1. 陕西省地质科技中心,陕西 西安 710043陕西省地质调查实验中心,陕西,西安,710043
2. 陕西省地质调查实验中心,陕西 西安 710043西安科技大学地质与环境学院,陕西,西安,710054
3. 西安科技大学地质与环境学院,陕西,西安,710054
[ "史利燕(1988—),女,硕士,工程师, 从事地质调查与矿产勘查研究。地址:陕西省西安市雁塔区西影路25号,邮政编码:710043。E-mail: sly1314888@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
史利燕, 李卫波, 康琴琴, 等. CH4-煤吸附/解吸过程视电阻率变化的实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022,(4):572-579.
SHI Liyan, LI Weibo, KANG Qinqin, et al. Experimental study on variation of apparent resistivity in CH4-coal adsorption/desorption process[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, (4): 572-579.
史利燕, 李卫波, 康琴琴, 等. CH4-煤吸附/解吸过程视电阻率变化的实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022,(4):572-579. DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.04.004.
SHI Liyan, LI Weibo, KANG Qinqin, et al. Experimental study on variation of apparent resistivity in CH4-coal adsorption/desorption process[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, (4): 572-579. DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.04.004.
为了揭示不同宏观煤岩组分CH
4
-煤吸附/解吸过程中煤体视电阻率的变化规律,以彬长矿区大佛寺煤矿侏罗系延安组4号煤层为研究对象,通过工业分析及不同煤样(暗煤、镜煤和原煤样)、含水率(空气干燥基样、自然吸水样和通风干燥箱温度为378.15 K的干燥样)视电阻率测试实验,分析了煤体视电阻率、甲烷吸附量和平衡压力之间的关系。研究发现,暗煤的固定碳含量高于镜煤,灰分、水分低于镜煤,暗煤干燥样(通风干燥箱温度为378.15 K)初始视电阻率最大。甲烷的吸附对煤体视电阻率的影响表现为随着甲烷吸附量增加,煤体视电阻率明显降低,升压(吸附)过程,煤体视电阻率与压力、吸附量呈二次函数关系,其主要原因是甲烷吸附放热、煤体膨胀以及水在孔喉内壁的铺展导致视电阻率降低。由于甲烷吸附导致煤基质表面发生气-水置换,游离水使得可溶矿物质溶解,离子浓度提高,煤体导电由电子导电变为离子导电为主辅以电子导电的混合导电,因此升压(吸附)过程,煤体视电阻率降低,但由于可溶矿物质的有限性以及煤的疏水性,使得吸附后期煤体视电阻率趋于稳定。降压(解吸)过程,由于煤基质膨胀后的收缩是不可逆(形变),煤体视电阻率不能恢复到初始值。相较暗煤,镜煤孔隙连通性差,但孔喉曲率较大,此时双电层带电粒子数量多,成堆聚集,最终导致相同条件下镜煤的导电性能好于暗煤,即镜煤的煤体视电阻率小于暗煤的煤体视电阻率。
In order to reveal the change law of apparent resistivity in the process of CH
4
-coal adsorption/desorption of different macroscopic coal petrology compositions
the No.4 coal seam of the Jurassic Yan'an Formation in Dafosi coal mine is taken as the experimental object. By the proximate analysis and apparent resistivity measurement experiments of differe
nt coal samples (the durain
vitrain and mixed samples) with different water content (air dry basis sample
natural water absorption sample and samples dried at 378.15 K) of coal
the relationship between the apparent resistivity
methane adsorption and pressures is studied. The experimental results found that when compared to the vitrain
the durain has higher fixed carbon content
but lower ash content and moisture. The initial resistivity of the samples dried at 378.15 K of the durain is the largest. The influence of the adsorption of methane on the resistivity of the coal body is manifested in that with the adsorption of methane
the apparent resistivity of coal is significantly reduced. During the pressure increasing process that is the process of adsorption
the coal resistivity has a quadratic function relationship with the pressure and the amount of adsorption. The reason is that methane adsorption heat release
coal body expansion
and the spread of water on the inner wall of the pore throat causes the apparent resistivity to decrease. Due to methane adsorption
gas-water replacement occurs on the surface of the coal matrix
free water dissolves soluble minerals
and the ion concentration increases. In the process of adsorption
the apparent resistivity of coal decreases
but due to the limited soluble minerals and the hydrophobicity of coal
the resistivity of coal tends to be stable in the later stage of adsorption. During the depressurization process
that is the process of desorption
since the shrinkage of the coal matrix after expansion is irreversible (deformation)
the apparent resistivity of the coal body cannot be restored to its initial value. Compared to the durain
the pore connectivity of vitrain is poor
but the pore throat curvature is larger
when the number of charged particles in the double electric layer is high and aggregated in piles. This eventually leads to better electrical conductivity of vitrain than durain under the same conditions
i.e.
the apparent resistivity of vitrain is
smaller than that of durain.
{"db_name":"期刊","reference_articles":["
新时代我国油气勘探开发战略格局与2035年展望 [J]. 门相勇,王陆新,王越,娄钰,郭威. 中国石油勘探 . 2021(03)","
不同煤体电性参数影响因素实验研究 [J]. 李祥春,张琪,安振兴,张帆. 中国矿业大学学报 . 2021(03)","
制约中国煤层气发展瓶颈问题及政策建议 [J]. 孙德强,高文凯,郑军卫,李超,王子龙,王维一. 中国能源 . 2021(01)","
低渗储层孔隙结构的分形特征研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地永宁油田顺宁—洛河北区长6储层为例 [J]. 井康康,董旭,蔺广泉,乔生虎. 非常规油气 . 2021(04)","
六种不同变质程度煤的电阻率研究 [J]. 柴斌,许小凯,张川,于光明. 地球物理学进展 . 2021(03)","
基于低温氮吸附的彬长矿区4号煤孔隙分形特征研究 [J]. 高丽蓉,杨甫,马东民,段中会. 非常规油气 . 2020(05)","
不同温度下低、中、高阶煤储层甲烷吸附解吸特征差异 [J]. 马东民,高正,陈跃,张辉,邵凯,张治仓,吴讯,杨甫. 油气藏评价与开发 . 2020(04)","
煤及煤层气储层导电特性研究综述与展望 [J]. 刘之的,王伟,杨珺茹,时梦璇,马廷昊,王得志,杨海星. 地球物理学进展 . 2020(04)","
低变质原生结构煤电阻率变化规律实验研究 [J]. 汤小燕,陈学健,张晨阳. 科学技术与工程 . 2019(26)","
不同变质程度煤介电常数特性 [J]. 郑学召,赵炬,张铎,郭军. 西安科技大学学报 . 2019(03)","
原生煤和碎裂煤电阻率对比分析 [J]. 任华育,曹志勇,童继强,李志军,王增玉. 煤炭技术 . 2018(09)","
瓦斯压力对煤体电阻率影响规律与机制 [J]. 陈鹏,陈学习,刘永杰,杨涛. 煤炭科学技术 . 2018(07)","
不同应力和瓦斯压力下煤的相对介电常数变化规律 [J]. 李祥春,张良,聂百胜,杨春丽,朱飞飞. 矿业科学学报 . 2018(04)","
不同温度下可溶有机质对煤电阻率的影响 [J]. 陈立,张英华,侯玮,黄志安,高玉坤,杨锐. 哈尔滨工业大学学报 . 2019(04)","
微观孔隙结构和煤的成分对煤样电阻率的影响 [J]. 李祥春,陆卫东,孟洋洋,刘艳,聂百胜,陈昔辉,朱飞飞. 采矿与安全工程学报 . 2018(01)","
煤介电常数影响因素研究现状及分析 [J]. 李芳,牛会永,李石林,朱豪. 煤矿安全 . 2017(12)","
不同含水率煤体电阻率随吸附/解吸变化实验研究 [J]. 薛王龙,冯增朝,董东,魏建平. 煤炭技术 . 2016(10)","
煤电阻率与其瓦斯含量关系的实验研究 [J]. 康天慧,董东,魏建平,薛王龙. 地质与勘探 . 2016(05)","
构造煤复电性实验及其特征研究 [J]. 郭晓洁,雷东记,张玉贵. 煤田地质与勘探 . 2015(04)","
受载煤体电阻率变化规律的实验研究 [J]. 陈鹏,王恩元,朱亚飞. 煤炭学报 . 2013(04)","
不同煤体结构类型煤的导电性质研究 [J]. 陈健杰,江林华,张玉贵,张彤. 煤炭科学技术 . 2011(07)","
构造软煤电性参数影响因素的分析 [J]. 王云刚,魏建平,刘明举. 煤炭科学技术 . 2010(08)","
煤层电性参数测试及其与煤岩特性关系的研究 [J]. 徐宏武. 煤炭科学技术 . 2005(03)","
煤的电性参数与瓦斯突出危险性之间关系研究 [J]. 康建宁,黄学满. 煤炭科学技术 . 2005(01)","
煤岩多孔介质及其充瓦斯后的电特性研究 [J]. 刘保县,徐龙君,鲜学福,孙才新. 岩石力学与工程学报 . 2004(11)","
双电层电粘度对润滑性能的影响研究 [J]. 白少先,黄平. 摩擦学学报 . 2004(02)"],"articles_count":26}
0
浏览量
108
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621