广东工业大学 可拓学与创新方法研究所,广东,广州,510006
颜伊庆(1990–),女,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为数据库、计算生物学、可拓智能,E-mail:yanlolo2012@gmail.com
李兴森(1968–),男,教授,博士,主要研究方向为可拓学与智能创新工程等,E-mail:lixs@gdut.edu.cn
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
颜伊庆, 李嘉豪, 黄思程, 等. 基于决策树的基元转化算法研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2026, 43(4): 122-130.
颜伊庆, 李嘉豪, 黄思程, 等. 基于决策树的基元转化算法研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2026, 43(4): 122-130. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.250229.
当前主流深度学习模型因可解释性不足,难以满足医疗、司法、金融等风险敏感领域对决策透明度与可控性的要求。针对现有监督学习方法侧重分类预测而忽略样本特征可转化性的问题,本文引入可拓学理论,提出一种基于决策树的基元转化算法。该算法首先明确分类问题与转化问题的本质差异,建立转化问题的形式化数学模型;其次定义转化距离以量化不同特征值之间的转化难度;在此基础上,设计可嵌入任意决策树模型的通用转化机制,实现特征级转化路径的定量推导。实验结果表明,该算法在个性化健康管理场景中能够有效挖掘正可拓域样本,提升整体达标率,验证了方法的有效性与可推广性。
Current mainstream deep learning models
due to insufficient interpretability
struggle to meet the demands for decision transparency and controllability in risk-sensitive domains such as healthcare
justice
and finance. To address the limitation that existing supervised learning methods focus on classification prediction while neglecting the transformability of sample features
this research introduces Extenics theory and proposes a basic-element transformation algorithm based on decision trees. The algorithm first clarifies the essential differences between classification and transformation problems and establishes a formal mathematical model for the transformation problem. It then defines a transformation distance to quantify the difficulty of transforming between different feature values. On this basis
a general transformation mechanism is designed which can be embedded into arbitrary decision-tree models
enabling quantitative derivation of feature-level transformation paths. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively mine samples in the positive extension domain and improve the overall compliance rate in personalized healthcare scenarios
verifying the effectiveness and generalizability of the method.
BENGIO Y, GOODFELLOW I, COURVILLE A. Deep learning[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2017.
LECUN Y, BENGIO Y, HINTON G. Deep learning[J]. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436-444.
DEVLIN J, CHANG M W, LEE K, et al . Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C ] //Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Human Language Technologies, 2019: 4171-4186.
VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al . Attention is all you need[J ] . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 5998-6008.
WANG F. Research on the ethical risks and governance mechanisms of generative artificial intelligence in e-commerce[J]. E-Commerce Letters, 2025, 14(7): 28-35.
GUNNING D, AHA D. DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program[J]. AI Magazine, 2019, 40(2): 44-58.
ARRIETA A B, DÍAZ-RODRÍGUEZ N, DEL SER J, et al . Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI[J ] . Information Fusion, 2020, 58: 82-115.
WALTERS R, NOVAK M. Cyber security, artificial intelligence, data protection the law[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2021.
BUSSMANN N, GIUDICI P, MARINELLI D, et al . Explainable AI in fintech risk management[J ] . Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 3: 26.
RIBEIROL M T, SINGH S, GUESTRIN C. “Why should I trust you?” explaining the predictions of any classifier[C]//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2016: 1135-1144.
LUNDBERG S M, LEE S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 4765-4774.
PEARL J. Causality[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
BREIMAN L, FRIEDMAN J, OLSHEN R A, et al . Classification and regression trees[M ] . New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017.
LETHAM B, RUDIN C, MCCORMICK T H, et al . Interpretable classifiers using rules and bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model[J ] . The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2015, 9(3): 1350-1371.
LI X, SUN J, LI J, et al . A transformation tree based on extension set theory[J ] . Annals of Data Science, 2025: 1-17.
CAI W. Extension set and non-compatible problems[J]. Journal of Science Exploration, 1983, 3(1): 83-97.
杨春燕, 蔡文, 汤龙. 可拓学[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2024.
ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
蔡文, 杨春燕, 陈文伟等. 可拓集与可拓数据挖掘[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008. 06.
TIAN Y J, LIU D L, LI X S. Extension classification method for label variability[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2025, 42(4): 1-7.
LI X S, XUN L B, LIU H T, et al . A complementary analysis of factor space and extenics and a fusion model for solving problems[J ] . CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2022, 17(5): 990-998.
DONG C L, YANG C Y. Improvement of the transforming bridge method and its application[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2023, 40(5): 15-20.
ARIK S Ö, PFISTER T. Tabnet: attentive interpretable tabular learning[C]// Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2021: 6679-6687.
CHEN T, GUESTRIN C. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM Press, 2016: 785-794.
KE G, MENG Q, FINLEY T, et al . Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree[J ] . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 31 46-3154.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621