深层油气全国重点实验室(中国石油大学(华东)),山东,青岛,266580
网络出版:2025-05-10,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
邵长印, 宋璠, 邱隆伟, 张世奇, 孔庆圆. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙河街组二段滩坝沉积规律、主控因素及油气勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 708-725.
Shao Changyin, Song Fan, Qiu Longwei, et al. Sedimentary regularities,main controlling factors,and hydrocarbon exploration potential of the beach-bars of the Member 2 of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 708-725.
邵长印, 宋璠, 邱隆伟, 张世奇, 孔庆圆. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙河街组二段滩坝沉积规律、主控因素及油气勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 708-725. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202504004.
Shao Changyin, Song Fan, Qiu Longwei, et al. Sedimentary regularities,main controlling factors,and hydrocarbon exploration potential of the beach-bars of the Member 2 of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 708-725. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202504004.
渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组二段(沙二段)历经60余年的勘探
已形成“广覆含油、多点突破”的勘探局面。目前
由于沙二段发育于断陷向坳陷转化阶段(断—坳转换期)
在复杂盆地结构影响下
滩坝的沉积特征、主控因素和勘探潜力仍不够明确。基于钻井、测井和取心等地质资料
对沾化凹陷沙二段滩坝的沉积特征、沉积相展布规律、主控因素和勘探潜力开展了研究。研究结果表明:①沾化凹陷沙二段发育砂岩滩坝、碳酸盐岩滩坝和混积滩坝3种沉积相类型。纵向上
由沙二段4砂组至1砂组
砂岩滩坝、碳酸盐岩滩坝和混积滩坝的规模逐渐增大;横向上
砂岩滩坝分布于湖岸线附近
碳酸盐岩滩坝分布于渤南洼陷的鼻状构造带附近
混积滩坝分布于渤南洼陷的鼻状构造带及其两翼。②滩坝受风场、物源和盆地结构控制。由风场决定的湖盆水动力区控制了滩坝的类型、走向和分布位置
其中
砂岩滩坝发育于水动力最强的破浪带
碳酸盐岩滩坝和混积滩坝发育于水体能量较强的碎浪带;物源控制了滩坝的发育程度和类型
其中
物源充足区发育规模较大的砂岩滩坝
而物源匮乏区则发育碳酸盐岩滩坝和混积滩坝;断—坳转换期产生的独特盆地结构控制了滩坝的类型和分布位置
并在构造高部位发育砂岩滩坝、碳酸盐岩滩坝和混积滩坝。③沾化凹陷沙二段储层整体具有高孔、低渗的特征
砂体单层厚度为2~6 m的储层是勘探开发的有利目标
共识别出28个有利砂体
预测有利勘探面积为300.24 km
2
。研究成果以期为同类地质背景的油气勘探提供理论依据。
After more than 60 years of exploration
the Member 2 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag of Bohai Bay Basin
has formed an exploration situation of "widely containing oil and making breakthroughs in many aspects". At present
due to the Member 2 of Shahejie Formation develo
ped in a transitional stage from rift to depression (rift-depression transition period)
under the influence of complex basin structure
the sedimentary characteristics
main controlling factors
and exploration potential of beach- bars are still unclear. Based on geological data of drilling
logging and coring
the paper investigates the depositional features
sedimentary facies distribution patterns
controlling factors
and exploration potential of beach-bars in the Member 2 of Shahejie Formation of Zhanhua sag. The research results show as follows. (1)Three types of sedimentary facies
i.e.
sandstone beach-bar
carbonate beach-bar
as well as mix beach-bar
have been identified in the Member 2 of Shahejie Formation. Vertically
the scale of all three beach-bar types gradually increases from the fourth sand group to the first sand group. Laterally
sandstone beach-bar facies are distributed near the lake shoreline
carbonate beach-bar facies are adjacet to the plunging structural belt in Bonan subsag
and the mix beach-bar facies are distributed across both the plunging structural belt and its flanks in Bonan subsag. (2)The development of beach-bar is mainly controlled by windfield
sediment source
and basin structure. Specifically
the windfield-controlled hydrodynamic zones of lake basin play a role in controlling the types
orientation and location of beach-bar. Sandstone beach-bar is developed in the breaker zone with the strongest hydrodynamic energy
while both carbonate and mix beach-bars are developed in the surfzone with strong water body energy. The sediment source influences the development scale and type of beach-bar. Large-scale sandstone beach-bar is developed in the area with sufficient provenance
while carbonate and mix beach-bars are developed in the area with poor provenance. The unique basin structure formed during the transition period has a controlling effect on the types and distributions of beach-bars. Sandstone
carbonate
and mix beach-bars are developed in structural high. (3)The M
ember 2 of Shahejie Formation reservoir exhibits high porosity and low permeability. The sand bodies with the layer thicknesses of 2 m to 6 m are favorable exploration targets in the study area. A total of 28 favorable sand bodies have been identified
and the favorable exploration area is predicted to be 300.24 km
2
. The research results are expected to provide a theoretical basis for oil and gas exploration under similar geological backgrounds.
LI Xin,QIU Longwei,FU Jian,et al. Architectural characteristics,evolutionary stages,and sedimentary models of clastic beach bars[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2022,146:105976.
侯方浩,蒋裕强,方少仙,等.四川盆地上三叠统香溪组二段和四段砂岩沉积模式[J].石油学报,2005,26(2):30-37.
徐长贵,周家雄,杨海风,等.渤海海域油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):163-182.
刘强虎,朱红涛,舒誉,等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷古近系恩平组物源体系及其对滩坝的控制[J].石油学报,2015,36(3):286-299.
JIANG Zaixing,LIU Hui,ZHANG Shanwen,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of large-scale lacustrine beach-bars and their formation in the Eocene Boxing sag of Bohai Bay Basin,East China[J].Sedimentology,2011,58(5):1087-1112.
SHANG Xiaofei,HOU Jiagen,DONG Yue.Genesis of reservoir heterogeneity and its impacts on petroleum exploitation in beach-bar sandstone reservoirs:a case study from the Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Energy Geoscience,2022,3(1):35-48.
ZHAO Dongna,ZHU Xiaomin,DONG Yanlei,et al.Application of seismic sedimentology to prediction of beach and bar sandbodies in gentle slope of lacustrine basin:a case study of the Lower Cretaceous in Chepaizi area,Junggar Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41 (1):60-67.
WANG Yanqing,SONG Guangyong,ZHU Chao,et al.Controls on the occurrence of beach-bar sandstone in a Neogene saline lake basin,southwestern Qaidam Basin,China[J].Geological Journal,2022,57(9):3478-3495.
TAMURA T.Beach ridges and prograded beach deposits as palaeoenvironment records[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2012,114(3-4):279-297.
刘君龙,纪友亮,杨克明,等.浅水湖盆三角洲岸线控砂机理与油气勘探意义——以川西坳陷中段蓬莱镇组为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(9):1060-1073.
JIN Wei,WANG Zhiguo.Discussion on marine facies and beach bar—lagoon system of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2021,766:012072.
PLINK-BJÖRKLUND P.Morphodynamics of rivers strongly affected by monsoon precipitation:review of depositional style and forcing factors[J].Sedimentary Geology,2015,323:110-147.
邵长印,宋璠,张世奇,等.渤海湾盆地黄河口凹陷SC7区块古近系东营组二段下亚段滩坝储集体构型特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2024,45(2):486-501.
DENG Hongwen,XIAO Yi,MA Lixiang,et al.Genetic type,distribution patterns and controlling factors of beach and bars in the second member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dawangbei sag,Bohai Bay,China[J].Geological Journal,2011,46(4):380-389.
孙波.东营凹陷滩坝油气成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J].地质论评,2023,69(增刊1):293-294.
林会喜,邓宏文,秦雁群,等.层序演化对滩坝储集层成藏要素与分布的控制作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):680-689.
LIU Qianghu,ZHU Hongtao,SHU Yu,et al.Provenance identification and sedimentary analysis of the beach and bar systems in the Palaeogene of the Enping sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin,South China Sea[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,70:251-272.
朱筱敏,钟大康,袁选俊,等.中国含油气盆地沉积地质学进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):820-829.
赵贤正,蒲秀刚,王家豪,等.断陷盆地缓坡区控砂控藏机制与勘探发现——以歧口凹陷歧北缓坡带为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(7): 729-739.
姜在兴,王俊辉,张元福,等."风-源-盆"三元耦合油气储集体预测方法及其应用——对非主力物源区储集体的解释与预测[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1465-1476.
王俊辉,姜在兴,鲜本忠,等.古风力恢复研究进展:利用介质的搬运能力[J].地学前缘,2018,25(2):309-318.
冯兴雷.车镇大王北洼陷沙二段滩坝砂体沉积微相及成因模式研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2008.
鄢继华,张鹏,陈世悦,等.沾化凹陷断坳转换期层序地层及沉积特征[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(4):465-467.
郭文建,郭瑞婧,唐勇,等.准噶尔盆地二叠系上乌尔禾组退覆式扇(辫状河)三角洲前缘-滩坝复合砂砾岩沉积特征及控制因素[J].古地理学报,2024,26(3):584-599.
刘建国,孙钰,李世银,等.济阳坳陷断拗转换期基本特征研究[J].特种油气藏,2007,14(1):34-36.
宋国奇.陆相断陷盆地断-拗转换体系与地层超覆油藏"T-S"控藏模式——以济阳坳陷第三系为例[J].地质学报,2007,81(9):1208-1214.
崔纹纹.沾化凹陷四扣洼陷沙二段层序地层及沉积特征研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2016.
邱隆伟,王义,代莉,等.沾化凹陷孤北洼陷沙二段—沙三中亚段上部沉积体系分析[J].东北石油大学学报,2016,40(1):89-102.
赵宁,邓宏文.沾化凹陷桩西地区沙二上亚段滩坝沉积规律及控制因素研究[J].沉积学报,2010,28(3):441-450.
宋璠,邱隆伟,苏妮娜,等.渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组二段沉积相特征及演化[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(4):499-508.
苏妮娜,宋璠,邱隆伟.沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙二段储层特征及主控因素[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,47(3):829-838.
SONG Fan,SU Nina,YANG Shaochun,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of thick layer lacustrine beach-bars in the Cenozoic Banqiao sag of the Bohai Bay Basin,East China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2018,151:73-89.
林会喜,方旭庆,李凌,等.鲁北济阳坳陷沾化凹陷东部潜山的发育及油气成藏控制因素[J].地质通报,2006,25(9/10):1160-1167.
李润芳.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷构造特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2018.
朱光有,金强,张水昌,等.陆相断陷盆地复式成烃及成藏系统研究——以济阳坳陷沾化凹陷为例[J].石油学报,2004,25(2):12-18.
孙耀庭,刘雅利,巩建强,等.济阳坳陷沾化凹陷沙四上亚段灰质滩坝储层评价[J].中国石油勘探,2016,21(5):62-69.
XIA Rui,ZHANG Jianguo,ZHONG Qi.Study on the differential distribution patterns of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower third Member of the Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Minerals,2024,14(1):70.
漆家福,张一伟,陆克政,等.渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1995,19(增刊1):1-6.
赵宁,邓宏文,王训练.济阳坳陷沾化凹陷古近系沙河街组二段潜山周缘滩坝及物性特征[J].古地理学报,2010,12(1):57-68.
张静仪.孤北洼陷沙一、二段地层对比及沉积相分析[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2021.
MILLIKEN K L,KO L T,POMMER M,et al.Sempetrography of eastern Mediterranean Sapropels:analogue data for assessing organic matter in oil and gas shales[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2014,84(11):961-974.
武瑾,郭为,郭伟,等.深层海相页岩气立体开发"甜点"岩相及其成因机制——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J].石油学报,2024,45(8):1219-1233.
薛欣宇.基于过程模拟的浅水湖盆风驱水体流场及沉积物运聚研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2023.
尹力,冯文杰,尹艳树,等.波浪作用下砂质滩坝的沉积过程与沉积模式——基于水槽沉积模拟实验研究[J].沉积学报,2022,40(5):1393-1405.
姜在兴.风场-物源-盆地系统沉积动力学:沉积体系成因解释与分布预测新概念[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
JIANG Zaixing,WANG Junhui,FULTHORPE C S,et al.A quantitative model of paleowind reconstruction using subsurface lacustrine longshore bar deposits - An attempt[J].Sedimentary Geology,2018,371:1-15.
JIANG Zaixing,LIANG Shuyi,ZHANG Yuanfu,et al.Sedimentary hydrodynamic study of sand bodies in the upper subsection of the 4th Member of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation the eastern Dongying depression,China[J].Petroleum Science,2014,11(2):189-199.
王冠民,林国松.济阳坳陷古近纪的古气候区分析[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2012,31(5):505-509.
姜在兴,王俊辉,张元福.滩坝沉积研究进展综述[J].古地理学报,2015,17(4):427-440.
杨勇强,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等.陆相断陷湖盆滩坝沉积模式——以东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段为例[J].石油学报,2011,32(3):417-423.
王俊辉.东营凹陷始新统风场-物源-盆地系统沉积动力学研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2016.
姜在兴,王雯雯,王俊辉,等.风动力场对沉积体系的作用[J].沉积学报,2017,35(5):863-876.
张培园.沾化凹陷桩西地区沙二段滩坝沉积研究与有利区带预测[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2009.
王夏斌,姜在兴,胡光义,等.辽河西部凹陷曙北地区古近系沙四上亚段滩坝发育的控制因素[J].高校地质学报,2018,24(6):800-809.
白军科.渤南地区沙二段沉积及油气成藏特征研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2017.
商晓飞,侯加根,孙福亭,等.砂质滩坝储集层内部结构特征及构型模式——以黄骅坳陷板桥油田古近系沙河街组为例[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1160-1171.
刘鹏,杜鹏伟.断陷盆地中浅层油气成藏特征及有利区预测:以渤南洼陷沙二段为例[J].现代地质,2020,34(4):849-857.
0
浏览量
38
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621