网络首发:2026-07-08,
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
闫翔宇, 于绍轩, 柳英洲, 等. 漂浮式光伏组合式支撑结构整体吊装模拟优化及误差控制分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(6):717-726.
闫翔宇, 于绍轩, 柳英洲, et al. 漂浮式光伏组合式支撑结构整体吊装模拟优化及误差控制分析[J]. 2026, 47(6): 717-726.
闫翔宇, 于绍轩, 柳英洲, 等. 漂浮式光伏组合式支撑结构整体吊装模拟优化及误差控制分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(6):717-726. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0155.
闫翔宇, 于绍轩, 柳英洲, et al. 漂浮式光伏组合式支撑结构整体吊装模拟优化及误差控制分析[J]. 2026, 47(6): 717-726. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0155.
对一种新型海上漂浮式光伏组合式支撑结构的整体吊装入海施工技术进行研究
采用有限元软件ANSYS对支撑结构整体吊装入水的施工过程进行数值仿真
通过对比分析确定组合式支撑结构底部构件选型优化方案
对两点吊装、三点吊装和四点吊装的施工过程进行分析比选
确定组合式支撑结构的最佳吊点布置方案;着重分析吊耳位置、吊装缆绳长度等误差量对组合式支撑结构吊装过程中内力和变形等的影响规律
提出相应的误差控制指标。分析结果表明:吊点位置为长边三等分点的四点吊装工况最优;吊耳位置误差超过10 mm时
吊装缆绳内力不均匀差值超过57%
建议吊耳位置误差控制在±5 mm以内;吊装缆绳长度误差超过67.5 mm时
整体结构变形达到77 mm
结构竖向变形差超过35 mm
建议吊装缆绳长度控制在67.5 mm内。
This paper investigates the integral lifting and launching technology for a new type of offshore floating photovoltaic (FPV) modular support structure. Based on the finite element software ANSYS
numerical simulations of the entire lifting and launching process of the support structure into the water were conducted. Through comparative analysis
an optimized selection scheme for the bottom components of the modular support structure was determined. The construction processes of two-point lifting
three-point lifting
and four-point lifting were analyzed and compared to identify the optimal lifting point arrangement for the modular support structure. The influence of errors
such as the position of lifting lugs and the length of lifting cables
on the internal forces and deformations during the lifting process of the modular support structure was emphatically analyzed
and corresponding error control indices were proposed. The analysis results indicate that the four-point lifting condition with lifting points at the trisection points of the long sides is optimal. When the position error of the lifting lugs exceeds 10 mm
the uneven difference in the internal forces of the lifting cables exceeds 57%
suggesting that the position error of the lifting lugs should be controlled within ±5 mm. When the length error of the lifting cables exceeds 67.5 mm
the overall structural deformation reaches 77 mm
and the vertical deformation difference of the structure exceeds 35 mm
recommending that the length error of the lifting cables be controlled within 67.5 mm.
CAZZANIGA R, CICU M, ROSA-CLOT M, et al.Floating photovoltaic plants: performance analysis and design solutions[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2018, 81: 1730-1741.
TANG Y C, CHEN X, HUANG G Z, et al.Dynamic analysis of multi-module floating photovoltaic platforms with composite mooring system by considering tidal variation and platform configuration[J]. Ocean engineering, 2024, 312: 119243.
XIONG L C, LE C H, ZHANG P Y, et al.Hydrodynamic characteristics of floating photovoltaic systems based on membrane structures in maritime environment[J]. Ocean engineering, 2025, 315: 119827.
耿宝磊, 唐旭, 金瑞佳. 海上浮式光伏结构及其水动力问题研究展望[J]. 海洋工程, 2024, 42(3): 190-208.
柳英洲, 王文华, 李昕, 等. 考虑桩基础柔性的地震风浪作用下海上风力机结构耦合响应机理研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(3): 67-76.
林逸凡, 杨梓豪, 刘玉飞, 等. 中国沿海风电施工窗口期及功效分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(1): 273-280.
马宇轩, 闵烨, 闫中杰, 等. 基于离散数值分析技术的海上风电机组安装施工规划模拟研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(6): 673-679.
LI L, GAO Z, MOAN T, et al.Analysis of lifting operation of a monopile for an offshore wind turbine considering vessel shielding effects[J]. Marine structures, 2014, 39: 287-314.
魏宇墨. 海上风电三筒导管架基础下放过程运动特性研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2020.
刘俊峰, 倪道俊, 校建东, 等. 海上风电单柱复合筒型基础沉放过程分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(3): 239-243.
ATAEI B, YUAN S, REN Z R, et al.Effects of structural flexibility on the dynamic responses of low-height lifting mechanism for offshore wind turbine installation[J]. Marine structures, 2023, 89: 103399.
武斌斌. 异型结构物海上拆除吊装分析[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2017, 32(2): 29-33.
刘建峰, 杜颖, 王彦多, 等. 泰国湾固定式海洋平台组块拆除关键技术[J]. 船海工程, 2022, 51(6): 86-91.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621