LIU Jie, HUANG Fei, YANG Yu-nan, et al. Nondestructive testing of porosity of rock based on capillary infiltration technique[J]. 2018, 39(3): 1137-1144.
LIU Jie, HUANG Fei, YANG Yu-nan, et al. Nondestructive testing of porosity of rock based on capillary infiltration technique[J]. 2018, 39(3): 1137-1144.DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1507.
Taking the rock porosity as the focal point of rock damage analysis
this study is to develop a capillary infiltration technique for non-destructive quantitative analysis of the geotechnical damage. Moreover
variations of the capillary infiltration rate
infiltration area and depth of infiltration are investigated by changing the porosity in capillary infiltration tests. The capillary bundle model is proposed and the mechanism of capillary infiltration technique is also analysed in depth. Compared with the existing damage and non-repeatable measurement technologies
this technology is easy to operate and low cost. In particular
for a rock with specific damage
we can establish a relationship between titration parameters and mechanical parameters. In addition
the capillary model 1
the cylindrical model 2 and the spherical model are put forward
respectively
by considering the effect of capillary infiltration on the lower part of the capillary body in the capillary bundle model. The depth of the liquid infiltration in the lower porosity L is estimated from the upper liquid column descending height and the surface of infiltration radius a. According to the infiltration parameters of the actual pore soil
the validation of the above model is verified. In addition
the result indicates that the spherical infiltration model can better simulate the infiltration depth of the liquid during the process of capillary infiltration. Based on the capillary bundle model
the porosity calculation formulas of three models are separately deduced by the infiltration rate
which is the relationship between the infiltration depth and the infiltration rate. The calculated porosity of the spherical cap model is examined with the measured porosity
and its error is less than 10%. Therefore
the results calculated by this porosity formula are reasonable and effective for general accuracy requirements.