
1. 国网天津市电力公司, 天津市 南开区,300384
2. 智能电网教育部重点实验室(天津大学), 天津市 南开区,300072
[ "梁伟(1983),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为电动汽车与电网互动研究,E-mail:liuli@163.com" ]
[ "刘晓楠(1989),女,博士研究生,研究方向为电动汽车与电网互动研究,E-mail:13752580388@163.com" ]
[ "张智达(1994),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为电动汽车与电网互动研究,E-mail:1540481951@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
梁伟, 刘晓楠, 张智达, 等. 考虑用户个体异质性和态度潜变量的电动私家车随机充电决策方法[J]. 现代电力, 2025,42(5):1052-1059.
LIANG Wei, LIU Xiaonan, ZHANG Zhida, et al. A Random Charging Decision Method for Electric Private Cars Considering Individual Heterogeneity of Users and Latent Attitudinal Variables[J]. 2025, 42(5): 1052-1059.
梁伟, 刘晓楠, 张智达, 等. 考虑用户个体异质性和态度潜变量的电动私家车随机充电决策方法[J]. 现代电力, 2025,42(5):1052-1059. DOI: 10.19725/j.cnki.1007-2322.2023.0344.
LIANG Wei, LIU Xiaonan, ZHANG Zhida, et al. A Random Charging Decision Method for Electric Private Cars Considering Individual Heterogeneity of Users and Latent Attitudinal Variables[J]. 2025, 42(5): 1052-1059. DOI: 10.19725/j.cnki.1007-2322.2023.0344.
针对电动私家车(electric private car
EPC)充电决策行为,介绍一种考虑用户个体异质性和态度潜变量的EPC随机充电决策方法。该方法首先通过分析充电决策的影响因素,并针对不同因素设计调查问卷。其次,针对态度潜变量设计问题,得到测量指标以间接量化态度潜变量,并通过问卷信度和效度分析调查数据的质量。然后,考虑影响用户个体充电决策的充电场景变量、态度潜变量以及个体社会经济属性,利用混合选择模型(hybrid choice model
HCM)建立充电效用,确定充电概率。通过调查数据估计模型参数,最后确定充电效用与3类影响因素的具体表达式。与基于混合Logit模型的预测结果相比,所提方法的预测结果精度更高,采用所提方法后误差缩小了将近14%。
According to the charging decision behavior of electric private cars (EPCs)
a random charging decision method for EPCs is proposed with individual heterogeneity and latent attitude variables taken into account. Firstly
an analysis on the influencing factors of charging decision is conducted
and questionnaires for the different factors are designed. Secondly
to address the design problem of latent variables of attitude
a measurement index is derived to indirectly quantify latent variables of attitude. Additionally
the quality of the survey data is analyzed through an examination of questionnaire data reliability and validity. Then
considering the charging scene variables
attitude latent variables and individual socioeconomic attributes that affect individual charging decisions
the hybrid choice model (HCM) is employed to establish the charging utility
and the charging probability is subsequently determined. Through the investigation data
the model parameters are estimated
leading to the determination of specific expressions of charging utility and three types of influencing factors. Compared to the prediction results based on the mixed Logit model
the proposed method achieves higher prediction accuracy
and the error has been reduced by nearly 14% when adopting the proposed method.
公安部. 2022年全国新能源汽车保有量达1310万辆[OL].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1754698332767076172wfr=spiderfor=pc, 2023.01.11.
RAO Yingqing, ZHANG Xiaodong, RAO Yufei, et al. A practical probability load model of electric vehicles considering segmental charging[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2021, 58(06): 26−32(in Chinese).
饶颖卿, 张晓东, 饶宇飞, 等. 考虑分段充电的实用型电动汽车概率负荷模型[J]. 电测与仪表, 2021, 58(06): 26−32.
LIU Yong, LI Quanyou, DAI Chaohua. Review on the spatiotemporal distribution modeling of electric vehicle charging load[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2022, 59(08): 1−9(in Chinese).
刘勇, 李全优, 戴朝华. 电动汽车充电负荷时空分布建模研究综述[J]. 电测与仪表, 2022, 59(08): 1−9.
QIN Jianhua, PAN Chongchao, ZHANG Xuan, et al. Charging load forecast of electric vehicle based on analysis of charging behavior[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2023, 60(04): 19−26(in Chinese).
秦建华, 潘崇超, 张璇, 等. 基于充电行为分析的电动汽车充电负荷预测[J]. 电测与仪表, 2023, 60(04): 19−26.
ZHANG Meixia, WU Zijing, YANG Xiu. Electric vehicle charging load prediction based on dynamic energy consumption model and user psychology[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2022, 39(06): 710−719(in Chinese).
张美霞, 吴子敬, 杨秀. 基于动态能耗模型与用户心理的电动汽车充电负荷预测[J]. 现代电力, 2022, 39(06): 710−719.
ZHANG Meixia, SUN Quanjie, YANG Xiu. Electric vehicle charging load prediction considering multi-source information real-time interaction and user regret[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(02): 632−645(in Chinese).
张美霞, 孙铨杰, 杨秀. 考虑多源信息实时交互和用户后悔心理的电动汽车充电负荷预测[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(02): 632−645.
ZHOU Xiang, CHEN Jiejun, XIE Peiyuan, et al. Load demand analyzing method for electric vehicle charging station based on the principle of maximizing utility[J]. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 2018, 55(04): 1−8(in Chinese).
周翔, 陈杰军, 谢培元, 等. 基于效用最大化原则的电动汽车充电站负荷特性分析方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2018, 55(04): 1−8.
POWELL S, CEZAR G V, RAJAGOPAL R. Scalable probabilistic estimates of electric vehicle charging given observed driver behavior[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 309: 118382.
QU Keqing, ZHAO Denghui, MAO Ling, et al. Fast charging load prediction of electric vehicles considering urban spatial structure and user bounded rationality[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18(10): 151−160(in Chinese).
屈克庆, 赵登辉, 毛玲, 等. 考虑城市空间结构和用户有限理性的电动汽车快充负荷预测[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18(10): 151−160.
ZHOU Yi, YUAN Quan, TANG Yi, et al. Charging decision optimization for electric vehicles based on traffic-grid coupling networks[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(09): 3563−3572(in Chinese).
周毅, 袁泉, 汤奕, 等. 基于路-电耦合网络的电动汽车充电决策优化方法[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(09): 3563−3572.
FENG Wanlu, QUAN Yi, FU Bo, et al. Charging decision model of electric vehicle based on improved cumulative prospect theory[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2023, 42(02): 170−179(in Chinese).
冯万璐, 权轶, 付波, 等. 基于改进累积前景理论的电动运营车充电决策模型[J]. 电力工程技术, 2023, 42(02): 170−179.
YUN B, SUN DJ, ZHANG Y, et al. A charging location choice model for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle users[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(20): 5761.
LI Hao, YU Lu, CHEN Yu, et al. Uncertainty of available range in explaining the charging choice behavior of BEV users[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2023, 170: 103624.
YANG Ye, TAN Zhongfu, JIAO Gangxin. Analysis of factors influencing fast charging behavior based on data of connected electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(5): 86−92(in Chinese).
杨烨, 谭忠富, 焦港欣. 基于网联数据的电动车快速充电影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(5): 86−92.
孙庭源. 分时电价下电动出租车司机充电时间选择行为研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
LEE J H, CHAKRABORTY D, HARDMANS J, et al. Exploring electric vehicle charging patterns: mixed usage of charging infrastructure[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transportation and Environment, 2020, 79: 102249.
SUN X, YAMAMOTO T, TAKAHASHI K, et al. Home charge timing choice behavior of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle users under a dynamic electricity pricing scheme[J]. Transportation, 2018, 45(6): 1849−1869.
PAN L, YAO E, MACKENZIED D. Modeling EV charging choice considering risk attitude and attribute non-attendance[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 102: 60−72.
潘龙. 基于充电选择行为的电动汽车充电设施布局优化研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2020.
WANG Yue, YAO Enjian, PAN Long. Electric vehicle drivers' charging behavior analysis considering heterogeneity and satisfaction[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 286: 124982.
DAIAN N, POLAK J W, SIVAKUMAR A. Patent and latent predictors of electric vehicle charging behavior[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015, 2502(1): 116−123.
XU Hao, MIAO Shihong, QIAN Tiantian, et al. A modeling strategy for charging loads of large-scale electric vehicles considering multi-days spaced charging mode[J]. Transaction of China Electrotechnical Society, 2015, 30(9): 129−137(in Chinese).
徐浩. 苗世洪, 钱甜甜, 等. 计及多日一充模式的规模化电动汽车充电负荷建模策略[J]. 电工技术学报, 2015, 30(9): 129−137.
BEN-AKIVA M, WALKER J, BERNARDINO A, et al. Integration of choice and latent variable models in: in perpetual motion: travel behavior research opportunities and application challenges[J]. Radiología, 2002(1): 431−470.
张悦. 基于扩展TAM模型的公共充电桩用户使用意愿研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022.
0
浏览量
9
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621