EN基于停泵压降监测数据的支撑缝网参数解释方法——以四川盆地威远页岩气田A井为例
Method for interpreting propped fracture-network parameters based on pump-stopping drop monitoring data:a case study of Well A in Weiyuan shale gas field,Sichuan Basin
- 石油学报 2025年46卷第10期 页码：1916-1928
- 作者机构：
1. 中国石油天然气集团有限公司,北京,100007
2. 中国石油集团油田技术服务有限公司,北京,100007
3. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院,北京,102249
4. 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司,四川,成都,610051
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.7623/syxb202510007
中图分类号： TE357.1-
网络出版：2025-11-04，
纸质出版：2025-11-04
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨立强, 王飞, 柳明, 李彦超, 张显聪. 基于停泵压降监测数据的支撑缝网参数解释方法——以四川盆地威远页岩气田A井为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1928.
Yang Liqiang, Wang Fei, Liu Ming, et al. Method for interpreting propped fracture-network parameters based on pump-stopping drop monitoring data:a case study of Well A in Weiyuan shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta petrolei sinica, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1928.
杨立强, 王飞, 柳明, 李彦超, 张显聪. 基于停泵压降监测数据的支撑缝网参数解释方法——以四川盆地威远页岩气田A井为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1928. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202510007.
Yang Liqiang, Wang Fei, Liu Ming, et al. Method for interpreting propped fracture-network parameters based on pump-stopping drop monitoring data:a case study of Well A in Weiyuan shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta petrolei sinica, 2025, 46(10): 1916-1928. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202510007.
摘要
针对现有压裂监测解释技术无法对支撑缝网参数进行有效解释的难题
提出一套基于停泵压降监测数据的压裂支撑缝网参数解释方法。通过建立考虑支撑剂在主、次裂缝网中运移、缝网内液体滤失与支撑缝网闭合耦合效应的压裂段停泵压降模型模拟井底压降动态
绘制出不同支撑缝网宽度和密度下的压降特征曲线
从而诊断支撑缝网类型并建立支撑缝网参数反演计算流程。选取四川盆地威远区块典型页岩气A井开展应用
通过与光纤和示踪剂产气剖面监测结果对比验证了新方法的有效性
并进一步证明砂撑裂缝体积是页岩气井压后产能的主控参数。对比A井套管固井和未固井完井工艺下的压裂段支撑缝网参数解释结果发现
套管固井完井段压裂形成"主裂缝短窄、次裂缝宽密"型缝网
砂支撑体积占比更大
分别为77%和62%;套管未固井完井段压裂形成"主裂缝长宽、次裂缝窄疏"型缝网
液支撑体积占比更大
分别为38%和23%。充分借助天然裂缝发育的地质属性
可用较小施工规模实现更大规模的改造效果
实现"风险防控—降本提效"最大化。研究表明
新方法只需压裂施工数据和停泵后的井口压力监测数据
即可实现支撑缝网6个核心参数的定量评价。
Abstract
Current fracturing monitoring and interpretation technologies face difficulties in effectively explaining the parameters of the propped fracture network. This paper presents a method for interpreting the parameters of the propped fracture network based on pump-stopping pressure drop monitoring data. The dynamics of the bottom-hole pressure drop is simulated by a model established for the pressure drop during the pump-stopping phase in a single fracturing stage
which considers the coupling effects of the proppant transport within the primary and secondary fracture networks
fluid leak-off
and fracture network closure. On this basis
pressure drop characteristic curves are plotted for different propped fracture network widths and densities. This method aids in identifying the type of propped network and establishes a process for the inversion of propped network parameters. A typical shale gas well A
located in the Weiyuan Block of Sichuan Basin
is selected for the case study. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated by comparing it with the monitoring results of optical fiber and tracer gas production profiles. The results further demonstrate that the sand-propped fracture volume is the primary control parameter for the post-fracturing productivity of shale gas wells. Then a comparison of the interpretation results for propped fracture network parameters from two completion techniques in a fracturing interval of Well A reveals that for the casing-cemented completion
the fracture network is characterized by short and narrow main fractures
as well as wide and dense secondary fractures; the sand-propped volume ratio is higher (77 % vs. 62 %). In contrast
for the non-casing-cemented completion
the fracture network is characterized by long and wide main fractures
as well as narrow and sparse secondary fractures; the fluid propped volume ratio is higher (38 % vs. 23 %). By fully utilizing the geological characteristics of well-developed natural fractures
a larger-scale modification effect can be achieved with a smaller construction scale
thereby maximizing risk prevention and control
cost reduction
and efficiency improvement. Research indicates that the proposed method requires only fracturing construction data and wellhead pressure monitoring data after pump-stopping to provide a comprehensive and quantitative evaluation of the six core parameters of the propped fracture network.
关键词
Keywords
references
赵金洲, 雍锐, 胡东风, 等. 中国深层—超深层页岩气压裂:问题、挑战与发展方向[J].石油学报, 2024, 45(1):295-311.
吴宝成, 吴承美, 谭强, 等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷昌吉页岩油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报, 2024, 45(2):437-460.
翁定为, 雷群, 管保山, 等.中美页岩油气储层改造技术进展及发展方向[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(12):2297-2307.
ROBERTS G, WHITTAKER J, MCDONALD J, et al.Proppant distribution observations from 20, 000+perforation erosion measurements[R].SPE 199693, 2020.
UGUETO C G A, HUCKABEE P T, MOLENAAR M M.Challenging assumptions about fracture stimulation placement effectiveness using fiber optic distributed sensing diagnostics:diversion, stage isolation and overflushing[R].SPE 173348, 2015.
DENNEY D.Distributed acoustic sensing for hydraulic-fracturing monitoring and diagnostics[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2012, 64(3):68-74.
JIN G, UGUETO G, WOJTASZEK M, et al.Novel near-wellbore fracture diagnosis for unconventional wells using high-resolution distributed strain sensing during production[J].SPE Journal, 2021, 26(5):3255-3264.
陈铭, 郭天魁, 翁定为, 等.基于裂缝前缘邻井光纤应变的压裂裂缝参数解释方法[J].石油学报, 2024, 45(8):1282-1295.
王爱国, 张胜传, 余洲, 等.稳定电场压裂裂缝监测技术[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊2):87-92.
LEI Li, TAN Jingqiang, WOOD D A, et al.A review of the current status of induced seismicity monitoring for hydraulic fracturing in unconventional tight oil and gas reservoirs[J].Fuel, 2019, 242:195-210.
修 乃岭, 严玉忠, 窦晶晶, 等.四川长宁A平台页岩气水平井组压裂地面测斜仪监测评估[J].石油地质与工程, 2016, 30(5):124-126.
LIU Junrong, CAO Shijie, WU Xingru, et al.Detecting the propped fracture by injection of magnetic proppant during fracturing[J].Geophysics , 2019, 84(3):JM1-JM14.
孟晋, 刘得军, 翟颖, 等.基于电磁方法的水力压裂裂缝探测技术研究进展[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2023, 58(6):1508-1521.
KUMAR A, SETH P, SHRIVASTAVA K, et al.Well interference diagnosis through integrated analysis of tracer and pressure interference tests[R].URTEC 2901827, 2018.
罗红文, 李海涛, 李颖, 等.低渗透气藏压裂水平井产出剖面与裂缝参数反演解释[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(7):936-947.
VAN DER HORST J.Recent advances in fiber optic technology for in-well production and injection profiling[R].IPTC 18563, 2015.
李伟, 申建, 汪跃跃, 等.深部煤系气合采产层组合判识方法及效果评价[J].石油学报, 2024, 45(5):844-854.
MOHAMED I M, NASRALLA R A, SAYED M A, et al.Evaluation of after-closure analysis techniques for tight and shale gas Formations[R].SPE 140136, 2011.
MARONGIU-PORCU M, EHLIG-ECONOMIDES C A, ECONOMIDES M J.Global model for fracture falloff analysis[R]. SPE 144028, 2011.
SOLIMAN M Y, AZARI M, ANSAH J, et al.Review and application of short-term pressure transient testing of wells[R].SPE 93560, 2005.
EHLIG-ECONOMIDES C A, ECONOMIDES M J.Water as proppant [C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.Denver:SPE, 2011:SPE-147603-MS.
BACHMAN R C, WALTERS D A, HAWKES R A, et al.Reappraisal of the G time concept in mini-frac analysis[R].SPE 160169, 2012.
王飞, 张士诚, 蔡久杰.一种简便的测试压裂压力递减分析方法[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3):115-120.
王飞, 潘子晴.致密气藏压裂水平井反卷积试井模型[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(7):898-902.
ZANGANEH B, CLARKSON C R, HAWKES R V.Reinterpretation of fracture closure dynamics during diagnostic fracture injection tests[R].SPE 185649, 2017.
ZANGANEH B, CLARKSON C R, JONES J R.Reinterpretation of flow patterns during dfits based on dynamic fracture geometry, leakoff and afterflow[R].SPE 189840, 2018.
LIU Guoqing, EHLIG-ECONOMIDES C.Practical considerations for diagnostic fracture injection test (DFIT)analysis[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 171:1133-1140.
王飞, 周彤, 许佳鑫, 等.考虑支撑剂运移的压裂停泵压降模型[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(4):647-656.
王飞, 许佳鑫, 周彤, 等.考虑压裂缝网动态滤失的停泵压降模型[J].石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(2):416-423.
ROOSTAEI M, NOURI A, FATTAHPOUR V, et al.Numerical simulation of proppant transport in hydraulic fractures[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 163:119-138.
WANG Fei, LI Baoman, CHEN Qiaoyun, et al.Simulation of proppant distribution in hydraulically fractured shale network during shut-in periods[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178:467-474.
STABEN M E, ZINCHENKO A Z, DAVIS R H.Erratum:"motion of a particle between two parallel plane walls in low-Reynolds-number Poiseuille flow" [Phys.Fluids 15, 1711 (2003)][J].Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(11):4206.
SHARMA M M.Advanced fracturing technology for tight gas:an east Texas field demonstration[R].Texas:University of Texas, 2005.
SANO O, HASIMOTO H.The effect of two plane walls on the motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 87(4):673-694.
MCCABE W L, SMITH J C, HARRIOTT P.Unit operations of chemical engineering[M].New York:McGraw-hill, 1967.
HUANG Xuemin, WANG Jingyi, CHEN Shengnan, et al.A simple dilation-recompaction model for hydraulic fracturing[J].Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2016, 16:62-75.
WANG Fei, PAN Ziqing, ZHANG Yichi, et al.Simulation of coupled hydro-mechanical-chemical phenomena in hydraulically fractured gas shale during fracturing-fluid flowback[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 163:16-26.
MEYER B R, BAZAN L W.A discrete fracture network model for hydraulically induced fractures-theory, parametric and case studies[R].SPE 140514, 2011.
AGUILERA R.Recovery factors and reserves in naturally fractured reservoirs[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1999, 38(7):15-18.
BOURDET D, AYOUB J A, PLRARD Y M.Use of pressure derivative in well-test interpretation[J].SPE Formation Evaluation, 1989, 4(2):293-302.
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
AI问答- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies