1. 广州航海学院 广东省近海基础设施绿色建造与智能运维重点实验室,广东,广州,510725
2. 中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广东,广州,510230
3. 中交集团交通基础工程环保与安全重点实验室,广东,广州,510230
4. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东,广州,510641
5. 广州科技职业技术大学 智慧城市工程学院,广东,广州,510440
网络首发:2025-09-04,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 等. 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025,46(9):2763-2772.
BAO Shu-feng, DONG Zhi-liang, MO Hai-hong, et al. Calculation of static batch settlement and low-pressure consolidation settlement of suspended and fluid mud[J]. 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 等. 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025,46(9):2763-2772. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0913.
BAO Shu-feng, DONG Zhi-liang, MO Hai-hong, et al. Calculation of static batch settlement and low-pressure consolidation settlement of suspended and fluid mud[J]. 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0913.
浮泥−流泥的物理力学特性与常规软土存在较大差异,以致大面积浮泥−流泥地基的沉降计算仅采用“在经典公式基础上通过沉降计算经验系数进行修正”的方法是欠科学的。鉴于此,通过理论推导建立了间歇沉降阶段及其后续低压(0~100 kPa)排水固结阶段的总沉降计算方法,并通过开展室内静态间歇沉降模型试验和低压固结试验,分别验证了间歇沉降计算方法和低压固结沉降计算方法的科学合理性。研究结果表明:(1)平均孔隙比累计变化率和低压固结压缩指数是两个关键技术参数,前者可通过理论公式推导和开展长期静态间歇沉降模型试验综合确定,后者则通过开展低压固结试验确定。(2)对于黏粒含量为40%~60%的浮泥−流泥,在无法开展静态间歇沉降模型试验的情况下,可将“平均孔隙比累计变化率为60%~75%”作为静态间歇沉降稳定状态的判定标准,即当黏粒含量为40%时,取为75%;当黏粒含量为60%时,取为60%。该标准同样适用于无初始结构的宾汉体。(3)基于(为孔隙比,为竖向压应力)曲线采用斜率平均法确定低压固结压缩指数的取值,更为合理。(4)总沉降计算公式综合考虑了静态间歇沉降行为与低压(0~100 kPa)排水固结行为,能满足工程精度要求,弥补了现行相关研究的不足,可为浮泥−流泥地基处理的设计与施工提供科学支撑。
The physico-mechanical properties of suspended and fluid mud differ significantly from those of conventional soft soils. Therefore
using only the method of “correction by empirical coefficients of settlement calculation based on classical formulae” for calculating settlement in large areas of suspended and fluid mud foundations is unscientific. In response
this study established a total settlement calculation method for the intermittent settlement stage and the subsequent low-pressure (0−100 kPa) consolidation stage through theoretical derivation. Static intermittent settlement modeling tests were conducted to evaluate the validity of the batch settlement calculation method
and low-pressure consolidation tests were performed to assess the validity of the low-pressure consolidation settlement calculation method. The study results indicate that
1) The cumulative change rate of average void ratio () and the low-pressure consolidation compression index () are two key technical parameters. The former can be determined by combining theoretical formulae with long-term static intermittent settlement modeling tests
while the latter can be determined through indoor low-pressure consolidation tests. 2) For suspended and fluid mud with a clay content of 40% to 60%
if static intermittent settlement modeling tests cannot be conducted
a “cumulative change in the average void ratio of 60% to 75%” can serve as a criterion for determining the stable state of static intermittent settlement. Specifically
when the clay content is 40%
is 75%
and when the viscous grain content is 60%
is 60%. This criterion also applies to Bingham bodies with no initial structure. 3) Determining the value of the low-pressure consolidation compression index based on the ( is the pore ratio
is the vertical compressive stress) using the slope averaging method is more reasonable. 4) The total settlement formula integrates the static intermittent settlement behaviors and low-pressure (0−100 kPa) consolidation behaviors
meeting the requirements for engineering accuracy. This study addresses the shortcomings of current research and provides scientific support for the design and construction of suspended and fluid mud foundation treatments.
0
浏览量
48
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621