纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
郑文迪, 余铠文, 吕博超, 等. 计及设备动态效率与电堆价格不确定性的质子交换膜氢储系统优化配置[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2026,54(13).
ZHENG Wendi, YU Kaiwen, LÜ Bochao, et al. Research on optimal configuration of proton exchange membrane hydrogen storage systems considering dynamic equipment efficiency and stack price uncertainty[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2026, 54(13).
郑文迪, 余铠文, 吕博超, 等. 计及设备动态效率与电堆价格不确定性的质子交换膜氢储系统优化配置[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2026,54(13). DOI: 10.19783/j.cnki.pspc.251268.
ZHENG Wendi, YU Kaiwen, LÜ Bochao, et al. Research on optimal configuration of proton exchange membrane hydrogen storage systems considering dynamic equipment efficiency and stack price uncertainty[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2026, 54(13). DOI: 10.19783/j.cnki.pspc.251268.
针对质子交换膜氢储系统 (proton exchange membrane hydrogen storage system
PEMHSS) 优化配置中运行参数、设备动态效率及价格不确定性对系统经济性和实用性的影响问题,提出一种计及设备动态效率与电堆价格不确定性的 PEMHSS 优化配置方法。首先,考虑两相传输与物质守恒机制,建立能够精准反映实际运行特性的 PEMHSS 精细模型。然后,针对精细模型计算复杂度高、耗时长的瓶颈问题,采用数据驱动方法构建系统代理模型,实现模型高精度与求解高效率的统一。最后,基于代理模型对电堆运行参数进行优化,并在此基础上建立综合考虑设备动态效率与电堆价格不确定性的氢储系统优化配置模型。算例结果表明,经参数优化后,PEMHSS 的制氢与发电效率分别提升了 5.95% 和 13.04%,且配置方案有效降低了系统年均综合成本,验证了所提方法的有效性。
To address the impacts of operating parameters
dynamic equipment efficiency
and price uncertainty on the economic performance and practicality of proton exchange membrane hydrogen storage systems (PEMHSS)
this paper proposes an optimal configuration method that accounts for dynamic equipment efficiency and stack price uncertainty. First
considering the mechanisms of two-phase transport and mass conservation
a refined model accurately reflecting the actual operation characteristics of the PEMHSS is established. Then
to overcome the challenges of high computational complexity and long solution times associated with the refined model
a surrogate model is constructed using a data-driven approach
achieving a balance between modeling accuracy and computational efficiency. Finally
stack operating parameters are optimized using the surrogate model
and an optimal configuration model for the hydrogen storage system is developed by comprehensively considering dynamic equipment efficiency and stack price uncertainty. Case study results show that
after parameter optimization
the hydrogen production and power generation efficiencies of the PEMHSS are improved by 5.95% and 13.04%
respectively. Moreover
the configuration scheme effectively reduces the system's average annual total cost
demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.
LIU L, HU X, CHEN J, et al. Embedded scenario clustering for wind and photovoltaic power, and load based on multi-head self-attention[J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2024, 9(1): 122-132.
YIGIT T, SELAMET O F. Mathematical modeling and dynamic Simulink simulation of high-pressure PEM electrolyzer system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(32): 13901-13914.
AFSHARI E, KHODABAKHSH S, JAHANTIGH N, et al. Performance assessment of gas crossover phenomenon and water transport mechanism in high pressure PEM electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(19): 11029-11040.
DIAZ D F R, VALENZUELA E, WANG Y. A component-level model of polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis cells for hydrogen production[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 321.
ABDIN Z, WEBB C J, GRAY E M A. PEM fuel cell model and simulation in Matlab-Simulink based on physical parameters[J]. Energy, 2016, 116: 1131-1144.
LIU G, QIN Y, YIN Y, et al. Thermodynamic modeling and exergy analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell power system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(54): 29799-29811.
GONG Z, WANG B, WU K, et al. A 1+1-D multiphase proton exchange membrane fuel cell model for real-time simulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2021, 8(2): 2928-2944.
PU Y, LI Q, ZOU X, et al. Optimal sizing for an integrated energy system considering degradation and seasonal hydrogen storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 302.
SHI M, WANG W, HAN Y, et al. Research on comprehensive benefit of hydrogen storage in microgrid system[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 194: 621-635.
ZHANG Y, SUN H, TAN J, et al. Capacity configuration optimization of multi-energy system integrating wind turbine/photovoltaic/hydrogen/battery[J]. Energy, 2022, 252.
YAZDANI H, BANESHI M, YAGHOUBI M. Techno-economic and environmental design of hybrid energy systems using multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision making methods[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 282.
WANG J, XUE K, GUO Y, et al. Multi-objective capacity programming and operation optimization of an integrated energy system considering hydrogen energy storage for collective energy communities[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 268.
SHI M, HUANG Y, LIN H. Research on power to hydrogen optimization and profit distribution of microgrid cluster considering shared hydrogen storage[J]. Energy, 2023, 264.
CHEN J, LÜ H, SHEN X, et al. Multi-objective optimization design and sensitivity analysis of proton exchange membrane electrolytic cell[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434.
ZHANG Y, LIANG L, ZHANG D, et al. Hybrid vibration isolation optimization of a flexible manipulator based on neural network agent model[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(5): 482-505.
ZHENG W, LÜ B, SHAO Z, et al. Optimization of power allocation for the multi-stack PEMEC system considering energy efficiency and degradation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 53: 1210-1225.
HOU D, EVINS R. A protocol for developing and evaluating neural network-based surrogate models and its application to building energy prediction[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 193.
PRINA M G, DALLAPICCOLA M, MOSER D, et al. Machine learning as a surrogate model for EnergyPLAN: Speeding up energy system optimization at the country level[J]. Energy, 2024, 307.
TAN J, HU H, LIU S, et al. Optimization of PEMFC system operating conditions based on neural network and PSO to achieve the best system performance[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(84): 35790-35809.
BÜHLER L, MÖST D. Derivation of one- and two-factor experience curves for electrolysis technologies[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 89: 105-116.
FABIANEK P, GLENSK B, MADLENER R. A sequential real options analysis for renewable power-to-hydrogen plants for Germany and California[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 192.
KRISHNAN S, KONING V, DE GROOT M T, et al. Present and future cost of alkaline and PEM electrolyser stacks[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(83): 32313-32330.
WANG Y, PANG Y, XU H, et al. PEM Fuel cell and electrolysis cell technologies and hydrogen infrastructure development—a review[J]. Energy Environmental Science, 2022, 15(6): 2288-2328.
0
浏览量
10
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621