1. 中国科学院 虚拟经济与数据科学研究中心,北京,100190
2. 北京联合大学 数理部,北京,100101
3. 北京联合大学 数理与交叉科学研究院,北京,100101
4. 广东工业大学 可拓学与创新方法研究所,广东,广州,510006
田英杰 (1973–),男,教授,博士,主要研究方向为机器学习与最优化,E-mail:tyj@ucas.ac.cn
刘大莲 (1978–),女,教授,博士,主要研究方向为机器学习与最优化,E-mail:ldtdalian@buu.edu.cn
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
田英杰, 刘大莲, 李兴森. 面向标签可变性的可拓分类方法[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2025, 42(4): 1–7.
Tian Yingjie, Liu Dalian, Li Xingsen. Extension Classification Method for Label Variability[J]. 2025, 42(4): 1-7.
田英杰, 刘大莲, 李兴森. 面向标签可变性的可拓分类方法[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2025, 42(4): 1–7. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.250108
Tian Yingjie, Liu Dalian, Li Xingsen. Extension Classification Method for Label Variability[J]. 2025, 42(4): 1-7. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.250108.
传统分类方法通常假设训练样本的类别标签是静态且确定的,忽略了现实场景中样本标签可能随条件变化而发生转变的动态性特征。针对这一问题,本文提出了一种新的学习问题设定——标签可变性的可拓分类问题,在训练数据中同时标注样本的类别标签与标签可变性状态,用以刻画样本在变化机制作用下的类别转变潜力。基于此设定,设计了多标签学习框架,构建了基于支持向量机的可变标签可拓分类算法,实现类别判别与标签可变性预测的协同优化。实验部分在合成数据集与真实数据集上验证了所提算法的有效性。本文工作为复杂系统中标签动态性学习问题提供了一种新的建模思路,具有较好的应用前景。
Traditional classification algorithms typically assume that the labels of training samples are static and deterministic
ignoring the dynamic characteristics of sample labels that may change with conditions in real-world scenarios. In response to this issue
this paper proposes a new learning problem setting—the Extended Classification Problem
which simultaneously gives the class labels and label variability states of samples in the training data
which to characterize the class transition potential of samples under the influence of change mechanisms. Based on this setting
a multi-label learning framework was designed
an extension classification algorithm for label variability using support vector machine was constructed
to achieve collaborative optimization of category discrimination and label variability prediction. The experimental section validated the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm on both synthetic and real datasets. This paper provides a new modeling approach for label dynamic learning problems
which has good application prospects.
YANG C Y, LI X S. Development and research progress of extenics over the past 40 years[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2023, 40(6): 1-11.
LI X S, LU L, XU L B. Research on knowledge graph model of shili based on comparative analysis of WSR methodology and extenics[J]. Business Review, 2021, 33(5): 152-162.
LI X S, ZHANG H L, ZHU Z X, et al . An intelligent transformation knowledge mining method based on extenics[J ] . Journal of Internet Technology, 2013, 14(2): 315-325.
杨春燕, 李小妹, 陈文伟, 等. 可拓数据挖掘方法及其计算机实现[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 2010
蔡文, 杨春燕, 陈文伟, 等.可拓集与可拓数据挖掘[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
GUO C, PLEISS G, SUN Y, et al . On calibration of modern neural networks[C ] // arXiv: 1706.04599(2017-06-14)[2025-06-10 ] . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.04599.
BENGIO Y, LOURADOUR J, COLLOBERT R, et al . Curriculum learning[C ] //Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. Montreal Quebec: ICML, 2009: 41-48.
KUMAR M P, PACKER B, KOLLER D. Self-paced learning for latent variable models[C] //Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver: NeurIPS, 2010.
TONEVA M, SORDONI A, TACHET DES COMBES R, et al . An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning[C ] //International Conference on Learning Representations. New Orleans: ICLR, 2019.
GOODFELLOW I J, SHLENS J, SZEGEDY C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples[C] //International Conference on Learning Representations. San Diego: ICLR, 2015.
MADRY A, MAKELOV A, SCHMIDT L, et al . Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks[C ] //International Conference on Learning Representations. Vancouver: ICLR, 2018.
RIBEIRO M T, SINGH S, GUESTRIN C. “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier[C] //Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. San Francisco: KDD, 2016: 1135-1144.
LUNDBERG S M, LEE S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions[C] //Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. LongBeach: NeurIPS, 2017.
WACHTER S, MITTELSTADT B, RUSSELL C. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR[J]. Harvard Journal of Law Technology, 2017, 31: 841.
MOTHILAL R K, SHARMA A, TAN C. Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations[C] //Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Online: FAccT 2020, 2020: 607-617.
ZHANG M L, ZHOU Z H. A review on multi-label learning algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(8): 1819-1837.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621