1. 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川,成都,610072
2. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏,南京,210096
3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北,武汉,430074
4. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北,武汉,430071
网络首发:2025-12-20,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
张世殊, 李青春, 刘松玉, 等. 深厚覆盖层孔内原位测试技术现状与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025,46(12):4009-4028.
ZHANG Shi-shu, LI Qing-chun, LIU Song-yu, et al. A state-of-the-art review on the borehole in-situ testing techniques in deep overburden layer[J]. 2025, 46(12): 4009-4028.
张世殊, 李青春, 刘松玉, 等. 深厚覆盖层孔内原位测试技术现状与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025,46(12):4009-4028. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0039.
ZHANG Shi-shu, LI Qing-chun, LIU Song-yu, et al. A state-of-the-art review on the borehole in-situ testing techniques in deep overburden layer[J]. 2025, 46(12): 4009-4028. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0039.
我国西部水电工程、桥梁桩基和高层建筑多修建于高山峡谷中的深厚覆盖层上,为了准确获取深厚覆盖层物理力学参数,钻孔原位测试技术已受到广泛关注。为深入系统地梳理深厚覆盖层钻孔原位测试技术,对常用的静力触探、旁压、钻孔剪切、动力触探和标准贯入试验等原位测试仪器、测试技术与工艺、理论分析和数据解译等方面的研究现状与成果进行了综述分析。结果表明:静力触探试验的主要优点是测试连续快速和数据精度高等,主要缺点是难以贯入碎石类土和无法直接观测土层;针对深厚覆盖层中致密粉土、砂层、砾石、卵石和漂石层等,可采用钻探−触探联合法或多重套管触探技术,通过先引孔后测试的方法获得深厚覆盖层的锥尖阻力、侧摩阻力和渗透系数等参数。旁压试验的主要优点是在不同深度原位测量覆盖层的力学参数,主要缺点是受成孔质量影响大和软土测试精度不高;与预钻式和压入式旁压测试技术相比,自钻式旁压测试能够最大限度地减少对孔壁的扰动,有效防止深厚覆盖层中无黏性土的塌孔和黏性土的缩径现象,从而快速、精确地获得深厚覆盖层的静止侧压力、临塑压力、极限压力和旁压模量等参数。钻孔剪切试验的主要优点是在覆盖层天然应力状态下测量强度参数,主要缺点是剪切机制和排水条件不易控制;适用于深厚覆盖层中饱和细粒土,试验结果接近于固结不排水剪切强度参数。动力触探和标准贯入试验的主要优点是适用范围广和可进行砂土液化判别,主要缺点是锤击能量的传递不易确定;在超过一定深度的深厚覆盖层中,动力触探和标准贯入锤击数随深度的修正关系为非线性,宜通过监测锤击能量对锤击数进行修正。最后,指出缺少针对高应力水平、复杂结构性和超固结性的深厚覆盖层钻孔原位测试技术和精准的数据解译方法是当前存在的不足,研发多功能原位测试装备,联合多种原位测试技术,基于机器学习开展综合性多源数据融合与评价、测试参数关联性分析是解决这一问题的有效途径。
Hydropower projects
pile foundations of bridges and tall buildings in western China are primarily constructed on deep overburden layers within high mountainous valleys. To accurately determine the physical and mechanical parameters of these deep overburden layers
in-situ borehole testing technology has gained significant attention. This paper systematically reviews the current research status and achievements from the aspect of the test instrument
test technology and process
theoretical analysis and data interpretation of various in-situ testing techniques for deep overburden drilling
including static cone penetration test
pressuremeter test
borehole shear test
dynamic penetration test
and standard penetration test. The findings indicate that the main advantages of static cone penetration test are continuous rapid testing and high data accuracy
and its disadvantages include difficulty penetrating gravel soils and an inability to observe soil layers directly. The combined drilling-penetration exploration method and multi-casing penetration technology can effectively obtain cone-tip resistance
side friction resistance
and permeability for dense silt
sand
gravel
pebble and cobble layers in deep overburden. The pressuremeter test can measure in-situ mechanical parameters at different depths
but results are strongly affected by the pore-forming quality
with a lower testing precision in soft soil. Compared to pre-drilling and press-in pressuremeter methods
self-boring pressuremeter minimizes disturbance to the borehole walls
effectively preventing collapse in non-cohesive soils and shrinkage in cohesive soils within deep overburden layers
thereby rapidly and accurately obtaining static lateral pressure
plastic pressure
ultimate pressure
and lateral pressure modulus. The main advantage of the borehole shear test is that the strength parameter is measured under the natural stress state of the overburden
but the main disadvantage is that the shear mechanism and drainage conditions are not easy to control. Borehole shear tests are suitable for saturated fine-grained soils in deep overburden
with results closely approximating consolidated undrained shear strength parameters. The main advantages of dynamic penetration test and standard penetration test are wide application range and identification of sand liquefaction
but the main disadvantage is that the transmission of hammer energy is not easy to determine. In deep overburden at considerable depths
the relationship between dynamic penetration and standard penetration hammer numbers is nonlinear
necessitating appropriate correction of hammer numbers through monitoring hammer energy. Current challenges include a lack of in-situ drilling testing technologies and robust data-interpretation methods for deep overburden characterized by high-stress levels
complex structures
and overconsolidation. It is recommended to develop multifunctional in-situ testing equipment
integrate various in-situ testing technologies
and enhance the multi-source data correlation analysis of test parameters using machine learning. This approach is an effective solution to the problems.
0
浏览量
347
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621