1. 中国石油化工股份有限公司西南油气分公司,四川,成都,610041
2. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室,四川,成都,610500
3. 北京大学地球与空间科学学院,北京,100871
4. 云南大学地球科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
网络出版:2025-11-04,
纸质出版:2025-11-04
移动端阅览
熊亮, 董晓霞, 熊鹰, 王同, 罗思聪, 王保保, 石开波, 姚盈江, 王恩泽, 刘波. 川南地区二叠系茅口组一段致密碳酸盐岩储层类型及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1875-1891.
Xiong Liang, Dong Xiaoxia, Xiong Ying, et al. Types and controlling factors of tight carbonate reservoirs in the Member 1 of Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta petrolei sinica, 2025, 46(10): 1875-1891.
熊亮, 董晓霞, 熊鹰, 王同, 罗思聪, 王保保, 石开波, 姚盈江, 王恩泽, 刘波. 川南地区二叠系茅口组一段致密碳酸盐岩储层类型及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1875-1891. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202510004.
Xiong Liang, Dong Xiaoxia, Xiong Ying, et al. Types and controlling factors of tight carbonate reservoirs in the Member 1 of Permian Maokou Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta petrolei sinica, 2025, 46(10): 1875-1891. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202510004.
四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段(茅一段)为天然气勘探的新层系
受其复杂的岩相组合、多变的岩石组构和微观孔缝结构影响
优质储层的精确预测面临显著挑战。基于岩石学、矿物学和储层物性等资料
系统厘定了川南地区茅一段的储层类型
并阐明了其主控因素与空间展布规律。研究结果表明
茅一段自下而上可划分为8个小层
发育含泥(黏土矿物)灰岩、生屑泥粒灰岩和生屑粒泥灰岩3类储集岩
具有低孔、低渗裂缝-孔隙型致密碳酸盐岩储层特征。含泥灰岩以发育有机质孔、黏土矿物(滑石)孔缝和粒缘缝等基质微孔缝系统为特征
其相对高的孔渗性和高总有机碳(TOC)含量主要受控于高频海侵旋回背景下黏土矿物和有机质的周期性富集;含泥灰岩呈源-储一体
稳定、连续分布于茅一段1小层、2小层、4小层和6小层
是茅一段的最有利储集岩。生屑泥粒灰岩和生屑粒泥灰岩的储集空间以溶蚀孔缝为主
主要赋存于茅一段7小层和8小层
其储集性能主要受内缓坡带局部高部位的准同生期溶蚀作用控制;溶蚀作用虽然可使得生屑泥粒灰岩和生屑粒泥灰岩的岩石物性得到提升
但其TOC含量仍较低
天然气富集条件一般。茅一段经历了同沉积期—埋藏期的多期构造叠加改造
形成了网状裂缝系统
显著改善了致密碳酸盐岩储层的储-渗性能
这为天然气的富集提供了优势输导条件。川南地区茅一段天然气勘探应重点关注厚层连续含泥灰岩(基质孔缝发育带)和构造断层/断裂带的叠合区(裂缝强化改造区)。
The Member 1 of Middle Permian Maokou Formation represents the new series of strata for natural gas exploration in Sichuan Basin. Its complex lithological assemblages
heterogeneous rock fabrics and microscopic pore-facture structures pose challenges for accurately predicting high-quality reservoirs. Based on petrology
mineralogy and reservoir physical properties
this paper comprehensively investigates the types
controlling factors and spatial distribution of the Member 1 of Maokou Formation reservoirs in southern Sichuan Basin. The results show that the Member 1 of Maokou Formation can be divided into 8 sublayers from bottom to top
where three types of reservoir rocks are developed
including argillaceous (clay-rich)limestones
bioclastic packstones
and bioclastic wackestones
all characterized as low-porosity and low-permeability fracture-pore type tight carbonate reservoirs. Among these
argillaceous limestones feature a matrix microscopic pore-fracture system dominated by organic matrix pores
clay mineral (talc)pore-fractures
and grain-edge fractures
whose relatively higher porosity
permeability
and total organic carbon (TOC)contents are mainly controlled by the periodic enrichment of clay minerals and organic matters in high-frequency transgressive cycles. Argillaceous limestone has a source-reservoir integrated structure
stably and continuously distributed in the 1st
2nd
4th and 6th sublayers of Member 1 of Maokou Formation
representing the most favorable reservoirs in the Member 1 of Maokou Formation. Bioclastic packstones and bioclastic wackestones are dominated by dissolution pore-fractures
and mainly occur in the 7th and 8th sublayers. The formation of these reservoirs is controlled by penecontemporaneous dissolution in local uplift areas of the inner ramp. Although the dissolution can enhance the petrophysical properties of bioclastic packstones and bioclastic wackestones
their TOC contents are still relatively low
exhibiting a suboptimal condition for natural gas accumulation. A fracture network system was formed due to the multi-stage tectonic modifications during syndepositional to burial periods
significantly improving the accumulation/permeability capacity of tight carbonate reservoirs and providing favorable migration pathways for natural gas enrichment. For natural gas exploration in the Member 1 of Maokou Formation
the focus should be put on the area where the continuous thick argillaceous limestones (matrix pore-fracture developed zones)overlap with structural fault/fracture zones (fracture-enhanced transformation zones).
胡东风, 王良军, 张汉荣, 等.碳酸盐岩烃源岩气藏的发现及其油气地质意义——以四川盆地涪陵地区中二叠统茅口组一段气藏为例[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(7):23-33.
郭彤楼.四川盆地碳酸盐岩源岩气地质特征与勘探前景[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1):1-16.
赵培荣.焦石坝地区茅一段储层特征及天然气勘探潜力[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5):772-781.
刘树根, 文龙, 宋金民, 等.四川盆地中二叠统构造-沉积分异与油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 49(4):385-413.
江青春, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 等.四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(6):949-960.
肖笛, 谭秀成, 郗爱华, 等.四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组碳酸盐岩岩溶特征:古大陆环境下层控型早成岩期岩溶实例[J].古地理学报, 2015, 17(4):457-476.
李红敬, 解习农, 黄俊华, 等.川西北二叠系茅口组海相优质烃源岩发育控制因素[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2012, 37(1): 171-180.
黄士鹏, 江青春, 汪泽成, 等.四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组与茅口组烃源岩的差异性[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(12):26-34.
江青春, 汪泽成, 苏旺, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段泥灰岩源内非常规天然气成藏条件及有利勘探方向[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6):82-97.
张培先, 何希鹏, 高全芳, 等.四川盆地东南缘二叠系茅口组一段页岩气藏地质特征及富集模式[J].石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 146-157.
梁兴, 徐政语, 栗维民, 等.蜀南—渝西地区中二叠统茅一段灰质源岩气储层特征及主控因素——以DB1井为例[J].石油实验地质, 2023, 45(4):714-725.
任海侠, 林小兵, 刘叶, 等.川西南二叠系茅口组一段滑石特征及其形成机理——以A1井茅一段样品为例[J].石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6):1038-1047.
范建平, 宋金民, 江青春, 等.川东地区中二叠统茅口组一段储层特征与形成模式[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(6):1413-1430.
韩月卿, 李双建, 韩文彪, 等.川东南地区中二叠统茅口组灰泥灰岩储层孔隙特征[J].石油实验地质, 2022, 44(4):666-676.
李蓉, 苏成鹏, 石国山, 等.川南地区二叠系茅口组一段瘤状灰岩储层成因[J].天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6):806-815.
宋金民, 江青春, 刘树根, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段含海泡石层系古环境与沉积格局指示意义[J].石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
苏成鹏, 李蓉, 石国山, 等.四川盆地及周缘中二叠统茅口组一段储集层特征及对油气勘探的启示[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6): 1150-1161.
张庄, 宋晓波, 苏成鹏, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段岩石微相特征及储层成因——以华蓥山二崖剖面为例[J].断块油气田, 2023, 30(3):405-414.
SCOTESE C R, LANGFORD R P.Pangea and the paleogeography of the Permian[M].Berlin:Springer, 1995.
WANG Yue, JIN Yugang.Permian palaeogeographic evolution of the Jiangnan Basin, South China[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2000, 160(1/2):35-44.
何斌, 徐义刚, 王雅玫, 等.东吴运动性质的厘定及其时空演变规律[J].地球科学, 2005, 30(1):89-96.
YAN Jiaxin, CARLSON E H.Nodular celestite in the Chihsia Formation (Middle Permian)of South China[J].Sedimentology, 2003, 50(2):265-278.
HAQ B U, SCHUTTER S R.A chronology of Paleozoic sea-level changes[J].Science, 2008, 322(5898):64-68.
唐大海, 肖笛, 谭秀成, 等.古岩溶地貌恢复及地质意义——以川西北中二叠统茅口组为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(5):689-695.
XIAO Di, TAN Xiucheng, XI Aihua, et al.An inland facies-controlled eogenetic karst of the carbonate reservoir in the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 72:218-233.
田小彬, 师江波, 董景海, 等.川中地区茅口组一段沉积相新认识——基于最新钻井资料[J].天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(11):1646-1655.
DUNHAM R J.Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture[M]//Ham W E.Classification of carbonate rocks:A Symposium.Tulsa:AAPG, 1962:108-121.
STANLEY S M.Influence of seawater chemistry on biomineralization throughout Phanerozoic time:paleontological and experimental evidence[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2006, 232(2/4):214-236.
殷树军, 文政, 金雪英, 等.泥灰岩非常规储层特征及测井表征方法——以四川盆地合川—潼南地区茅口组一段为例[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(7):1105-1117.
张运波, 王根厚, 余正伟, 等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组米兰科维奇旋回及高频层序[J].古地理学报, 2013, 15(6):777-786.
LI Jie, CAI Zhongxian, CHEN Haoru, et al.Influence of differential diagenesis on primary depositional signals in limestone-marl alternations:an example from Middle Permian marine successions, South China[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2018, 495:139-151.
PANG Qian, HU Guang, ZHANG Xihua, et al.Organic geochemistry, sedimentary environment, and organic matter enrichment of limestone-marlstone rhythms in the middle Permian northern Sichuan Basin, China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 134:105306.
朱传庆, 徐明, 袁玉松, 等.峨眉山玄武岩喷发在四川盆地的地热学响应[J].科学通报, 2010, 55(6):474-482.
李佳欣, 房大志, 程泽虎.川东南地区茅口组一段地质特征及天然气富集规律——以南川区块为例[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 38(4):12-19.
梁兴, 张磊, 蒋立伟, 等.四川盆地渝西大安地区灰质源岩气勘探突破与资源潜力[J].中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(2):30-45.
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621