1. 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北,武汉,430072
2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北,武汉,430072
3. 中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司,湖北,武汉,430060
网络首发:2026-06-05,
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
卢巧荣, 李奇龙, 毛新莹, 等. 压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026,47(6):1878-1894.
LU Qiao-rong, LI Qi-long, MAO Xin-ying, et al. Optimal design of lining structure in artificial cavern of compressed air energy storage[J]. 2026, 47(6): 1878-1894.
卢巧荣, 李奇龙, 毛新莹, 等. 压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026,47(6):1878-1894. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0827.
LU Qiao-rong, LI Qi-long, MAO Xin-ying, et al. Optimal design of lining structure in artificial cavern of compressed air energy storage[J]. 2026, 47(6): 1878-1894. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0827.
压缩空气储能是提升可再生能源消纳与电网调峰能力的关键技术之一,人工硐室储气库因其选址局限性小和工程质量可控性好等优势而具有较大应用前景。然而,在高压运行状态下,储气库衬砌承受较大的拉应力,当超过材料临界强度时易发生拉伸破坏,为应对这一问题,通常需要增加衬砌配筋率或减小硐室尺寸、减小储气压力,这不仅增加建设成本,也限制了储气能力。针对以上问题,本研究提出了一种将衬砌设置在密封层内侧的衬砌−密封层−找平−初支−围岩的优化结构,并基于热力耦合模型进行了数值模拟与分析。结果表明:在温度方面,优化结构下由于衬砌保护作用,密封层温度显著低于传统结构,以钢板为密封材料时最高温度降低了46.08%;在应力方面,衬砌结构整体呈环向受拉、径向受压的状态,结构优化后钢板、混凝土衬砌和围岩最大拉应力分别降低了16.00%、28.19%和24.73%,且荷载分担研究表明两种形式下均由围岩承担大部分压力(>70%);在变形方面,最大位移均出现在衬砌顶部,优化结构的整体变形幅度相对较小。进一步分析了高、中、低3种地应力水平下的衬砌结构力学响应,相较于传统结构,优化结构在高、中、低3种地应力水平下的钢板最大第一主应力分别减小了40.26%、32.01%和22.46%,说明优化结构可以有效降低密封层环向拉应力。此外,围岩等级和围岩变形模量对储气库结构的力学响应影响显著,建议储气库在选址时选择III类及以上围岩等级。最后,对比分析了不同材料密封层的受力特征,钢板和玻璃钢作为密封材料时,整体呈环向受拉、径向受压的状态;柔性混凝土和橡胶作为密封材料时,整体呈受压状态。针对传统和优化两种结构,分别推荐钢板和柔性混凝土作为密封材料,此时围岩应力和变形相对最小。综上所述,对于人工硐室储气库,本研究提出的优化结构相较于传统结构更有利于结构稳定,研究成果对压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构设计具有重要参考意义。
Compressed air energy storage (CAES) is a key technology for the consumption of renewable energy and peak shaving of power grid. Artificial cavern gas storage has promising application prospects because it is less constrained by site selection and offers better controllability of construction quality. However
the lining and surrounding rock are subjected to significant tensile stress during high-pressure operation. When the maximum tensile stress exceeds the material’s critical strength
tensile failure occurs. To address this issue
the reinforcement ratio of the lining must usually be increased
or the chamber size and storage pressure must be reduced. However
these measures increase construction costs and limit storage capacity. In this study
an optimized structure is proposed in which the lining is placed inside the sealing layer. From the inside outward
the structure consists of the lining
sealing layer
leveling layer
initial support
and surrounding rock. Numerical simulations and analyses are conducted based on a thermo-mechanical coupling model. The results show that the sealing layer temperature in the optimized structure is significantly lower than that in the traditional structure because of the protective effect of the lining. When using steel plate as the sealing material
the maximum temperature is reduced by 46.08%. In terms of stress
the entire lining structure is subjected to circumferential tension and radial compression. After structural optimization
the maximum tensile stresses in the sealing layer
concrete lining
and surrounding rock are reduced by 16.00%
28.19%
and 24.73%
respectively. Furthermore
the load-sharing results show that more than 70% of the pressure is borne by the surrounding rock in both structures. In terms of deformation
the maximum displacement occurs at the top of the lining. The overall displacement variation of the optimized structure is relatively small. Further analysis examines the lining structure’s mechanical response under high
medium
and low in situ stress levels. Compared with the traditional structure
the optimized structure reduces the sealing layer’s maximum first principal stress by 40.26%
32.01%
and 22.46% under high
medium
and low in situ stress levels
respectively. This reduction demonstrates the optimized structure’s effectiveness in mitigating circumferential tensile stress in the sealing layer. Surrounding rock grade and deformation modulus significantly influence the structure’s mechanical response. For gas storage sites
surrounding rock of Grade III or higher is selected. Moreover
the mechanical properties of four kinds of sealing layer materials are compared. The steel plate and fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) are subjected to circumferential tension and radial compression
whereas flexible concrete and rubber are in compression. Steel plate is recommended for traditional structure
whereas flexible concrete is recommended as the sealing material for optimized structure
because it minimizes stress and deformation in the surrounding rock. In summary
for artificial cavern gas storage
the optimized structure proposed in this study is more conducive to structural stability than the traditional structure. The findings provide valuable guidance for the design of artificial cavern lining structures in compressed air energy storage applications.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621