ZHANG Yu, LIANG Hao, LIN Liang, et al. Experimental study on the mechanical response of buried pipelines under different subsidence patterns[J]. 2023, 44(6): 1645-1656.
ZHANG Yu, LIANG Hao, LIN Liang, et al. Experimental study on the mechanical response of buried pipelines under different subsidence patterns[J]. 2023, 44(6): 1645-1656.DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0983.
The frequent occurrence of buried pipeline accidents caused by the ground collapse and subsidence makes it urgent to carry out experimental studies on the mechanical response under different subsidence effects. A systematical survey of the pipeline strain
earth pressure and soil deformation was conducted considering the effects of ground subsidence and collapse. The result showed that due to the arching effect at the top of the pipeline
the strain and earth pressure firstly increased and then decreased with the extension of the collapse zone
while they increased as the subsidence zone extended during the collapse and settlement. In the subsidence and collapse zones
the pipeline along the axial direction exhibited a saddle shape with both ends convex and concave in the middle. Pipeline deformation was more significantly affected by the subsidence. When the subsidence and collapse were both 50 mm
the maximum strain at the top
bottom and middle of the pipeline increased by approximately 18.8%
249% and 273% compared to the ground collapse
respectively. It could be seen by comparing the ratio of the increasing area to the decreasing area of earth pressure around the pipeline that in the subsidence was increased by 78% compared with that in the collapse; therefore
the pipeline was subjected to larger earth pressure during the subsidence. Based on the modified Marston calculation model
a method for predicting the vertical earth pressure during ground subsidence was proposed
and the accuracy of the method was verified using the model test results.