广东工业大学 管理学院,广东,广州,510520
莫赞(1962–),男,教授,博士,主要研究方向为数据挖掘与神经科学,E-mail:mozan@126.com
网络首发:2023-03-25,
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
莫赞, 范梦婷, 刘洪伟, 严杨帆. 基于在线用户行为的产品非对称竞争市场结构研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2023, 40(2): 111-119.
Mo Zan, Fan Meng-ting, Liu Hong-wei, et al. Market Structure of Product Asymmetric Competition Based on Online User Behavior[J]. 2023, 40(2): 111-119.
莫赞, 范梦婷, 刘洪伟, 严杨帆. 基于在线用户行为的产品非对称竞争市场结构研究[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2023, 40(2): 111-119. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.220093.
Mo Zan, Fan Meng-ting, Liu Hong-wei, et al. Market Structure of Product Asymmetric Competition Based on Online User Behavior[J]. 2023, 40(2): 111-119. DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.220093.
消费者对产品的卷入度研究成为热点问题,然而从产品竞争市场结构中获得竞争情报一直被忽略。为了更全面了解产品的竞争市场结构,本文以在线用户行为数据为对象从卷入理论视角构建产品考虑集,利用复杂网络聚类可视化产品的非对称竞争市场。结果发现,由消费者对产品的关注卷入度构成的考虑集对映射产品非对称竞争市场是最具有代表性的;复杂网络聚类方法映射的产品非对称竞争市场结构图简洁清晰,不仅识别了焦点产品的竞争对手,还表征了与焦点产品的竞争对手之间的非对称竞争程度、不同的子市场受欢迎程度、子市场内部产品竞争程度高而外部之间产品竞争程度低等;证明了本研究模型比传统模型更具有可解释性。本文为电商企业理解焦点产品的非对称竞争市场提供了更好的理论依据及方法。
The study of consumer involvement in products has become a hot issue
yet obtaining competitive intelligence from the structure of the product competitive market has been neglected. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the competitive market structure of products
product consideration sets are constructed from an involvement theory perspective using online user behavior data as the object. Complex network clustering method is used to visualize the asymmetric competitive market of the product. The results show that the consideration set consisting of consumers' attention involvement of products is the most representative for mapping the product asymmetric competition market. The structure map of the product asymmetric competition market mapped by the complex network clustering method is concise and clear. This market structure map not only identifies the competitors with the focal product
but also maps the degree of asymmetric competition with the competitors of the focal product. In addition
it shows insights such as the popularity of different submarkets
the high level of product competition within the submarkets and the low level of product competition between the external ones. This study demonstrates that this research model is more interpretable than traditional models.
HEATH T B, RYU G, CHATTERJEE S, et al . Asymmetric competition in choice and the leveraging of competitive disadvantages [J ] . Journal of Consumer Research, 2000, 27(3): 291-308.
WEI Q, QIAO D D, ZHANG J, et al . A novel bipartite graph based competitiveness degree analysis from query logs [J ] . ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2016, 11(2): 1-25.
NETZER O, FELDMAN R, GOLDENBERG J, et al . Mine your own business: market-structure surveillance through text mining [J ] . Marketing Science, 2012, 31(3): 521-543.
RINGEL D M, SKIERA B. Visualizing asymmetric competition among more than 1, 000 Products using big search data [J]. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(3): 511-34.
LIU Y Z, QIAN Y, JIANG Y C, et al . Using favorite data to analyze asymmetric competition: machine learning models [J ] . European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 287(2): 600-15.
GAO H M, LIU H W, ZHAN M J, et al . Research on the impact of online reviews and product on virtual shopping-car decision-making based on consumer involvement [J ] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019: 1-12.
DAY G S, SRIVASTAVA R K. Customer oriented approaches to identifying product markets [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1979, 43(4): 8-19.
DAMANGIR S, DU R Y, HU Y. Uncovering patterns of product co-consideration: a case study of online vehicle Price Quote Request Data [J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2018, 42: 1-17.
LIU H W, ZHAN M J, GAO H M, et al. A product competitive market structure analysis based on consumer behavioral stream [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2021, 38 (2) : 26-33.
BIGNÉ J E, NATALIA V L. Competitive groups in the automobile industry: a compared supply-demand approach [J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2002, 10(1): 21-45.
VOLETI S, KOPALLE P K, GHOSH P. An inter-product competition model incorporating branding hierarchy and product similarities using store-level data [J]. Management Science, 2015, 61(11): 2720-38.
DESARBO W S, GREWAL R. An alternative efficient representation of demand-based competitive asymmetry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(7): 755-66.
KIM J B, ALBUQUERQUE P, BRONNENBERG B J. Mapping online consumer search [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, 48(1): 13-27.
YUAN Z Q, YI S P, WANG Y H, et al . Visualization of ERP operation based on user behavior analysis and Its application [J ] . Industrial Engineering and Management, 2022, 27(3): 127-138.
ZAICHKOWSKY J L. Measuring the involvement construct [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1985, 12(3): 341-52.
DAHLéN M, EKBORN Y, MöRNER N. To click or not to click: an empirical study of response to banner ads for high and low involvement products [J]. Consumption Markets Culture, 2000, 4(1): 57-76.
DESARBO W S, GREWAL R, WIND J. Who competes with whom? a demand-based perspective for identifying and representing asymmetric competition [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 101-29.
ELROD T, RUSSELL G J, SHOCKER A D, et al . Inferring market structure from customer response to competing and complementary products [J ] . Marketing Letters, 2002, 13(3): 221-32.
LI J, NETESSINE S, KOULAYEV S. Price to compete with many: how to identify price competition in high-dimensional space [J]. Management Science, 2018, 64(9): 4118-36.
PINTO T, FALCAO-REIS F. Strategic participation in competitive electricity markets: internal versus sectorial data analysis [J]. International Journal of Electrical Power Energy Systems, 2019, 108(Jun.): 432-444.
WANG J. A method of security management of early warning based on mean shift algorithm and data mining [J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 39(8): 1-8.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621