1. 重庆大学 输变电装备技术全国重点实验室,重庆,400044
2. 温州职业技术学院 智能制造学院,浙江,温州,325035
3. 西南石油大学 智能电网与智能控制南充市重点实验室,四川,南充,637001
[ "徐奇伟(1983—),男,博士,副教授,博士生导师,研究方向为永磁同步电机本体设计与控制技术" ]
[ "龙学汉(1994—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为永磁同步电机控制技术" ]
[ "苗轶如(1988—),男,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为功率变换器的建模与控制技术" ]
[ "王益明(1985—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为高性能电机控制技术" ]
[ "涂郁潇颖(1994—),女,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向为电力电子与电力传动" ]
[ "汤梦阳(1990—),男,硕士,副教授,研究方向为无传感器的电机控制技术。" ]
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
徐奇伟, 龙学汉, 苗轶如, 等. 永磁同步电机双矢量模型预测控制的计算量优化方法研究[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2025,29(5).
XU Qiwei, LONG Xuehan, MIAO Yiru, et al. Double-vector model predictive current control for PMSM drive system with low calculation burden[J]. 2025, 29(5).
徐奇伟, 龙学汉, 苗轶如, 等. 永磁同步电机双矢量模型预测控制的计算量优化方法研究[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2025,29(5). DOI: 10.15938/j.emc.2025.05.003.
XU Qiwei, LONG Xuehan, MIAO Yiru, et al. Double-vector model predictive current control for PMSM drive system with low calculation burden[J]. 2025, 29(5). DOI: 10.15938/j.emc.2025.05.003.
双矢量模型预测控制策略可同时兼顾开关损耗与稳态性能
但是其矢量确定方法与占空比计算过程相对复杂
需要较大的计算量。因此
本文面向电压源型PMSM驱动系统
提出一种可降低计算量的双矢量模型预测电流控制方法。在电机稳态运行时
将第一最优矢量备选范围缩小至上一控制周期所采用的第一有效矢量及其相邻的两个矢量
再依次代入代价函数确定第一有效矢量
从而将比较次数从六次减小至三次。然后将剩余两个矢量与零矢量作为第二备选矢量
分别以q轴电流无差拍为条件计算占空比
再依次代入代价函数
确定使代价函数最小的矢量组合与占空比。最后
分别搭建仿真模型与实验平台
对所提方法的稳定性、可行性与有效性进行验证。 结果表明
所提模型预测控制在平均计算时间仅为15.3 μs的前提下
可取得6.57%的电流总谐波畸变率
以及±0.4 N·m的转矩脉动
与其他模型预测控制方法相比
具有最优的稳态性能。
The double vector model predictive control strategy can improve the steady-state control performance of the motor without significantly increasing switching losses. However
its vector determination method and duty cycle calculation process are more complex
which requires heavy computation burden. Therefore
a double-vector model predictive control scheme with low computational burden for PMSM was proposed. Firstly
when the PMSM operates in the steady-state
the candidate range of the first optimal active vector was reduced to three
including the first optimal vector adopted in the previous control period and its adjacent active voltage vectors. The cost function was sequentially substituted to determine the first optimal vector
thereby the number of comparisons decreases from six times to three times. Then
the remaining two vectors and the zero vector was considered as the alternatives for the second optimal vector
according to the deadbeat condition of the q-axis current
the duty cycle of all vector combinations was obtained separately. The vector combination and duty cycle that minimizes the cost function was obtained by substituting the vectors with their duty cycle into the cost function. Finally
the simulation models and experimental platforms were established
the stability
feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model predictive control scheme with low computation burden were certified
respectively. The proposed model predictive control can achieve a current THD of 6.57% and a torque ripple of ±0.4 N·m with an average calculation time of only 15.3 μs. Compared with other model predictive control methods
it can obtain the best steady-state performance.
0
浏览量
93
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621