全球七大产业发展水平的空间分异与动态演化——基于2000~2020年世界500强的实证分析

吴小节; 卢荣秀; 谭晓霞; 童乾

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.220112

欢迎来到能源电力期刊网！

English Version 期刊登录

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

全球七大产业发展水平的空间分异与动态演化——基于2000~2020年世界500强的实证分析

综合研究 | 更新时间：2026-05-27

- 全球七大产业发展水平的空间分异与动态演化——基于2000~2020年世界500强的实证分析
- Spatial Divergence and Dynamic Evolution of the Development Levels of Seven Major Industries in Global —Empirical Analysis Based on the Fortune Global 500 from 2000 to 2020
- 广东工业大学学报 2022年39卷第6期页码：10-25
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广东工业大学管理学院,广东,广州,510520
  2. 广东第二师范学院数学学院,广东,广州,510303
- 作者简介：
  
  吴小节(1980–)，男，教授，博士，博士生导师，主要研究方向为企业管理，E-mail：xiaojie_wu@163.com
  童乾(1972–)，女，副教授，博士，主要研究方向为企业管理，E-mail：tongqian@gdei.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(71872053);国家社会科学基金资助一般项目(20BGL032)
- DOI：10.12052/gdutxb.220112
  中图分类号： F279
- 网络首发：2022-11-10，
  
  纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴小节, 卢荣秀, 谭晓霞, 童乾. 全球七大产业发展水平的空间分异与动态演化——基于2000~2020年世界500强的实证分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 10-25.

Wu Xiao-jie, Lu Rong-xiu, Tan Xiao-xia, et al. Spatial Divergence and Dynamic Evolution of the Development Levels of Seven Major Industries in Global —Empirical Analysis Based on the Fortune Global 500 from 2000 to 2020[J]. 2022, 39(6): 10-25.
吴小节, 卢荣秀, 谭晓霞, 童乾. 全球七大产业发展水平的空间分异与动态演化——基于2000~2020年世界500强的实证分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 10-25. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.220112.

Wu Xiao-jie, Lu Rong-xiu, Tan Xiao-xia, et al. Spatial Divergence and Dynamic Evolution of the Development Levels of Seven Major Industries in Global —Empirical Analysis Based on the Fortune Global 500 from 2000 to 2020[J]. 2022, 39(6): 10-25. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.220112.

摘要

为测度北美、东亚和欧洲七大产业的发展现状、时空分异及发展趋势，采用Dagum基尼系数、Kernel密度估计、Markov链方法进行实证分析。研究发现三大区域内七大产业发展水平存在区域差异，不同区域内差异从高到低排序不一，总体差距的主要来源是区域间差异；此外，七大产业发展水平发生跨阶段转移的概率比较小，具有一定的邻接依赖性。基于时间和空间双重维度，评估了全球七大产业的发展现状，并预测区域的产业发展趋势，为关键产业的发展现状分析提供证据支持，为国家对关键产业的全球区域布局以及发展方向决策提供参考。

Abstract

To measure the development status

spatial and temporal divergence and development trend of the seven industries in North America

East Asia and Europe

Dagum Gini coefficient

Kernel density estimation and Markov chain method were used for empirical analysis. It is found that there are regional differences in the development levels of the seven industries in the three major regions

and the differences within different regions are ranked from high to low

and the main source of the overall gap is inter-regional differences; in addition

the probability of inter-stage transfer of the development levels of the seven industries is relatively small

with a certain degree of neighbor dependence. Based on both temporal and spatial dimensions

the current development status of the seven global industries is assessed

and the regional industrial development trends are predicted to provide evidence to support the current development status of key industries

and to provide a reference for the national decision on the global regional layout of key industries as well as the development direction.

关键词

Keywords

references

ZHU N, LIU W Q, YU Z Q, et al . Structural total factor productivity growth in China’s banking sector [J ] . Journal of Financial Research, 2021(7): 1-18.

WANG J H, ZHOU S J. The current situation, characteristics and spillover effect of the development of digital industry in China [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2021, 38(3): 103-119.

ZHU H L, WANG C J. Industry digitalization against the strategic background of the new development paradigm: theory and countermeasures [J]. Finance Trade Economics, 2021, 42(3): 14-27.

GUO Z M, QIU Y. The reconstruction of global value chains in the era of digital economy: typical features, theoretical mechanisms and China’s countermeasures [J]. Reform, 2020(10): 73-85.

ZHAO Y C. The new trend of economic globalization and the construction of “ dual circulation” development pattern after COVID-19 [J]. The Journal of Humanities, 2020(11): 65-71.

ZHAO J B. The integration of the new generation information technology with the real economy: based on the paradigm of smart manufacturing [J]. Science of Science and Management of S T, 2020, 41(3): 3-16.

WANG Y M. Changes unseen in a century, high-quality development,and the construction of a new development pattern [J]. Management World, 2020, 36(12): 1-13.

黎精明, 张泽宇. 国有企业发展质量评价指标体系构建与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(12): 166-169.

SUN X. Division of knowledge, learning strategies and industrial leadership: comparative case study in Chinese firms which reshape value chains [J]. Science of Science and Management of S T, 2018, 39(11): 31-46.

WANG K, WEI Y M. China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 130: 617-631.

GAO Y M, XU Y M, JI C F, et al . The measurement and characteristics of China’s financial industry high-quality development [J ] . The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2020, 37(10): 63-82.

WANG J T, LIANG D. Spatio-temporal differentiation of Chinese cultural industry and its influencing factors [J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(4): 82-92.

GAO X, YUAN K H. Measurement and evolution analysis of the level of Chinese enterprises’ servitization of manufacturing [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2020, 37(11): 3-22.

LYU Y, CHEN S, SHENG B. Does embedding the global value chain lead to Chinese manufacture’s“low-end locking”? [J]. Management World, 2018, 34(8): 11-29.

YAN B Q, TIAN K L. The impact analysis of industrial relocation on China’s GDP and employment: from the perspective of global value chain [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2020, 37(12): 121-139.

ZHAO Y L, GU J J. Measurement and comparison of the development quality in manufacturing between China and the US [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2018, 35(12): 116-133.

ZHENG Y. The evolution and international comparison of China’s industry international division of labor [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2020, 37(3): 67-85.

宁南山. 未来站在中国这一边[M]. 北京: 红旗出版社, 2020.

LI L S, ZHAO H B, GUO F Y, et al . High-quality development spatio-temporal evolution of industry in urban agglomeration of the yellow river basin [J ] . Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1751-1762.

DAGUM C. A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality Ratio [J]. Empirical Economics, 1997, 22(4): 515-531.

陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014.

WANG Q, DONG Y L. Research on the regional difference and distributional dynamic evolution of real economy development [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2018, 35(5): 77-94.

SHEN L, BAO J H. Research on the regional disparity of financial development in China—an analysis based on dagum Gini coefficient decomposition [J]. Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2013, 25(4): 41-48.

ZHONG Y X, CHEN L, HUANG J. Chinese industrial structure and its regional disparity based on the data of Chinese top 500 enterprises [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 190-199.

CUI R, LI G F. Regional differences and distributional dynamics of internet level in China: 2006−2018 [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2021, 38(5): 3-20.

FU C Y, YANG Y L. Measurement and evaluation of industrial development quality in the process of China’s industrialization [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2020, 37(3): 3-25.

ZHAO L. Spatial pattern evolution and spatial transformation trend of industry in China [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(3): 387-396.

ZHAO C W, XU Z Y, ZHU H M. Industrial research department of development research center of the state council finance research institute of development research center of the state council [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015, 33(6): 44-54.

YU Z, GU H. Global value chains position and regional industry upgrading policies: taking northeast China as an example [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(9): 1371-1377.

PAN A M, LIU Y J, XIANG G C. Research on industrial transformation and upgrading and overcapacity governance—summary of “2014 annual conference of Chinese industrial economics association” [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015, 33(1): 89-94.

LIU S Y, YANG J D. The evolution and policy selection in China’s industrial upgrading: based on product space perspective [J]. Management World, 2019, 35(6): 81-94.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于PSI技术的福州市地面形变监测与影响因素分析

多套餐共享储能模式下考虑功率互济的社区联盟优化运行策略

储能变流器电能质量治理策略研究

双模态迭代交叉注意力融合集成框架

具守恒量波动方程的循环双子网物理信息神经网络