVAR M R,RAMEZANZADEH A.Pore pressure prediction by empirical and machine learning methods using conventional and drilling logs in carbonate rocks[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2023,56(1):535-564.

FARSI M,MOHAMADIAN N,GHORBANI H,et al.Predicting Formation pore-pressure from well-log data with hybrid machine-learning optimization algorithms[J].Natural Resources Research,2021,30(5):3455-3481.

宋先知,姚学喆,李根生,等.基于LSTM-BP神经网络的地层孔隙压力计算方法[J].石油科学通报,2022,7(1):12-23.

许玉强,何保伦,王舒,等.深度学习与Eaton法联合驱动的地层孔隙压力预测方法[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(6):50-59.

朱海燕,王智辉,范宇,等.碳酸盐岩地层孔隙压力预测方法研究进展及展望[J].石油学报,2025,46(8):1628-1646.

ISEMIN I,NKUNDU K A.Investigating the Use of machine learning models for the prediction of pressure gradient and flow regimes in multiphase flow in horizontal pipes[R].SPE 208410,2021.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

人工智能在测井地层评价中的应用现状及前景

储层裂缝测井评价技术

基于特征点和改进卷积神经网络的压裂水平井裂缝参数高效快速反演

智能钻井技术现状与发展方向