基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO<sub>3</sub>

杭文林; 赵荣杭; 孙佳兴; 和永涛; 龚宏强; 姚晶晶; 李华; 谢灵欧

doi:10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250050

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO₃

绿色低碳 | 更新时间：2026-10-10

- 基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO₃
- Efficient Removal of SO₃ from Coal-fired Flue Gas Using Low- particle-size Absorbents Synthesized by Inhibition Method
- 动力工程学报 2026年46卷第5期页码：165-172,183
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
  
  杭文林(1972—),男,泰州姜堰人,高级工程师,本科,研究方向为大气污染控制。孙佳兴(通信作者),男,工程师,硕士,E-mail:yangdiansjx@163.com。
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250050
  中图分类号： X701.3
- 纸质出版：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杭文林, 赵荣杭, 孙佳兴, 和永涛, 龚宏强, 姚晶晶, 李华, 谢灵欧. 基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO3[J]. 动力工程学报, 2026, 46(5): 165-172,183.
杭文林, 赵荣杭, 孙佳兴, 和永涛, 龚宏强, 姚晶晶, 李华, 谢灵欧. 基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO3[J]. 动力工程学报, 2026, 46(5): 165-172,183. DOI： 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250050.

DOI： 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250050

摘要

燃煤过程中产生的SO3不仅会对火电厂设备和选择性催化还原(SCR)系统的催化剂造成损害

还会危害人体健康

因此对燃煤烟气中的SO3进行脱除具有极其重要的意义。采用抑制法合成了低粒径的氢氧化钙

并深入探究了不同添加剂对氢氧化钙晶体生长的抑制作用。同时

系统分析了吸收剂粒径、SO3初始浓度、m(Ca)/m(S)、吸收剂停留时间及烟气温度等因素对SO3脱除率的影响

并进一步研究了反应机理。结果表明:氢氧化钙-苯甲酸钠的粒径最小且分布均匀

其SO3脱除率最高

具有良好的经济性;吸收剂的停留时间、m(Ca)/m(S)、SO3初始浓度及烟气温度均会对SO3的脱除率产生显著影响;反应过程中产物层呈现出岛状效应生长趋势

而Bangham模型能够较好地描述SO3的吸附动力学行为。

Abstract

The SO3 generated during coal combustion in thermal power plants not only damages equipment and catalysts in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems but also poses significant health risks. Therefore

the removal of SO3 from coal-fired flue gas is of great importance. The low-particle-size calcium hydroxide was synthesized using the inhibition method

and the effects of different additives on the crystal growth of calcium hydroxide were thoroughly investigated. The impact of various factors such as the absorbent particle size

initial SO3 concentration

m(Ca)/m(S)

absorbent residence time

and flue gas temperature on SO3 removal efficiency was systematically analyzed. The reaction mechanism was also further explored. Results show that the calcium hydroxide-sodium benzoate absorbent

which has the smallest and most uniform particle size

achieves the highest SO3 removal efficiency and offers good economic viability. The absorbent's residence time

m(Ca)/m(S)

initial SO3 concentration

and flue gas temperature can significantly influence SO3 removal efficiency. During the reaction

the product layer exhibits an island growth effect

and the Bangham model is found to describe the adsorption kinetics of SO3 effectively.

关键词

Keywords

references

KUMAR L, JANA S K. Advances in absorbents and techniques used in wet and dry FGD: a critical review[J]. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2022, 38(7): 843-880.

YU Hang, SHAN Chuanjia, LI Jinjin, et al. Alkaline absorbents for SO2 and SO3 removal: a comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 366: 121532.

杨江毅, 陆强, 曲艳超, 等. 改性吸收剂选择性脱除SO3技术研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2019, 39(11): 912-918.YANG Jiangyi, LU Qiang, QU Yanchao, et al. Research on selective removal of SO3 by modified absorbents[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2019, 39(11): 912-918.

WANG Tao, LIU Jun, YANG Yihuan, et al. Catalytic conversion of mercury over Ce doped Mn/SAPO-34 catalyst: sulphur tolerance and SO2/SO3 conversion[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 381: 120986.

李文焘, 肖海平, 洪春雪, 等. 大型脱硝中试平台上SO3的低温催化生成特性[J]. 动力工程学报, 2024, 44(5): 810-816.LI Wentao, XIAO Haiping, HONG Chunxue, et al. Low-temperature catalytic generation characteristics of SO3 on a large pilot denitrification platform[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2024, 44(5): 810-816.

YANG Yuzhu, WANG Runqing, LIU Jie, et al. Recycling of manganese ore desulfurization slag for preparation of low-temperature NH3-SCR catalyst with good scale-up production performance[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 469: 133988.

尹子骏, 苏胜, 钟毓秀, 等. SCR催化剂活性组分V对SO2氧化影响的研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2023, 43(3): 332-340.YIN Zijun, SU Sheng, ZHONG Yuxiu, et al. Study on the effect of active component V of SCR catalyst on SO2 oxidation[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2023, 43(3): 332-340.

ZHANG Shibo, ZHANG Qingzhu, DÍAZ-SOMOANO M, et al. Influence of SO3 on the MnOx/TiO2 SCR catalyst for elemental mercury removal and the function of Fe modification[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 433: 128737.

陈杰, 黄纪荣. 燃煤电厂SCR脱硝的副产物对空预器的腐蚀性能研究[J]. 化学工程师, 2024, 38(12): 77-81.CHEN Jie, HUANG Jirong. Research on the corrosion performance of SCR denitrification by-products on air preheaters in coal-fired power plants[J]. Chemical Engineer, 2024, 38(12): 77-81.

陈招妹, 刘含笑, 崔盈, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气中SO3的生成、危害、测试及排放特征研究[J]. 发电技术, 2019, 40(6): 564-569.CHEN Zhaomei, LIU Hanxiao, CUI Ying, et al. Study on generation, hazard, testing and emission characteristics of SO3 in flue gas of coal-fired power plants[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2019, 40(6): 564-569.

YE Junhui, SHANG Jing, LI Qian, et al. The use of vacuum ultraviolet irradiation to oxidize SO2 and NOx for simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 271: 89-97.

XU Guiling, CHEN Feihan, QIAN Yangjie, et al. Experimental investigation of removal of SO3 from flue gas with modified fly ash adsorbents[J]. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(19): 16656-16672.

ZHANG Qin, CHEN Jiacheng, WU Yanan, et al. Suppressing SO3 formation in copper smelting flue[KG(16x] gas by ejecting pyrite into flue[J]. EnvironmentalScience and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(4): 4307-4316.

高伟, 刘明, 赵永亮, 等. 燃煤机组脱硫浆液循环泵定频运行控制策略优化及节能分析[J]. 热力发电, 2024, 53(10): 134-143.GAO Wei, LIU Ming, ZHAO Yongliang, et al. Control strategy optimization and energy saving analysis for slurry circulation pumps in fixed-frequency mode of desulfurization system in coal-fired power units[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2024, 53(10): 134-143.

刘国伟, 原志勇, 孙仁财, 等. 高活性氢氧化钙脱硫剂在焦炉烟气脱硫中的应用[J]. 煤化工, 2023, 51(2): 81-83.LIU Guowei, YUAN Zhiyong, SUN Rencai, et al. Application of high activity calcium hydroxide desulfurizer in coke oven flue gas desulfurization[J]. Coal Chemical Industry, 2023, 51(2): 81-83.

HE Kejia, TANG Zuozhou, SONG Qiang, et al. Process analysis of SO3 removal by Ca(OH)2 particles from flue gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 247: 117054.

WANG Hui, CHEN Denggao, LI Zhenshan, et al. SO3 removal from flue gas with Ca(OH)2 in entrained flow reactors[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(4): 5364-5373.

ZHOU Xiaohan, TANG Wenjing, HE Minqiang, et al. Combined removal of SO3 and HCl by modified Ca(OH)2 from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 857: 159466.

GALMARINI S, AIMABLE A, RUFFRAY N, et al. Changes in portlandite morphology with solvent composition: atomistic simulations and experiment[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(12): 1330-1338.

CHEN Xin, WEI Shuaifei, WANG Qianqian, et al. Morphology prediction of portlandite: atomistic simulations and experimental research[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 502: 144296.

ZHAO Rongfang, LIU Haidi, YE Shufeng, et al. Ca-based sorbents modified with humic acid for flue gas desulfurization[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(21): 7120-7125.

YU Hang, WANG Chengpeng, CHEN Heng, et al. SO3 removal by submicron absorbents synthesized via inhibition method: the product layer grows like parallel peaks[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 479: 135593.

邵衍伟, 龚宏强, 孙佳兴, 等. 碱性吸收剂喷射脱除燃煤烟气中SO3实验[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2024, 30(增刊1): 376-382.SHAO Yanwei, GONG Hongqiang, SUN Jiaxing, et al. Experimental study on SO3 removal from coal-fired flue gas by alkaline absorbent injection[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2024, 30(Sup1): 376-382.

李秋白, 黄亚继, 许月阳, 等. 典型碱性吸附剂炉内脱除燃煤烟气SO3特性实验[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2023, 29(增刊2): 415-421.LI Qiubai, HUANG Yaji, XU Yueyang, et al. Experimental study on removal of SO3 from coal flue gas in furnace by alkaline adsorbents[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2023, 29(Sup2): 415-421.

宋玉宝, 谢新华, 何川, 等. 碱基吸收剂脱除SO3实验研究[J]. 热力发电, 2023, 52(5): 122-126.SONG Yubao, XIE Xinhua, HE Chuan, et al. Experimental study on SO3 removal by alkaline absorbent[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2023, 52(5): 122-126.

MORAN J, LI Li, OUYANG Hui, et al. Characterization of the bidimensional size and charge distribution of sub-and supermicrometer particles in an electrostatic precipitator[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 425: 118578.

李振山, 蔡宁生. 气固反应动力学速率方程理论[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(4): 704-721.LI Zhenshan, CAI Ningsheng. Rate equation theory for gas-solid reaction kinetics[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2022, 62(4): 704-721.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

1 000 MW燃煤机组钙循环烟气CO2捕集系统模拟研究

650℃下TP321不锈钢多轴蠕变行为与失效准则研究

基于物理模型与机器学习求解叶栅流场的降阶模型

煤-氨混燃锅炉建模及近邻传播-最小支持向量机多模态验证优化

考虑风光不确定性的风电光伏与燃气电站联合参与日前-实时市场的交易决策研究

基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO3

Efficient Removal of SO3 from Coal-fired Flue Gas Using Low- particle-size Absorbents Synthesized by Inhibition Method

DOI：10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250050

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references

基于抑制法合成的低粒径吸收剂高效脱除燃煤烟气中的SO₃

Efficient Removal of SO₃ from Coal-fired Flue Gas Using Low- particle-size Absorbents Synthesized by Inhibition Method