1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
2. 机械工业勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西,西安,710000
3. 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,陕西,西安,710043
网络首发:2025-06-10,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 等. 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025,46(6):1811-1824.
LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, et al. Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation[J]. 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 等. 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025,46(6):1811-1824. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0525.
LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, et al. Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation[J]. 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0525.
黄土地区的地层结构大多具有上部黄土、下部泥岩的二元结构特点。隧道穿越泥岩和黄土−泥岩复合地层时,地下水重分布并易于富集于仰拱底部,泥岩遇水膨胀则会产生仰拱底鼓,而不同的地层组合及其差异性对衬砌变形及受力特性影响显著。尝试采用在仰拱底部施加位移的方式模拟泥岩膨胀作用,依托甘肃天水某隧道,开展了纯泥岩地层与交界面位于拱腰处的黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道基底均匀膨胀作用下的底鼓模型试验。分析了两种工况下衬砌内力、变形及破坏特征的差异性,并将模型试验与数值模拟结果进行了对比。结果表明:(1)模型底部加载强制位移引起的膨胀变形可分为基底土体压密阶段和基底位移等效传递阶段两个阶段。(2)由于泥岩与黄土弹性模量比值约为2:1,相较之下,交界地层中上覆黄土刚度较小,对衬砌变形约束效果弱,仰拱隆起位移更大;交界面处拱腰更易向外扩张,扩张变形达9.2 mm,约为纯泥岩地层的3倍;交界面附近衬砌截面处易产生应力集中现象。(3)在两种地层中,仰拱及拱脚位置均表现出易于产生裂缝和损坏的特性。此外,在交界地层中,衬砌拱肩部位同样显示出较高的开裂风险,并且拱脚处的裂缝有向拱腰部位扩展的趋势。(4)相较于纯泥岩地层,交界地层中交界面附近黄土对仰拱底鼓作用具有荷载释放效应,交界面处黄土压缩吸收部分底鼓作用力,因此,上覆黄土地层可延后填充层发生受拉临界破坏的时间。其研究结果可为类似交界地层隧道的理论分析、设计与施工提供参考。
Strata structure of loess area mostly features a dualistic structure of loess and mudstone. When tunnels traverse mudstone and loess-mudstone composite strata
groundwater tends to redistribute and accumulate at the base of the inverted arch. The interaction between mudstone and water causes tunnel heave
and the lithological differences between the strata significantly affect the deformation and stress characteristics of the tunnel lining. Based on a tunnel project in Tianshui City
Gansu Province
model tests were conducted on tunnel in pure mudstone and loess-mudstone composite strata with the interface at the arch waist. Displacement was applied beneath the inverted arch to simulate the swelling effect of mudstone-water interaction. Differences in internal force
deformation
and failure characteristics of the lining under two loading conditions were investigated
and numerical simulations were conducted for comparison and verification. The differences in internal force
the deformation and failure characteristics of lining under two loading conditions were investigated
and the corresponding conditions numerical simulation was conducted for comparison and verification. The results show that: (1) Expansion deformation due to forced displacement at the model’s base can be divided into two stages: the base soil compaction stage and the equivalent transfer stage of base displacement. (2) With the elastic modulus ratio of mudstone to loess approximately 2:1
the loess stratum exhibits smaller overall stiffness
resulting in larger lining deformation and even larger heave displacement in inverted arch. The arch waist at the interface is more prone to outward expansion
with an expansion deformation of 9.2 mm
about three times that of the pure mudstone stratum. Stress concentration tends to occur at the lining section near the interface. (3) In both strata
the inverted arch and arch foot positions are prone to cracking and damage. Additionally
in the composite strata
the lining arch shoulder shows a high risk of cracking
with cracks at the arch foot tending to expand towards the arch waist. (4) Compared to pure mudstone stratum
the loess near the interface in loess-mudstone strata exerts a load release effect on the heave of inverted arch. The loess at the interface compresses and absorbs some of the heave force
thereby delaying the critical tensile failure time of the filling layer. The results can provide valuable references for theoretical analysis
design and construction of tunnels in similar composite strata.
0
浏览量
117
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621