纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
鲁宗相, 乔 颖, 姜继恒, 等. 双馈风电场频率响应模型的结构与参数联合辨识[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2026,54(18).
LU Zongxiang, QIAO Ying, JIANG Jiheng, et al. Joint structure and parameter identification of DFIG wind farm frequency response model[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2026, 54(18).
鲁宗相, 乔 颖, 姜继恒, 等. 双馈风电场频率响应模型的结构与参数联合辨识[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2026,54(18). DOI: 10.19783/j.cnki.pspc.260390.
LU Zongxiang, QIAO Ying, JIANG Jiheng, et al. Joint structure and parameter identification of DFIG wind farm frequency response model[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2026, 54(18). DOI: 10.19783/j.cnki.pspc.260390.
双馈风力发电机组可通过附加有功控制向电力系统提供虚拟惯量与下垂调节服务。然而,机组频率响应模型还受转速控制、桨距角控制影响,借用同步机惯量-阻尼模型辨识将产生较大误差。提出了基于增广UD分解(augmented UD decomposition identification
AUDI)的双馈风电场频率响应模型辨识方法。首先论证了频率响应模型在桨距角闭锁和切入时分别呈现5阶、7阶等高阶特征变化。其次,考虑到调度难以获取场站机组内部状态参数导致全环节动态模型无法实施,搭建了双馈风场频率响应的多项式离散系统模型,仅采用场站并网点PMU频率、有功采样数据输入即可完成辨识。推导了AUDI方法的递推形式,并结合F检验理论提出了模型最优阶次选择方法,实现了微扰动工况下的风电场频率响应模型的结构与参数辨识。最后,基于5机11节点仿真表明,所提策略能精准识别变风速工况下的模型阶次、辨识结果接近无偏估计,稳定性优于最小二乘类方法。
Doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) wind turbines can provide virtual inertia and active droop control to power systems through supplementary active power control. However
the frequency response modeling of DFIG-based wind farms are also affected by rotor speed control and pitch angle control. Therefore
directly applying the inertia-damping model commonly used for synchronous generators can result in significant errors. This paper proposes a frequency response model identification method for DFIG-based wind farms based on augmented UD decomposition identification (AUDI). First
it is demonstrated that the frequency response model exhibits high-order characteristics
with the effective model order changing to fifth and seventh order under pitch-angle control locking and activation
respectively. Second
considering that the internal states and control parameters of wind farm units are generally inaccessible to system operators
making a full-order dynamic model impractical for implementation
a polynomial discrete-time model is established for the frequency response of DFIG-based wind farms. The proposed model requires only PMU frequency measurements and active power sampling data at the point of common coupling. An AUDI recursive formulation is derived
and an optimal model-order selection method is developed based on the F-test theory
enabling joint structure and parameter identification of the wind farm frequency response model under small-disturbance conditions. Finally
simulations on a 5-machine
11-bus system demonstrate that the proposed method can accurately identify the model order under varying wind-speed conditions. The identification results are close to unbiased estimates
and the proposed method exhibits better numerical stability than least-squares-based methods.
SWAIN S, SUBUDHI B. Grid synchronization of a PV system with power quality disturbances using unscented Kalman filtering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2019, 10(3): 1240-1247.
GONZÁLEZ-CAGIGAL M A, ROSENDO-MACÍAS J A, GÓMEZ-EXPÓSITO A. Parameter estimation of wind turbines with PMSM using cubature Kalman filters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 35(3): 1796-1804.
TAN B, ZHAO J, NETTO M, et al. Power system inertia estimation: Review of methods and the impacts of converter-interfaced generations[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2022, 134.
HUANG Z, SCHNEIDER K, NIEPLOCHA J. Feasibility studies of applying Kalman filter techniques to power system dynamic state estimation[C] // IEEE International Power Engineering Conference, December 3-6, 2007, Singapore, Singapore: 376-382.
AGHAMOLKI H G, MIAO Z, FAN L, et al. Identification of synchronous generator model with frequency control using unscented Kalman filter[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2015, 126: 45-55.
HUANG M, LI W, WEI Y. Estimating parameters of synchronous generators using square-root unscented Kalman filter[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2010, 80(9): 1137-1144.
ROUHANI A, ABUR A. Constrained iterated unscented Kalman filter for dynamic state and parameter estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018, 33(3): 2404-2414.
LIU M, CHEN J, MILANO F. On-line inertia estimation for synchronous and non-synchronous devices[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 36(3): 2693-2701.
CAI G, WANG B, YANG D, et al. Inertia estimation based on observed electromechanical oscillation response for power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(6): 4291-4299.
DU P, MATEVOSYAN J. Forecast system inertia condition and its impact to integrate more renewables[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, 9(2): 1531-1533.
TAVAKOLI M, POWER M, RUTTLEDGE L, et al. Load inertia estimation using white and grey-box estimators for power systems with high wind penetration[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2012, 45(21): 399-404.
蔡旭, 李征. 风电机组与风电场的动态建模[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
NI Y, LI C, DU Z, et al. Model order reduction based dynamic equivalence of a wind farm[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power Energy Systems, 2016, 83: 96-103.
MA J, SONG Z, ZHANG Y, et al. Model order reduction analysis of DFIG integration on the power system small- signal stability considering the virtual inertia control[J]. IET Generation, Transmission Distribution, 2017, 11(16): 4087-4095.
萧德云. 系统辨识理论及应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2014.
WANG G, SHU H, SHI B, et al. Model-data hybrid driven SOC estimation for energy storage batteries using AFF-RLS and BiLSTM-Transformer[J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2026, 11(2): 89-106.
0
浏览量
21
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621