基于不同评估规范的过热器联箱蠕变-疲劳损伤分析

张浩; 夏咸喜; 张天宇; 田根起; 王小威; 巩建鸣

doi:10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.230713

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 读者登录期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于不同评估规范的过热器联箱蠕变-疲劳损伤分析

动力设备与系统 | 更新时间：2026-01-21

- 基于不同评估规范的过热器联箱蠕变-疲劳损伤分析
- Creep-Fatigue Damage Assessment of a Superheater Header Based on Different Evaluation Codes
- 动力工程学报 2025年45卷第2期页码：205-213
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京工业大学机械与动力工程学院,江苏,南京,211816
  2. 南京工业大学高端装备可靠性制造研究院,江苏,南京,211816
  3. 苏州热工研究院有限公司,江苏,苏州,215004
  4. 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司,上海,200240
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张浩(1999—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事高温承压设备蠕变-疲劳损伤方面的研究" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFF0605600);国家自然科学基金资助项目(52375149)
- DOI：10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.230713
  中图分类号： TM621
- 网络出版：2025-02-15，
  
  纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张浩,夏咸喜,张天宇,田根起,王小威,巩建鸣. 基于不同评估规范的过热器联箱蠕变-疲劳损伤分析动力工程学报, 2025, 45(2): 205-213 https://doi.

org/10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.230713
张浩,夏咸喜,张天宇,田根起,王小威,巩建鸣. 基于不同评估规范的过热器联箱蠕变-疲劳损伤分析动力工程学报, 2025, 45(2): 205-213 https://doi. DOI： 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.230713.

org/10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.230713 DOI：

摘要

超临界机组过热器出口联箱长期在高温、高压的恶劣工况下工作

高温环境下频繁启停及长时间稳态运行导致联箱承受典型的蠕变-疲劳损伤。为确保超临界机组的长周期稳定运行

应选取合适的损伤评估方法对机组损伤状态进行评价。以某发电厂超临界机组过热器联箱为分析对象

基于有限元软件Abaqus获取机组运行期间联箱应力的分布情况

分别采用ASME-Ⅲ标准、RCC-MRx标准、R5规程进行损伤评价。结果表明:ASME-Ⅲ标准评估的许用时间与检修年限相当;RCC-MRx标准评价结果偏大

过于保守;R5规范评价结果非保守

明显小于前两者;因此

对于此类设备可优先选用ASME-Ⅲ规范作为损伤评估准则

在ASME-Ⅲ标准评估结果趋于保守时

可采用R5规范作为替代方案。

Abstract

Supercritical unit superheater outlet headers operate under chronic high-temperature and high-pressure conditions

the frequent start-stops and long-time steady-state operations under high temperature lead to typical creep-fatigue damages in the header. An appropriate method should thus be selected to evaluate the damage state of the unit to ensure long-term steady operation of supercritical units. A numerical simulation based on finite element software Abaqus was carried out on the superheater header of a supercritical power generation unit. During the operation of the unit

the distribution of stress on the header was obtained

and the damage was evaluated with three different codes: ASME-III

RCC-MRx and R5

respectively. Results show good agreement in the allowable time evaluated by the ASME-III code with the maintenance life

conservative and overpredicted damage by the RCC-MRx code

and underpredicted damage by the R5 code with significantly less damage than the other codes. Therefore

the ASME-III code should be selected first as the criteria of the damage evaluation for this type of equipment

and the R5 code can be used as an alternative when the ASME-III code gives conservative results.

关键词

Keywords

references

KUMAR M M, JOSHNA K, MARKENDEYA R, et al. Effect of steamside oxidation and fireside corrosion degradation processes on creep life of service exposed boiler tubes[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2016, 144: 45-48.

HAGHIGHAT-SHISHAVAN B, FIROUZI-NERBIN H, NAZARIAN-SAMANI M, et al. Failure analysis of a superheater tube ruptured in a power plant boiler: main causes and preventive strategies[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 98: 131-140.

LIU W. A superheater creep-fatigue interaction failure and its stress assessment[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 119: 105004.

FARRAGHER T P, SCULLY S, O'DOWD N P, et al. Development of life assessment procedures for power plant headers operated under flexible loading scenarios[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2013, 49: 50-61.

LI M, BENAARBIA A, MORRIS A, et al. Assessment of potential service-life performance for MarBN steel power plant header under flexible thermomechanical operations[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2020, 135: 105565.

DINH H B, YOON K B. Numerical simulation of thermal stress and creep fatigue crack growth analysis for thick-walled tubes of header[C]//Proceedings of RCTEMME 2021, the AUN/SEED-Net Joint Regional Conference in Transportation, Energy, and Mechanical Manufacturing Engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2021: 837-850.

NAVARKAR A, HASTI V R, DENEKE E, et al. A data-driven model for thermodynamic properties of a steam generator under cycling operation[J]. Energy, 2020, 211: 118973.

吴穹, 王炜哲, 张军辉, 等. 超超临界汽轮机中压转子高温蠕变强度分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2015, 35(1): 25-29. WU Qiong, WANG Weizhe, ZHANG Junhui, et al. High-temperature creep strength analysis for IP rotor of an ultra-supercritical steam turbine[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2015, 35(1): 25-29.

ASME. Section Ⅲ division 5 high temperature reactors-rules for construction of nuclear facility components: ASME/BPVC-SEC III-5[S]. New York: ASME/BPVC, 2023.

French Association for Design, Construction and In-Service Inspection Rules for Nuclear Island Components (AFCEN). RCC-MRx design and construction rules for mechanical components of nuclear installations: high temperature, research and fusion reactors[S]. Paris: AFCEN, 2015.

EDF Energy. R5 2014 edition, assessment procedure for the high temperature response of structures[S]. London: EDF Energy, 2014.

MUSCAT M, MOLLICONE P, YOU J H, et al. Creep fatigue analysis of DEMO divertor components following the RCC-MRx design code[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2023, 188: 113426.

国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料蠕变-疲劳损伤评定与寿命预测方法:GB/T 43103—2023[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2023.

国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料蠕变裂纹及蠕变-疲劳裂纹扩展速率测定方法:GB/T 42903—2023[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2023.

庞力平, 易思泽, 段立强, 等. 灵活性运行的锅炉联箱应力分析及寿命计算[J]. 动力工程学报, 2019, 39(12): 953-958. PANG Liping, YI Size, DUAN Liqiang, et al. Stress analysis and lifetime calculation of a boiler header in flexible operation[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2019, 39(12): 953-958.

LEE H Y, SONG K N, KIM Y W. Evaluation of creep-fatigue damage for hot gas duct structure of the NHDD plant[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2010, 132(3): 1411-1417.

于少博, 戴守通, 王田静, 等. 基于ASME Ⅲ-5规范和R5规程的高温非弹性蠕变疲劳损伤评价方法研究[J]. 压力容器, 2023, 40(1): 68-74. YU Shaobo, DAI Shoutong, WANG Tianjing, et al. Research on evaluation method of high temperature inelastic creep fatigue damage based on ASME Ⅲ-5 code and R5 procedure[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2023, 40(1): 68-74.

莫亚飞, 龚程, 高付海, 等. 核电高温设备蠕变强度评价方法对比研究[J]. 压力容器, 2022, 39(7): 35-42. MO Yafei, GONG Cheng, GAO Fuhai, et al. A comparative study on creep evaluation methods of elevated temperature equipment in nuclear applications[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2022, 39(7): 35-42.

武欣宇. 2.25Cr1MoV钢加氢反应设备蠕变疲劳寿命设计方法[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2015.

ASME. Section Ⅱ-materials Part D properties (metric)—2014, ASME boiler and pressure vessel code[S]. New York: ASME/BPVC, 2014.

秦炎锋, 冯相赛, 关凯书. 小冲杆法确定蠕变Norton参数[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 41(4): 569-574. QIN Yanfeng, FENG Xiangsai, GUAN Kaishu. Determination of Norton creep parameters by small punch creep test[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 41(4): 569-574.

华能集团.设备检修管理标准:Q/HN-2-7203.07.033—2014[S]. 北京: 华能集团检修部, 2014.

NGUYEN T T, YOON K B, PARK J, et al. Characterization of strain-controlled low-cycle fatigue and fracture behavior of P91 steel at elevated temperatures[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 133: 105887.

束国刚, 赵彦芬, 薛飞, 等. P91钢蠕变损伤试验研究与数值模拟[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(23): 103-107. SHU Guogang, ZHAO Yanfen, XUE Fei, et al. Experiment research and numerical simulation of creep damage for P91 steel[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(23): 103-107.

SPINDLER M W. The multiaxial creep ductility of austenitic stainless steels[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2004, 27(4): 273-281.

浏览量

101

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

超临界电站锅炉末级过热器管屏汽固两相流动特性数值模拟研究