上海电力大学 电气工程学院, 上海市 杨浦区,200090
[ "姚寅(1986),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为新型电力系统优化运行,E-mail:yin.yao@shiep.edu.cn" ]
[ "王业晖(1999),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为电动汽车规划,E-mail:wangyehui1999@163.com" ]
[ "周波(1980),男,博士,讲师,通信作者,研究方向为需求侧响应,E-mail:ryanz125@163.com" ]
[ "林顺富(1983),男,博士,教授,研究方向为电能质量及智能电网用户端技术,E-mail:shunfulin@shiep.edu.cn" ]
[ "徐波(1981),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为新能源并网分析与控制,E-mail:xubo@shiep.edu.cn" ]
[ "杨帆(1981),女,博士,教授,研究方向为分布式发电与微电网控制技术、新型电力系统稳定控制,E-mail:81751369@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
姚寅, 王业晖, 周波, 等. 基于配电网电能质量指标体系的多区域电动汽车充换电站比例规划[J]. 现代电力, 2025,(6):1309-1317.
YAO Yin, WANG Yehui, ZHOU Bo, et al. Proportional Planning for Multi-region EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Dynamic Weighting of Power Quality Indexes in Distribution Networks[J]. 2025, (6): 1309-1317.
姚寅, 王业晖, 周波, 等. 基于配电网电能质量指标体系的多区域电动汽车充换电站比例规划[J]. 现代电力, 2025,(6):1309-1317. DOI: 10.19725/j.cnki.1007-2322.2023.0349.
YAO Yin, WANG Yehui, ZHOU Bo, et al. Proportional Planning for Multi-region EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Dynamic Weighting of Power Quality Indexes in Distribution Networks[J]. 2025, (6): 1309-1317. DOI: 10.19725/j.cnki.1007-2322.2023.0349.
随着电动汽车渗透率的高速增长,不合理的充换电站比例规划会导致配电网电能质量和运行经济性下降,亟需建立配电网电能质量指标体系对充换电站的比例规划进行评估。传统指标体系赋权方式单一,且不能准确描述指标间相互关系。文中提出了基于改进序关系分析(G1-criteria importance though intercrieria correlation
CRITIC)组合赋权针对不同比例充换电站规划的配电网电能质量评价方法。首先,从配电网电压越限率及稳定裕度、馈线均衡度及损耗、电流谐波畸变率多个角度设立可量化指标,建立配电网电能质量指标体系;其次,采用Kendall相关系数对CRITIC客观赋权法进行改进,利用主客观组合赋权法对体系内各个指标进行赋权;然后,通过赋权后的指标体系对不同职能区域进行充换电站比例规划评估。最后,通过仿真实例分析,验证了所提配电网电能质量指标体系的合理性以及改进后赋权方法的有效性。
The rapid growth in the penetration rate of electric vehicles accompanies by the irrational proportional planning of charging stations and battery swapping stations
resulting in a decline of power quality and operational economy of distribution network. The establishment of a power quality index system is therefore imperative for evaluating the proportional planning. Traditional weighting methods for the index system fail to accurately describe the relationship between the indexes. As a result
an evaluation method for power quality of distribution network is proposed based on the G1 and the CRITIC methods. Firstly
the power quality index system of distribution network is established by quantifying indexes based on voltage overlimit rate and stability margin
feeder balance and loss
as well as current harmonic distortion rate. Secondly
the Kendall correlation coefficient is utilized to improve the CRITIC objective weighting method. Each index in the system is weighted by the subjective and objective combination weighting method. The proportional planning evaluation of Charging Stations and Battery Swapping Stations in different functional areas is then conducted using the weighted index system. Finally
the rationality of the proposed power quality index system and the effectiveness of the improved weighting method are verified through analysis of simulation examples.
TAN Xiandong, LIU Jun, XU Zhicheng, et al. Power supply and demand balance during the 14th five-year plan period under the goal of carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(05): 1−6(in Chinese).
谭显东, 刘俊, 徐志成, 等. “双碳”目标下“十四五”电力供需形势[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(05): 1−6.
ZHANG Yi, HAO Sipeng. Optimized configuration of transformer capacity and energy storage for electric vehicle charging stations[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2023, 60(7): 19−25(in Chinese).
张怡, 郝思鹏. 电动汽车充电站变压器容量及储能优化配置[J]. 电测与仪表, 2023, 60(7): 19−25.
ZHA Pengcheng, GAN Yali, GAO Haiyou, et al. Quality assessment of electric vehicle charging stations accessing distribution network[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2022, 59(6): 69−75(in Chinese).
查鹏程, 甘雅丽, 高海祐, 等. 电动汽车充电站接入配电网的电能质量评估[J]. 电测与仪表, 2022, 59(6): 69−75.
XU Haoxiang. Power control of electric vehicle bidirectional converter based on virtual synchronous machine[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2021, 58(12): 31−38(in Chinese).
徐浩祥. 基于虚拟同步机的电动汽车双向变流器功率控制[J]. 电测与仪表, 2021, 58(12): 31−38.
ZHU Sijia, YU Siyu, WANG Ge, et al. Research on charging station planning of EV based on CVaR[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2023, 60(7): 13−18,82(in Chinese).
朱思嘉, 余思雨, 王戈, 等. 基于条件风险价值的电动汽车充电站规划[J]. 电测与仪表, 2023, 60(7): 13−18,82.
LI Juan, ZHANG Liang, QIAN Guangchao, et al. Feeders load balancing method for flexible distribution network with large-scale electric vehicles [J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2023, 35(09): 53−61(in Chinese).
李娟, 张梁, 钱广超, 等. 规模化电动汽车接入下柔性配电网馈线负载平衡方法[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2023, 35(09): 53−61.
CHEN Zhonghua, CHEN Zhiyuan, WANG Menghan, et al. A method to evaluate flexibility of distribution network considering grid-connection of electric vehicles[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2022, 39(06): 702−709(in Chinese).
陈忠华, 陈致远, 王梦涵, 等. 考虑电动汽车接入的配电网灵活性评估方法[J]. 现代电力, 2022, 39(06): 702−709.
HU Siyang, YANG Jianwei , LIAO Kai, et al. Fault analysis method for an urban distribution network considering large-scale electric vehicle access[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(16): 33–46(in Chinese).
胡思洋, 杨健维, 廖凯, 等. 计及大规模电动汽车接入的配电网故障分析方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(16): 33−46.
RODRIGUEZ-PAJARON P, HERNANDEZ A, MILANOVIC J V. Probabilistic assessment of the impact of electric vehicles and nonlinear loads on power quality in residential networks[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power Energy Systems, 2021, 129: 106807.
ARIAN Z, MUTTAQI K M, DANNY S. Coordinated charging control of electric vehicles while improving power quality in power grids using a hierarchical decision-making approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(11): 2585−2596.
CASALEIRO A, RODRIGO A E S, TEIXEIRA B, et al. Experimental assessment and model validation of power quality parameters for vehicle-to-grid systems[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2021, 191: 106891.
KHALID M R, ALAM M S, SARWAR A, et al. A comprehensive review on electric vehicles charging infrastructures and their impacts on power-quality of the utility grid[J]. ETransportation, 2019, 1: 100006.
ROMO R, MICHELOUD O. Power quality of actual grids with plug-in electric vehicles in presence of renewables and micro-grids[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 46: 189−200.
TORRES S, DURAN I, MARULANDA A, et al. Electric vehicles and power quality in low voltage networks: Real data analysis and modeling[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 305: 117718.
SHARMA G, SOOD V K, ALAM M S, et al. Comparison of common DC and AC bus architectures for EV fast charging stations and impact on power quality[J]. ETransportation, 2020, 5: 100066.
BALASUNDAR C, SUNDARABALAN C K, SHARMA J, et al. Design of power quality enhanced sustainable bidirectional electric vehicle charging station in distribution grid[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 74: 103242.
SAHOO B, ROUTRAY S K, ROUT P K, et al. Power quality and stability assessment of hybrid microgrid and electric vehicle through a novel transformation technique[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 51: 101927.
HASHEMIAN S N, LATIFY M A, YOUSEFI G R. PEV fast-charging station sizing and placement in coupled transportation-distribution networks considering power line conditioning capability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(6): 4773−4783.
YAN Ning, LI Xiangjun, ZHANG Bo, et al. Energy storage capacity allocation method with cascade utilization based on battery health in microgrids[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(5): 1630–1638(in Chinese).
颜宁, 李相俊, 张博, 等. 基于电池健康度的微电网群梯次利用储能系统容量配置方法[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(5): 1630−1638.
ZHANG Liang, SUN Chenglong, CAI Guowei, et al. Two-stage optimization strategy for coordinated charging and discharging of EVs based on PSO algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(05): 1837–1852(in Chinese).
张良, 孙成龙, 蔡国伟, 等. 基于PSO算法的电动汽车有序充放电两阶段优化策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(05): 1837–1852.
0
浏览量
11
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621