复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究

吴健; 张高明; 江佳琦; 徐志鹏; 周彬

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究

更新时间：2026-07-21

- 复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究
- 复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究
- 太阳能学报 2026年47卷第5期页码：797-807
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  浙江省自然科学基金（LQ24E060007）;浙江省基本科研业务费资助项目（2022YW33）
- DOI：10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0005
  中图分类号： TK513
- 网络首发：2026-06-04，
  
  纸质出版：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴健, 张高明, 江佳琦, 等. 复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(5):797-807.

吴健, 张高明, 江佳琦, et al. 复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究[J]. 2026, 47(5): 797-807.
吴健, 张高明, 江佳琦, 等. 复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2026,47(5):797-807. DOI： 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0005.

吴健, 张高明, 江佳琦, et al. 复合双曲面聚光器设计与性能研究[J]. 2026, 47(5): 797-807. DOI： 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0005.

摘要

针对传统复合抛物面聚光器（CPC）高宽比较大、接收角较小、聚光能流分布不均匀等问题

通过建立几何型线数学模型

设计复合双曲面聚光器（CHC）

获得不同几何聚光比下聚光器的高宽比以及接收半角。运用蒙特卡洛光线追踪方法

对比分析CPC和CHC的光学效率

辐照非均匀度。结果表明

不同聚光比下CHC的高宽比总是小于CPC

接收半角总是大于CPC。以聚光比分别为2和4为例

CHC的高宽比分别为1.5和5.6

均小于CPC的2.6和7.5;CHC的接收半角分别为53.14°和28°

均大于CPC的30°和14.1°。对比两者在不同入射角条件下的光学效率

CPC在接收角范围内的光学效率更高

但CHC相较于CPC持续聚光能力更强。当CHC聚光比分别为2和4时

需分别在纵向长度上增加约20%和30%的反射面积来弥补在CPC接收半角内所损失的光学效率

而在CPC接收半角之外

CHC所具有的宽接收半角可使两种聚光器聚光能力相近。此外

在不同入射角条件下

CHC最大辐照非均匀度分别为0.59和0.58

均小于CPC的6.31和12.51

接收面能流分布更加均匀。以上结果表明

相较于传统CPC

CHC高宽比较小、接收角较大、聚光能流分布更均匀

在应用于免跟踪低倍聚光光伏光热系统上具有更好的潜力。

Abstract

To address the issues of high aspect ratio

small acceptance angle and non-uniform irradiance distribution in traditional compound parabolic concentrators （CPCs）

a compound hyperbolic concentrator （CHC） was designed by establishing a mathematical model of the geometric profile. The half acceptance angles and aspect ratios of the concentrators were obtained under different geometric concentration ratios. By applying the Monte Carlo ray tracing method

the optical efficiency and irradiance non-uniformity of CPC and CHC were analyzed. The results indicated that under different concentration ratios

the aspect ratio of CHC was always lower than that of CPC

and the half acceptance angle of CHC was always larger than that of CPC. When the concentration ratios were 2 and 4

the aspect ratios of CHC were 1.5 and 5.6 respectively

which were lower than those of CPC at 2.6 and 7.5. The half acceptance angles of CHC were 53.14° and 28° respectively

which were largr than those of CPC at 30° and 14.1°. The optical efficiency of CPC within the acceptance angle range was higher than that of CHC

but CHC possessed a stronger ability for continuous concentration than CPC. When the concentration ratios were 2 and 4

respectively

it was necessary to increase the reflective area of CHC by approximately 20% and 30% along the longitudinal direction to compensate for its lower optical efficiency within the CPC half acceptance angles. However

outside the CPC half acceptance angles

the wider half acceptance angles allowed the CHC to achieve similar concentrating performance to CPC. Additionally

under different incident angles

the maximum irradiance non-uniformity of CHC （0.59 and 0.58） was much lower than that of CPC （6.31 and 12.51）

suggesting a more uniform irradiance distribution on the receiving surface. On account of lower aspect ratio

wider acceptance angle and more uniform irradiance

CHC had better potential than CPC in the application of non-tracking low concentrating photovoltaic/thermal systems.

关键词

Keywords

references

温廷新, 郭晓赛. 基于特征组合的ECA-TCN光伏发电功率预测模型[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(12): 94-100.

向宇玥, 褚磊驰, 方元, 等. 基于PV/T的双源热泵热水系统的实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(10): 171-178.

陈艺鑫, 陈健斌, 李旭东, 等. 一种轻薄型光伏/光热集热器性能分析及实验研究[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45(4): 666-674.

石天庆, 商永强, 刘媛媛, 等. 低倍聚光光伏/光热与地源热泵集成系统综合分析及优化[J]. 热力发电, 2024, 53(7): 45-52.

黄晔, 张高明, 高峰, 等. 双轴跟踪和单轴南北向跟踪CPV/T系统的热电性能研究[J]. 太阳能, 2021(2): 66-73.

颜健, 聂笃忠, 彭佑多, 等. 可改善平面接收器能流均匀性的太阳能碟式聚光器设计[J]. 光学学报, 2020, 40(9): 148-158.

金祝岭, 季杰, 徐宁, 等. 一种菲涅尔式高倍聚光光伏光热系统的实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(1): 69-75.

高阳, 魏进家, 谢胡凌, 等. 低倍聚光光伏光热系统热性能分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2016, 37(3): 624-628.

王刚, 陈翔龙, 林建清, 等. 低倍聚光太阳能纳米流体PV/T系统实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2024, 45(11): 3233-3238.

吴小龙, 舒碧芬, 连榕海, 等. V形槽式低倍聚光光伏光热一体化组件性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(13): 191-199.

马明瑞, 李明, 吴德众, 等. CPC不同方位辐射量及最佳倾角计算[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(3): 256-262.

常泽辉, 杭小蓉, 刘雪东, 等. 槽式复合多曲面聚光集热器光热性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(7): 221-228.

胡金萍, 李强. 聚光光斑的均匀性对硅太阳电池性能影响的理论研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(10): 23-28.

XUAN Q D, LI G Q, PEI G, et al.Optimization design and performance analysis of a novel asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator with rotation angle for building application[J]. Solar energy, 2017, 158: 808-818.

易云帆, 郑灿阳, 肖李业, 等. 真空管吸收体非对称复合平面聚光器模型构建与聚能特性[J]. 光学学报, 2024, 44(18): 356-364.

RABL A, GOODMAN N B, WINSTON R.Practical design considerations for CPC solar collectors[J]. Solar energy, 1979, 22(4): 373-381.

谢胡凌, 魏进家, 高阳, 等. 消除复合抛物面聚光器二次反射的设计研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2015, 35(7): 599-604.

XIE H L, WEI J J, WANG Z X, et al.Design and performance research on eliminating multiple reflections of solar radiation within compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) in hybrid CPV/T system[J]. Solar energy, 2016, 129: 126-146.

BAIG H, SELLAMI N, CHEMISANA D, et al.Performance analysis of a dielectric based 3D building integrated concentrating photovoltaic system[J]. Solar energy, 2014, 103: 525-540.

ZHANG G M, WEI J J, ZHANG L, et al.A comprehensive study on the effects of truncation positions of the compound parabolic concentrator eliminating multiple reflections on the performances of concentrating photovoltaic and thermal system[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2021, 183: 116162.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

微热管工质对MHP-PV/T系统性能影响研究

太阳能辐射数据驱动下光电催化与光伏电解协同制氢的地区适应性分析

太阳能资源精细化评估中多源辐射数据精度对比及适用性分析

热力耦合变液位作用下支撑刚度对熔盐储罐力学性能影响研究

太阳能界面蒸发器蒸发性能强化研究进展