燃气轮机叶片危险区域裂纹结构完整性评定模拟

柴小帅; 尹利众; 刁圣轩; 徐建平; 杨杰

doi:10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250102

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

燃气轮机叶片危险区域裂纹结构完整性评定模拟

动力设备与系统 | 更新时间：2026-07-16

- 燃气轮机叶片危险区域裂纹结构完整性评定模拟
- Simulation on Structural Integrity Assessment of Cracks in Dangerous Areas of Gas Turbine Blade
- 动力工程学报 2026年46卷第7期页码：11-18
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院,上海,200093
  2. 菏泽朝泰环境科技有限公司,山东,菏泽,274000
- 作者简介：
  
  柴小帅(2002—),男,河南驻马店人,硕士,研究方向为结构完整性评定。杨杰(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:yangjie@usst.edu.cn。
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助项目(52375154,52311530067)
- DOI：10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250102
  中图分类号： TK474.8+11
- 纸质出版：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
柴小帅, 尹利众, 刁圣轩, 徐建平, 杨杰. 燃气轮机叶片危险区域裂纹结构完整性评定模拟[J]. 动力工程学报, 2026, 46(7): 11-18.
柴小帅, 尹利众, 刁圣轩, 徐建平, 杨杰. 燃气轮机叶片危险区域裂纹结构完整性评定模拟[J]. 动力工程学报, 2026, 46(7): 11-18. DOI： 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250102.

DOI： 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250102

摘要

选择某燃气轮机叶片为研究对象

基于有限元模拟

首先对无裂纹叶片进行应力分析确定危险区域

然后在危险区域设置初始裂纹

基于R6规范对裂纹进行结构完整性评定

绘制失效评定图(failure assessment diagram

FAD)

计算最大可接受裂纹尺寸。其次考察裂纹位置对评定的影响

并针对实际工况下可能出现的双裂纹

分析了第二条裂纹的存在对第一条裂纹失效的影响。最后考察了裂纹形状对FAD的影响。结果表明:1/4圆形角裂纹的最大可接受尺寸在两侧倒角处最小

在中心位置最大;第二条裂纹的存在会增加第一条裂纹的危险性;改变裂纹形状

对于单个1/4椭圆形角裂纹

随着短半轴长/长半轴长(即a/c)的增加

失效评定曲线会逐渐从安全区向危险区偏移

最大可接受裂纹尺寸减小。

Abstract

A gas turbine blade was selected as the research object

based on finite element simulation. Firstly

the stress analysis was conducted on the non-cracked blade to determine the dangerous area

then the initial crack was set up in the dangerous area

and the structural integrity assessment was conducted based on the R6 specification for the cracks to draw the failure assessment diagram (FAD) and calculate the maximum acceptable crack size. Further

the influence of crack location assessment was investigated

and the influence of the existence of the second crack on the failure of the first crack was analyzed for the double cracks that may occur under actual working conditions. Finally

the effect of crack shape on FAD was examined. Results show that the maximum acceptable size of the 1/4 rounded corner crack is the smallest at both chamfers and the largest at the center. The presence of the second crack increases the danger of the first crack. When changing the crack shape

for a single 1/4 ellipticalcorner crack

the failure assessment curve gradually shifts from the safe region to the hazardous region with the increase of a/c (a is the length of the elliptical short half axis

c is the length of the long half axis)

and the maximum acceptable crack size decreases.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国国家标准质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 在用含缺陷压力容器安全评定: GB/T 19624—2004[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005.

MILNE I, AINSWORTH R A, DOWLING A R, et al. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1988, 32(1/2/3/4): 3-104.

HUSSAIN M. BS 7910- Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures [S]. London: The British Standards Institution, 2019.

WEBSTER S E, BANNISTER A C. Structural integrity assessment procedures for European industry (SINTAP)[C]//17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 1998), 1998.

GUTIRREZ-SOLANA F, CICERO S. FITNET FFS procedure: a unified European procedure for structural integrity assessment[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2009, 16(2): 559-577.

ASME. Rules for inservice inspection of nuclear power plant components [S]. New York: ASME, 1975.

MINAMI F, OHATA M, SHIMANUKI H, et al. Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2006, 73(14): 1996-2020.

BERGANT M A, YAWNY A A, IPIA J E P. Failure assessment diagram in structural integrity analysis of steam generator tubes[J]. Procedia Materials Science, 2015, 8: 128-138.

KINGKLANG S, DAODON W, UTHAISANGSUK V. Failure investigation of liquefied petroleum gas cylinder using FAD and XFEM[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2019, 171: 69-78.

CORRA J R P, JUNIOR J S, CARRASCO J A P, et al. Structural integrity assessment of a 5CT P110 steel riser pipe according to BS 7910:2013 standard[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2020, 188: 104206.

BERGANT M A, YAWNY A A, IPIA J E P. A comparison of failure assessment diagram options for Inconel 690 and Incoloy 800 nuclear steam generators tubes[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020, 140: 107310.

ZAIDI R, KOZAK D, SEDMAK A, et al. Risk assessment based on analytical evaluation of structural integrity and life of drilling rig pipe[J]. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2021, 33: 1181-1186.

TAIEB L H, BETTAIEB N, ELAOUD S. Effect of air mass fraction on transient pressure and structural integrity assessment in a relatively long cast iron pipe[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 122: 105293.

ZHU Jiangchao, MADIA M, SCHURIG M, et al. Burst speed assessment of aero-engine turbine disk based on failure assessment diagramand global stability criterion[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2023, 277: 109005.

缪新婷, 刘国旭, 张锦波, 等. 复合型裂纹拘束度及其承压结构失效评定图研究[J]. 机械强度, 2025, 47(1): 113-122.MIAO Xinting, LIU Guoxu, ZHANG Jinbo, et al. Study on constraint of mixed mode crack and failure assessment diagram of pressure-bearing structure[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2025, 47(1): 113-122.

束国刚, 陈坚, 张晓毅, 等. 重型燃气轮机结构完整性分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2022, 42(12): 1213-1222, 1271.SHU Guogang, CHEN Jian, ZHANG Xiaoyi, et al. Mechanical integrity analysis of heavy-duty gas turbines[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2022, 42(12): 1213-1222, 1271.

宋迎东, 凌晨, 张磊成, 等. 航空发动机和燃气轮机热端部件热腐蚀-疲劳研究进展[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 54(5): 771-788.SONG Yingdong, LING Chen, ZHANG Leicheng, et al. Research progress on hot corrosion-fatigue of aero-engine and gas turbine hot-section components[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2022, 54(5): 771-788.

CHOWDHURY T S, MOHSIN F T, TONNI M M, et al. A critical review on gas turbine cooling performance and failure analysis of turbine blades[J]. International Journal of Thermofluids, 2023, 18: 100329.

YUE Peng, MA Juan, DAI Changping, et al. Probabilistic framework for reliability analysis of gas turbine blades under combined loading conditions[J]. Structures, 2023, 55: 1437-1446.

MOURAD A H I, ALMOMANI A, SHEIKH I A, et al. Failure analysis of gas and wind turbine blades: a review[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 146: 107107.

周登极, 张会生, 苏明. 一种燃气轮机涡轮叶片蠕变损伤评估模型及其应用[J]. 动力工程学报, 2015, 35(12): 964-969.ZHOU Dengji, ZHANG Huisheng, SU Ming. An evaluation model for the creep damage of gas turbine blades and its application[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2015, 35(12): 964-969.

杨啊涛, 郭雄, 李海松, 等. 燃气轮机叶片热裂缺陷的应力形成及演化研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2021, 41(3): 189-194.YANG Atao, GUO Xiong, LI Haisong, et al. Research on formation and evolution of stress on hot tearing in gas turbine blades[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2021, 41(3): 189-194.

LIU Hongxia, WANG Xiaoxiao, LIU Fang, et al. A study on three coalescence modes of non-collinear parallel elliptical double cracks[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2024, 210: 105254.

CHENG Yanting, HUANG Mei, LI Yaodi, et al. Influence of interaction among multiple cracks on crack propagation in nozzle corner of reactor pressure vessel[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2023, 194: 110142.

WU Shengjia, DONG Pingsha. Modeling of distributed defects and a proposed fatigue interaction criterion for additively manufactured metal parts[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2023, 206: 105048.

NEJAD R M, LIU Zhiliang, MA Wenchen, et al. Fatigue reliability assessment of a pearlitic grade 900A rail steel subjected to multiple cracks[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 128: 105625.

ARANDJELOVIC M, DJORDJEVIC B, SEDMAK S, et al. Failure analysis of welded joint with multiple defects by extended finite element method and engineering critical analysis[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024, 160: 108176.

MA Yan, CUI Chuang, ZHANG Qinghua, et al. Fatigue life prediction for Q420qFNH weathering steel welded joints considering the effect of multiple cracks[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2025, 190: 108665.

刘红侠, 杨杰, 刘芳, 等. 基于GTN损伤模型的均质平板非共线平行双裂纹合并方式研究[J]. 压力容器, 2023, 40(6): 50-62.LIU Hongxia, YANG Jie, LIU Fang, et al. Study on coalescence modes of non-collinear parallel double cracks in homogeneous plate based on GTN damage model[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2023, 40(6): 50-62.

刘红侠, 崔元元, 王骁晓, 等. 基于GTN模型的单向受拉有限大均质平板内椭圆形双裂纹合并准则研究[J]. 机械强度, 2025, 47(12): 107-117.LIU Hongxia, CUI Yuanyuan, WANG Xiaoxiao, et al. Study on coalescence criterion of double elliptic cracks in finite homogeneous plates under the uniaxial tensile load based on GTN model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2025, 47(12): 107-117.

LIU Dan, LIU Daoxin, ZHANG Xiaohua, et al. Microstructural evolution mechanisms in rolled 17-4PH steel processed by ultrasonic surface rolling process[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2020, 773: 138720.

张继林, 张又铭, 罗文翠, 等. 考虑应变、应变率和温度耦合作用下航空不锈钢0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb本构模型的建立[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2023, 44(6): 149-159.ZHANG Jilin, ZHANG Youming, LUO Wencui, et al. Establishment of a constitutive model of aviation stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb considering the coupling effects of strain, strain rate and temperature[J]. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2023, 44(6): 149-159.

林浩, 耿海鹏, 周西锋. 重型燃气轮机叶片离心载荷下应力特性的研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(22): 212-218.LIN Hao, GENG Haipeng, ZHOU Xifeng. Stress characteristic study of heavy-duty gas turbine blade under centrifugal load[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(22): 212-218.

彭立强. 大型燃气轮机涡轮叶片疲劳寿命研究[D].大连: 大连理工大学, 2008.

徐敏, 李飞, 杨健, 等. 某进口350 MW汽轮机低压第2级叶片和叶轮开裂故障原因分析[J]. 汽轮机技术, 2023, 65(6): 469-474.XU Min, LI Fei, YANG Jian, et al. Cause analysis of cracking failure of low-pressure stage 2 blade and impeller of an imported 350 MW steam turbine[J]. Turbine Technology, 2023, 65(6): 469-474.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

新一代煤电背景下机组最小出力与煤耗的分析研究

光伏-光热电站中熔盐电加热器配置方式及其热力学分析

基于电石渣-CFB粉煤灰复合颗粒制备及其固碳性能研究

基于数据驱动的600 MW煤氨混合机组协调控制

基于TCN-SDAE模型与自适应动态阈值的引风机故障预警研究