EN川东南地区龙马溪组页岩现今地应力场扰动因素及其开发地质意义
Disturbance factors of current geostress field of Longmaxi Formation shale in southeastern Sichuan Basin and their geological significance for gas exploitation
- 石油学报 2025年46卷第4期 页码：743-762
- 作者机构：
1. 成都理工大学能源学院(页岩气现代产业学院),四川,成都,610059
2. 页岩油气富集机理与高效开发全国重点实验室,北京,102206
3. 中国石油化工股份有限公司西南油气分公司,四川,成都,610041
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院,北京,102206
5. 大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院,黑龙江,大庆,163712
6. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西,西安,710065
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.42402148);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42072182);页岩油气富集机理与高效开发全国重点实验室开放基金项目(ZC0699)和中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目(P24181)资助。
DOI：10.7623/syxb202504006
中图分类号： E121.2-
网络出版：2025-05-10，
纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
何建华, 熊亮, 王濡岳, 徐碧兰, 李瑞雪, 曹峰, 邓虎成, 徐浩, 李勇, 李丹, 尹帅. 川东南地区龙马溪组页岩现今地应力场扰动因素及其开发地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 743-762.
He Jianhua, Xiong Liang, Wang Ruyue, et al. Disturbance factors of current geostress field of Longmaxi Formation shale in southeastern Sichuan Basin and their geological significance for gas exploitation[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 743-762.
何建华, 熊亮, 王濡岳, 徐碧兰, 李瑞雪, 曹峰, 邓虎成, 徐浩, 李勇, 李丹, 尹帅. 川东南地区龙马溪组页岩现今地应力场扰动因素及其开发地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 743-762. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202504006.
He Jianhua, Xiong Liang, Wang Ruyue, et al. Disturbance factors of current geostress field of Longmaxi Formation shale in southeastern Sichuan Basin and their geological significance for gas exploitation[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 743-762. DOI： 10.7623/syxb202504006.
摘要
川东南地区深层页岩现今地应力场的大小、方向及结构等变量的分布规律不清
严重制约了页岩气的勘探开发部署、实施及生产效果。以川东南地区重点区块内的龙马溪组为研究对象
综合利用岩心分析以及来自钻井的多源多维地应力响应资料
采用地质力学分析与数值模拟方法
查明了引起地应力场扰动的关键地质作用
揭示了地应力扰动的力学机制与变化规律并明确其对页岩气富集高产的影响。研究结果表明:川东南地区按现今地应力方位的分布可划分为5个区域
总体的应力机制以走滑状态为主
但盆缘复杂区的应力机制由浅至深发生了由逆断层应力机制转换为走滑应力机制或正断层应力机制的变化;褶皱和断裂是引起川东南地区地应力场发生偏转的关键外部因素
以龙马溪组一段(龙一段)1小层—2小层的中和面为界
褶皱中和面之上的地应力方位顺着褶皱轴向发生偏转
偏转角度受控于岩层力学性质和变形强度
而在中和面之下
地应力方位和大小的变化则呈现相反规律;越靠近断裂
地应力方位沿着断层走向偏转
地应力规模变小且两向应力差变大;孔隙压力的变化主要影响最小水平主应力的大小
造成的方向偏转角度最高可达35°;纵向上
受岩性扰动影响
五峰组—龙一段3小层1亚小层富硅质页岩岩相的应力值低
作为应力薄弱层
其压裂效果最好。综合分析认为
在褶皱区中和面之下、向斜区或四级以下的NE向断裂附近
裂缝的封闭性好
含气量较高
此外
平面上拉张应力扰动区的应力值低
两向应力差小
易于形成高缝高的复杂缝网
产量高
是页岩气勘探开发的有利区。研究成果以期为深层复杂构造区页岩储层的地应力场准确评价和甜点区优选提供重要借鉴和指导。
Abstract
For the current deep shale reservoirs in southeastern Sichuan
the variables such as geostress magnitude
orientation and structure are complex and changeable
and their changing laws are still unclear
thus severely restricting the deployment
implementation
and production efficiency of shale gas exploration and development. This study targets at Longmaxi Formation in key blocks of southeastern Sichuan Basin. Based on the core analyses and the multi-source and multi-dimensional stress responses data from wells
as well as geomechanical analyses and numerical simulations
the study identifies the key geological processes causing geostress disturbances
reveals the mechanical mechanisms and patterns of stress variations and further clarifies their impacts on shale gas enrichment and high production. Results indicate that the southeastern Sichuan Basin can be divided into five regions according to the current geostress
and the stress machanism is mainly presented as strike-slip stress regime. However
in complex marginal zones
the stress mechanism transitions from reverse faulting at shallow depths to strike-slip or normal faulting at greater depths. Folds and faults are identified as the critical external factors causing stress field deflections. Above the neutral surface of the folds at the first and second submembers of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation
the stress orientation deflects along the fold axis
with the deflection angle controlled by the mechanical properties and deformation intensity of the rock layers
and stress magnitudes decrease. Below the neutral surface
the opposite trend from stress magnitudes and orientation is observed. Moreover
the stress orientation deflects along the fault strike as the distance from the fault decreases
with the stress magnitude decreasing and the differential stress between principal directions increasing. Pore pressure variations mainly influence the minimum horizontal principal stress
with the deflection angles reaching up to 35°. Vertically
as influenced by lithological disturbances
stress values are low for siliceous shales from Wufeng Formation to the first sub-layer of the third submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation
and these weak-stress layers are favorable for fracturing. Comprehensive analysis suggests that below the neutral surface
syncline zones or areas near low-level (Grade Ⅳ or below)NE-trending faults exhibit good fracture sealing and high gas content. The tensile stress disturbance areas exhibit low stress magnitudes and small differential stresses
facilitating the formation of complex fracture networks with high fracture heights and high production rates. These areas are highlighted as priority zones for future shale gas exploration and development. The research results are expected to provide important insights and guidance for the accurate evaluation of geostress fields and optimal selection of sweet spots in deep and structurally complex shale reservoirs.
关键词
Keywords
references
汪凯明.川东南盆缘复杂构造区深层页岩气富集特征[J].天然气地球科学,2023,34(2):334-348.
惠沙沙,庞雄奇,谌卓恒,等.四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J].石油学报,2024,45(3):531-547.
翁定为,雷群,管保山,等.中美页岩油气储层改造技术进展及发展方向[J].石油学报,2023,44(12):2297-2307.
席胜利,魏嘉怡,张才利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地海相页岩油勘探发现及意义[J].石油学报,2023,44(2):253-269.
庞河清,熊亮,魏力民,等.川南深层页岩气富集高产主要地质因素分析——以威荣页岩气田为例[J].天然气工业,2019,39(增刊1):78-84.
梁兴,张朝,张鹏伟,等.湖北宜昌深层山地页岩气地质力学研究及应用[J].油气藏评价与开发,2019,9(5):20-31.
李曙光,徐天吉,吕其彪,等.深层页岩气双"甜点"参数地震预测技术[J].天然气工业,2019,39(增刊1):113-117.
何建华,丁文龙,王哲,等.页岩储层体积压裂缝网形成的主控因素及评价方法[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(4):108-118.
张金才,亓原昌.地应力对页岩储层开发的影响与对策[J].石油与天然气地质,2020,41(4):776-783.
郭彤楼,何希鹏,曾萍,等.复杂构造区页岩气藏地质特征与效益开发建议——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1490-1500.
赵金洲,雍锐,胡东风,等.中国深层—超深层页岩气压裂:问题、挑战与发展方向[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):295-311.
周文,闫长辉,王世泽,等.油气藏现今地应力场评价方法及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2007.
ZENG Lianbo,LYU Wenya,LI Jian,et al.Variation in the orientation of the maximum horizontal stress in thick channel-fill sandstones with low-permeability:a case of the Bonan oilfield in the Bohai Bay Basin,eastern China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,107:32-40.
HAIMSON B C.The effect of lithology,inhomogeneity,topography,and faults,on in situ stress measurements by hydraulic fracturing,and the importance of correct data interpretation and independent evidence in support of results[C]//ISRM International Symposium on In-Situ Rock Stress.Beijing,2010.
XU Shang,LIU Rui,HAO Fang,et al.Complex rotation of maximum horizontal stress in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale on the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin,China:implications for predicting natural fractures[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,109:519-529.
包汉勇,梁榜.页岩地应力分布规律及其影响因素——以涪陵页岩气田五峰—龙马溪组一段为例[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,2021,34(5):1-4.
何建华,邓虎成,马若龙,等.川东南深层复杂构造区龙马溪组页岩储层现今地应力场扰动特征及评价方法研究[C]//第六届非常规油气地质评价暨新能源学术研讨会.武汉:中国地质大学,2021:9-12.
张东涛,胡朝俊,闫亚蕾,等.昭通地区现今构造应力场分布特征及成因机制[J].天然气工业,2021,41(增刊1):24-29.
TIAN He,ZENG Lianbo,XU Xiang,et al.Factors influencing the in-situ stress orientations in shales:a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in the Jiaoshiba area,southeastern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2021,94:104110.
FAULKNER D R,MITCHELL T M,HEALY D,et al.Slip on'weak’faults by the rotation of regional stress in the fracture damage zone[J].Nature,2006,444(7121):922-925.
陈世杰,肖明,陈俊涛,等.断层对地应力场方向的扰动规律及反演分析方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(7):1434-1444.
RADWAN A E,ABDELGHANY W K,ELKHAWAGA M A.Present-day in-situ stresses in Southern Gulf of Suez,Egypt:insights for stress rotation in an extensional rift basin[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2021,147:104334.
翁剑桥,曾联波,吕文雅,等.断层附近地应力扰动带宽度及其影响因素[J].地质力学学报,2020,26(1):39-47.
ZHANG Shihuai,MA Xiaodong.How does in situ stress rotate within a fault zone? Insights from explicit modeling of the frictional,fractured rock mass[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,2021,126(11):e2021JB022348.
BRUNO M S,WINTERSTEIN D F.Some influences of stratigraphy and structure on reservoir stress orientation[J].Geophysics,1994,59(6):954-962.
徐珂,戴俊生,商琳,等.南堡凹陷现今地应力特征及影响因素[J].中国矿业大学学报,2019,48(3):570-583.
范存辉,李虎,钟城,等.川东南丁山构造龙马溪组页岩构造裂缝期次及演化模式[J].石油学报,2018,39(4):379-390.
何建华,李勇,邓虎成,等.川东南永川地区龙马溪组页岩储层构造裂缝特征及期次演化研究[J].地学前缘,2024,31(3):298-311.
LI Chuanxin,HE Dengfa,SUN Yanpeng,et al.Structural characteristic and origin of intra-continental fold belt in the eastern Sichuan basin,South China Block[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2015,111:206-221.
MA Yongsheng,GUO Xusheng,GUO Tonglou,et al.The Puguang gas field:new giant discovery in the mature Sichuan Basin,southwest China [J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(5):627-643.
谢润成.川西坳陷须家河组探井地应力解释与井壁稳定性评价[D].成都:成都理工大学,2009.
陈文婷,郑质彬,彭岩岩.水力压裂法在地应力测量中的应用[J].煤炭技术,2020,39(2):66-68.
王璞,王成虎,杨汝华,等.基于应力多边形与震源机制解的深部岩体应力状态预测方法初探[J].岩土力学,2019,40(11):4486-4496.
陈念,王成虎,高桂云,等.基于应力多边形与钻孔崩落的白鹤滩右岸厂房区地应力场特征研究[J].岩土力学,2021,42(12):3376-3384.
赵德安,陈志敏,蔡小林,等.中国地应力场分布规律统计分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(6):1265-1271.
BROWN E T,HOEK E.Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1978,15(4):211-215.
顾宏星,傅雪海,季明,等.褶皱中和面位置确定及其在六盘水涝河向斜中的应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2011,39(5):11-14.
王濡岳,胡宗全,周彤,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及其控储意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(6) :1295-1306.
郭德勇,揣筱升,张铁岗,等.首山一矿深部地应力分布规律及影响因素[J].煤炭学报,2024,49(5):2360-2375.
MA Xiaodong,ZHANG Shihuai,ZHANG Xiaowen,et al.Lithology-controlled stress variations of Longmaxi shale—example of an appraisal wellbore in the Changning area[J].Rock Mechanics Bulletin,2022,1(1):100002.
EATON B A.Fracture gradient prediction and its application in oilfield operations[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1969,21(10): 1353-1360.
童亨茂.断层开启与封闭的定量分析[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(3):215-220.
SIMPSON R W.Quantifying Anderson’s fault types[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,1997,102(B8):17909-17919.
0
浏览量
24
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
AI问答- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies