1. 国网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院
2. 山东省能源工业互联网大数据技术重点实验室
3. 国网山东省电力公司
4. 东南大学能源与环境学院
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
刘冬兰, 姚洪磊, 许善杰, 等. 风轮高度阵风预报模型的验证和优化研究[J]. 热力发电, 2026,(7).
刘冬兰, 姚洪磊, 许善杰, et al. 风轮高度阵风预报模型的验证和优化研究[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026, (7).
刘冬兰, 姚洪磊, 许善杰, 等. 风轮高度阵风预报模型的验证和优化研究[J]. 热力发电, 2026,(7). DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202512001.
刘冬兰, 姚洪磊, 许善杰, et al. 风轮高度阵风预报模型的验证和优化研究[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026, (7). DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202512001.
【目的】阵风在风轮高度处(约90 m)的短时剧烈波动对风力发电的安全稳定运行有着重要影响,而传统基于地面高度观测(约10 m)修订的阵风模型对风轮高度处阵风的预测存在极大不确定性。【方法】基于此,系统性对比优化多种阵风算法模型,为风电场风轮高度阵风预报提供方法参考。为突破观测局限性,首先创新性地利用WRF(weather research and forecast model)大涡模型进行秒级百米尺度超高分辨率模拟再现某风电场风轮高度阵风的快速变化情况,并提供物理一致的三维空间数据,分别对基于湍流动能(TKE)算法和基于边界层风廓线外推的多种阵风模型展开评估,并提出融合改进方案。同时还基于长期观测讨论了上述三种模型在实际预报中的适用性和局限性。【结果】实验结果表明,风廓线模型相对较差,阵风预报误差与基准数据离散程度指标R2为0.64,平均偏差为1.43 m/s;TKE阵风模型效果稳定,R2为0.93,平均偏差为0.64 m/s;融合改进方案最为优良,R2为0.94,平均偏差为0.12 m/s。【结论】融合改进方案可考虑应用于风轮高度阵风预报的实际业务中,但在极端天气下无法再现阵风变化的快速波动,需对极端天气条件下的阵风预报进行针对性考虑。
[Objective] Short-term intense fluctuations in wind gusts at hub height(90 m) present critical challenges to the efficient grid integration and safety operation of wind farms. However
a significant gap exists in the hubheight gust forecasting because the conventional gust models based on the surface(approximately 10 m) wind observations exhibit considerable uncertainty in predicting hub-height gusts due to the complex vertical structure which modifies the gust major characteristics across the lower atmospheric boundary layer. To address this limitation
this study systematically evaluates and optimizes multiple gust models
aiming to establish a robust methodological reference for accurate hub-height gust prediction. [Methods] To overcome the lack of high-precision gust observations
the weather research and forecasting model with large eddy simulation(WRF-LES) is utilized to conduct an ultra-high-resolution meteorological numerical simulation. Operating at a second-level temporal resolution and a hectometer-level spatial scale
this simulation effectively reproduces the rapid variation of hubheight gusts at a target wind farm and also generates physically consistent three-dimensional atmospheric variables(e.g.
turbulence kinetic energy
vertical wind profile and stability parameters) for model validation. Multiple gust models are evaluated
including turbulence kinetic energy(TKE)-based models which directly quantify the turbulent intensity
and wind-profile-based models which rely on the vertical wind shear relationships. Furthermore
an improved hybrid model integrating both algorithms is subsequently proposed. The applicability
accuracy and limitations of all models are thoroughly assessed based on long-term observations of hub-height gusts across diverse atmospheric stability conditions. [Results] The results demonstrate that the conventional wind-profile-based models exhibit relatively poor performance with R2 of 0.64 and mean bias of 1.43 m/s
especially under unstable atmosphere conditions. In contrast
the TKE-based model demonstrates stable and superior performance across different atmospheric stability conditions
achieving an R2 of 0.93 and a mean bias of 0.64 m/s since the TKE captures the major features of the turbulent intensity. Compared to both individual gust models
the optimized hybrid model yields the best forecasting performance with R2 of 0.94 and mean bias of 0.12 m/s. [Conclusion] Therefore
the optimized hybrid model exhibits significant potential for operational application in hub-height gust forecasting and wind farm management. However
the hybrid model still tends to underestimate the rapid gust fluctuations during strong convection and extreme weather events
suggesting a key area for future refinement.
0
浏览量
3
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621