1. 中国石油西南油气田公司,四川,成都,610051
2. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院,四川,成都,610041
3. 中国石油西南油气田公司勘探事业部,四川,成都,610041
4. 中国石油杭州地质研究院,浙江,杭州,310023
5. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室(成都理工大学),四川,成都,610059
6. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室(西南石油大学),四川,成都,610500
网络出版:2025-05-10,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
谢继容, 罗冰, 张玺华, 张本健, 陈聪, 冉崎, 赵容容, 彭瀚霖, 李天军, 陈康, 赖强, 何青林, 李文正, 袁海锋, 胡广. 四川盆地川中地区龙女寺茅口组白云岩气田勘探发现及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 661-675,742.
Xie Jirong, Luo Bing, Zhang Xihua, et al. Exploration and discovery of the Maokou Formation dolomite gas field in Longnüsi area of central Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 661-675.
谢继容, 罗冰, 张玺华, 张本健, 陈聪, 冉崎, 赵容容, 彭瀚霖, 李天军, 陈康, 赖强, 何青林, 李文正, 袁海锋, 胡广. 四川盆地川中地区龙女寺茅口组白云岩气田勘探发现及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(4): 661-675,742. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202504001.
Xie Jirong, Luo Bing, Zhang Xihua, et al. Exploration and discovery of the Maokou Formation dolomite gas field in Longnüsi area of central Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2025, 46(4): 661-675. DOI: 10.7623/syxb202504001.
2023年
四川盆地中部地区龙女寺区块茅口组二段(茅二段)勘探获得重大突破
向自然资源部提交探明储量超过460×10
8
m
3
是四川盆地茅口组60年勘探历程中发现的首个大型气藏。截至2024年
中国石油天然气股份有限公司在川中地区茅口组探明天然气地质储量超过1 500×10
8
m
3
茅口组成为四川盆地增储上产重要新领域。主要取得以下认识:①创新提出了川中古隆起对茅二段沉积早期的古地貌分异具有显著控制作用
古隆起边缘发育的坡折带是高能滩体发育的有利区
龙女寺—合川—南充地区的滩体厚度大
是勘探的有利突破口。②川中地区龙女寺区块的高能滩相遭受了早期暴露溶蚀及浅埋藏等多期白云岩化作用
可形成茅二段优质白云岩储层
为规模成藏提供储集空间条件。研究区内的茅二段下亚段发育裂缝-孔隙型优质储层
储层厚度为5~30 m
岩心孔隙度为2%~8%
渗透率为0.01~1.00 mD。③多源接力供烃、早期成储成圈是川中地区龙女寺区块茅口组规模成藏的主要机理。寒武系筇竹寺组、志留系龙马溪组和二叠系茅口组一段优质烃源岩先后成熟且持续供烃
这为龙女寺区块的茅口组气藏提供了从中三叠世至晚垩世的4期持续油气充注。高能滩相储层早期成储
且滩体外有致密灰岩封堵
由此形成早期岩性圈闭
有利于规模成藏。④龙女寺—合川—南充一带是茅二段下亚段勘探最有利区
川西地区雅安—都江堰一带、川北地区盐亭区块、蜀南地区泸州区块具有相似的沉积背景和有利成藏条件
是下一步勘探的潜在有利区。
In 2023
a major breakthrough was achieved in exploration of the Member 2 of Maokou Formation in Longnüsi area of central Sichuan Basin. The proven reserves submitted to Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China exceeded 460×10
8
m
3
marking the first large-s
cale gas reservoir discovered in the 60-year exploration history of Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin. As of 2024
PetroChina Company Limited has proven geological reserves of natural gas exceeding 1 500×10
8
m
3
in Maokou Formation of central Sichuan Basin
making the Maokou Formation an important new field for increasing reserves and production in the Sichuan Basin. The main understandings obtained are as follows. (1) It is innovatively proposed that the paleo-uplift of central Sichuan Basin has a significant controlling effect on the differentiation of ancient landforms in the early sedimentary period of the Member 2 of Maokou Formation. The slope break zone developed at the edge of the paleo-uplift is a favorable area for the development of high-energy shoals. The shoal thickness is large in Longnüsi-Hechuan-Nanchong area
which is a favorable breakthrough area for exploration. (2) The high-energy shoal facies in Longnüsi area of central Sichuan Basin has undergone multiple dolomitization processes such as early exposure
dissolution and shallow burial
resulting in the formation of high-quality dolomite reservoirs in the Member 2 of Maokou Formation and providing reservoir space conditions for large-scale accumulation. The lower submember of Member 2 of Maokou Formation in the study area develops fracture-pore type high-quality reservoirs
with thickness from 5 m to 30 m
core porosity from 2 % to 8 %
and permeability from 0.01 mD to 1.00 mD. (3) The large-scale hydrocarbon accumulation in Maokou Formation of the Longnüsi area was mainly controlled by multi-source relay hydrocarbon supply
early reservoir formation and trap formation. High-quality source rocks from the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation
the Silurian Longmaxi Formation
and the Member 1 of Permian Maokou Formation successively played an important role in sustained hydrocarbon supply after maturation
providing four-stage continuous oil and gas charging from Middle Triassic to Late Cretaceous in Maokou Formation. Early-stage hy
drocarbon accumulation occurred in high-energy shoal facies reservoirs
which were laterally sealed by tight limestone
forming early lithologic traps favorable for the formation of large-scale gas reservoirs. (4) The Longnüsi-Hechuan-Nanchong area is the most favorable exploration area for the lower submember of Member 2 of Maokou Formation. The Ya’an-Dujiangyan area in western Sichuan Basin
the Yanting area in northern Sichuan Basin
and the Luzhou area in southern Sichuan Basin have similar sedimentary backgrounds and favorable accumulation conditions
and are potential favorable areas for the next exploration.
杨跃明,杨雨,文龙,等. 四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新进展与前景展望[J].天然气工业,2020,40(7):10-22.
杨跃明,文龙,罗冰,等.四川盆地达州—开江古隆起沉积构造演化及油气成藏条件分析[J].天然气工业,2016,36(8):1-10.
杨雨,谢继容,赵路子,等.四川盆地茅口组滩相孔隙型白云岩储层天然气勘探的突破及启示——以川中北部地区JT1井天然气立体勘探为例[J].天然气工业,2021,41(2):1-9.
汪华,沈浩,黄东,等.四川盆地中二叠统热水白云岩成因及其分布[J].天然气工业,2014,34(9):25-32.
张玺华,陈聪,黄婕,等.四川盆地中二叠世广元—巴中拉张槽的发现及其油气地质意义[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(4):466-475.
张玺华,陈聪,张亚,等.川西北地区茅口组海槽相地质特征及其油气地质意义[J].天然气勘探与开发,2018,41(3):42-50.
张健,周刚,张光荣,等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气地质特征与勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2018,38(1):10-20.
文龙,汪华,徐亮,等.四川盆地西部中二叠统栖霞组天然气成藏特征及主控因素[J].中国石油勘探,2021,26(6):68-81.
鲁雪松,桂丽黎,汪泽成,等.四川盆地中部走滑断裂活动时间与控藏作用——来自断裂带胶结物U-Pb定年和流体包裹体的证据[J].石油学报,2024,45(4):642-658.
焦方正,杨雨,冉崎,等.四川盆地中部地区走滑断层的分布与天然气勘探[J].天然气工业,2021,41(8):92-101.
管树巍,梁瀚,姜华,等.四川盆地中部主干走滑断裂带及伴生构造特征与演化[J].地学前缘,2022,29(6):252-264.
马德波,汪泽成,段书府,等.四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区走滑断层构造特征与天然气成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(5): 795-805.
四川油气区石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志卷十:四川油气区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989.
沈平,张健,宋家荣,等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):1-9.
杨帅,陈安清,张玺华,等.四川盆地二叠纪栖霞—茅口期古地理格局转换及勘探启示[J].沉积学报,2021,39(6):1466-1477.
杨光,汪华,沈浩,等.四川盆地中二叠统储层特征与勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):10-16.
陈洪德,郭彤楼.中上扬子叠合盆地沉积充填过程与物质分布规律[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
胡朝伟,胡广,张玺华,等.川西北地区茅口组上部黑色岩系的层位、沉积环境及生烃潜力评价[J].石油实验地质,2020,42(2):202-214.
梁新权,周云,蒋英,等.二叠纪东吴运动的沉积响应差异:来自扬子和华夏板块吴家坪组或龙潭组碎屑锆石LA-ICPMS U-Pb年龄研究[J].岩石学报,2013,29(10):3592-3606.
陈维涛,周瑶琪,马永生,等.关于龙门山地区东吴运动的存在及其性质的认识[J].地质学报,2007,81(11):1518-1525.
燕继红,申继山.中国南方东吴运动的特征[J].国土资源导刊,2006(增刊1):3-5.
胡世忠.论东吴运动构造事件与二叠系分统界线问题[J].地层学杂志,1994,18(4):309-315.
夏茂龙,文龙,李亚,等.四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山喷发旋回、环境与模式[J].天然气工业,2020,40(9):11-22.
苏桂萍,李忠权,应丹琳,等.四川盆地加里东古隆起形成演化及动力学成因机理[J].地质学报,2020,94(6):1793-1812.
周进高,郝毅,邓红婴,等.四川盆地中西部栖霞组—茅口组孔洞型白云岩储层成因与分布[J].海相油气地质,2019,24(4):67-78.
李大军,陈辉,陈洪德,等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组储层形成与古构造演化关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(5):756-763.
周进高,姚根顺,杨光,等.四川盆地栖霞组—茅口组岩相古地理与天然气有利勘探区带[J].天然气工业,2016,36(4):8-15.
梁东星,胡素云,谷志东,等.四川盆地开江古隆起形成演化及其对天然气成藏的控制作用[J].天然气工业,2015,35(9):35-41.
白晓亮,杨跃明,文龙,等.四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组沉积相展布及勘探意义[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(5):13-24.
黎荣,胡明毅,杨威,等.四川盆地中二叠统沉积相模式及有利储集体分布[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(2):369-379.
冯明友,强子同,沈平,等.四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区震旦系灯影组热液白云岩证据[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):587-598.
董才源,谢增业,朱华,等.川中地区中二叠统气源新认识及成藏模式[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,32(4):18-23.
谢增业,魏国齐,李剑,等.四川盆地川中隆起带震旦系—二叠系天然气地球化学特征及成藏模式[J].中国石油勘探,2021,26(6): 50-67.
SHEN Chen,YUAN Haifeng,KUANG Mingzhi,et al.Sources of natural gas in the Middle-Permian carbonate succession in the central-northern Sichuan Basin,Southwest China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2024,268:106164.
0
浏览量
92
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621